logo
Wild New Image Shows a Twin of Our Solar System Being Born

Wild New Image Shows a Twin of Our Solar System Being Born

Gizmodo16-07-2025
The first-ever baby pictures of a solar system that's not our own are finally here—and they're beautiful—and as adorable as space entities can get.
In a paper published today in Nature, astronomers presented HOPS-315: a Sun-like protostar cooking up a brew of hot minerals and silicon monoxide gas, located about 1,300 light-years away from Earth. The special thing about HOPS-315 is that the baby star and its surrounding environment bear a striking resemblance to an earlier version of our own solar system, making it the quintessential candidate for astronomers hoping to better understand how our Solar System came to be.
For study lead author Melissa McClure, the most intriguing aspect of HOPS-315 is its protoplanetary disk, or the stormy region around a newborn star where planets are born, she told Gizmodo in a video call. Astronomers have already observed protoplanetary disks by the hundreds, some of which even have (gassy) planets. But none have been as young, robust, and filled with planet-forming compounds as the one encircling HOPS-315, McClure, an astronomer at Leiden University in the Netherlands, told Gizmodo in a video call.
McClure and her team analyzed data on nearly 3,000 protostars gathered by the now-retired Spitzer Space Telescope. Most of them were too old—'like, at least a million years, maybe five million years old'—and only had enormous gas giants floating in their vicinity, she said. On the other hand, stars that did fit the 'age requirement,' so to speak, were enveloped by a thick, cold molecular cloud concealing their stormy insides from view.
Of the thousands of stars they sifted through, HOPS-315—about 100,000 years old—happened to be positioned at an angle that allowed the team to get a rare peek past the thick, gassy barrier. Using a combination of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) and the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA), they singled out what McClure described as 'wiggly, hairy-looking' signatures of chemical compounds strongly correlated with early planet formation.
One of those, silicon monoxide, according to McClure, was a 'clear smoking gun for interstellar grains' that evolve to become planets, so she knew they'd struck on something meaningful.
'And we also saw these hot minerals in the same part from JWST, so we could put these two things together and say we're clearly seeing this 't=0' moment for the first time,' McClure said. 'HOPS-315 is very similar, in terms of mass, size, and the age we're seeing it at, to what the Sun would have looked like [earlier on]. Because of that, it's like an analog to the Sun—that's why we're saying we're seeing another solar system being formed.'
Looking ahead, McClure's team plans to conduct a deeper dive into these signals, some of which didn't quite match what theoretical models would have predicted for similar situations, she noted. In particular, HOPS-315 offers an extremely rare opportunity to study planetesimals—hard fragments of loose cosmic mass that eventually bunch up to form the more solid parts of a planet.
Because they're so ephemeral and just generally very tiny, the only way astronomers could study planetesimals was by indirectly tracking their formation through meteorite samples—until now, that is.
Webb Telescope Spots a Small Asteroid From 62 Million Miles Away
'We're actually seeing right now that these planetesimals are actively forming,' McClure said. 'And we're absolutely going to follow that up—and this would be a cool new way to access [our galaxy's origins] that you can't do in any other way.'
A fair number of recent discoveries in astronomy have come from revisiting previously observed objects using newer, more advanced instruments. In this case, astronomers used JWST and ALMA to supplement pre-existing Spitzer data. A similar example is Herbig-Haro 49/50, or the 'Cosmic Tornado.' Astronomers initially observed this steaming pillar of space dust—the product of fierce plasma jets from protostars—with Spitzer in 2006. Almost 20 years later, JWST captured the same object but in much finer resolution, revealing details that weren't so clear back then.
This, in part, is evidently thanks to the continuous advances in observational technology. But it's also the product of the grueling tenacity of astrophysicists who refuse to forget about the pressing mysteries surrounding the universe, no matter how dated they may be.
So, HOPS-315, as with many discoveries in astrophysics, is a testament to just how long certain findings can take—the reason why, perhaps, the answers we finally arrive at feel ever more rewarding, illuminating, and, of course, beautiful!
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Duffy says climate science will ‘move aside,' with NASA only focusing on space exploration
Duffy says climate science will ‘move aside,' with NASA only focusing on space exploration

