Seth Meyers on Maga's Epstein scandal: ‘They did this to themselves'
Seth Meyers continued to relish Donald Trump's Jeffrey Epstein scandal that just won't go away, as the president was hounded by questions about his friendship with the convicted sex offender while in Scotland. 'They did this to themselves,' the Late Night host said of Maga's Epstein quagmire. 'This is like if after Trump screamed they're eating the dogs in a debate, Donald Trump started eating the dog.'
Despite Trump's evident frustration with the topic, 'people haven't moved on, because Trump and his Maga mates spent years cynically hyping up the Epstein conspiracy,' Meyers explained on Wednesday evening. 'They thought only their political enemies would be harmed. But they either forgot or completely ignored the fact that Trump was Epstein's best friend. It's like basing an entire political movement around your opposition to Bert, and then voting for Ernie for president.'
Meyers then poked fun at Trump's many defenses against the Epstein scandal, starting with his claim that he didn't send a lewd birthday greeting to Epstein featuring a nude drawing of a woman, as reported by the Wall Street Journal. As Trump said: 'I don't do drawings of women.'
'The way you keep saying 'I don't do drawings of women,' instead of just saying 'I don't do drawings of people' makes it sound like you do a ton of drawings of dudes,' Meyers laughed.
Trump then 'dug the hole deeper' by saying that his friendship with Epstein ended only because Epstein hired employees out from under him.
'That's not helping you, dude! Going out of your way to explain that you cut ties with a monster not because he was a monster, but because he hired people away from you makes you sound even worse,' said Meyers. 'That's like saying you stopped inviting Charles Manson to parties because he wouldn't use a coaster.'
Asked on the flight back from Scotland if the workers Epstein hired away from Trump were young women, the president responded: 'Well, I don't want to say, but everyone knows the people who were taken. And the concept of taking people who work for me is bad.' He then confirmed that they were indeed young women who worked at the spa – 'a great spa, one of the best spas in the world'.
Meyers just laughed – 'If this were a Law & Order episode, right about here is where Trump's attorney would turn to Jack McCoy and say, 'He doesn't say any more until we have a deal.''
On the Late Show, Stephen Colbert reacted to news that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is seeking to throw out the 'endangerment finding' from 2009 that found that greenhouse gases endanger health and public welfare. Eliminating the rule will allow the Trump administration to scrap rules to reduce climate pollution from cars and trucks.
'OK, but you're the Environmental Protection Agency. You're supposed to protect the environment!' Colbert fumed. 'You're just giving up? This explains why Woodsy Owl has updated his catchphrase to: 'Why give a hoot? I'm just filling my pockets with rocks and walking into the river like Virginia Woolf.''
Trump's EPA head, Lee Zeldin, appeared on Fox News with the energy secretary, Chris Wright, to push back on what they see as a 'climate change hoax'. 'The goal is to restore confidence in science and data and rationalism,' Wright said. 'That is what enabled the creation of modern science, then we slid back into this kind of cancel culture, Orwellian squelching of science.'
'Nice try, fellas, but it makes it hard to dismiss global warming when you're sharing the screen with a heat index of 126 degrees in Missouri,' Colbert responded.
In 'more proof' that 'the Earth is mad at us,' there was also a powerful 8.8 magnitude earthquake off the coast of Russia's eastern Kamchatka peninsula. There were only a few injuries, despite the fact that the quake occurred along Russia's so-called 'megathrust' fault line. 'Yes, the Megathrust Fault, which is right next to Humpmaster Canyon and the Cape of I Had a Big Dinner, Can We Just Watch Gilded Age?' Colbert joked.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
14 minutes ago
- Reuters
Ghislaine Maxwell says she opposes release of grand jury material
NEW YORK, Aug 5 (Reuters) - Ghislaine Maxwell, the former girlfriend of the late financier Jeffrey Epstein who was convicted in 2021 of helping him sexually abuse teenage girls, said on Tuesday she opposed the potential release of transcripts of proceedings before the grand jury that indicted her. President Donald Trump last month instructed Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek the release of the Epstein and Maxwell grand jury material, as he sought to quell discontent from his base of conservative supporters and congressional Democrats over his administration's handling of documents from the cases. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence after being convicted of sex trafficking. Epstein died by suicide in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. He had pleaded not guilty.
The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
What are the pros and cons of introducing digital identity cards?
