logo
Opinion - The Ayatollah's survival was no accident — it was Israel's choice, and a wise one

Opinion - The Ayatollah's survival was no accident — it was Israel's choice, and a wise one

Yahoo5 days ago

Israel just executed the most far-reaching decapitation strike in the history of Iran. Within hours, targeted airstrikes had eliminated Iran's top military planners — General Mohammad Bagheri, General Amir Ali Hajizadeh, and General Ali Rashid. Simultaneously, missile development facilities and key military coordination nodes were targeted, severing some of Iran's communication links with proxy networks in Syria and Iraq.
And yet the man at the apex of the system, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was not targeted. To some observers, this omission may seem inexplicable. But martyring Khamenei would have produced explosive consequences far beyond the battlefield.
Under Iran's constitution, the death of the Supreme Leader triggers an emergency succession process managed by the Assembly of Experts. Since the March 2024 elections, this body has been dominated by clerics aligned with the hardline factions.
Their candidate would likely be Mojtaba Khamenei, the Supreme Leader's son and behind-the-scenes enforcer. But Mojtaba faces a problem: He lacks the religious credentials necessary for the role. He has never issued a formal legal opinion, never taught in the traditional seminaries of Qom or Najaf and has never been accepted as a senior clerical authority.
In Shi'a Islam, legitimacy must be earned through decades of scholarship and peer recognition — it is not inherited as with a monarchy.
Had Israel killed Khamenei, this would likely have fast-tracked and legitimized Mojtaba's rise. Absent that, it would be very controversial. Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani in Iraq, for example, has long rejected Iran's system of having a cleric as a political ruler. As long as the Ayatollah lives to a ripe old age, Mojtaba is both too illegitimate to unify the system and too protected to be sidelined. Thus, he may stall Iran's succession process into a doctrinal stalemate — one that Israel has now made more likely by weakening his military protectors while leaving his father alive.
Shi'a political theology is structured around martyrdom. The Seventh Century deaths of Ali and Hussein form the religious foundation of resistance and sacrifice.
Had Khamenei been killed by an Israeli missile, it would not have been processed politically but mythologically. His death would have been viewed as a reenactment of the Karbala tragedy. That would have sanctified his son, unified Iran's factions, and legitimized violent escalation from Iran's regional proxies.
These groups — Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Yemen, and Kata'ib Hezbollah in Iraq — see themselves as guardians of the Supreme Leader's religious authority. Iranian defectors have long hinted at internal escalation plans that treat the assassination of the Supreme Leader as a trigger for full-spectrum retaliation: coordinated missile barrages, cyberattacks on Gulf energy terminals, and asymmetric operations against U.S. targets in the region. Sparing Khamenei denies Iran that trigger.
It also preserves strategic ambiguity. By targeting Iran's ability to act but not its spiritual figurehead, Israel prevents the regime from invoking an existential crisis. The message to Iran's mid-level commanders and bureaucrats is clear: Escalation is not inevitable. There is still room for recalibration.
Khamenei's regime has never relied solely on brute force. At the center of this is the Office for the Preservation and Publication of the Works of the Supreme Leader. While nominally a clerical publishing organ, the office functions in reality as a doctrinal surveillance and enforcement bureau. Under the informal leadership of Mojtaba Khamenei, it regulates clerical discourse, curates access to the Supreme Leader, disciplines heterodox scholars, and manages a patronage economy for the seminaries.
This system operates under the protection of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps senior command. The generals eliminated were the regime's enforcers of doctrinal compliance. Their presence deterred rebellion, reinforced Mojtaba's authority, and insulated the clerical apparatus from challenge. The strike helps to break this protective outer layer, leaving the regime's ideological core exposed and overextended.
Israel should keep targeting the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps command. But it should not eliminate Mojtaba or high-profile hardliner clerics. That would risk martyrdom and consolidation. Instead, it should be to disrupt the infrastructure that sustains Mojtaba's influence. This includes severing the financial lifelines that fund loyalist seminaries, exposing internal contradictions within Qom's clerical elite, and quietly empowering transnational rivals — especially those aligned with Sistani in Najaf, who reject clerical political rule altogether. The goal should not be to decapitate the regime, but to delay, fragment, and deny.
For the first time in decades, the Iranian religious establishment faces the threat of a vacuum of coercive insulation. In this new context, figures who once maintained quiet distance from the state may now emerge as active challengers to Mojtaba's succession, potentially leading to a schism that would dramatically affect the operations of pro-Iranian militias across the region. Their legitimacy not just to Tehran's treasury but also to the symbolic authority of the Supreme Leader.
If that authority is contested — if Mojtaba is promoted without consensus — then these groups may begin aligning with other clerics or factions. Figures such as Qais Khazali or Hashem Safieddine, who combine militia leadership with religious aspirations, could become new centers of gravity. The result would be the transformation of the Axis of Resistance from a coordinated deterrent bloc into a constellation of semi-autonomous and potentially competing actors.
In wars of theology, as in wars of missiles, the decisive blow is not the one that kills a man. It is the one that denies a myth.
Carlo J.V. Caro is a New York-based writer who studied and lived in both Jordan and Israel.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Five takeaways from Tucker Carlson's interview with Ted Cruz
Five takeaways from Tucker Carlson's interview with Ted Cruz