The Hill

time3 hours ago

  • The Hill

Duffy says climate science will ‘move aside,' with NASA only focusing on space exploration

Acting NASA Administrator Sean Duffy said Thursday that climate and Earth science at the agency will 'move aside' as it refocuses solely on space exploration. 'All the climate science and all of the other priorities that the last administration had at NASA we're going to move aside, and all of the science that we do is going to be directed towards exploration, which is the mission of NASA,' Duffy, who also leads the Transportation Department, told Fox Business. 'That's why we have NASA — is to explore, not to do all of these earth sciences,' he added. NASA, which stands for the National Aeronautics and Space Agency, explores both air and space. It has historically conducted science related to both Earth and space, including climate science. A pivot away from climate science is not necessarily a surprise — the Trump administration has sought to deny and downplay climate change's impacts and has moved to dismantle science research, including by dismissing scientists working on the National Climate Assessment. But moving to get rid of all climate science at the agency may still be an escalation.

The Third Rock From Another Sun Shows No Signs of Life So Far
The Third Rock From Another Sun Shows No Signs of Life So Far

New York Times

time3 hours ago

  • New York Times

The Third Rock From Another Sun Shows No Signs of Life So Far

In the search for signs of life on what seemed like a promising little exoplanet, astronomers' hopes have dimmed. Living things, as we understand them, seem to flourish best in an atmosphere like the one on Earth. But scientists who have been using the James Webb Space Telescope to examine the planet known as Trappist-1 d have found no sign of an earthlike atmosphere, according to a study published on Wednesday in The Astrophysical Journal. Exoplanets revolve around stars other than our sun. And the exoplanet in question is the third of seven that orbit Trappist-1, a star some 40 light-years from our place in the Milky Way. It is a red dwarf, so named because this type of star emits reddish light and tends to be small. In the search for life elsewhere in the galaxy, the discovery of the Trappist-1 planetary system was a big deal. Researchers announced in 2017 that the seven planets around Trappist-1 seemed to have excellent potential as hosts for living things. But in the years since, astronomers have not detected habitable atmospheres on the two innermost planets. They are still examining the outer ones. The star Trappist-1, which was named for a telescope in the Atacama Desert of Chile, is just a little bigger than Jupiter. Red dwarves are the most common stars in our galaxy, but this particular star and its planets are a bit easier to study than other known planetary systems. The system is fairly close to Earth, and the seven planets follow a tight, fast orbit. That makes them good candidates for a method of observation called transmission spectroscopy. When light from a star shines through a planet's atmosphere on its way to the Webb telescope, scientists can find clues about the chemical makeup of that atmosphere by determining which wavelengths of light it absorbed. The third world from the Trappist-1 star, a rocky planet, had appeared promising, according to Caroline Piaulet-Ghorayeb, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Chicago and the study's lead author. But the starlight that passed the exoplanet before reaching the Webb telescope did not appear to have been filtered through the kinds of atmospheric molecules that are essential to life on Earth, like water or carbon dioxide. The research of Dr. Piaulet-Ghorayeb and her team did not completely rule out the possibility of an atmosphere there, she said. But it did suggest that cool red dwarves — or, at least, this cool red dwarf — might be too volatile to support life. 'Maybe that tells us that it's going to be harder than we thought to find atmospheres on these rocky planets,' she added. Astronomers may need to turn their attention to planets that circle brighter stars, like our sun. Those planets are more difficult to observe and will probably require another telescope, said Jacob Bean, an astronomer at the University of Chicago who advises Dr. Piaulet-Ghorayeb but was not involved in the study. 'We still have this burning question: Can life develop elsewhere?' he said. Dr. Piaulet-Ghorayeb agreed that other planets might be better candidates for life than Trappist-1 d, but she was not ready to give up on the exoplanet just yet. 'There are different ways of figuring out whether these planets have atmospheres,' she said. 'Transmission spectroscopy is just one of them.' Based on the results of her study, she said, 'our job is going to be a little bit harder.' 'But it definitely doesn't kill our prospects,' she added. Dr. Bean called the Trappist-1 system 'a fantastic laboratory for studying terrestrial planets around other stars,' and said that the research so far had yielded plenty of interesting data despite the largely negative result of the latest study. 'If we go look, sometimes we come up disappointed,' Dr. Bean said. 'But if we hadn't looked, we wouldn't know. And it's always better to know.'

