The Chancellor courting China signals a craven betrayal of British interests and human rights
The list of human rights abuses perpetrated by the People's Party is both lengthy and indefensible. From the grave persecution and reprisals faced by government critics and those who fight for human rights to the stringent censorship of Chinese citizens and quashing of freedom of expression and association, repression in China is only intensifying.
State-sanctioned abuse against Uyghurs and other Turkic Muslims in Xinjiang persists – as does the continued repression of pro-democracy activists in Hong Kong. Forced organ harvesting perpetrated against religious minorities remains one of the most barbaric and sickening examples of abuse imaginable.Moreover, there is the espionage committed by agents of the Chinese state around the world. The Chinese embassy in London recently urged the UK to 'stop creating trouble' after Yang Tengbo – a businessman accused of spying on us on their behalf was barred from the country. The controversy unsurprisingly revived demands for the UK to classify China as a national security threat. However, with Reeves apparently cosying up to them, it feels like we are moving in the opposite direction.Yes, Reeves is right to point out that China is both our fourth-largest single trading partner and the world's second-largest economy. But this neither negates nor alleviates the grave threat to national security that China presents.
Reeves has promised to challenge China, saying she raised during her recent trip 'issues around human rights, forced labour, Hong Kong and Jimmy Lai, and around the sanctioning of parliamentarians'.
But one cannot help but wonder what truly goes on behind doors in such negotiations - and whether the chancellor or the wider UK government takes China's track record of human rights violations as seriously as they should. UK leaders have long excelled at paying homage to democratic principles and human rights but this so often amounts to lip service and empty promises.Since taking office last July, Labour has made no secret of its eagerness to improve our relationship with China. But such efforts have also been marked by an apparent dearth of consternation and anger at the regime's grisly catalogue of human rights abuses.
Take the weaponisation of Interpol red notices. Red Notices are designed to be alerts to track down serious criminals but the mechanisms have been weaponised by Beijing as a tool of transnational repression. In turn, they have been wielded to target individuals who have escaped the regime's repression - with human rights defenders and political dissidents among them.Such persecution is at times deeply rooted in ideology and those Chinese who have become successful in business and subsequently 'westernised' have found themselves punished. Being targeted by a Red Notice is life-changing - your assets can be frozen, you can face travel bans, and most irrevocably of all, your reputation can be profoundly damaged. Such harm can outlive the notice being withdrawn because it is found to be unwarranted. To sum up, China's sophisticated manipulation of Interpol's system of red notices is unparalleled - and its misuse poses a far-reaching danger to international law enforcement. Its successful infiltration of a global institution like Interpol is a tell-tale sign of the authoritarian regime's swelling power and control. The UK government – which gives substantial funding to Interpol – must demand reform of the institution.There is also the issue of cyberattacks. In 2020, the US Department of Justice announced criminal charges against Chinese nationals after a campaign of attacks aimed at governments and businesses.
If the UK government remains intent on pursuing economic ties with China, it will have to keep its eyes wide open. Unsurprisingly, concerns have been raised about the security risk posed by China's plans to build a new 600,000-square-foot embassy in London – both Foreign Secretary David Lammy and Home Secretary Yvette Cooper have signalled their support for the mega-embassy. But the threat which China presents does not just exist in cyberspace, with Chinese nationals even assaulted here in the UK. Take the case of Consul General Zheng Xiyuan assaulting a Hong Kong protester inside the grounds of the Chinese consulate in Manchester back in 2022.
Reeves's opening to China signals a craven betrayal of human rights and of British interests.
Ben Keith is a lawyer with extensive background in international criminal and human rights law
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
24 minutes ago
- USA Today
US stock futures higher as investors digest earnings, tariffs
U.S. stock futures are higher as investors digested earnings, tariffs and what President Donald Trump's pick to replace an outgoing Federal Reserve governor may mean for the economy, interest rates and Bitcoin. Trump chose Stephen Miran, who chairs the White House's Council of Economic Advisers, to serve the roughly six months remaining in the term of former Fed Governor Adriana Kugler, who resigned on Aug. 1. Miran has been a critic of the Fed and a supporter of Bitcoin. Meanwhile, Expedia, Pinterest, Sweetgreen and Instacart were among the companies that reported after the bell. General Motors also said it would continue to buy Chinese batteries for its electric vehicles despite tariffs. At 6 a.m. ET, futures linked to the blue-chip Dow rose 0.18%, while the broad S&P 500 futures added 0.27% and tech-laden Nasdaq futures gained 0.30%. Corporate news Cryptocurrency Stephen Miran, chair of the Council of Economic Advisors and Trump's pick to replace Adriana Kugler as a Fed governor, is a Bitcoin supporter. He has publicly posted supportive comments on social media 'I think that crypto has a big role potentially to play in innovation and ushering in another Trump Administration economic boom,' he previously stated. Medora Lee is a money, markets, and personal finance reporter at USA TODAY. You can reach her at mjlee@ and subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday morning.


Bloomberg
25 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
China Defends Buying Russian Oil After Trump's Tariff Threat
China said its imports of Russian oil are justified, pushing back against US threats of new tariffs after Washington slapped secondary levies on India for buying energy from Moscow. 'It is legitimate and lawful for China to conduct normal economic, trade and energy cooperation with all countries around the world, including Russia,' the Chinese Foreign Ministry said Friday in a statement to Bloomberg News. 'We will continue to adopt reasonable energy security measures in accordance with our national interests.'


Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Space Race 2.0
With help from Connor O'Brien and Alex Nieves WELCOME TO POLITICO PRO SPACE. NASA interim administrator Sean Duffy made a splash this week with his first directives at the agency, including advancing plans for a nuclear reactor on the moon. What's your opinion of the new administrator? Should President Donald Trump just keep him in the post or continue the search for a permanent head? Email me at sskove@ with tips, pitches and feedback, and find me on X at @samuelskove. And remember, we're offering this newsletter for free over the next few weeks. After that, only POLITICO Pro subscribers will receive it. Read all about it. The Spotlight The Pentagon has poured millions of dollars into preparing for a threat from Beijing on land and at sea. But U.S. officials increasingly worry they're missing the chance to tackle another big risk: China in space. Rep. Brian Babin (R-Texas), chair of the committee that oversees NASA, warned this week that American astronauts might land on the moon and be greeted by a 'no trespassing' sign in Mandarin if the U.S. doesn't step up. Some of the rhetoric is akin to orbital debris. But the U.S. does face challenges from China in both military and commercial space. Beijing could weaponize satellites and other tools to prevent the U.S. from helping Taiwan — or anyone else — in a conflict. And if the Chinese government plants a flag on the moon, it could bar American access to lucrative new resources on the lunar surface. China ascendant: Beijing is second only to America in its vast array of space capabilities, according to Chinese space expert Blaine Curcio. And, in some cases, it now surpasses the U.S. For example, China in July attempted the first-ever satellite refueling in orbit. China is also figuring out how to knock out satellites that allow the U.S. to communicate in the Pacific, said Dean Cheng, a nonresident fellow at the Space Policy Institute. 'The Chinese have been very carefully and assiduously developing an array of military counter space options.' But the commercial use of many space tools makes it harder to figure out what's actually a threat. Chinese satellites that can move debris, for instance, may also be able to eviscerate an American satellite. 'China isn't big on transparency,' said Victoria Samson, a space expert at the Secure World Foundation, a space-focused think tank. Moon dance: China also has plans to land an astronaut on the moon by 2030 and set up a permanent base. Such a move would dent American prestige, as it would no longer be the only nation to land on the lunar surface. It would also allow Beijing to write the terms for potentially lucrative space exploration. 'We're in a race to the moon, in a race with China to the moon,' Duffy said Tuesday at a press conference. China already has shown it can pull off complex uncrewed lunar missions. Beijing recently used its Chang'e 6 to land a rover on the moon and return samples to Earth. The U.S. aims to return to the lunar surface in 2027, before China gets there. But the timeline has slipped before due to spacecraft issues, and it could happen again. Room for hope: Beijing has been less successful when it comes to the commercial sector, which the U.S. dominates. Think reusable rockets and low-earth satellite constellations such as Starlink. This is despite the Chinese government's effort to supercharge the growth of a commercial space sector through investments and other support, such as free land or factory space. But so far, there are more companies than space services. 'You have this absence of real demand,' Curcio said. 'And then you've also had all this government money coming in and creating oversupply in some situations.' The high number of companies may also dilute the ability of any single firm since they're competing for the same specialized engineering talent, he said. 'You're not going to really have a critical mass of highly talented rocket scientists working for any one company.' Galactic Government SpaceX vs. California: The fight between Elon Musk's SpaceX and the California agency tasked with protecting the state's coastline is back on. Space Force officials will stand in front of the California Coastal Commission next week with a plan to double the company's rocket launches from Vandenberg Space Force Base from 50 to 95 per year. And the agency staff is recommending commissioners reject it. 'The simple fact remains that it is a privately owned company engaged in activities primarily for its own commercial business,' staff said in a Friday report. 'It is not a public federal agency or conducting its launches on behalf of the federal government.' That argument mirrors commissioners' pushback in October when they rejected an increase from 36 to 50 launches. SpaceX sued the agency for bias after members cited Musk's politics. Space Force ultimately moved forward with the increase, citing federal preemption and national security considerations. SpaceX did not respond to a request for comment. Space Launch Delta 30 Commander Col. James T. Horne III, who oversees Vandenberg and Western operations, noted the military's 'unwavering commitment to preserving the California coastline' and said its partnership with SpaceX allows the agency to maintain 'its technological edge and strategic advantage over competitors.' Military SPACE FORCE GETS NEW NO. 2: The Space Force has a new no. 2 officer on the job. The Senate quietly approved Gen. Shawn Bratton for vice chief of space operations last week and promoted him to a four-star general before leaving town until September. He officially took over on July 31, the same day he was confirmed. Bratton succeeds Gen. Michael Guetlein, who was approved in July to oversee the nascent — and nebulous — Golden Dome missile defense shield. Bratton was most recently the Space Force's deputy chief for strategy, plans, programs and requirements. That made him a key player in the development of the recently released Space Warfighting Framework, the service's blueprint for how it would conduct war in space. He was also the first commander of the Space Training and Readiness Command, which leads training for the Space Force. He began his military career as an enlisted member of the Arizona Air National Guard. Bratton was part of a larger tranche of officers whose promotions were confirmed before the Senate recessed. The Reading Room At missile defense conference, the first rule of Golden Dome is don't talk about Golden Dome: Breaking Defense SpaceX signs deal to fly Italian experiments to Mars on Starship's 1st commercial Red Planet flights: New report details Trump DoD's space spending spree: Payload NASA's new chief has radically rewritten the rules for private space stations: Ars Technica Firefly Aerospace Surges 45% After Upsized $868 Million IPO: Bloomberg Duffy to announce nuclear reactor on the moon: POLITICO Event Horizon SUNDAY: The 39th Annual Small Satellite Conference begins. Photo of the Week