The Hill

time34 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Five takeaways from Tucker Carlson's interview with Ted Cruz

Pundit Tucker Carlon published a nearly two-hour interview with Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) on Wednesday, during which the two conservative firebrands debated President Trump's foreign policy, the future of the Middle East and America's place in the world. The conversation was decidedly contentious, at times deteriorating into shouting and insults, punctuated by a short clip Carlson published on Tuesday evening showing him quizzing Cruz on Iran's population, which for hours drove social media buzz around the full interview's release. Cruz went on the offensive on Wednesday morning, blasting Carlson over his framing of their back and forth and urging listeners of his 'Verdict' podcast to listen to the full interview he granted the former Fox News host. Here are five takeaways from the interview. As he opened the interview, Carlson asked the Republican lawmaker why he has voiced support for regime change in Iran and potential U.S. military action to prevent the country from obtaining nuclear weapons. The pundit needled Cruz about the benefit of the U.S. sending money to Israel as it fights Iran and suggested lawmakers on Capitol Hill are being influenced by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, which raises money for Cruz along with many other lawmakers on Capitol Hill. 'Everyone is obsessed with Israel,' Cruz exclaimed as Carlson drilled down on the money in politics phenomenon, to which Carlson replied, 'I'm not obsessed with Israel,' before saying 'I've never taken money from Israel, have you?' Cruz conceded AIPAC 'raises a lot of money for me' and lamented the fact the lobbying group 'is not more effective' in Washington. The Texas senator said he came to Congress with the explicit intention of being a staunch defender of Israel and expressed no regret about his posture toward Iran or other Middle Eastern entities that seek to harm the U.S. ally. Carlson countered that AIPAC is effectively a 'foreign lobby' and suggested its influence could lead the U.S. into a costly war. Carlson insisted during his conversation with Cruz that he believes in 'self-defense,' and would support military action against a foreign government if it was trying to harm the U.S. president. After Carlson noted Cruz's stated belief that the Iranian government is trying to hurt Trump, he asked him 'why don't you support military action right now against Iran?' Cruz told Carlson that 'nobody disputes' the Iranians wish to harm Trump, to which the former cable news host said, 'I'm disputing it.' 'What other conspiracy theories do you believe, Tucker,' Cruz shouted back. 'Did we land on the moon, was 9/11 an inside job?' Before moving on, Carlson said Cruz's 'logic train has a massive hole in it,' dismissing the senator's attacking him as a conspiracy theorist and saying he 'wasn't into the slurs … antisemite, I just don't like that … I'm telling you what I believe.' The conversation took sudden and a tense turn after Carlson peppered Cruz on Iran's population, which the senator dismissed, calling the line of questioning 'snide.' 'You engage in reckless rhetoric with no facts,' Cruz said, admonishing the former cable news host whom he earlier called a 'brave' voice on issues like the coronavirus pandemic and immigration. 'I'm not calling for the overthrow of a government, you are,' Carlson said as Cruz pointed at him. The Republican lawmaker later read a direct quote from President Trump criticizing comments from Carlson and others questioning his strategy on the Middle East, and advocating against U.S. involvement in Israel's war with Iran. 'I never attacked Donald Trump, I campaigned for Donald Trump,' Carlson shrugged, defending himself. 'I love Trump.' The president criticized Carlson directly earlier this week, calling him 'kooky' over his comments on the Middle East and taking a dig at the former cable host, saying he should share his opinions on 'a television network and say it so that people listen.' The commentator told Cruz he spoke to Trump this week and insisted 'I think we should be very careful about entering into more foreign wars that don't help us when our country is dying.' After their debate about Trump's position on Iran, Carlson accused Cruz of 'presiding over' some of the country's biggest 'foreign policy disasters' in recent years, calling attention to the Republican's support for Ukraine in its war with Russia. 'You've been spending the last three years telling us that Valdimir Putin is evil and we're gonna beat him with other people's children,' Carlson said, raising his voice. 'And you've never apologized for that.' A seemingly irritated Cruz sat up in his chair and shot back, 'the number of falsehoods you lay out in one sentence is rather astonishing.' 'The war against Russia was caused by Joe Biden's weakness,' Cruz continued. But Carlson was not satisfied. 'You supported the war,' he again asked him, insisting 'shouldn't you apologize.' 'You should apologize,' Cruz shouted at the pundit, before stopping himself and scoffing, 'I'm not going to engage in the demanding of apologies.' Carlson has for years criticized U.S. involvement in the war in Ukraine and stirred controversy with an interview he landed Russian President Vladimir Putin after launching his own media company. Carlson's conversation with Putin came during a reporting trip to Moscow, during which he praised the country's economy and infrastructure. After Carlson published his interview with the Republican lawmaker, Cruz sought to discredit the pundit's framing of their conversation and criticized the former Fox host on a subsequent episode of his 'Verdict' podcast. 'Did a long interview w/ Tucker. He released a snippet playing a 'gotcha' on the population of Iran. I declined to play that silly game,' Cruz wrote on social media late Tuesday. 'WATCH the full 2-hr interview, where Tucker ATTACKS Trump, attacks the 'AIPAC lobby,' & falsely claims Iran is NOT trying to assassinate Trump.' In a subsequent social media post, Cruz asked why Carlson 'refuses to acknowledge' what he called an 'indisputable truth' about the Middle East and U.S. foreign policy. 'Facts don't care about your feelings Tucker, and they certainly won't bend to your narrative,' the senator said. Cruz released a new episode of his Verdict podcast after the short clip of their back and forth on the population of Iran was published but before the full interview was released on Carlson's X account. 'On foreign policy, Tucker has gone bat-crap crazy. He's gone off the rails,' Cruz said, arguing the pundit is misreading what the American people want from Trump. 'I think the American people want a president who's going to say, 'We will protect ourselves against people who want to kill us,' he said. 'That's exactly what Donald Trump is doing.'

