Octopus Energy advert banned for misleading £500 claim
The Facebook ad, seen in September, stated "Installs from £500", adding: "The government grant covers up to 90 per cent of the costs of a new heat pump. Replace your old broken boiler with an award-winning energy supplier and help stop our reliance on gas."
The ASA received two complaints, including from the Energy and Utilities Alliance, challenging the "installs from £500" claim's substantiation and omitted material information.
Octopus told the ASA their claim reflected what customers would pay, rather than the industry average.
Sales data from April 2024 to January 2025 showed 13.9 per cent of Octopus Energy heat pump customers paid £500 or less. In these instances, the £8,000 total installation cost was reduced to £500 after the £7,500 Boiler Upgrade Scheme (BUS) funding. The ASA ultimately found the ad misleading.
Octopus said they targeted the ad at consumers in their installation coverage area, which accounted for around 86 per cent of postcode districts.
They referred to a consumer opinion survey they had commissioned from a third party after receiving notification of the complaints from the ASA, to see what people understood from the claim, finding that 58 per cent of respondents understood that the cost of having a heat pump installed by Octopus Energy could be as low as £500 with help from government funding.
The ASA said advertising regulations required that price claims such as 'from' must not exaggerate the availability or amount of benefits likely to be obtained by the consumer.
Competition and Markets Authority guidance similarly stated that 'from' prices should reflect what a significant proportion of consumers were likely to pay for the advertised product.
The ASA said consumers would understand the claim 'Installs from £500″, in the context of the ad, to mean that a significant proportion of consumers could purchase a heat pump and have it installed by Octopus Energy for £500.
However, its assessment of sales data showed that at the time the ad appeared, in September 2024, 5.8 per cent of heat pump sales had been made at or below the price claimed in the ad.
In the preceding months for which Octopus held data, less than 5.8 per cent of sales made had been at or below the claimed price.
For the final two months of 2024, the proportion of heat pumps sold at or below £500 stood between 23 per cent and 24 per cent. However, the data did not show that a significant proportion of sales, at the time the ad appeared, were at the claimed price of £500.
The ASA said: 'We therefore considered the price did not reflect what a significant proportion of consumers were likely to pay at the time the ad appeared.'
It added: 'We had not seen sufficiently robust evidence that a significant proportion of consumers to whom the ad was targeted could purchase a heat pump and have it installed by Octopus Energy for £500. We therefore concluded the ad was likely to mislead.'
The ASA ruled that the ad must not appear again in the form complained about, adding: 'We told Octopus to ensure that suitably robust evidence was held to demonstrate that any claimed 'from' price could be achieved by a significant proportion of consumers.
'We further told them to ensure ads making price claims for heat pump installation included all material information, including clarification of any government grant included in the advertised price, and the existence of eligibility criteria.'
Rebecca Dibb-Simkin, chief product and marketing officer at Octopus Energy, said: 'We disagree with this ruling. 13 per cent of all heat pumps sold by Octopus during the campaign were £500 or less, exceeding the ASA's guideline of 10 per cent.
'This clearly has the fossil fuel lobby worried, which is why they are relentlessly pressuring the authorities to undermine the clean energy sector.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
9 minutes ago
- USA Today
Zara asked to remove ads featuring 'unhealthily thin' models, UK watchdog says
In response, Zara said the two models provided medical certificates attesting good health. Zara has been asked to remove two advertisements from its United Kingdom website for featuring "unhealthily thin" models. The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA), the United Kingdom's independent advertising regulator, has asked Zara to remove ads, on its U.K. website, for a dress and oversized shirt that feature "unhealthily thin" models, a breach of industry standard, it claims. The ASA says these ads were not prepared "with a sense of responsibility to consumers and to society." In total, the ASA reviewed four Zara ads flagged by a member of the public who believed the featured models were too thin, ASA Media and Public Relations Manager Matthew Wilson told USA TODAY. Based in Spain, Zara is a fast fashion company that sells men's and women's clothing, accessories and beauty products, known for their simplistic design. The company operates about 100 locations in the U.S. Zara did not immediately respond for comment about the ads when contacted by USA TODAY on Wednesday, Aug. 6. Ads flagged for 'protuding collarbones' The two advertisements featured models with "protruding collarbones," the ASA wrote in its findings. One of the advertisements was for Zara's ZW Collection Oversized Pocket Shirt in Oyster-White. In one of the photographs, the shirt's low-cut design draws attention to the model's upper chest, "creating a focal point around her collarbone, which was protruding," the ASA wrote. The positioning of the model's arms, one on her hip and the other in her pants pocket, also made her arms appear "very slim," the agency said. The other ad was for Zara's Voluminous Combined Short Dress in Ecru (off-white). In the photos, shadows on the model's legs draw attention to them, making them appear "noticeably thin," the ASA wrote in its findings. The positioning of the model's upper arms also makes her body appear "slightly out of proportion," the ASA continues. Finally, the model's hair was pulled back in a slick bun, drawing emphasis to her head with appears "slightly gaunt." What was Zara's response? According to the ASA, Zara claimed the two models had worked for "well-known" fashion brands and provided medical certification proving they were in good health. As for the photos themselves, Zara told the ASA that they had not been modified, outside of "very minor lighting and coloring edits." The ASA findings published on Aug. 6 state that Zara removed the ads from its website. As of Aug. 6, the flagged photos for the Voluminous Combined Short Dress were removed and the entire ZW Collection Oversized Pocket Shirt listing was gone from the U.K. website. Greta Cross is a national trending reporter at USA TODAY. Story idea? Email her at gcross@
