Three-quarters of UN members support Palestinian statehood
The Israel-Hamas war, raging in Gaza since the Palestinian militant group's attack on October 7, 2023, has revived a global push for Palestinians to be given a state of their own.
The action breaks with a long-held view that Palestinians could only gain statehood as part of a negotiated peace with Israel.
According to an AFP tally, at least 145 of the 193 UN members now recognise or plan to recognise a Palestinian state, including France, Canada and Britain.
Here is a quick recap of the Palestinians' quest for statehood:
1988: Arafat proclaims state
On November 15, 1988, during the first Palestinian intifada, or uprising against Israeli rule, Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat unilaterally proclaimed an independent Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital.
He made the announcement in Algiers at a meeting of the exiled Palestinian National Council, which adopted the two-state solution as a goal, with independent Israeli and Palestinian states existing side-by-side.
Minutes later, Algeria became the first country to officially recognise an independent Palestinian state.
Within a week, dozens of other countries, including much of the Arab world, India, Turkey, most of Africa and several central and eastern European countries followed suit.
The next wave of recognitions came in late 2010 and early 2011, at a time of crisis for the Middle East peace process.
South American countries, including Argentina, Brazil and Chile, answered calls by the Palestinians to endorse their statehood claims.
This came in response to Israel's decision to end a temporary ban on Jewish settlement-building in the occupied West Bank.
2011-2012: UN recognition
In 2011, with peace talks at a standstill, the Palestinians pushed ahead with a campaign for full UN membership.
The quest failed, but in a groundbreaking move on October 31 of that year, the UN cultural agency UNESCO voted to accept the Palestinians as a full member, much to the dismay of Israel and the United States.
In November 2012, the Palestinian flag was raised for the first time at the United Nations in New York after the General Assembly overwhelmingly voted to upgrade the status of the Palestinians to "non-member observer state".
Three years later, the International Criminal Court also accepted the Palestinians as a state party.
2024-2025 new push
Israel's offensive in Gaza after the October 7, 2023 attack has boosted support for Palestinian statehood.
Four Caribbean countries (Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago, Barbados and the Bahamas) and Armenia took the diplomatic step in 2024.
So did four European countries: Norway, Spain, Ireland and Slovenia, the latter three EU members.
Within the European Union, this was a first in 10 years since Sweden's move in 2014, which resulted in years of strained relations with Israel.
Other member states, such as Poland, Bulgaria and Romania, had already done so in 1988, long before joining the EU.
On the other hand, some former Eastern bloc countries, such as Hungary and the Czech Republic, do not or no longer recognise a state of Palestine.
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Monday that "Australia will recognise the right of the Palestinian people to a state of their own" at the UN General Assembly.
France said last month it intends to recognise a Palestinian state come September, while Britain said it would do the same unless Israel takes "substantive steps", including agreeing to a ceasefire in Gaza.
Canada also plans to recognise a Palestinian state in September, Prime Minister Mark Carney said, marking a dramatic policy shift that was immediately rejected by Israel.
Among other countries that could also formally express recognition, Malta, Finland and Portugal have raised the possibility.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
35 minutes ago
- The National
France's complete withdrawal from West Africa should worry the rest of the world
Last month, France's armed forces finished dismantling their bases in Senegal, the last West African country to have hosted a permanent French military presence. The withdrawal marked the final chapter of a French retreat from the region that began in Mali in 2022 and was followed by closures in Burkina Faso, Chad and Niger. At first, the pressure on Paris seemed to have been driven by the rise of new rulers in the Sahel and their growing frustrations with the French regional counterterrorism operation called Barkhane. However, the momentum eventually extended beyond the Sahel to include countries such as the Ivory Coast, Gabon and Senegal. Paris now maintains only one permanent military outpost in Africa – in Djibouti. From a French standpoint, this highlights the necessity to reduce the country's global military footprint. Given the refocus on European security amid the war in Ukraine, France could no longer afford this costly presence. As one high-ranking defence official told me last month, 'the Ukraine war leaves us no bandwidth for anything else'. France is not the only western power to withdraw from the region. Since last September, the US military has also left Niger. Like Paris, Washington's presence in Africa is now limited to a base in Djibouti. The departure of western forces from the Sahel and surrounding countries builds on a shared regional desire to part ways with former colonial powers and chart their own trajectories. But even as they begin new chapters, new questions emerge for their governments. There is little doubt that western forces failed to defeat terrorist groups based in the region. But without their support, local militaries have struggled to stem the rising tide of extremism, forcing