logo
Voices: Mischievous, kind, extraordinarily empathetic: The Pope I knew supported me even at my lowest hour

Voices: Mischievous, kind, extraordinarily empathetic: The Pope I knew supported me even at my lowest hour

Yahoo23-04-2025
I will never forget the first time I met the Pope in 2013.
I had never met a Pope before and was on edge. The Vatican is designed to overwhelm visitors with power. We walk through long corridors to his office, a man in an exquisitely tailored tailcoat leading us; Swiss Guards in their full uniforms salute as we pass.
The wall paintings are beyond description; you could do a Renaissance art course just in the rooms we go through. I am taken into the meeting, with my colleagues, cameras clicking, TV present. It is surreal. The others are ushered out and we sit either side of a desk.
'I am senior to you,' he says, with a level look. I feel a sense of disappointment: I did not think he was like that. 'Indeed you are, Your Holiness...' I begin.
He interrupts, smiling, 'by three days'. He was inaugurated that much before me: in March, earlier that year.
We both laugh and there are the beginnings of a friendship.
The second standout time I remember with the Pope is around 2016 – in a small room in the modern block of flats in Rome where the Pope has lived since his election.
I am with him and an interpreter. We speak of prayer, of God's love in Christ, of the work of God's Spirit in a world of war, of human weakness including ours. I listen to his wisdom on how to lead a global church.
At the end of the meeting, I nervously ask if he would do a recorded message for an event in Trafalgar Square a couple of months later. He grins. 'Have you got your phone?' I answer yes. 'Let's record it now, before anyone tries to stop me!' He delivers a fluent and off the cuff message about the work of the Holy Spirit of God, profound in theology, accessible and powerful.
The third fond memory is of a roasting hot evening in 2023. I am at a vast stadium and gathering place in Juba, South Sudan; the crowd stretches to the horizon, some have walked nine days to be there.
On the stage are three chairs. In the centre, the white clad figure of the Pope. To his right sits the moderator of the Church of Scotland. I am on the left. It is the Pilgrimage of Peace: we each address the crowd, and each speak directly to different people. The president and cabinet are sitting in the front row.
No punches are pulled. The Pope challenges corruption, violence, power seeking. He turns to the women in the crowd and tells them of God's love for them in their agony of war, rape and hunger. He speaks of the need for a government that loves. Inspired by his example, the moderator and I are equally direct.
As the crowd responds with singing, with cries and tears, a flight of cranes flies over our heads towards the setting sun. It is the universal pastor of Christians speaking God's call to a government that seems unwilling to listen, in the hearing of the people for whom they are meant to care.
How many times did we meet? I am not sure, but many. We last spoke when he rang after the announcement of my resignation last November.
There was little warning, just a call and his voice.
This was typical of the man who was, above all, a pastor. Every day, he used to ring a designated telephone number to talk to the congregation of a bombed out monastery in northern Gaza. It was always his instinct to connect and to comfort.
The last time I saw him in person was in St Peter's Square, the great basilica behind us as he convened a meeting of Christian leaders – from Orthodox to Pentecostal and all between. He was, as usual, humble and kind, as a few of us spoke. We knelt in silent and united prayer before an ikon of the Jesus' crucifixion, the crowd behind us also silent as the sun shone down from a cloudless sky.
It always seemed to be sunny when we met. It was probably the most varied and largest gathering of church leaders since the reformation. He convened it not by force, but by love and it was in mutual love that for a moment such a large part of the more than 2bn Christians were represented together before Jesus Christ in seeking God. As we all left, he shook my hands with both of his.
Francis was someone who made people want to know God – and God's love – as he did. He was not perfect, but he was passionate for God. He was supremely relational – regardless of status – and he lived out his call for the shepherd to be close to the sheep. He saw those who sought, however poorly and fallibly, to follow Christ as brothers and sisters. Whether they were in prisons or palaces, slums or stadiums, made no difference.
He lived simply, like St Francis, from whom he took his name. He lived out Mary's song, the Magnificat, in Luke's gospel – that revolutionary hymn to the reversal of power. As Mary the mother of Jesus sang, so Francis obeyed – calling on the powerful to serve, the rich to be sacrificially generous, the rulers to be at the feet of the ruled.
He was a supreme master of symbolic actions that preached a sermon instantly.
In 2019, at his request, the leaders of government and rebels in South Sudan gathered for a 36 hour retreat at the Vatican. Once again, the then moderator of the Church of Scotland and I worked with the Curia and co-led the event. At the end, he spoke on the witness and call of Christ – superbly, profoundly.
Then he stood, walked round to the South Sudanese leaders – the towering Dinka and Nuer included – and knelt to kiss their shoes, saying, 'I beg you, make peace'. It is on YouTube.
Their choice as to what to do – and they have yet to act as they should – was squarely before them. The symbol spoke in tones of absolute authority; through it the voice of God was saying, 'act rightly like my servant Francis'.
So, what now? God's universal, fractured and suffering church is so much greater than any Pope (let alone Archbishop). As I found even in the small corner that is Anglicanism around the world, centuries of history and a global presence bring a complexity – which means that even Roman Catholicism is an organism, a living ecology, not an organisation.
It can be frustrating – I saw and heard his frustration. To the outside observer, little may seem to change. It will be decades before we see whether the things Francis did bear fruit. The next Pope may well be from Asia or Africa, with a deep conservatism on issues we consider in the UK to be so obvious they need no discussion.
But they will also find that bending the attitudes of 1.2bn Catholics to a single agenda is unthinkable. They come from every country on earth and speak every tongue under heaven. The Pope is not the CEO of Rome Inc., but the Holy Father. His call is to love God and love people – and through his universal primacy, to enable Catholics first (and all others also) to love God in Christ and to love people.
That is his legacy: to be a Pope of love, serving the God of love, who emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, like Jesus Christ. That love was returned – and it is that love that God's church is called to sow, nurture and see from it a harves, in God's time.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Switzerland is eyeing cuts to its F-35 stealth fighter order amid price battles with the US
Switzerland is eyeing cuts to its F-35 stealth fighter order amid price battles with the US

