Students shouldn't be 'deprived' of J1 visas for expressing their views, Tánaiste says
It comes after the US Embassy in Dublin announced last month that students applying for J1s
will now undergo 'enhanced social media vetting'
.
A US State Department official said consular officers will conduct a 'comprehensive and thorough vetting of all student and exchange visitor applicants'.
All applicants are now required to list all of their social media profiles and set them to public to allow screening for anti-American content, with anyone failing to do this running the risk of having their application rejected.
The changes also apply for other exchange visitor applicants in the F, M and J non-immigrant classifications.
The US embassy said it will use all available information in its visa screening to identify those who 'are inadmissible' to the US, including those who pose a threat to national security.
Advertisement
It said it wanted to ensure those applying for admission into the US 'do not intend to harm Americans and our national interests', adding that a US visa 'is a privilege, not a right'.
The national students' union said the new measures represent a significant and disproportionate intrusion into personal lives and digital privacy, and that they raise serious concerns about freedom of expression and online surveillance.
Speaking to reporters today following a meeting with US ambassador to Ireland Ed Walsh, Simon Harris said the two men had 'a really good conversation' about student visas.
'I think Ambassador Walsh knows the importance of the people-to-people connection between our two countries,' Harris said.
'Freedom of speech matters'
'I was making the point that we live in a country where young people have very, very strong views – as do I, by the way – on a lot of what's going on in the world and they have every right to express those views.
'Freedom of speech matters and being able to freely express yourself – online, offline, through protest – is an important part of our democracy, and I know President Trump is somebody who, I'd imagine in his own country, would champion free speech.'
He added: 'We very much want our young people to continue to be able to articulate their very strongly-held views on horrific issues that are happening around the world, but that shouldn't deprive somebody from going on a J1.'
Harris said that while immigration policy and visas is a matter for the US, he said he and the ambassador agreed to keep in touch on the matter.
Related Reads
We asked students queuing outside the US embassy what they make of new visa social media checks
US embassy wants 'every social media username of past five years' on new visa applications
'Enhanced social media vetting' of foreign students for anti-American content
'Ireland and the US have been friends for hundreds of years. It's important we keep those connections going, and I wouldn't like to see anything that causes apprehension for a young person travelling to the United States – and I just made that point to Ambassador Walsh.'
Taoiseach Micheál Martin previously said there should not be 'any overzealous examinations of people's records' when speaking about the matter.
'Obviously, authorities do monitor for potential criminal activity and that's generally done by the police services,' he said.
'But I wouldn't be in favour of any overbearing inquisitorial approach to young people or their social media for that matter in terms of traveling from here to the United States, or indeed to any other part of the world.'
Martin said J1 visas 'work both ways', adding: 'It works very well for the United States in terms of a lot of workers in the hospitality sector.'
Roughly 5,000 Irish students avail of the J1 visa programme every summer.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Post
an hour ago
- Irish Post
Ireland delays cancer warning label for alcohol
IRELAND'S plan to become the first country in Europe to introduce cancer warning labels on alcohol has been delayed. This delay is widely attributed to intense lobbying by the drinks industry and fears of trade retaliation from the United States. The labelling rules, set to take effect in May 2026 under the Public Health (Alcohol) Act 2018, would have required alcohol products sold in Ireland to carry clear warnings about their links to cancer and liver disease. Now, government officials have confirmed the measure will be pushed back by at least three years. The delay marks a stark reversal from the policy's original champions, Tánaiste Simon Harris and Taoiseach Micheál Martin. Harris, who spearheaded the legislation during his time as health minister, recently announced the postponement. Alcohol Action Ireland, a leading campaign group, described the move as a 'political surrender' that prioritises corporate interests over public health. Research published in the British Medical Journal has found Ireland to have the highest level of alcohol industry influence in government across five key areas, including policy development and political ties. Industry arguments against the labelling have ranged from claims that the science is too complex to explain on a label to assertions that such warnings are misleading or bad for business. Despite this, the scientific consensus is clear. Alcohol has been classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the World Health Organisation since 1988, which is the same category shared by tobacco and asbestos. It is strongly linked to multiple cancers, including breast, liver and colorectal cancer, even at low levels of consumption. In recent weeks, Irish officials have also voiced concerns that the cancer warnings could trigger US trade tariffs, especially if Donald Trump returns to power and revives threats of duties on EU goods. The United States is the largest export market for many Irish drink producers, particularly for brands like Jameson. Irish ministers have warned that acting unilaterally could put the industry at risk. Enterprise Minister Peter Burke and others have argued that Ireland should instead wait for an EU-wide approach. However, no such proposal currently exists. The European Commission has already ruled that Ireland's alcohol labelling plans are legal and compatible with the single market. The labels were to include simple messages: that alcohol causes cancer and liver disease, a pregnancy warning graphic and a link to the HSE's website. According to the HSE, only 38 percent of Irish adults are aware that alcohol can cause cancer. Every day, three people in Ireland are diagnosed with alcohol-related cancer, and up to 15 babies are born with foetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Yet most people do not associate these harms with alcohol. Taoiseach Micheál Martin, once lauded for leading Ireland's historic indoor smoking ban in 2004, is now facing calls to show similar resolve in the face of alcohol industry opposition. More than 85 organisations, coordinated by Alcohol Action Ireland, are urging the government to stick to the original timeline and resist pressure to water down or delay the law. Critics warn that postponing labelling may be politically convenient, but it comes at a cost—one paid in public health. They argue that consumers have a basic right to know the risks associated with what they consume and that laws passed through the democratic process should not be quietly undone by industry influence. While warning labels won't solve Ireland's alcohol problem overnight, public health experts say they are a critical first step.
Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Trump threatens to impose drug and chip tariffs as soon as 1 August
Donald Trump has threatened to impose tariffs on pharmaceutical products and semiconductors as soon as 1 August, the latest deadline for the introduction of his 'reciprocal' levies on individual countries. The US president told reporters late on Tuesday the taxes on drug imports could be announced 'probably at the end of the month, and we're going to start off with a low tariff and give the pharmaceutical companies a year or so to build, and then we're going to make it a very high tariff'. He added he had a similar timeline for imposing levies on semiconductors, as he believed it was 'less complicated' to implement tariffs on the chips required by all electronic devices, but did not provide further details. Earlier in the month, Trump told a meeting of his cabinet that he expected to raise tariffs on pharmaceuticals as high as 200%, once he had given drug companies a year to a year and a half to bring their manufacturing to the US. He also threatened a 50% tariff on imported copper in an effort to increase US production of the metal. The Trump administration began investigations in April into imports of pharmaceuticals and semiconductors into the US under section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, as part of an attempt to impose tariffs on both sectors on national security grounds. Any levies imposed on pharmaceuticals are expected to hit drugmakers including Eli Lilly, Pfizer and Merck, which have overseas production sites, while such a move risks increasing prices for US consumers. Any tariffs on semiconductors are predicted to affect chipmakers and the companies such as Apple and Samsung whose smartphones and computers require chips. Trump's latest pledge to escalate the global trade war comes as the US's trading partners are waiting for a temporary pause on the 'reciprocal' tariffs announced on 2 April to expire on 1 August, after the deadline was extended from 9 July. It also coincided with the White House launching an investigation into Brazil's trading practices, which it called unfair. Investigators will look into Brazilian government policies 'related to digital trade and electronic payment services; unfair, preferential tariffs; anti-corruption interference; intellectual property protection; ethanol market access; and illegal deforestation', according to a statement from the trade representative, Jamieson Greer, and whether these restrict US trade. He cited 'Brazil's attacks on American social media companies as well as other unfair trading practices that harm American companies, workers, farmers, and technology innovators'. Trump last week announced 50% tariff on Brazil, despite the fact it has a trade deficit with the US, citing a 'witch-hunt' against the country's former president Jair Bolsonaro. Trump said on Tuesday he had struck a trade pact with Indonesia to reduce the tariff rate levied on the country's goods, after negotiations. The south-east Asian country made multibillion-dollar commitments to buy US energy, agricultural products and 50 Boeing jets, Trump said in a social media post. As a result, Indonesian goods entering the US would face a 19% tariff, significantly below the 32% level previously threatened. Bloomberg
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Steve Parish says Crystal Palace will appeal against Europa League exclusion
Crystal Palace will mount a legal challenge to UEFA's decision to exclude them from next season's Europa League, with chairman Steve Parish announcing the club will appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport. The FA Cup winners have been demoted to the Conference League owing to what Europe's governing body says is a conflict of interest regarding former director and co-owner John Textor, who also owns part of Ligue 1 side Lyon. The American stepped away from Palace at the start of July, but the ownership issue relates to the end of last season when the club secured a first European appearance by beating Manchester City at Wembley. Crystal Palace fans have protested against UEFA's ruling (Yui Mok/PA). UEFA's ruling would mean Nottingham Forest, who finished seventh in the Premier League, taking Palace's place in the Europa League. 'We are still fighting,' Parish told the The Rest is Football podcast. 'There's an appeal process, so we go to CAS which is the court for arbitration and, you know, we're very hopeful. We think we've got great legal arguments. 'We don't think this is the right decision by any means. We know unequivocally that John didn't have decisive influence over the club. 'We know we proved that beyond all reasonable doubt because it's a fact.'
