Absa Group chairman Sello Moloko steps down from a board that has seen much change
Sello Moloko has stepped down as Absa's Group Chairman.
Image: Supplied
Absa Group chairman Sello Moloko's decision to step down as chairman represents a continuation of a number of changes on the board in recent months.
The bank announced Wednesday that Moloko, who turns 60 in July, will step down as independent non-executive director on July 15, and he will be succeeded by independent board member René van Wyk, who had also been the interim CEO in 2019.
Moloko intends to work with Van Wyk over the next few months for a smooth transition. Frequent and unexpected board changes to the board often indicates to investors that there might be instability in the management of a company, or different views among them on strategy.
'Moloko, who has led the strategic work of the board, will be handing over the reins for the next phase of leadership and for him to focus on his family, personal business interests, and community commitments,' the bank's board said in a statement.
Moloko said the board had dealt with several challenges in 2024, and as a result, did work to reposition the group for a more sustainable performance trajectory, which included appointing a permanent chief executive and initiating the restructure of the retail operating model.
'These challenges have prompted me to reflect on the demands on my time. I feel the time is ripe to refocus my attention on my family, my community commitments, and the several personal business initiatives outside the group that I need to drive. This will, naturally, adversely affect my ability to devote the requisite time to a group of the scale of Absa,' he said.
In March, the bank announced Zarina Bassa and Sindi Zilwa had been appointed as non-executive directors, from April 1, 2025. Bassa is also a non-executive director of Gold Fields and of the JSE. Zilwa has almost 30 years as a director and her current board seats include Sibanye-Stillwater, Metrofile and Delta Property Fund.
Last month, Absa announced its seventh CEO in less than 7 years, after Standard Bank's former deputy chief executive Kenny Fihla was appointed as ABSA CEO. This was after the early retirement of the prior CEO, Arrie Rautenbach was announced on the same day last year that the bank declared a 5% decline in annual headline earnings. And the CEO before Rautenbach, Daniel Mminele, had resigned due to differences with the board on strategy.
Absa's share price barely changed on the announcement of Moloko's resignation slipping by 0.88% Wednesday afternoon to R169.02. In contrast the JSE Bank Index was up by 0.45% at the same time. Absa's share price was 13.3% higher than a year ago.
Van Wyk was interim group CEO in 2019. He re-joined the Absa board, after a cooling-off period, as a non-executive director from August 1, 2020, and thereafter became an independent non-executive director from August 1, 2021.
He is the chairman of the Absa Group Risk and Capital Management Committee, and Credit Risk Committee, and is a member of the Directors' Affairs Committee and the Audit and Compliance Committee, and was a member of the Board Finance Committee. His committee memberships and chairmanships will be revised upon his appointment as Chairman.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
3 days ago
- IOL News
Gauteng couple in financial distress blames Absa for reckless lending on R3. 2 million home loan
A Gauteng couple took action against Absa bank after alleging reckless lending practices that have led them into a spiralling debt of over R5.1 million. A Gauteng couple has launched legal action against Absa bank, alleging that reckless lending practices have pushed them into a spiralling debt of over R5.1 million. Christian Daniel De Klerk and his partner, who have been long-standing customers of the bank, argue that their financial well-being was jeopardised when they accepted a second home loan from Absa without receiving an appropriate affordability assessment. Initially, the De Klerks secured a R1.9 million home loan from Absa in 2011 and, for nearly a decade, they successfully met their repayment obligations. However, following the collapse of the husband's legal practice in March 2020 due to the pandemic, the couple were granted a temporary three-month payment holiday. Ironically, during the same month, they said Absa approached them with an offer for a second loan, amounting to R3.2 million. Despite their precarious situation, the couple accepted the offer. Meanwhile, the husband remained unemployed until June 2024 and the couple faced mounting debt because of missed repayments from 2022. They maintained that their current income was inadequate to service both the new instalments and the arrears. Nevertheless, they submitted that they could meet the loan obligations under terms similar to those agreed upon in March 2020.