Business Insider

time15 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Switzerland is eyeing cuts to its F-35 stealth fighter order amid price battles with the US

Switzerland is considering reducing its F-35 order in response to price negotiations with the US. It said the US government had abandoned a fixed price plan, leaving Switzerland vulnerable to inflation and tariffs. Some US allies and partners have questioned the F-35 over Trump's treatment of allies. Switzerland said it might scale back its order of US-made F-35 fighter jets after failing to fix the price in its negotiations with the White House. Amid shifts in US attitudes toward allies and partners, some Western nations have questioned the jet and, in at least one case, even rejected the fifth-generation fighter for European alternatives. Switzerland still wants the F-35, considering its high-end capabilities, but it may cut its order. Switzerland said that attempts to negotiate a fixed price for the F-35A fighter jet, made by the US's Lockheed Martin, were unsuccessful, with higher costs expected as a result. Switzerland may now order fewer F-35s, the defense minister, Martin Pfister, said in a press conference on Wednesday, per Swiss newspaper Tages-Anzeiger. He said that other options include asking parliament for another loan for the jets and deducting operating costs from the purchase price, among other possibilities. Switzerland committed to buying 36 F-35As after signing a contract in 2022, with the jets expected between 2027 and 2030. However, Pfister said the defense department must now examine whether that figure is really what the country needs. Switzerland's government explained in a press release on Wednesday, that while options were on the table after failed negotiations with the US, Switzerland remains committed to procuring F-35As, citing "a significant technological advantage over other aircraft" that would help "to protect Switzerland from airborne threats." Pfister said that Switzerland must continue the procurement of the jets, or else it won't have the defense it needs by the early 2030s. The Swiss government described the US government's actions in negotiations as an "abandonment of the fixed price." It previously viewed the price as fixed at what is now $7.2 billion. In a situation without a fixed price where the cost is subject to volatility as a result of inflation and tariffs, Switzerland is unable to determine the total price of its procurement. It says that the additional costs for procuring the jet could be more than $1.6 billion, which would represent a tremendous cost growth. The government said that the unsuccessful negotiations were with senior White House representatives and that there was a conversation between Pfister and US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. It said "the discussions clearly showed that the USA is not prepared to deviate from its position." The Swiss defense department was thus instructed to consider other options by the end of November, with the government saying the department "will examine whether current air defence requirements still correspond to the principles on which the evaluation of the F-35A was based." Lockheed Martin told Business Insider in a statement that "since foreign military sales are government-to-government transactions, questions about F-35 cost, schedule and procurement are best addressed by the armasuisse and US government." Switzerland is a neutral country, and while it's not a member of NATO, it is seen as a partner nation and has deepened its cooperation with the alliance since Russia's invasion of Ukraine. While it remains committed to the F-35, some US allies are no longer sure. Some wavering on the F-35 NATO member Spain said last week that it would not buy the F-35 and would instead focus on European alternatives. The country's decision came after some other allies publicly questioned the fighter jet amid Trump's treatment of allies, which has included criticizing the NATO alliance and European defense spending. Trump's approach to the alliance and questions of US reliability, amid growing security concerns, has sparked a new focus within Europe on investing in the continent's defense firms. Politicians across all of Switzerland's political parties said earlier this month that the country should withdraw or reconsider its planned purchase of F-35s in response to Trump's tariffs. So far, Spain is the only ally to formally step back from the jet, which is used by 19 US partner nations. The F-35 is a top-class fifth-generation fighter that many nations want, and any country that steps away from it after already committing to it would likely encounter huge costs and logistical issues, among other challenges. The jet's widespread use among allies and partners is also an advantage. It lets militaries operate together more easily, something that could be key in a conflict on the continent. The Swiss government noted that its desire for the jet is driven by how widespread F-35 usage is across Europe. But Europe's view of the US has changed. When asked on Wednesday if the US is seen as a reliable partner for future arms purchases, Pfister responded by saying that they are not reliable when it comes to tariffs. The depth of that concern is unclear.