The prime minister is said to be 'seriously considering' a national system of digital identification, both to make it easier to access online services, including government ones, and to clamp down on illegal working by irregular migrants. Given the push to introduce artificial intelligence in so many areas of our lives, it may be an idea whose time has come. But there are political, as well as practical, complications. What is digital ID? It would in essence be a virtual ID card, and using it in the existing, and enhanced, Government Gateway would make it easier for people to manage everything from tax records and social security entitlements to driving licences, education, citizenship and probate – a vast array of areas in which the individual has dealings with the state. It could also be used, as a passport or driving licence is now, to help with all sorts of other activities, such as banking or getting a job. There is a separate, and obviously sensitive, question about whether digital ID should also encompass someone's medical history, voluntarily or otherwise. Why digital ID now? According to the briefings, the aim is to reduce the cost and increase the efficiency of the government machine, so that, for example, people don't have to spend hours on hold when contacting a government agency. Unavoidably, though, it is also a way to detect people who shouldn't be in the country or working in the UK. That, the theory goes, means less of a 'pull factor' for certain sorts of migrant. Would it work? In a sense it is working already, in that almost everyone must have a unique tax reference, a national insurance number, a driving licence number, an NHS number and so on, and can, if they wish, share this information with others. But at the moment the system is compartmentalised and clunky, even if more and more interactions are taking place online and with chatbots. What stage are we at? Reports emanating from a 'senior minister' say that the prime minister has ordered a 'comprehensive and expansive look' at the proposal: 'Keir is leading on it,' they said. 'This is a serious piece of work. After a year in government, it is clear that technology is underpinning everything. Digital ID is foundational. Things are moving forward.' Didn't we have identity cards before? They were introduced as plain cardboard documents during the Second World War as a national security measure. People had to use them to get rationed food and petrol, and had to be ready to produce them on demand, a serious infringement of the traditional British way of doing things. The request for 'Papers, please' has always been regarded as an alien phenomenon. In the words of Boris Johnson in 2004: 'If I am ever asked, on the streets of London, or in any other venue, public or private, to produce my ID card as evidence that I am who I say I am ... then I will take that card out of my wallet and physically eat it in the presence of whatever emanation of the state has demanded that I produce it.' (He subsequently brought in compulsory photo ID for elections.) Even now, a driver stopped by the police is granted 14 days to produce their driving licence at a police station. The wartime measures were resented, and were abolished in 1952. Mandatory ID would be a minor revolution. What about the ID cards Tony Blair wanted? He still does, by the way. Much of the present momentum for change comes from the Tony Blair Institute (TBI), as if the former PM has never given up the struggle. At any rate, the current prime minister's chief aide, Morgan McSweeney, commissioned the TBI to produce proposals, and is said to be 'forceful' in making the case for them to No 10. Certainly, a more primitive version of this project was very much 'on the cards 20 years ago' when the Blair administration tried to bring in ID cards, but it ran into enormous resistance and administrative problems. The motives, in essence, were no different from today. In 2003, the then home secretary, David Blunkett, argued that cards with biometric data were needed so that 'people don't work if they are not entitled to work, they don't draw on services which are free in this country, including health, unless they are entitled to', and that 'when we find people we can identify quickly that they are not entitled and get them out'. When a limited, entirely voluntary ID card was introduced in 2010, some 15,000 were in circulation, but the incoming Conservative-Liberal Democrat government scrapped the entire scheme, after £5bn had been spent. A voluntary biometric residence permit is available as an option for foreign students or workers. Official photo ID cards for voting have also been introduced in recent years. What does the opposition say? Despite showing little interest in it while in government, earlier this year the shadow home secretary, Chris Philp, conceded that digital ID could help tackle 'illegal' immigration. But Nigel Farage remains stubbornly libertarian, and opposes digital ID because he 'doesn't trust this government' and claims that it 'hurts law-abiding citizens'. Labour, and the Tories, could use his reluctance to argue that, given he is not prepared to use every possible measure in the fight against irregular migration, Farage wouldn't succeed in his own ambition to stop the boats. Will it happen? With 40 Labour backbenchers recently calling for change and the Conservatives warming to the idea, alongside the trend towards digitising everything, it feels pretty inevitable, like it or not. Will it work? To some extent, but there are ways to get around any system, and digital is no different from paper in that respect. It could make things worse for some. If a fraudster managed to 'steal' a vulnerable person's digital ID, for example, then it would be 'open sesame' on their entire life, and comprehensive identity theft might become more common. Leaks cannot be ruled out. There's also the grim possibility that a migrant who wanted to come to the UK to work, deprived of any ID, would just melt into the underground economy, and become even more exposed to crime and exploitation. In a worst-case scenario, some criminals or a malign foreign government could execute a mega-hack in which millions of people's data is stolen or frozen and held to ransom. Last, we must reflect on British governments' past lamentable record on grand digital integration schemes – and the fact that the current proposal, which would potentially bring together HMRC, the DWP, the DVLA, the Passport Office, criminal records, local authority records, and the NHS database, would be hugely more ambitious, and hazardous, than anything attempted before.
The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘Has to sting': MTG turned on GOP after Trump snubbed her ambitions to be governor, expert says
Donald Trump 's apparent reluctance to publicly back Georgia Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene 's gubernatorial bid triggered her potential break with the GOP, according to an expert. Once one of the president's most loyal supporters, Greene ramped up her anti-Republican rhetoric over the weekend, claiming that she had become disillusioned with the party and questioned its treatment of female politicians. In an interview with the Daily Mail, the conservative firebrand blasted the Trump administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, criticized U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities in June and condemned Israel over its actions in Gaza. Gabby Birenbaum, The Texas Tribune 's Washington correspondent, pointed to one possible source of Greene's fury: her reported ambitions to run for Georgia governor and Trump's lack of public support. 'I think part of the subtext here, right, is she wanted to run for higher office in Georgia, and reportedly he discouraged her,' she told CNN Tuesday morning. 'I mean, I'm sure that has to sting if you're her.' In public, Greene has maintained that she 'has always been Trump's most outspoken ally,' and there is no 'break' between her and the president. Greene announced last Tuesday (July 29) that she will not run for governor next November, citing a desire to focus on her district and a growing frustration with what she called Georgia's 'good ole boy' political system. 'I am humbled and grateful by the massive statewide support that I have to run for Governor, and if I wanted to run we all know I would win,' she wrote in a lengthy X post. 'It's not even debatable.' Weeks before shutting down rumors surrounding a potential gubernatorial bid, Greene pulled her name out of the race for the U.S. Senate seat up for grabs held by Democratic Senator Jon Ossoff. The Congresswoman was reportedly under fire from GOP colleagues – including Trump – who were concerned she might win big at the conservative primary but come up short in a general election. Trump's political team commissioned a poll that showed Greene losing a potential Senate race in Georgia by double digits, sources told the Wall Street Journal last month. The president reportedly shared the result with Greene to discourage her from running in 2026, the sources added.
