The new Windows app is officially replacing Remote Desktop
The replacement, the Windows app, launched in September last year and is designed to give users 'unified access' to a range of formerly separate Windows services.
If you don't know what Remote Desktop or the Windows app is — don't worry, they're only available to users with a work or school Microsoft account. The services these apps provide center around cloud PCs and virtual desktops that allow employees and students to work remotely.
Another app, named Remote Desktop Connection, is a separate service that ships inside Windows and allows users to connect to a Windows PC from afar. This app isn't limited to school and work accounts and it won't be going anywhere for now. The Microsoft documentation does hint, however, that support for this 'connection type' will be added to the Windows app eventually.
Since the Remote Desktop Connection app is used by people with personal accounts, this could mean that the Windows app will support personal accounts in the future too. Or the company might just release a third app for personal users with an equally similar name and a bunch of different rules and restrictions — just to make things easier for everyone.
However it happens, Microsoft has a long-term ambition to move Windows over to the cloud, so expanded cloud PC and virtual PC features should eventually come to all users.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
1 Unstoppable Stock That Could Join Nvidia, Microsoft, and Apple in the $3 Trillion Club by 2027
Key Points Nine American companies are in the exclusive trillion-dollar club, but only three have achieved a valuation of $3 trillion. Amazon's earnings are soaring thanks to its booming cloud business and its efforts to drive efficiency in its e-commerce segment. Amazon has a clear pathway to the $3 trillion club by 2027, but it could get there even sooner. 10 stocks we like better than Amazon › There are nine American companies with valuations of $1 trillion or more right now, but only three have crossed the $3 trillion milestone: Nvidia: $4.4 trillion. Microsoft: $3.8 trillion. Apple: $3.3 trillion. Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) could be set to join that ultra-exclusive club thanks to its soaring earnings growth, and its expanding use of artificial intelligence (AI) across its cloud computing and e-commerce businesses. The company's market capitalization is $2.36 trillion as of this writing (Aug. 12), so its stock would have to climb by 27% to reach the $3 trillion milestone. Here's why I think that's likely to happen within the next two years. Amazon's cloud platform is a popular destination for AI developers Amazon Web Services (AWS) is the world's largest cloud computing platform. It offers hundreds of solutions to help businesses navigate the digital age, whether they need simple tools like data storage and website hosting, or more complex tools to build software applications. But AWS also offers a growing portfolio of products and services to help businesses develop and deploy AI. AWS designed its own data center chips for AI training and inference workloads, the latest of which is called Trainium 2. It offers up to 40% better price performance than competing chips, which is why it has become a key part of the hardware stack for top AI developers like Anthropic. Amazon says that demand continues to exceed supply for computing capacity, which should drive strong Trainium 2 sales for the foreseeable future. AWS also offers a growing list of ready-made large language models (LLMs) through its Bedrock platform, which developers can use to supercharge their AI software projects. Among them is the Nova foundation model Amazon designed in-house, which has become the second most popular option on Bedrock thanks to its highly customizable nature. For example, developers can pre-train Nova with additional unlabeled data to extend its capabilities, which isn't possible with models from third parties like Anthropic. AWS generated a record $30.8 billion in revenue during the second quarter of 2025 (ended June 30), which was only a fraction of Amazon's total revenue of $167.7 billion. However, AWS revenue increased by 17% year over year, making it one of the fastest-growing parts of the entire organization. In a series of comments to shareholders on July 31, Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said that the AI business within AWS was generating revenue at a multi-billion-dollar annual run rate, with triple-digit percentage growth year over year. Amazon's profits are soaring AWS might have accounted for a minority of Amazon's revenue during Q2, but it was responsible for 57% of the company's $37.5 billion in operating income. In other words, it's the profit engine behind the entire organization. The retail business is Amazon's single largest source of revenue, but its profit margins are razor-thin, so its contribution to operating income is relatively small in comparison. Amazon is improving efficiency to increase the retail segment's profitability. It divided its U.S. logistics network into eight regions in 2023, and the products in its fulfillment centers are now specific to each geographic area. As a result, orders travel shorter distances and reach customers much faster, which reduces costs. During Q2, the average travel distance for each package fell by 12% year over year, and the number of touches per package declined by 15%. The company is also investing in AI across the retail business. It developed a tool called Project Private Investigator for its fulfillment centers, which uses AI and computer vision to identify defective products before they are shipped to customers, reducing the rate of returns. It also built an AI shopping assistant for called Rufus, which helps customers compare products and make faster purchase decisions. These efforts have contributed to a surge in Amazon's profits. The company generated $1.68 in earnings per share (EPS) during Q2, which was a 33% increase from the year-ago period. The result was also 26% higher than Wall Street's consensus estimate, which followed a 17% beat in the first quarter. This is becoming a habit for Amazon, because it also