NASA Has a Badass Moon Rover but No Way to Get It to the Moon
NASA's VIPER is designed to search for water ice around the Moon's south pole. But instead of exploring the lunar terrain, the fully assembled four-wheeled robot is in storage at the Johnson Space Center in Houston. After canceling its VIPER mission last year, NASA is still searching for alternatives to launch its lunar rover, and the agency just took another step backward in making it happen.
NASA canceled a solicitation for partnership proposals it had sent out earlier this year, calling on the private sector to take over its VIPER mission. This week, the agency announced it would explore alternative options to deliver its lunar rover to the Moon. 'We appreciate the efforts of those who proposed to the Lunar Volatiles Science Partnership Announcement for Partnership Proposals call,' Nicky Fox, associate administrator of NASA's Science Mission Directorate, said in a statement. 'We look forward to accomplishing future volatiles science with VIPER as we continue NASA's Moon to Mars exploration efforts.'
VIPER, or Volatiles Investigating Polar Exploration Rover, was originally scheduled to launch in 2023. The launch date was first pushed back to 2024 and later to 2025 due to additional schedule and supply chain delays. In July 2024, the space agency decided to cancel the mission altogether, stating that it threatens to disrupt other commercial payload missions to the Moon.
At first, NASA's plan was to disassemble the VIPER rover and use its parts for future missions. The decision, however, sparked outrage from the science community over the loss of the lunar explorer. In response, NASA abruptly put together a call for the private sector to take over its robot and send it to the Moon. Space startups, such as Intuitive Machines, stepped up to put together a plan to respond to NASA's request for information. It's unclear why NASA has reversed earlier decision to pursue a private partnership to send VIPER to the Moon.
NASA has already spent $450 million developing its VIPER mission, and the agency declared that it wouldn't spend any more money on getting the rover to land on the lunar surface. Without the help of the private sector, NASA's alternatives for VIPER, at no additional cost from its own pocket, seem rather limited. 'The agency will announce a new strategy for VIPER in the future,' NASA wrote in its statement.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
21 minutes ago
- CBS News
Deadly toxic algae bloom off Southern California coast ends
The toxic algae bloom off the Southern California coast that's been killing and sickening so many sea lions and other marine mammals has finally ended. "Our demoic acid toxic hostess event is over, for the time being," biologist Dave Bader said. Bader, who works for San Pedro's Marine Mammal Care Center, said recent samples of the ocean water do not show signs of the algae that create the toxic domoic acid bloom that has been afflicting sea lions, dolphins, pelicans and even whales over the past three months. "It's been rough," Bader said. "We've seen so many animals." For those three months, Bader and his team have triaged and treated thousands of animals that were seizing, dying or dead on beaches from Ventura to Orange County. Rescue centers shared the burden and pain during the toxic algae bloom. "It's not just the volume of animals," Bader said. "The females were pregnant, almost all of them, they all aborted their young ... Also, there were so many dolphins this time around as well, which is also tragic. So to see the volume of animals, the types of animals that are coming in, it was really hard on everybody." Typically, the algae blooms begin in June. However, this round of domoic acid spread began much earlier and has the possibility of returning later this year, according to Bader. "We still have another several months when a bloom of this type could reoccur," he said. Bader said humans created this crisis, and can ultimately solve it. "We need to do a better job of mitigating against the future effects of climate change, making it not as bad as it could be. That's step number one," he said. "It's a big step that we have to take. The ocean is telling us it's not well, it's not healthy, and we have to take those big steps to solve problems like this."
Forbes
29 minutes ago
- Forbes
Android's Impossible Deadline—3 Weeks To Update Or Stop Using Phones
Android flaw cannot yet be fixed. Future Publishing via Getty Images A tricky dilemma for Android users this week, as both Google and Samsung release this month's Pixel and Galaxy security updates with critical missing fixes. And with a June 24 deadline to secure phones or power them down, something needs to give. There are 30-plus important fixes that have been released, but not the ones that matter most. The fixes are long-awaited patches from Qualcomm, which warns Android users that 'there are indications from Google Threat Analysis Group that CVE-2025-21479, CVE-2025-21480, CVE-2025-27038 may be under limited, targeted exploitation.' The flaw affects Adreno Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) drivers. It is assumed but not known that exploitation would have been used in commercial spyware software, similar to the well publicized attacks outed by Amnesty International. Qualcomm says patches 'have been made available to OEMs in May together with a strong recommendation to deploy the update on affected devices as soon as possible.' The deadline which comes courtesy of America's cyber defense agency is mandatory for federal staff and recommended for everyone else. CISA warns 'multiple Qualcomm chipsets contain' these vulnerabilities, which it describes as follows: CISA has slapped a 21-day mandatory deadline on federal agency employees to update phones by June 24 'or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable.' Right now, the window for June's security updates has been missed, which means absent an out-of-band update that deadline will also be missed. In the past, we have seen such updates make their way to Pixel faster than Galaxy, with Samsung phones lagging. The company warns patches from chipset vendors 'may not be included in the security update package of the month. They will be included in upcoming security update packages as soon as the patches are ready to deliver.' This plays into the challenge for Samsung in working around an OS and ecosystem it dominates but doesn't control. In that regard, the more pressing issue for its users will be the speed with which Android 16 via One UI 8 reaches their phones. With a Pixel timeline expected any day now, the gap between the two phones will be critical. While CISA's deadline is only mandatory for federal staff, its remit is to operate 'for the benefit of the cybersecurity community and network defenders — and to help every organization better manage vulnerabilities and keep pace with threat activity.' As such all users are urged to install these Qualcomm updates as soon as they're available.
