Matthew James Dullard fronts SA Supreme Court on attempted police officer murder charge
Mr Dullard was due to enter his pleas on Monday morning to the allegation he tried to murder Brevet Sergeant Mark Woods during a routine traffic stop in March last year.
Police allege Mr Dullard, from Victoria, struck Sergeant Woods with his vehicle on the Barrier Highway at Ucolta, about 250km north of Adelaide, and then fled the scene.
A police chopper tracked him for 45 minutes before police apprehended him.
Sergeant Woods, based at Orroroo, suffered non life-threatening injuries in the alleged hit-and-run and paramedics flew him to Royal Adelaide Hospital for treatment.
Police have charged Mr Dullard with attempted murder, aggravated endangering life, causing harm by dangerous driving and leaving the scene of an accident after causing harm by careless driving.
In his earlier appearances, the court was told the 43-year-old man had been diagnosed with schizophrenia in 2019.
He initially refused to co-operate with either the police or any legal representation.
On Monday, Director of Public Prosecutions Martin Hinton KC asked Justice Julie McIntyre to adjourn the matter for two weeks, telling her he needed time to query a doctor about their report into Mr Dullard's mental competence.
'I've considered the report … I have a number of questions for the doctor,' he said.
'I don't know yet whether in light of the answers to those questions I'll be seeking a further report or will determine to concede mental incompetence.'
Mr Dullard's defence team did not oppose the request and Justice McIntyre listed July 21 for Mr Dullard's arraignment.
Justice McIntyre allowed Mr Dullard to appear by telephone for his next appearance.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
16 hours ago
- ABC News
Port Adelaide Salvage and director found guilty of illegally dumping asbestos
An Adelaide demolition company and its director have been ordered to pay more than $700,000 after being found guilty of breaching the Environment Protection Act. Thousands of tonnes of asbestos-contaminated demolition waste was illegally dumped by Port Adelaide Salvage and its director Maurizio Corsaro in 2017. The waste was discovered by the Environment Protection Authority (EPA) at two seperate sites in Sedan, in the state's Murraylands, and at Houghton, in the Adelaide Hills. The EPA said the waste was discovered after a tip-off and subsequent investigation in 2017, and included timber, bricks and concrete. The land in Houghton was owned by Corsaro, while the EPA said the Sedan sites were owned by members of the public who were not fully aware of its use. The Environment, Resources and Development Court of South Australia found Port Adelaide Salvage and Corsaro guilty of 14 charges. Corsaro was fined $117,500 for operating a waste depot without a licence, hindering and using offensive or threatening language towards an EPA officer, assaulting an EPA officer and failing to comply with a clean-up order. Port Adelaide Salvage was fined $170,000. Both have been ordered to pay prosecution costs of $26,987, and entered into an agreement with the EPA to pay back $400,000 in clean-up costs. In his sentencing remarks in July, Senior Judge Michael Durrant said he was not confident about Corsaro's prospects for rehabilitation. "The offending in this case was done with an awareness of the need for a licence," Mr Durrant said. "It was also done despite the imposition of past penalties. It involved actions for significant commercial gain and it was sophisticated and deceptive. "This offending in this case is a serious example of its type." Mr Durrant said the inherent criminality of the offending was reflected in the sentencing. "Unlawful dumping harms the community and detracts from general amenity and the enjoyment of the community of land," he said. EPA director of compliance Steven Sergi told ABC Radio Regional Drive host Narelle Graham regional areas typically had more illegal dumping than metropolitan areas due to the remoteness of the sites. "Between us and local government, we're quite aware of some of those pockets. "We will target those areas and catch a lot of fines, hence the covert cameras that we use, and really staking out those areas to get as much evidence as we can." Mr Sergi said illegal dumping occurred at various scales across the state; however, offending of this scale were rare. He said it typically included people throwing items such as old mattresses or couches out on roadsides. "Illegal dumping is effectively free riding off the system and local governments, who typically get stuck with the bill of cleaning that up, especially from the side of the road," he said. Port Adelaide Salvage has been contacted for comment.
News.com.au
a day ago
- News.com.au
‘Severely punished': Outrage after jetskiers filmed stalking pod of dolphins at Adelaide beach
A pair of jetskiers have caused outrage after being caught chasing a pod of dolphins at a South Australian beach. The two men were filmed trailing after the dolphins on Sunday near Brighton beach about 45 minutes southwest of Adelaide. Footage showed one of the men following behind the pod of dolphins while another waits behind. A Department for Environment and Water spokesman told NewsWire they were investigating the incident. 'The Department for Environment and Water is investigating an incident where it appeared that jet skiers travelled through a pod of dolphins near Brighton on August 10,' they said. 'In South Australia, jet skis must maintain a distance of at least 300m from marine mammals and is a legal requirement for the safety of both the animals and the jet ski operators.' All marine mammals, including whales, sea lions and dolphins, are protected in SA waters, and those caught causing harm to the marine life risk facing a $100,000 fine or up to two years imprisonment. Speaking to the Adelaide Advertiser, locals said they 'don't need to have that sort of thing along the coastal areas'. 'They should have everything that the law has thrown against them,' he said. 'While it's understandable to want to see animals up close, he said people needed to take care. 'If you're on a jet ski and you see the things, paddle up to them carefully don't chase them.'
News.com.au
a day ago
- News.com.au
Court's stunning apology to South Australian MP over blackmail charges
A South Australian court has apologised for a system error which logged a guilty finding against an ex-MP who was accused of blackmailing Premier Peter Malinauskas. Annabel Digance is suing Mr Malinauskas for damages, claiming he orchestrated a 'malicious prosecution' against her to further his own political ambitions and crush a parliamentary inquiry into alleged bullying in the Labor Party. During a hearing in the South Australian Supreme Court in late July, Justice Graham Dart told the court that Ms Digance and her husband Greg had been found guilty of blackmailing Mr Malinauskas. The court was told their charges were later dropped, according to court records. Ms Digance and her husband Greg were charged with blackmailing Mr Malinauskas in 2021. The SA Courts Administration Authority (CAA) said in a statement on Tuesday that neither Ms or Mr Digance had been found guilty. The court said that in April 2023 a nolle prosequi order was made, meaning the prosecution was abandoned. 'There were no orders made which involved a finding of guilt against either of the defendants,' the court said in a statement. The court said that a document which stated that a finding of guilt had been made was 'generated in error and is incorrect'. 'The CAA unreservedly apologises to the parties for this error,' the court said in a statement. 'The CAA will review all court matters with orders made in the same circumstances to ensure that court records are accurate. 'The CAA will also commission an external assurance review into this matter.' In Ms Digance's statement of claim in her civil lawsuit, she argued that her arrest and prosecution caused 'injury, loss, damage and harm' and that Mr Malinauskas conspired with the SA Police to pursue her. She is suing both the premier and the State of South Australia and is seeking $2.3m in damages. The matter is scheduled to return to court in September.