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Two more ads banned over ‘misleading' government funding claim
The UK's advertising watchdog has banned two more heat pump ads for misleading consumers about installation costs. The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) found that ads from home heating supplier Aira and EDF Energy both failed to include information regarding the eligibility criteria for government funding available for installing the pumps. It comes a week after the ASA banned an ad from Octopus Energy for misleading consumers by claiming heat pumps could be installed for as little as £500. The Meta ad for Aira, seen in March, said: 'Ditch your gas boiler for an Aira heat pump today … £7,500 grant available.' Aira said the ad was only targeted at homeowners living in England and Scotland, where £7,500 Government grants were available to replace their gas boiler with a heat pump. The firm said it did not believe that a consumer would interpret the ad to mean the grants were given automatically and without conditions. It added that social media ads did not allow for extensive clarification and claimed that consumers would be confused by phrasing such as 'eligibility criteria apply'. They said that, in practice, nearly all of their customers who replaced a gas boiler in their own home with a heat pump were eligible for a £7,500 grant. However, the ASA said the ad gave the impression that consumers would be automatically eligible to receive a government grant of £7,500, and it did not make clear that the funding for a heat pump was subject to eligibility. EDF's Google ad in February said: 'Get A £7,500 Grant – EDF Air Source Heat Pumps.' EDF said the ad linked through to one of three pages, where all relevant information about the government funding's eligibility criteria was made clear. Again, the ASA said the ad did not make clear that government funding for a heat pump was subject to eligibility. The ASA said of both ads: 'We considered that it was material information that should have been included. Because the ad omitted material information, we concluded it was likely to mislead.' Last week, the ASA told Octopus to ensure that ads making price claims for heat pump installation included all material information, including clarification of any Government grant included in the advertised price and the existence of eligibility criteria.
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Octopus heat pump ad claim row boils over
A war of words has erupted between energy providers after an Octopus Energy advert was banned for claiming that households could have a heat pump installed for as little as £500. The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) upheld a complaint against the Greg Jackson-run energy giant, ruling that not enough customers were eligible for the £500 offer for Octopus to be able to promote the price. Under Competition and Markets Authority guidance, advertisements containing 'from' offers should reflect the price that 'a significant proportion of consumers were likely to pay'. In its ruling, which Octopus disputes, the ASA found that when the ad appeared in September Octopus was installing just 5.8 per cent of its heat pumps for at or below the £500 price promoted, considerably below the ASA's 10 per cent threshold to make such a claim. The advert promoting 'installs from £500' ran predominantly on Facebook. It also claimed a government grant to encourage households to switch from a gas boiler to a heat pump 'covers up to 90 per cent of the costs'. 'Replace your old broken boiler with an award-winning energy supplier and help stop our reliance on gas,' it added. 'Breathtaking hypocrisy' The ASA said it received two complaints about the advert, one of which came from the Energy and Utilities Alliance (EUA), a trade body which energy equipment providers like Cadent and British Gas, and which has campaigned against the government's heat pump subsidies. A spokesperson for Octopus said: 'This shows the breathtaking hypocrisy from these fossil fuel lobbyists. They logged this complaint against us, yet their biggest member – British Gas – also claims to install heat pumps from £499.' '13.9% of all heat pumps sold by Octopus during the campaign were £500 or less, exceeding the ASA's guideline of 10%. We'd like to see the figures for British Gas.' The spokesperson added that 'Octopus will be reporting British Gas to the ASA and expects to see robust action.' Complainants challenged whether Octopus could justify its starting price claim, and sought clarity on whether the firm had omitted material information – including eligibility criteria and information on the government grant referenced – from the advert. 'The ad did not state the funding was subject to eligibility criteria,' the ASA said in its ruling. 'While we understood eligibility criteria for the funding were stipulated on a landing page, one click away from the ad, we considered that the fact the funding was subject to meeting specific criteria was material information that was likely to affect consumers' understanding of the ad's overall message.' In its original response, Octopus cited third-party survey data it commissioned on learning of the complaint, which found 58 per cent of respondents gathered that the cost of getting Octopus to install a heat pump could cost £500 with the help of government funding. The advertising watchdog also found that in the months after the adverts were in circulation, the proportion of people eligible for a price of £500 or lower for the heat pump rose to over 20 per cent. Octopus said: 'We disagree with this ruling. 13 per cent of all heat pumps sold by Octopus during the campaign were £500 or less, exceeding the ASA's guideline of 10 per cent.' Sign in to access your portfolio