IOL News
3 days ago
- IOL News
Financial distress: Couple accuses Absa of reckless lending after accepting R3. 2 million second home loan
A Gauteng couple took action against Absa bank after alleging reckless lending practices that have led them into a spiralling debt of over R5.1 million. Image: Oupa Mokoena / Independent Newspapers A Gauteng couple took action against Absa bank after alleging reckless lending practices that have led them into a spiralling debt of over R5.1 million. Christian Daniel De Klerk and his partner, long-standing customers of the bank, claim that their financial wellness was compromised when they accepted a second home loan from Absa without being given a suitable affordability assessment. Initially, the De Klerks secured a R1.9 million home loan from Absa in 2011 and, for nearly a decade, they successfully met their repayment obligations. However, following the collapse of the husband's legal practice in March 2020 due to the pandemic, the couple were granted a temporary three-month payment holiday. Ironically, during the same month, they said Absa approached them with an offer for a second loan, amounting to R3.2 million. Despite their precarious situation, the couple accepted the offer. Meanwhile, the husband remained unemployed until June 2024 and the couple faced mounting debt because of missed repayments from 2022. They maintained that their current income was inadequate to service both the new instalments and the arrears. Nevertheless, they submitted that they could meet the loan obligations under terms similar to those agreed upon in March 2020. In seeking respite, the couple brought their case before the National Consumer Tribunal (NCT), voicing their primary grievance against Absa's alleged failure to conduct a proper affordability assessment before approving the second loan. They argued that Absa did not request essential financial documentation such as proof of income, detailed expense records, or even a credit history report—critical assessments that would typically inform responsible lending practices. The couple contended that granting them a loan while the husband was unemployed amounted to reckless lending. In addition, the couple alleged that Absa also failed to provide clear information regarding the loan's terms, conditions, interest rates, and penalties for missed repayments, all of which they argue have contributed to their current financial hardship. As a result of these alleged contraventions, the couple said that they are suffering severe financial hardship, face the risk of foreclosure, and are enduring significant emotional distress, which has adversely affected their quality of life. In the answering affidavit, Absa argued the couple's application was time-barred as more than three years have elapsed since the alleged cause of action arose. Moreover, the bank submitted that the North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria enforced the loan agreement in September 2024 and ordered the couple to pay over R5.1 million including interests and declared the couples' property executable. The bank added that the couple's case was frivolous, vexatious, and constitutes an abuse of the Tribunal's process. In their reply, the couple disputed the assertion that the matter was time-barred. They argue that the cause of action only arose in 2022 when they began defaulting on their home loan repayments. On this basis, they contend that the three-year period should be calculated from 2022, not from 2020 when the second home loan was granted. They also disputed the contention that the high court judgment precludes them from pursuing the complaint before the tribunal. They argue that the issue of reckless lending, which forms the crux of their complaint before the tribunal, and it was not adjudicated by the high court. Looking at matter, the tribunal said by law, the limitation period must be calculated from 2020 March when the alleged reckless credit was extended. Having filed their application for leave to refer in February 2025—almost five years post the alleged reckless lending—the tribunal indicated that they would be barred from considering the complaint, potentially closing the door on their search for justice. As a result, the application was dismissed. [email protected] IOL News Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel.
IOL News
4 days ago
- IOL News
SA's manufacturing activity firmly in contractionary territory in May
The Absa Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) released on Monday indicated that the seasonally adjusted PMI decreased by 1.6 points to 43.1 in May 2025. Image: Supplied The Absa Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) released on Monday indicated that the seasonally adjusted PMI decreased by 1.6 points to 43.1 in May 2025. Absa said that the PMI remained in contractionary territory for a seventh consecutive month. The PMI suggests that the manufacturing sector continued to suffer in May, despite some flickers of activity and demand improvement, albeit at extremely low levels. 'However, a decline in the supplier deliveries index pushed the headline PMI lower. The business activity index indicated some improvement, increasing by 3.4 points to 43.4 in May. New sales orders also increased, by 2.2 points to 38.3 in May. This was likely due to domestic demand recovering slightly as export sales continued to deteriorate at a rapid rate.' Absa said the supplier deliveries index has been tricky to interpret since the Covid-19 pandemic. 'Across the globe, the traditional signal of an increase being positive (with the index being inverted, so slower deliveries are seen as a positive sign as they are caused by increased demand for supplies) was no longer valid, as supply-chain bottlenecks and delays, and not higher demand, caused slower deliveries.' The purchasing price index decreased by 7.9 points to 60.4 in May due to fuel price cuts at the start of the month. 'A lower Brent crude oil price and a stronger rand, despite the fuel levy increase, bode well for further fuel price declines at the start of this month.' Absa added that the index tracking expected business conditions in six months' time increased by a significant 13.9 points to 62.5 in May, the highest level since the end of 2024. 'Sentiment improved as global tariffs were suspended, and businesses showed faith that local political disagreements on policy within the government would be resolved.' Investec economist Lara Hodes said, "The slide in the index was partly underpinned by a decrease in the suppliers' delivery index, which fell from 56.6 to 49.0. According to the BER, the decline in the index (the index is inverted so a decline suggests faster deliveries) could technically mean that logistical constraints are easing.' Hodes added that the business activity and new sales orders' indices remained subdued, well below 50, but did pick up modestly in May, despite a continued weakening in export sales. 'Worryingly, the employment index fell further into contractionary territory in May with a reading of 40.0 (42.9 previously). It has been in negative territory for fourteen consecutive months. Hodes said addressing the country's unemployment crisis remains a key imperative of the government. 'However, to achieve this, we need a substantial lift in confidence, driving investment and accordingly economic growth. Purchasing prices declined notably in May by 7.9 points to 60.4, supported by a further cut in fuel prices. Favourably, the index measuring anticipated business conditions (in six months' time) moved back into expansionary territory, reaching the highest level since the end of 2024. It climbed 13.9 points to 62.5.' Dr Eliphas Ndou, an economist and author at Unisa's Department of Economics, said the latest Absa Purchasing Manager Index indicates the manufacturing sector is struggling and is susceptible to weak demand conditions, political and trade uncertainty, which has implications for economic growth and employment outlook in the country. 'The Absa PMI has a statistically strong and positive co-movement with economic growth and is a leading indicator of economic growth. This means an improvement in the indicator would signal an improvement in economic growth. Whilst a weakening in the Absa PMI signals a weakening in economic growth.' Professor Waldo Krugell, an economist at North-West University, said that the PMI is still in contractionary territory and this is worrying for the growth prospects of the economy. 'The expectations are that this week's quarter one growth figures are not going to look good, but the PMI has shown business struggling in April and May as well.' Professor Bonke Dumisa, an independent economic analyst said that he is not surprised about this negative Absa PMI. 'The buyers in most manufacturing companies are usually the most conservative in the business, believing it is safest to adopt a cautious approach and be accused of opportunity cost in case they run short of products. The global uncertainty created by Trump's tariffs, wars and other consequential impacts of his "Executive Orders" have resulted in most buyers becoming very pessimistic about the business conditions. BUSINESS REPORT