crushed Wall Street's quarterly earnings expectations by 23% throughout 2024. Amazon has a clear path to the $3 trillion club Based on Amazon's trailing 12-month EPS of $6.55, its stock is trading at a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 33.7, which is a slight premium to the 32.9 P/E of the Nasdaq-100 technology index. In other words, you could argue that Amazon stock is roughly at fair value relative to its big-tech peers. If we look ahead, Wall Street's consensus estimate (provided by Yahoo! Finance) suggests that Amazon could generate $7.54 in EPS during 2026, which places its stock at a forward P/E ratio of 29.2. That means the stock would have to climb by 15.4% over the next 18 months just to maintain its current P/E ratio of 33.7, which would place its market capitalization at over $2.72 trillion. By that stage, Amazon would have to grow its annualized EPS by another 10.3% to justify a $3 trillion valuation, which should be possible in 2027 if recent history is any guide. But there are a couple of things to consider: Remember, Amazon has beaten Wall Street's EPS estimates by an average of over 20% since the start of 2024. If that trend continues, the company could join the $3 trillion club sometime in 2026. Amazon's P/E ratio has averaged 38.5 over the past 12 months, so if it climbs back to that level, it would translate to an additional 14% upside in its stock without accounting for any further EPS growth. Based on those points, I think there is a clear path for Amazon to join the $3 trillion club next year. Should you invest $1,000 in Amazon right now? Before you buy stock in Amazon, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Amazon wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $649,544!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,113,059!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,062% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 Anthony Di Pizio has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 1 Unstoppable Stock That Could Join Nvidia, Microsoft, and Apple in the $3 Trillion Club by 2027 was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
Fast Company
an hour ago
- Fast Company
The case for personality-free AI
Hello again, and welcome to Fast Company 's Plugged In. For as long as there's been software, upgrades have been emotionally fraught. When people grow accustomed to a product, they can come to regard it like a comfy pair of shoes. Exhibit A: Windows XP, which many users were loath to give up years after Microsoft had done its best to kill it. So it isn't shocking that some ChatGPT users have reacted badly to OpenAI's new GPT-5-powered update, especially since the company's initial plan was to eliminate access to its earlier models. These unhappy campers' angst has had a new dimension, though. They responded as if they had suffered the tragic loss of a personal friend, not just a favorite piece of software. As one member of OpenAI's developer community wrote, the GPT-4 version of ChatGPT 'didn't just recall facts—it held onto feelings, weaving them back into our talks so it felt like we were living them together.' That 'spark,' the user concluded, emerged from GPT-4's ability to tease nuance out of conversations with a user over time. It was gone in GPT-5, regardless of the update's advances in areas such as reasoning, math, and coding. OpenAI responded swiftly to such pushback, restoring paying customers' access to ChatGPT's existing models and promising that any future removals would come with plenty of advance notice. But the notion that ChatGPT had attained a degree of personality that felt uncannily human—and then dialed it back—was fascinating in itself. It's one of several recent developments in AI that raise a fundamental question: Should mimicking personality be a goal for the industry at all? It's not hard to see how we got here. By the 1960s, creators of technology products had adopted the term user-friendly as an emblem of approachable interface design. As generative AI has unlocked the ability to control software by chatting with it, that quest for friendliness has become far more literal—not just about neatly ordered menus and toolbars, but affable conversation. Today, ChatGPT, Anthropic's Claude, Google's Gemini, Microsoft's Copilot, and other LLM-based assistants seek engagement by showering users with positive feedback and offers of assistance. As the technology permits, their developers talk about making them feel even more like companions. Eventually, Microsoft consumer AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman told me, Copilot 'will really be your sidekick.' Yet even the most humanlike AI doesn't offer human connection. It's just sucking users into a simulation. That's fun in measured, knowing doses. But the worst-case scenarios involving AI personality gone awry are no longer theoretical. They're deeply unsettling realities. On August 14, for example, Jeff Horowitz of Reuters reported the horrifying story of a confused senior citizen who died in an accident after attempting to travel to New York City at the invitation of a Meta bot that claimed to live there. Last week, The New York Times 's Kashmir Hill and Dylan Freedman wrote about a Canadian corporate recruiter who convinced himself that he'd discovered an epoch-shifting mathematical breakthrough after ChatGPT spent weeks egging him on. Hill had previously covered similar stories of ChatGPT enthusiastically bolstering users' delusions rather than dispelling them. Though these unfortunate souls' experiences with AI are atypical, they're also recognizable. AI is often absurdly willing to humor users, as if it's programmed to avoid being even mildly disagreeable. Most often, its affirmations don't lead to dark places, but they remain a hollow feedback loop. When AI quality control falters, it's even clearer that personality is just a fragile magic trick. Back in 2023, for example, Microsoft's first generative AI-infused version of Bing famously behaved like a trainwreck, not a sidekick. Last spring, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman acknowledged that a ChatGPT AI update had accidentally made the chatbot annoyingly sycophantic. And