Foreman-in-chief: With conflict looming, Trump installs 2 massive American flags at the White House
Foreman-in-chief: With conflict looming, Trump installs 2 massive American flags at the White House

CNN

timean hour ago

  • CNN

Foreman-in-chief: With conflict looming, Trump installs 2 massive American flags at the White House

While President Donald Trump weighs the single most consequential decision of his time in office so far — the possibility of US military intervention in Iran — he's also completing a personal project years in the making. Trump on Wednesday morning oversaw the installation of a pair of flagpoles on the White House lawn, one on the south side of the building, the other on the north. 'These are the best poles anywhere in the country or in the world,' the president told a group of reporters assembled to witness construction workers putting one of them up. 'It's a very exciting project to me,' he said. That he's taking on such major White House building projects in his second term – after coming under fire for changes to the space during his first – reflects an emboldened Trump impervious to criticism. Asked what gave him the idea to make the changes, Trump offered a revealing answer. 'I've had it for a long time. In the first term I had it, but, you know, you guys were after me. I said I had to focus. I was the hunted. And now I'm the hunter. There's a big difference,' he said. Trump spent nearly an hour inspecting and commenting on the flagpole's installation, despite heightened international tensions awaiting him. And while he refused to directly answer reporters' shouted questions about whether he would order the US military to strike Iranian nuclear facilities, his presence on the lawn underscored a president operating at his own pace. Hours later, Trump returned outside, flanked by, among others, the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, his daughter Ivanka Trump and son-in-law Jared Kushner, who were at the White House for the swearing in of Charles Kushner as ambassador to France. The president saluted the large American flag, which required five men to hoist up the newly erected pole. Trump is still a real estate magnate, enthusiastically consumed with the finer details of construction – including the materials used inside the poles, which he says he paid for himself. The reality of his day job, however, repeatedly cut in to Wednesday's festivities. Trump fielded questions on Iran, Israel, immigration and protests in California. In between, he marveled at the process of lifting the pole, which he said cost 'like $50,000.' 'They put sand inside, and if they use dirt or anything else other than sand, it rots out the pole over a period of years. But sand, for some reason, chemically just works. It gives you flexibility and it doesn't do anything to the cask,' he said as he observed the new, nearly-100-foot pole being put in the ground. 'I love construction,' he added. 'I love it, I know it better than anybody.' Trump greeted the construction workers and crane operators, and turned to consult them repeatedly during a question-and-answer session with press, once on immigration, a second time on the Russia-Ukraine war. 'Russia-Ukraine is so stupid, would've never happened if I was president. You guys agree with that, right?' Trump said as men in hard hats assembled behind him nodded their heads in agreement. Trump is no stranger to large-scale flagpole installations. Back in 2006, he violated Palm Beach town ordinances when he put an 80-foot flagpole on the grounds of his Mar-a-Lago club, according to the Palm Beach Post. Per the newspaper's reporting, Trump sued the town for $10 million 'over repeated demands that he withdraw the pole. He later increased the damage demand to $25 million. The town began fining Trump $1,250 a day on Jan. 6, 2007, for the code violations.' Trump and the town ultimately settled, and he installed a 70-foot flagpole further inland. Wednesday's pole raising is not the only change coming to the White House as the president seeks to make it more like his Florida club. Construction on the White House Rose Garden is underway, and the historic garden's green grass is now completely torn up in preparation for a patio installation over the coming weeks. Trump told Fox News in a March interview he planned to remodel the space with pavers, saying the grass 'doesn't work.' Over the weekend, the patch of grass that has served as a centerpiece for major events since the Kennedy administration gave way to dirt, filled in with gravel by Wednesday. Multiple tractors, along with PVC piping, hardwood, tarps and other construction equipment, filled the space. The garden's iconic roses and other plants, however, remained intact and are not expected to be removed. As for Trump's plans to build a ballroom near the White House East Wing, he said Wednesday that construction will 'start pretty soon.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store