Stripe 疑拒 LGBTQ+內容付款 遭投訴後指客服資訊錯誤 致歉並調查事件｜Yahoo
Steam 成人內容遊戲下架
早前線上遊戲平台Stream 下架大量涉成人內容的遊戲，Visa 及 Mastercard 亦自去年起要求部分平台下架特定主題成人內容。Stripe早前亦指，將不支援用於線上出售成人內容。但近日有 Stripe 用戶投訴指，在出售「非露骨、合法、非成人的LGBT內容」時，同樣無法使用，致電客服投訴時，獲得的回覆是「禁令已擴大至所有 LGBTQ+ 內容 - 包括非成人或非露骨性質的內容」。當用戶詢問被禁原因，客服已掛線。
廣告
廣告
— Mostlycogent (@mostlycogent.bsky.social) 2025年8月13日 清晨5:22
Same during my call- the wording I used was 'non-explicit, legal, non-adult LGBT content', and I got back the response that 'yes, stripe is blocking this. We're a private company, we make our own rules about it.' Was hung up on when I asked why.
Stripe 發言人回覆 BBC 查詢回應事件，表示支援團隊提供的資訊「完全是錯誤的」，Stripe 表示，並沒有禁止出售 LGBTQ+ 內容或商品，「我們正在調查此事，並確保未來的查詢能得到正確答案。」
來源：BBC
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bitcoin miner alleges Stripe cut them off as Trump bans crypto debanking
Bitcoin miner alleges Stripe cut them off as Trump bans crypto debanking originally appeared on TheStreet. A Germany-based Bitcoin mining hardware seller says they have been cut off from processing credit card payments after Stripe allegedly closed their account. The business, posting under the handle Solomining on X, says the move came shortly after Shopify's built-in payments service banned them from selling mining equipment. 'GM. We just got debanked by Stripe for selling mining hardware,' Solomining wrote. 'Yes, we do accept BTC as payment, but many customers prefer to pay with dirty fiat using their credit card.' Solomining is a Germany-based vendor that sells compact, energy-efficient Bitcoin mining hardware for solo and home mining setups. The miner said Stripe was their second choice after losing Shopify Payments. 'It is about the credit card payments processing on the Shopify checkout, not about the banking itself. My conventional business bank is totally fine with my business and will not debank me,' they clarified. Executive order in the United States targets Operation Chokepoint 2.0 The timing of the claim is notable because just days earlier United States President Donald Trump signed an executive order called Fair Banking for All Americans. The directive bans US banks and payment processors from refusing services to crypto companies on political or arbitrary grounds. The order is designed to dismantle what the industry has dubbed 'Operation Chokepoint 2.0' — an alleged Biden-era push to pressure financial institutions into cutting off services to digital asset firms. The White House said the move ensures regulators cannot engage in 'politicized or unlawful debanking.' However, because Solomining is based in Germany, the new rules offer no direct protection. 'We're located in Germany, not the US. So this won't help us,' the account owner responded when advised about the executive order. Personal and political backdrop Trump's order comes after years of political debate on the issue. His son Eric Trump has previously claimed in an interview that his own accounts were shut down without explanation and called the incident politically motivated. Since taking office in 2025 Donald Trump has appointed multiple pro-crypto officials to regulatory positions. His administration has rolled back several Biden-era enforcement actions against the industry and permitted crypto investments in 401(k) retirement plans. Limited options outside the United States In the Solomining thread, fellow entrepreneurs suggested alternative processors, including Paystand, and Revolut, though integrating these with Shopify may be complex. Others warned that mining hardware sellers are often flagged as 'high-risk merchants' by card processors, making debanking a persistent risk regardless of jurisdiction. Bitcoin consulting firm BTC DACH 21, based in Germany, said it had faced three bank rejections before finding a partner willing to support its business model. 'You're walking the path we walked a couple years ago,' commented Dutch miner Bitcoin Brabant, who experienced similar account closures in 2022. TheStreet Roundtable reached out to Stripe for comment and will update the story if and when the company responds. Bitcoin miner alleges Stripe cut them off as Trump bans crypto debanking first appeared on TheStreet on Aug 14, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Aug 14, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Forbes
8 hours ago
- Forbes
New $250 Visa Integrity Fee Will Cost US $11 Billion, Say Tourism Officials
Topline U.S. tourism officials say Congress's controversial $250 visa integrity fee will deter international visitors and cost the country nearly $11 billion in lost visitor spending and tax revenue over the next three years. Key Facts The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that the new $250 visa integrity fee will bring in around $27 billion over a decade—or $2.7 billion per year—to U.S. government coffers and reduce the national debt. But a U.S. tourism official told Forbes the fee will instead cost the U.S. economy $11 billion over three years, including $9.4 billion in lost visitor spending and $1.3 billion in lost tax revenue—or about $3.6 billion per year, according to an analysis by Tourism Economics. In addition, the lost revenue will lead to losing 15,000 U.S. travel jobs, according to U.S. tourism industry estimates. How Will The $250 Fee Impact Tourism To The U.s.? The CBO based its estimate solely on the potential revenue generated by the fee itself, while the U.S. tourism industry looked at the macroeconomic impact of implementing the fee, hence the wildly different estimates. The CBO estimated that charging roughly 11 million annual visa applicants $250 apiece would rake in roughly $2.7 billion per year for the State Department. Tourism officials say Congress wrongly assumed the pricey fee would have little impact on the volume of visitation. Tourism Economics, a division of Oxford Economics, estimated that the $250-per-person fee is onerous enough to deter 5.4% of international visitors from coming to the U.S., which would translate to a drop of nearly 1 million fewer visits annually. Fewer visitors translate to less visitor spending, and in turn to lower tax revenue and job losses in the tourism industry, sending a negative ripple effect throughout the national economy. 'By longstanding tradition, the Congressional Budget Office does not incorporate macroeconomic feedback effects into its traditional cost estimates,' a CBO spokesperson told Forbes. 'We didn't specifically do a dynamic analysis of this provision.' In other words, the CBO did not factor in the potential negative economic impact from lower visitor spending, tax revenue and subsequent job cuts—key metrics used by the U.S. tourism industry and the U.S. Commerce Department to evaluate the overall value of tourism to the U.S. economy. 