Texas Senate passes bills to fight AI-generated sexual images of children, non-consenting adults
AUSTIN (KXAN) — The Texas Legislature is working on several bills that could introduce more protections against AI-generated explicit images used for harassment and the production of child sexual assault materials (CSAM).
February: Bill to protect victims of deepfake 'revenge' porn passes US Senate
The Texas Senate passed three such bills by unanimous votes on Wednesday.
SB 20 and SB 1621 both update the state's statues against the possession of CSAM to include AI-generated content. SB 442 would update state law to consider AI-generated content as potentially unlawful production or distribution of sexually explicit video, if made without the consent of the person it depicts.
NewsNation: What state laws protect kids against AI-generated deepfakes?
Sen. José Menéndez, D-San Antonio, asked prior to the vote on SB 20 if it could take effect sooner than Sept. 1.
'There are not enough negative adjectives out there to describe people that would use a computer software animation or something to depict the child in some form of pornography or obscene visual material,' Menéndez said. 'I would like to see what we could do to get any material or any people that are possessing or creating this material to understand that they're going to be dealt with severely through the criminal justice system, and that we're not going to tolerate this.'
A Texas law can only take immediate effect if more than two-thirds of both chambers vote in favor of the bill's final version.
Sen. Tan Parker, R-Dallas, spoke about SB 20 prior to the vote. He is one of the bill's authors.
'The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence has created powerful tools that, while being beneficial in many areas, are being exploited to produce AI-generated and virtual [CSAM],' Parker said, 'Unlike traditional CSAM, which is already illegal, AI-generated images, videos and deep fakes depicting child exploitation exist in a legal gray area, allowing offenders to create and share disturbing content with impunity. This loophole must be closed immediately.'
In addition to those two bills, the Texas House of Representatives is working on its own legislation to protect against AI misuse.
On Wednesday, the House Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence committee heard testimony about House Bills 421 and 581. Both bills were authored by Rep. Mary González, D-El Paso, who chairs the Texas House LGBTQ Caucus.
HB 421 would allow for victims of AI-generated explicit images to sue the creators of such images. If the lawsuit succeeds, the plaintiff could be rewarded exemplary damages. Rep. Armando Walle, D-Houston, also authored the bill.
HB 581 also creates grounds for lawsuits; this time, against a commercial entity who creates an AI program that can create sexual material harmful to minors, which covers explicit images of adults. Businesses providing explicit AI-generation tools would need to comply with Texas' age verification law and have consent from the person whose likeness is used in the produced image.
González told the committee that the House has 'a responsibility to do something' to combat the use of AI-generated CSAM. She said that her solutions, aimed at companies that create AI tools for explicit image creation, would likely inconvenience some in the tech sector.
'Here's what's happening — a kid, a 12-year-old girl, her picture is taken, and another student uses her picture and creates sexually explicit content. The kid goes to school, it's traumatic,' González said. 'If it stops a 12-year-old girl from being bullied because [someone] had created sexual content about her, then yeah, let's inconvenience some people, because the long term effects are completely harmful and traumatic.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republicans advance measure to ban noncitizens from voting in local DC elections
WASHINGTON — The House advanced a bill to ban noncitizens from voting in local elections in Washington, D.C., marking the latest step from Republicans to crack down on city policies they view as too liberal. Lawmakers voted 268-148 largely along party lines to advance the measure, sending the bill over to the Republican-led Senate for consideration. The bill managed to garner some bipartisan support after 56 Democrats voted in favor. However, the legislation's future is uncertain as it would require seven Democrats to buck party leadership and support the proposal. 'The right to vote is a defining privilege of American citizenship,' House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., said in a speech on the House floor. 'Diluting that right by extending it to noncitizens — whether here legally or illegally — undermines the voice of D.C. residents.' The bill would overturn the Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act, a bill passed by the D.C. Council in 2022 that permits undocumented residents living in Washington to vote in local elections. City lawmakers have defended the measure by pointing to a 'long history of the U.S. allowing noncitizens to vote in local (or) state' elections. Lawmakers also note many of the undocumented residents pay local taxes, support businesses, and attend district schools — arguing that should qualify them to have a say in local elections. However, Republicans have argued that allowing noncitizens to vote in local elections sets a dangerous precedent that could negatively harm local governments. 'Some may wrongly dismiss these as local elections. The reality is local elections are a vital part of our democratic process and have a significant impact on communities,' Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, who led the bill in the House, said in a speech. 'Local elections determine matters such as taxation, the criminal code, and the election of city council members who create essential ordinances, including those that dictate voting rights.' Additionally, Republicans have criticized the law as a way to dilute 'the voice of American citizens.' 'It's also important to acknowledge that many local elections are decided by razor-thin margins underscoring their significance and importance of active participation,' Pfluger said. GOP lawmakers also cited opposition from D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, who withheld her signature from the ordinance but allowed it to take effect. 'Why would my colleagues on the other side of the aisle want foreigners to vote in local elections in Washington, D.C.? What's the purpose?' Pfluger said. 'Free and fair elections are prerequisites for the healthy republic our founding fathers envisioned, with the District of Columbia as the epicenter.' House Republicans passed a bill in 2023 seeking to repeal the D.C. law allowing noncitizens to vote. The bill was spearheaded by Republicans but 52 Democrats ultimately joined all Republicans in approving the bill despite efforts from Democratic leadership to quash the proposal. However, the legislation was never considered in the Senate, which was controlled by Democrats at the time. Despite not being a state, Washington is permitted to operate as an independent city government under the D.C. Home Rule Act. However, local laws are still subject to congressional approval before they can take effect, occasionally setting up showdowns between Congress and local lawmakers. The vote on Tuesday is the first of three bills being considered this week by the House to rein in some of D.C.'s local ordinances. Other proposals being considered would rescind D.C. Council policies allowing city employees to not comply with requests from the Department of Homeland Security or Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Democrats Have Selected Their First Major Candidate Of Trump's Second Term