their political masters to turn elsewhere for help. Enter Russia and Turkey, both of which are providing security assistance to these countries, although the nature and extent of their respective partnerships remain unclear. Russia initially increased its footprint in Africa primarily through the deployment of the Wagner Group in countries like the Central African Republic, Chad, Mali and Burkina Faso. However, after a failed mutiny led by the group's founder, Yevgeny Prigozhin, against Moscow in August 2023, its influence has declined. Given the demands of the war in Ukraine, a surge in Russian troops in West Africa is unlikely. The Kremlin has instead sought to replace Wagner with a paramilitary group called the Africa Corps. Meanwhile, Ankara's ties with several West African countries have grown in earnest over the past three years, particularly in arms sales. Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger have procured the well-known Turkish Bayraktar TB2 drone, and Turkey's defence industry has delivered armoured vehicles and light attack aircraft to local militaries. While it isn't clear what role the Turkish private security company Sadat is playing in the region, Ankara has acknowledged having negotiated access to a military base in Chad. Nonetheless, this does not amount to a robust deployment of troops. In other words, even as the aforementioned West African countries are diversifying their respective security arrangements, these new partnerships do not compensate for the co-operation frameworks they once had with western countries like France and the US. In addition to the uncertainties of security assistance, the cutting of US development aid is equally worrisome. The current US administration's decision to close USAID has had direct implications for West Africa, where governments rely heavily on foreign aid. More than a third of government spending in countries like Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger has traditionally come from international assistance. History teaches us that the collapse of governance and the unchecked rise of terrorism in one region eventually spreads to others The severe reduction of US support will undoubtedly affect the ability of these states to provide basic services. Underdevelopment and misgovernance are already fuelling the growth of terrorism in West Africa. For years, terrorist groups have found new recruits in the rural areas abandoned by local governments. For sure, the emphasis placed on military-centric responses by France and the US, through counterinsurgency operations, did not bring about enduring stability. But the inability of key West African governments to address the social and economic grievances of their populations perpetuates this predicament. Today, all indicators point to an increase in terrorist attacks across West Africa. In Burkina Faso, it is believed that groups like Al Qaeda and ISIS control 40 per cent of the territory. In Mali, military bases are constantly under attack from these groups. The rise of Jamaat Nusrat Al Islam Wal Muslimin – a coalition of extremist factions that includes a local branch of Al Qaeda – reflects this trend. Though JNIM emerged in Mali, it now conducts operations across the region, including in Togo, Benin and the Ivory Coast. JNIM claimed more than 240 attacks in the first half of this year alone, double the number for the same period last year. None of this bodes well for West Africa, which can now be considered the centre of terrorist operations worldwide. For now, governments in the West and the Middle East may consider this to be a regional issue, and one that does not affect their security interests. However, history teaches us that the collapse of governance and the unchecked rise of terrorism in one region eventually spreads to others. The rest of the world will do well to pay heed.
Zawya
an hour ago
- Zawya
India PM Modi likely to meet Trump in US next month, newspaper reports
NEW DELHI: Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is likely to meet President Donald Trump during a visit to the United States next month to attend the UN General Assembly meeting, the Indian Express newspaper reported on Wednesday, citing sources. Reuters could not immediately verify the information outside business hours. The General Assembly kicks off on Sept 9, but the annual meeting of heads of state and government will be held from Sept 23-29. Although the reason for the potential visit will be to attend the UN meeting in New York, a key objective will be to hold talks with Trump and iron out trade and tariff issues that have led to some souring of ties between the two countries, the newspaper reported. News of a possible Modi trip to the U.S. comes days after Trump announced an additional 25% tariff on Indian goods to penalise New Delhi for continuing to buy Russian oil. The penalty took the total levy on Indian goods exported to the U.S. to 50%, among the highest levied on any U.S. trading partner. Trade talks between New Delhi and Washington collapsed after five rounds of negotiations over disagreement on opening India's vast farm and dairy sectors and stopping Russian oil purchases. On Tuesday, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said several large trade agreements were still waiting to be completed, including with Switzerland and India, but New Delhi had been "a bit recalcitrant" in talks with Washington. Bessent told Fox Business Network's "Kudlow" he hoped the Trump administration could wrap up its trade negotiations by the end of October. "That's aspirational, but I think we are in a good position," he said, adding " I think we can be, we will have agreed on substantial terms with all the substantial countries."