Climate pollution is making GPS and communications satellites even more vulnerable to solar storms
Climate pollution is making GPS and communications satellites even more vulnerable to solar storms

CNN

time3 hours ago

  • CNN

Climate pollution is making GPS and communications satellites even more vulnerable to solar storms

Satellites, including those used for GPS and communications, will face greater risks in coming decades during solar-triggered geomagnetic storms because of the effect climate pollution has on Earth's atmosphere, a new study found. The increasing volume of planet-warming carbon dioxide in the upper atmosphere is likely to make the air less dense, while geomagnetic storms have the opposite effect: The ensuing rapid changes in density as a result could cause serious troubles for satellite operations. This study, published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, comes at a time when the world is growing more dependent on satellite networks for everything from internet access to navigation, as well as military applications. Geomagnetic storms occur when charged particles from the Sun interact with the Earth's upper atmosphere. Their most visible impact is the auroras that light up the sky with green, purple and pink light. But strong storms can wreak havoc on satellite operations and communication. They can increase how dense the air is in these thin upper layers, making it difficult for satellites to maintain their speed and altitude and potentially make them sink, cutting down on their operational lifetimes. Geomagnetic storms later this century that are of similar intensity to those today will cause bigger spikes in atmospheric density because Earth's upper atmosphere will be less dense overall, the researchers found, using a supercomputer to model changes in the entirety of Earth's atmosphere. 'For the satellite industry, this is an especially important question because of the need to design satellites for specific atmospheric conditions,' lead author Nicholas Pedatella of the National Center for Atmospheric Research told CNN. A less dense atmosphere means satellites in the future would experience less drag, and that could lengthen their lifespan — and would also exacerbate the problem of more space junk in low Earth orbit, Pedatella said. Scientists already knew that the upper atmosphere is likely to become less dense as the climate warms, with a lower concentration of non-ionized particles such as oxygen and nitrogen. It's partly because of how higher concentrations of carbon dioxide affect temperatures in the upper atmosphere, which in turn affects the density of the air. But this study breaks new ground by showing how much the atmosphere's density could change during strong geomagnetic storms. The researchers used last May's strong geomagnetic storm as a case study. At that time, a series of powerful coronal mass ejections from the Sun interacted with the Earth's atmosphere, disrupting and even damaging satellites and leading to brilliant displays of the Northern Lights unusually far south. The scientists analyzed how the atmosphere would respond to the same event in different years: 2040, 2061 and 2084. To perform the experiment, they used a supercomputer that can simulate the entirety of the Earth's atmosphere, including the thinner, upper layers, to show how changes in the composition of the lower levels can alter the characteristics at much higher altitudes. The researchers found that by later this century, the upper atmosphere would be 20% to 50% less dense at the peak of a solar storm similar to the 2024 event. The relative change would be greater, going from a doubling of density during such an event to a potential tripling. Such a rapid throttling up of atmospheric density could damage critical satellite networks and thereby cause problems for society at the Earth's surface. The bigger the spike, the bigger the impact on a satellite's orbit, Pedatella told CNN: 'If you have a really big increase in density, then the satellite kind of comes down closer to Earth.' The satellites being designed today need to take these climate change-related impacts into account, rather than basing their engineering on historical calculations, he added. 'You would think, 'Okay, for this magnitude of a (geomagnetic) storm, I would expect this density response.' But in 30 years from now, that magnitude of storm will have a potentially different magnitude of response,' Pedatella said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store