'I think in the minds of congressional leaders, foreign visitors don't vote, so making them pay more to help fund the [Big Beautiful] Bill wouldn't come at any political cost,' Erik Hansen, senior vice president of government relations at the U.S. Travel Association, told Forbes. 'But the problem is it comes at a huge economic cost to American businesses.' What Else Do U.s. Tourism Experts Say Congress Got Wrong? 'Congress made the mistake of assuming that this worldwide visa integrity fee would not have a big impact on visitors from countries like India or Brazil,' Hansen told Forbes. 'This is the exact type of armchair public policymaking that is going to get us into a big mess.' India, in particular, is a 'bright spot' for inbound international travel because visitation numbers have surpassed where they were in 2019, he said, while most other countries are lagging behind their pre-pandemic volume. In 2024, Indian tourists spent roughly $13.3 billion in the U.S., according to the National Travel and Tourism Office, part of the U.S. Commerce Department. 'Applying a $250 fee to a country where travel is growing is mindboggling. It will absolutely deter travel—that's what our research has found,' Hansen said. What Do International Visitors Need To Know About The Visa Integrity Fee? The fee is not actually as 'refundable' as Congress has billed it to be. As written, the Big Beautiful Bill says the State Department 'may reimburse' the fee after the visitor's visa expires, provided that the visa holder has complied with all conditions of the visa. But most visitor visas are valid for 10 years, Hansen pointed out. 'The idea that you're going to give the government money and then wait around 10 years and remember to ask for it back, even if you followed the rules, is just absolutely crazy,' he said. Indeed, to arrive at its projection, the CBO reasoned in its estimate that 'a large number of nonimmigrants would not be eligible to seek reimbursement until several years after paying the fee' so consequently only 'a small number of people would seek reimbursement.' In other words, said Hansen, 'there's a very good understanding that the refund process itself is not going to be easy, and even if it is easy, that a lot of people aren't going to seek that refund after a decade.' Another red flag: The $250 fee was inserted into the Big Beautiful Bill without a plan for processing refunds. In its analysis, the CBO wrote that 'the Department of State would need several years to implement a process for providing reimbursements.' Why Are So Many International Travelers Avoiding The U.s. This Year? In June, a World Travel & Tourism Council (WTTC) analysis of the economic impact of tourism in 184 countries revealed the U.S. was the only country forecast to see international visitor spending decline in 2025, which by some estimates is as much as $29 billion. The root causes of this decline, multiple studies have found, are a combination of President Trump's tariffs, travel bans, inflammatory rhetoric and harsher immigration policies, all which have created a chilling effect on visitors. 'While other nations are rolling out the welcome mat, the U.S. government is putting up the 'closed' sign,' Julia Simpson, president and CEO of WTTC, said in a statement. 'Given we're halfway through the year and we've seen these impacts, we don't know when the stiffest headwind is, but I think it does stay sustained,' Aran Ryan, director of industry studies at Tourism Economics, told Forbes last month. 'We're generally assuming that this persists for a while and that some of it is going to persist throughout the end of the administration.' Simpson characterized the WTTC study as a 'wake-up call for the U.S. government,' adding that 'without urgent action to restore international traveler confidence, it could take several years for the U.S. just to return to pre-pandemic levels of international visitor spend.' Tangent Trump's signature spending bill contains another blow to U.S. tourism. A Senate committee led by Senator Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) slashed the budget of Brand USA, the country's public-private destination marketing organization, from $100 million to $20 million. 'This is another error that Congress has made,' Hansen said, noting that the Trump administration recommended full funding for the organization in its fiscal year 2026 budget. 'We have a big misperception problem among international visitors right now, but Congress cut funding for the one organization that's in charge of setting perceptions and sending a welcoming message about travel to the United States.'
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mastercard policy chief calls Genius stablecoin act a ‘turning point' in push for mainstream use
Mastercard says the US has reached a 'turning point' in stablecoin regulation and digital asset adoption — a moment it's been preparing for over the past few years. The company's head of global policy, Jesse McWaters, cited the passage of the Genius Act as a catalyst for institutional involvement, pointing to a 'new era of regulatory clarity and confidence in digital assets.' Signed into law by President Donald Trump on Friday, the Genius Act allows regulated entities, including banks and corporations, to issue dollar-backed stablecoins if they meet strict reserve, disclosure, and compliance requirements. It is the first crypto-specific legislation to become law in the United States. McWaters said Mastercard has spent years building toward this moment, and emphasised the importance of integrating stablecoins into systems people trust if meaningful adoption is to follow. The law has already prompted movement from major players. Executives at JPMorgan, Citigroup, and Bank of America have signalled plans to enter the stablecoin space. Meanwhile, tech firms like Amazon and Apple are reportedly exploring stablecoin integration into their platforms. Representatives from Circle, Coinbase, Gemini, and Tether attended the bill's signing at the White House. Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino said the new law gives the sector 'a clear regulatory foundation.' Still, the bill remains divisive. Critics have warned it could encourage regulatory arbitrage and give traditional banks an unfair edge over decentralised stablecoin issuers. Others, including Democratic lawmakers, say the law doesn't go far enough to address consumer protection or financial crime risks. Kyle Baird is DL News' Weekend Editor. Got a tip? Email at kbaird@