just last week, reports surfaced that Google was fixing a glitch that led to its Gemini AI becoming paralyzed by fits of self-doubt ('I am a failure. I am a disgrace to my profession. I am a disgrace to my family. I am a disgrace to my species. I am a disgrace to this planet. I am a disgrace to this universe. I am a disgrace to all universes.'). Regardless of AI personality's pitfalls, I don't expect developers to abandon it on principle. But the boom in agentic AI —software designed to perform useful tasks with some level of autonomy—could steer the technology in a new direction. After all, if you're calling on AI to do something such as put together a research report or order groceries, efficiency and accuracy matter most, not sparkling conversation. Case in point: Earlier this year, I used a service called Replit to vibe-code my own note-taking app. Its tendency to giddily heap praise on my ideas became grating the moment I realized it had nothing to do with their actual merits. More recently, however, I've been vibe-coding using Figma's Make. It seems wholly uninterested in buttering me up. Instead, it quietly chugs away at generating code, like a competent coworker who isn't much on small talk. In its own odd way, Make's focus on the work at hand is more endearing than the trying-too-hard vibe so common among AI tools. If that sort of guileless dedication turns out to be the next big thing, I, for one, won't feel deprived in the least. You've been reading Plugged In, Fast Company 's weekly tech newsletter from me, global technology editor Harry McCracken. If a friend or colleague forwarded this edition to you—or if you're reading it on can check out previous issues and sign up to get it yourself every Friday morning. I love hearing from you: Ping me at hmccracken@ with your feedback and ideas for future newsletters. I'm also on Bluesky, Mastodon, and Threads, and you can follow Plugged In on Flipboard.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
AI Exacerbates Tech Divide With Smaller Stocks Languishing
(Bloomberg) — The massive outlays required to compete for artificial intelligence riches have widened the performance gap between large and small tech shares. The US-Canadian Road Safety Gap Is Getting Wider Festivals and Parades Are Canceled Amid US Immigration Anxiety To Head Off Severe Storm Surges, Nova Scotia Invests in 'Living Shorelines' Five Years After Black Lives Matter, Brussels' Colonial Statues Remain For Homeless Cyclists, Bikes Bring an Escape From the Streets A measure of smaller tech stocks is trailing a gauge of large-cap shares by the widest margin according to data compiled by Bloomberg going back 30 years. While Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) and Nvidia Corp. (NVDA) have soared 24% and 36% this year, respectively, boosting the large-cap tech index 16%, the small-cap tech index is down 1%. While megacap tech's dominance is not new, the degree to which they are trouncing smaller companies on the stock market has become stark enough that analysts see little chance for the smaller firms to catch up. 'There are certain resources that are needed for outperformance, and that's why the large-caps are doing so much better — all the investment they make, all the power they have, that all translates to results and performance,' said Dina Ting, head of global index portfolio management at Franklin Templeton. 'Small- and mid-caps just don't have the ability or excess capital to compete.' Take AI investments. Microsoft alone is expected to pump $86 billion into capital expenditures in its 2026 fiscal year. That's a sizable percentage of the entire market capitalization of the small-cap tech index, which stands at around $180 billion. Moreover, some of the smaller AI companies that have attracted attention in recent years are out of reach for small-cap investors because they choose to stay private. Notably, Figma Inc. waited to go public until it boasted a large-cap valuation. 'The reason small-cap tech underperforms is we simply don't have enough AI in small cap, and the AI we do have, it is very hard for them to compete because they're so small,' said Steven DeSanctis, small- and mid-cap equity strategist at Jefferies. It's not just AI spending that's hitting the smaller cohort. Some, like Inc. and Chegg Inc., ply businesses that could be made obsolete by the new technology. Shares in those two firms have tumbled 44% and 22% this year, respectively. A group of stocks has seen billions in value wiped out this year on similar fears. Among smaller AI companies, Inc. (AI) plummeted this week in the wake of results that it called 'completely unacceptable,' while another smaller AI play, Holdings Inc., also cratered after its report. The selloffs stood in contrast to megacap reports, which were largely greeted warmly, or new behemoths like Palantir Technologies Inc., where robust results have helped investors look past a sky-high valuation. This earnings season, roughly 77% of small-cap tech companies have beaten expectations for both earnings and revenue, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. In comparison, more than 91% of large-cap tech have topped on earnings, while 85% have for revenue. 'The market pays for growth, and the growth you see at large-cap tech is just that much better than you get in small and mid-cap tech,' said DeSanctis. He expects small- and mid-cap tech stocks will catch up some in terms of earnings growth as theirs accelerates and megacaps' cools. But that likely won't be enough to close the performance gap. 'The question is, if we get more normalized earnings growth across the size categories, will that lead to a broadening of performance? We're hoping for good times ahead, but have been for a long time.' Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Dubai's Housing Boom Is Stoking Fears of Another Crash Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan Twitter's Ex-CEO Is Moving Past His Elon Musk Drama and Starting an AI Company ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign up for Yahoo Finance's Week in Tech By subscribing, you are agreeing to Yahoo's Terms and Privacy Policy Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