Rep. Mikie Sherrill won the Democratic primary for governor of New Jersey on Tuesday night, making the former Naval helicopter pilot and federal prosecutor the first statewide Democratic nominee of President Donald Trump's second term in office. Sherrill, a mainstream Democrat who was first elected to the House in 2018, triumphed in a crowded primary, defeating avowed centrist Rep. Josh Gottheimer, Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, Jersey City Mayor Steve Fulop, New Jersey Education Association President Sean Spiller and former state Senate President Steve Sweeney. All six major candidates had substantial financial backing, with almost $88 million spent on television ads between the Democratic and Republican primaries. Sherrill was not the top spender in the race, with only about $12 million in ad support, but she stood out for being the only woman in the field and for convincing voters she was equipped to stand up to Trump. Her closing ads emphasized she had the 'courage to fight' and the 'strength to win.' Though New Jersey is traditionally a solidly blue state, Democrats are not taking the race for granted. Trump made significant gains with the state's working class and Latino voters in the 2024 election, and New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy (D) only narrowly won reelection in 2021. Murphy's GOP opponent that year, former state legislator Jack Ciattarelli, is also expected to be Sherill's opponent in this year's race.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NC Senators spar over rewrite of bill intended to prevent the sexual exploitation of women, minors
Senator Sydney Batch (seated far left) questions the proposed committee substitute for HB 805. (Screengrab of NCGA videostream) House Bill 805 started as a bipartisan bill to fight human trafficking and provide women with an avenue to remove nonconsensual content and images from the internet. House members on both sides of the aisle felt so strongly about the issue, they passed the bill 113-0 last month. But when the bill ('Prevent the Sexual Exploitation of Women and Minors Act') moved to the upper chamber, Senator Buck Newton (R- Greene, Wayne, Wilson) saw an opportunity to rework the legislation. Newton's proposed committee substitute for HB 805, spells out there are only two sexes – male and female – and that gender identity shall not be treated as legally equivalent to biological sex. 'This section ensures that our state follows federal policy and aligns with President Trump's executive order,' Newton told members of the Senate Judiciary Committee Tuesday. 'This ensures our state maintains eligibility for any and all federal funding.' Newton's proposal would ban the use of state funds for transgender surgeries for any prisoner incarcerated in the state prison system. The final section of Newton's PCS would require that when a person changes their sex on a birth certificate, the State Registrar must attach the new certificate to the original certificate of birth on file, preserving both copies. The state would also forward a copy of the new certificate to the register of deeds in the county of birth where both would be kept on file. 'What problem are we really trying to solve in terms of efficiency or cost savings?' asked Senator Sophia Chitlik (D-Durham). 'Well, there seems to be a great deal of confusion among our society about the fluidity of sex,' replied Newton. 'And it is time that we clarify, once and for all, what most people recognize would be obvious, which is that there are only two sexes.' 'I actually don't understand why this chamber is so obsessed with genitalia, but here we are,' said Sen. Sydney Batch (D-Wake) noting the new PCS does not allow for a definition that's based in science. Batch said the original House bill intended to safeguard women and children from exploitation by the pornography industry was a 'fantastic bill' and that Newton's proposal should be a standalone bill judged on its own merits. Senator Mujtaba Mohammed (D-Mecklenburg) questioned why the bill which once enjoyed unanimous support seeks to bar gender affirming care in the prison system. 'We reached out to our state agencies, and they confirmed that they've never authorized sexual procedures, there's never been gender affirming care, there's never been any authorized gender affirming surgeries,' Mohammed said. 'As a Republican, supporting limited government, why are we coming up with unnecessary laws?' Newton acknowledged while such medical surgeries had not happened yet using North Carolina funds, he believes taxpayers would appreciate that state funds will not be spent in this manner. 'We draw the line now, before anybody attempts to do such a thing.' Sen. Lisa Grafstein (D-Wake) said Newton's proposal reminded her of the hurricane Helene recovery bill – a clean bill that passed the House only to be muddied and politicized when it moved to the Senate. 'The idea that we're going to put into law that you cannot be transgendered, or that you cannot be all the things that you are railing against is a fool's errand,' said Grafstein. Reighlah Collins, Policy Counsel for the ACLU of North Carolina, said the PCS enforces rigid definitions of sex and gender, while forcibly outing people who change their sex on their birth certificate. 'These attempts are part of a larger strategy to push transgender people out of public life,' said Collins. Sen. Batch said she'd like to see the Judiciary Committee vote on the original House bill, setting aside Newton's additions. Rep. Laura Budd (D-Mecklenburg), a primary sponsor of the bill in the House, appealed to the Senate Judiciary Committee to remember the original intent of the bipartisan legislation. 'If you are the victim of human trafficking and there are images or videos of you online there is no remedy in the state of North Carolina to have those images or videos removed from the internet, which means that you're stuck,' said Budd. Budd said House Bill 805 was a long time coming and is an important tool to help women who've been taken advantage of to have these images removed and the videos taken down. Budd requested that Newton remove his proposal and find another avenue to advance his PCS. 'When we take this bill and we layer it with those things [in the PCS] we're not doing good for people with Carolina. We are imposing onto the bill things that are going to make it become the political football,' said Budd. Members of the Senate Judiciary Committee adjourned Tuesday before voting on the matter. The bill is back on the agenda for Wednesday afternoon.