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
How Italy adopted a harsher tone on Israel amid public anger over Gaza war
Italy, a close Israeli ally in the EU, has adopted a harsher tone on the country in recent weeks as domestic pressure from public opinion over the war in Gaza mounts. Defence Minister Guido Crosetto this week condemned Israel's intention to occupy Gaza city, saying the country's cabinet had "lost its reason and humanity". Recently pressed by pro-Palestine activists to "say a word about the genocide", Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni responded that she "worked every day on the Palestine genocide", in apparent acknowledgement of a hotly contested term that is rejected by Israel and the US. With a population estimated at 59 million, Italy is the EU's third-largest economy. Its position is closely scrutinised as any shift in the bloc's bigger countries could influence discussions over an EU vote in Brussels on imposing sanctions on Israel. "The political class, which has been rather silent over the past two years, senses that is no longer strategic to remain silent," said Maria Luisa Fantappie, a programme head at the Institute of International Affairs in Rome. "They are feeling pressure from the bottom." Ms Meloni is regarded as one of US President Donald Trump's strongest allies in Europe and has rarely publicly backed policy at odds with his. Yet she also has to reckon with polls showing that support for Israel is at an all-time low. A June YouGov survey found that at six per cent, Italians scored the lowest when asked if Israel had responded proportionally to the October 7 attacks, compared to Germans, Danes, French and Spanish. Italy has rarely taken pioneering positions in foreign policy issues in the past decades Head of Africa and Middle East Programme at Istituto Affari Internazionali in Rome In a phone call with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, Ms Meloni on Monday expressed her "deep concern" over Israel's plans to occupy Gaza city after 22 months of war. Israel's military operation has killed 61,599 Palestinians after about 1,200 people died in a Hamas-led attack against Israel. Comparison to Putin Yet the Italian cabinet is unlikely to translate its change in tone to policy as it probably wants to stay aligned with the US, analysts have told The National. Kelly Petillo, programme manager for the Middle East and North Africa at the European Council on Foreign Relations, described Mr Crosetto's statements on Monday as "the toughest so far expressed by a member of the Meloni government." Mr Crosetto, a harsh Russian critic, told the daily La Stampa that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had adopted methods that had become "dangerously similar" to those of Russian President Vladimir Putin in Ukraine. His comments were probably motivated by the fact that even within Israel's defence establishment there is reportedly no support for the recently announced new plan to take over Gaza, Ms Petillo said. Experts expressed doubt that Italy would lift its opposition to a suspension, even partially, of the EU-Israel Association Agreement, which would represent the most meaningful step taken at a co-ordinated level against Israel. Ms Meloni, who last month visited Algeria, takes pride in engaging diplomatically with Arab states. She is perpetuating an Italian tradition, adopted previously by centrist governments, of not displeasing the US and keeping business and diplomatic ties with Israel, Ms Fantappie said. "Italy has rarely taken pioneering positions in foreign policy issues in the past decades," she added. No Palestine state recognition Italy also appears to be no closer to recognising Palestinian statehood, despite a push by France which has so far convinced G7 countries such as Canada and the UK, as well as Australia. Rome's position remains steadfast, although Italy was one of the 17 states that took part in a two-state solution conference in New York last month, led by Saudi Arabia and France. "Italy is keen for recognition to have an impact but is aware that if Washington doesn't change tack, then Israel will not either and to Italy this means recognising Palestine will not have impact," Ms Petillo said. Recognising a Palestinian state does not equate with endorsing sanctions against Israel, Ms Fantappie highlighted. "Supporting the Global Alliance for a two-solution doesn't necessarily mean and entail a substantial revision of their own relation to Israel," she said. France, which has led the initiative, has also shied away from imposing sanctions on Israel, and has said it would not enforce an ICC arrest warrant against Mr Netanyahu. The latest and most controversial move to be taken by a European country was Germany's decision to partially suspend weapons exports to Israel. Germany views Israel's security as "reason of state" because of its responsibility in the Holocaust, and its weapons exports represent about one third of Israel's military purchases. The decision caused criticism among some politicians in Chancellor Friedrich Merz's political party. Mr Merz has defended his decision, saying his country could not supply weapons in a conflict in which hundreds or thousands could be killed. Neither Italy nor Germany have clarified their position on the EU Commission's recent proposal to partially suspend Israel from a flagship research programme, Horizon. Although the move is widely described as symbolic, it would be the first concrete step at EU level against Israel, and is supported by countries, including France and The Netherlands. For now, it appears that Italy and Germany are watching each other closely. "Italy is watching Germany's posturing very carefully and might indeed shift its position if Berlin does too in a substantial way – which at this stage is still uncertain it will happen," Ms Petillo said.