Swiss ministers meet with pharma executives amid tariff uncertainty
Swiss ministers meet with pharma executives amid tariff uncertainty

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Swiss ministers meet with pharma executives amid tariff uncertainty

ZURICH (Reuters) -Swiss ministers have met with senior executives of pharmaceutical companies Roche and Novartis to discuss the outlook for the sector under current U.S. trade policy, the government said on Thursday. President Donald Trump has imposed U.S. import tariffs of 39% on Swiss goods, one of the highest rates worldwide, though pharmaceutical firms have so far been spared the duties. The Trump administration is carrying out a probe into pharmaceutical imports, after which tariffs could follow. Swiss Interior Minister Elisabeth Baume-Schneider and Economy Minister Guy Parmelin met on Thursday morning with Roche Chairman Severin Schwan and Patrick Horber, head of the international unit for Novartis, the government said. "The participants of the meeting exchanged their views on the current situation in the pharmaceutical industry against the backdrop of discussions about the tariffs imposed by the United States," the Interior Ministry said in a statement. What was discussed is confidential, the ministry said, noting that the ministers were organising a roundtable discussion with the pharmaceutical industry in September. (Writing by Dave Graham. Additional reporting by Ariane Luthi. Editing by Mark Potter) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Defending Trump's Orders Leaves DOJ Lawyers Showing Strain, Seeking Delays
Defending Trump's Orders Leaves DOJ Lawyers Showing Strain, Seeking Delays

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Defending Trump's Orders Leaves DOJ Lawyers Showing Strain, Seeking Delays