The Verge
2 hours ago
- The Verge
Pokémon Violet and Scarlet's Switch 2 update is as good as it looks
I recently did something sort of unusual: I went to a preview event for a game that's been out for almost three years. I've played around 400 hours of Pokémon Scarlet, according to my Nintendo Switch, since it was released in late 2022. It's safe to say I know the game pretty well. And yet, when I was invited to preview Pokémon Scarlet and Violet on the Nintendo Switch 2 ahead of the new console's launch, I gladly took the opportunity to see three-year-old games I already own. I wanted to find out just how much they'd improved. I have a high jank tolerance with games — it builds character — but I'm well aware of Scarlet and Violet 's shortcomings on the original Switch. There's lag. The frame rate is… inconsistent. There are online connectivity issues. For a lot of people, performance problems overshadowed what was otherwise a great new generation of Pokémon games. With the release of the Nintendo Switch 2, and the accompanying free performance update for Scarlet and Violet, that might finally change. Starting up the demo of Pokémon Scarlet on the Switch 2 at The Pokémon Company International's office in Bellevue, Washington, I knew immediately where I wanted to go first: Casseroya Lake, sometimes called 'Lag Lake,' where the games' graphical issues are most apparent. On the original Switch, the game really chugs when you're on the lake; the frame rate takes a dive, and it struggles to render more than a handful of pokémon in your immediate vicinity. Exploring the liveliest open areas and encountering the pokémon that populate them is one of Scarlet and Violet 's biggest strengths, but on the Switch, Casseroya Lake is dull and empty at best and impossible to navigate at worst. Playing on the Switch 2, however, Casseroya Lake ran beautifully. There were far more pokémon in view (and I was immediately accosted by a torpedo-like Veluza, same as it ever was), and the lag and stuttering I'd come to expect were nonexistent. I battled that Veluza with no problems. I stumbled upon a Slowpoke outbreak and sent out my Clodsire to auto-battle them — no lag. I found a wild Tera Pokémon and watched the Tera animation play out, looking sharper than I'd ever seen it. (I was playing in docked mode at a station set up by TPCi, so maybe that last one could be credited to the TV. But still.) It was the same case everywhere I went during my 30-minute demo: a stable and smooth frame rate, significantly faster load times, and far more pokémon populating the world. The Switch 2 update is not a complete overhaul of the graphics themselves — the grass textures looked just as unremarkable as always to my eye, for example — but it does seem to eliminate the performance issues that have dragged Scarlet and Violet down for nearly three years. It's a noticeable improvement in the world, in battle, in Tera raids, and even in menus. Is it praiseworthy for a game to simply run well? Maybe not. I don't pretend to know how games are made on a technical level, or really any level, but I know they're not easy to make. And I had enough fun with Pokémon Scarlet to play for 400 hours without the performance issues bothering me much. But it did feel bittersweet, briefly, to think how much more these games could have shone if they'd run well in the first place. Then, in the last five minutes of my demo, as I waded in a different body of water to confirm that it too ran smoothly, I saw it: among the pods of Buizel dotting the shore, a shiny. A good portion of my 400 hours in Scarlet were spent shiny hunting, because even though the alternate-color versions of pokémon are not quite as hard to find as they were in previous games, I get excited every time I see one, without fail. It's the perfect encapsulation of the kind of joy Scarlet and Violet have to offer: exploring a lively area and finding something special. I caught the shiny Buizel despite knowing that it wasn't my save file and not mine to keep. The Switch 2 update is arguably arriving a bit late for my Scarlet save file, depending on how many hours you think are reasonable to spend playing this game. But I also own Violet, and I have played about two hours of that version total. Looking at the shiny Buizel I didn't get to keep, I realized I was really excited to have a reason to play Violet finally — to rediscover what I liked most about these games, in a state that does them justice.