(Bloomberg) -- Mass departures from the US Justice Department and a rising flood of lawsuits are squeezing government lawyers defending administration policies, with signs of strain spilling into court. The department's public court filings, along with interviews with current and former attorneys reveal challenges facing the government as it fights hundreds of cases against President Donald Trump's agenda. In deadline extension requests since January, lawyers have taken the unusual step of publicly acknowledging to judges that they are overextended and having trouble keeping up with the workload. The US-Canadian Road Safety Gap Is Getting Wider Sunseeking Germans Face Swiss Backlash Over Alpine Holiday Congestion To Head Off Severe Storm Surges, Nova Scotia Invests in 'Living Shorelines' Five Years After Black Lives Matter, Brussels' Colonial Statues Remain For Homeless Cyclists, Bikes Bring an Escape From the Streets The department has handled more than 450 court challenges — an unprecedented number for a new administration. In roughly one out of every seven cases, at least one of the government's lawyers was reassigned, left the department or withdrew without stating their reasons, according to a Bloomberg News review of the filings. In the Federal Programs Branch, which plays a lead role defending executive branch policies, more than half of the hundred-plus lawyers have left, according to a current Justice Department lawyer who requested anonymity to discuss internal dynamics. Those have included litigators involved in cases about Trump's ban on transgender military servicemembers, the work of the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, and termination of federal grants. Government lawyers have withdrawn in more than 30 of the cases challenging Trump's immigration policies since January, according to the data compiled by Bloomberg. That includes departures from the teams defending Trump's efforts to cancel birthright citizenship, stop the flow of refugees into the US, and use of a wartime powers law to send alleged Venezuelan gang members to a Salvadoran prison. Requests by lawyers for deadline extensions filed on public court dockets offer a rare window into the upheaval in offices tasked with trying to keep Trump's policies intact in the face of the departures and the deluge of lawsuits. One attorney focused on immigration cases cited the difficulties in 'balancing competing litigation obligations' following the departures of 'multiple' colleagues. A lawyer in a different office alluded to problems keeping up with a 'substantial current workload.' An assistant US attorney in Washington put it more bluntly, saying his office is 'overwhelmed' by the 'continued surge' of cases. Justice Department spokesperson Natalie Baldassarre said in a statement that, 'our attorneys in the Federal Programs Branch and elsewhere across the Civil Division are working tirelessly to fight the unprecedented number of lawsuits filed against the President's executive orders, policies, and actions. The Department has defeated many of these lawsuits all the way up to the Supreme Court and will continue to defend the President's agenda to keep Americans safe.' Hundreds of Justice Department lawyers have resigned or been removed since Trump took office, an exodus that's coincided with a rapidly rising caseload. Attorney General Pam Bondi has ousted dozens of lawyers deemed at odds with Trump's agenda, including prosecutors who handled Jan. 6 cases and now-defunct criminal probes of Trump. And many attorneys have departed voluntarily. During a Feb. 28 hearing in a fight over Trump shuttering the US Agency for International Development, a Federal Programs Branch lawyer cited his office's understaffing and fast-moving caseload when the judge questioned why the government hadn't offered more evidence. The lawyer said they hadn't had a break since the inauguration and that he and his colleagues were 'working day and night.' The current Justice Department attorney said that a number of longtime Programs Branch lawyers had left because the job had simply become untenable, pointing to the workload, lack of resources, the administration's persistent attacks on federal employees, and policy changes like getting rid of remote work and DOGE's demands for weekly emails about how they spent their time. For others, the nature of the work was a factor, said Stacey Young, an 18-year veteran of the Justice Department who left in January and founded a network of alumni called Justice Connection. 'They were asked to take positions they believed were illegal or unethical, including in the Civil Division,' she said. 'This number is considerably higher than most people realize.' In the Office of Immigration Litigation, a specialized division once home to more than 300 lawyers, the government litigators coordinate with local US attorney offices to defend against a swath of actions, from individual deportation orders to sweeping executive orders. The immigration litigation office's district court section is at capacity, said one former attorney, who requested anonymity to discuss internal dynamics. The office has also lost people with valuable expertise, the former attorney added. David McConnell resigned as director of the immigration office's appeals division in February after more than 30 years at the Justice Department. He said in a written statement to Bloomberg that he left because of his 'abrupt reassignment' to a Trump administration task force focused on so-called sanctuary cities. 'I feel badly for leaving people behind, particularly at a time when they are being asked to handle a tremendous workload and make challenging and new arguments without the same level of institutional support or knowledge that I and others who have since left the office had traditionally provided,' McConnell said. Another public flashpoint came in April, when Erez Reuveni, a DOJ attorney known for defending immigration policies during Trump's first term, was suspended – and eventually dismissed – after he admitted that the government had sent Kilmar Abrego Garcia to a prison in El Salvador by mistake. Reuveni later submitted a whistleblower complaint accusing senior administration officials of scheming to defy court orders and withhold information from a judge. The Justice Department has denied the allegations. Justice Connection's Young said the sequence of events leading to Reuveni's firing sent a chilling message: even some attorneys with a history of defending Trump's hard-line immigration policies were vulnerable to internal purges. 'Attorneys in the civil division know that Erez Reuveni was fired because he refused to violate his duty of candor to the court, and many are rightly concerned that they could be next,' Young said. To deal with the workload, the immigration litigation office has increasingly delegated a significant portion of new cases to lawyers in US attorney offices around the country, at least some of whom don't have the same amount of expertise handling immigration policy challenges with national consequences, according to a former trial attorney in that section. The same is true for the Federal Program Branch, with a larger proportion of cases going to US attorney offices that Main Justice lawyers would normally keep or at least lead, the current Justice Department lawyer said. Civil Division leadership is working to recruit more lawyers, the current attorney said, but new hires aren't bringing the same level of expertise and years of government experience to make up for what the litigating offices have lost. (Updates with DOJ comment in eighth paragraph.) Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates Dubai's Housing Boom Is Stoking Fears of Another Crash Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan Why It's Actually a Good Time to Buy a House, According to a Zillow Economist The Electric Pickup Truck Boom Turned Into a Big Bust ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store