Bill requiring app stores to verify age for minors in Alabama stalls in House committee
Rep. Chris Sells, R-Greenville, speaks to a colleague on the floor of the Alabama House of Representatives on Feb. 12, 2025 at the Alabama Statehouse in Montgomery, Alabama. (Brian Lyman/Alabama Reflector)
A bill that would require app stores to verify the age of individuals creating accounts in Alabama will likely not become law this year.
The House State Government Committee was set Tuesday to consider SB 187, sponsored by Sen. Clyde Chambliss, R-Prattville. But the committee did not have a quorum for its scheduled meeting, preventing a vote on the bill.
With just two days left in the 2025 legislative session, the committee would have to meet Wednesday to give the bill a chance of passage on May 14, the last scheduled day of the session, but Rep. Chris Sells, R-Greenville, the chair of the committee, indicated that legislation will be worked on over the summer to be introduced in the next legislative session.
The bill would require app stores to obtain parental consent for users identified as minors before they can download or purchase apps or make in-app purchases. The bill would have also prohibited developers from enforcing disclosures or terms of service on minors without parental consent.
'Apps would have to be approved by the parent and be age-appropriate for the child, so that would take care of the problem of the phones that are already out there, and that's what this is about, protecting children,' said Sells, who sponsored a similar bill in the House.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
A companion bill, SB 186, also sponsored by Chambliss, was passed by both chambers and sent to Gov. Kay Ivey Thursday. It will require smartphones and tablets manufactured on or after June 1 and activated in Alabama include a pre-installed filter capable of blocking obscene material. Sells said that 'will address the issue going forward.'
Justin Hill, a spokesperson for NetChoice advocating for limited internet government control, free speech and enterprise across the country aid 'we all agree on the why' for the bill, but disagreed on the basis of free speech. He suggested that the bill could face legal challenges.
'There are 17 states where this bill was filed, they run afoul of the First Amendment in our belief. And we do a lot of work in this space. We have a litigation team that litigates a lot of similar bills. This one has not made it to the point of litigation yet,' Hill said.
NetChoice has sued or is in litigation with at least 12 states. Georgia was sued in March after passing a law that would require children to acquire parental consent to use social media.
Melea Stephens, a Birmingham marriage and family therapist and a board member of the National Center on Sexual Exploitation, claimed to have seen cases in her private practice of children 'being exploited on commonly used apps.' She said that minors are entering contracts with 'multibillion dollar companies when they sign up for an app without parental permission.'
'We do not allow minors to go into a bank and sign a contract because they cannot comprehend the risk involved,' Stephens said, adding that the legislation is 'based on contract law, not content moderation or free speech issues.'
Rachel Holland, a spokesperson for Meta, a vocal proponent of the legislation, said in an email after the bill's passage that they look forward to working with lawmakers on this legislation.
'Parents want a one-stop shop to verify their teen's age and grant permission for them to download apps in a privacy-preserving way. The app store is the best place for it, and one-third of US states and the US Congress have introduced bills recognizing the central role app stores play,' she said in a statement.
Holland also cited a poll from the Alabama Policy Institute, a conservative think tank, suggesting 83% of voters support parental approval in app stores.
Rep. Russell Bedsole, R-Alabaster, said that 'whether or not this legislation is the right piece,' he feels that parents need help monitoring children's behavior online. He said that he uses a service that requires his children to ask for permission before downloading an app on their phone. Despite approving apps that seemed harmless to his children, Bedsole said there was still some unwanted content in the form of advertising or surveys.
Bedsole said that despite these concerns, lawmakers should work with groups like NetChoice to address them because of their complexity.
'We've got to have someone who represents the development of these apps to be at the table, because the technology behind it is so complex that, as a parent alone, I need some help,' Bedsole said.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Posting about the L.A. protests? Apparently that can get you banned from Facebook
Apparently, acknowledging the existence of violence can get you kicked off Facebook. Rebecca Solnit 's account on Meta's social media network has been suspended, the San Francisco author and activist posted to Bluesky on Monday, June 10. 'Facebook decided to suspend my account because of a piece (below) I wrote Monday about violence which in no way advocates for it (but does point out who is violent in the current ruckus),' Solnit wrote. She included a screenshot of Facebook's explanation of its decision, which reads, 'Your account, or activity on it, doesn't follow our Community Standards on account integrity.' Solnit did not explain how, beyond timing, she believed that the essay in question, 'Some Notes on the City of Angels and the Nature of Violence,' written on her independent site Meditations in an Emergency, was the reason for her ouster. Meta did not immediately respond to the Chronicle's request for comment. 'I think maybe it's begun, the bigger fiercer backlash against the Trump Administration,' her piece begins, referring to the clashes in Los Angeles between protesters of President Donald Trump's immigration policies and the California National Guard deployed by Trump against city and state officials' wishes. 'All they can do is punish and incite, and I hope that some of the protesters are telling them they're violating their mission and maybe the law,' the essay continues. 'We are escalating because they are escalating.' The 'Men Explain Things to Me' author goes on to question longtime right-wing and media narratives that stereotype protesters as violent while giving law enforcement a pass for much more harm to people and property. 'One thing to remember is that they'll claim we're violent no matter what; the justification for this ongoing attack on immigrants and people who resemble immigrants in being brown is the idea that America is suffering an invasion and in essence only a certain kind of white person belongs here,' she writes. The piece never advocates meeting fire with fire. Instead, it argues for a defiant yet nonviolent response. 'I believe ardently that nonviolent resistance is in the big picture and the long term the most effective strategy, but that doesn't mean it must be polite, placid, or please our opponents,' she writes. Solnit concludes by enumerating the kinds of violence the Trump administration has perpetrated — against the environment, against the First Amendment, against women, against his personal enemies, against the very notion of truth. 'It is up to us to defeat that agenda,' she writes. Solnit said she appealed the suspension. On Wednesday, June 11, she shared a screenshot of Facebook's response saying it decided to disable her account: 'It still doesn't follow our Community Standards on account integrity. You cannot request another review of this decision.' Solnit noted that she doesn't think a Meta higher-up has it in for her, despite the popularity of her account. She cited 'inane algorithms that often delete posts' as the likeliest explanation. (In April, the Chronicle reported on Meta's rejection of an ad promoting a Northern California Pride festival.) Even so, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has cozied up to the Trump administration, dining with the president at Mar-a-Lago and appointing Trump ally Dana White to his company's board. Meta also donated $1 million to Trump's inauguration fund. Meta's Community Standards on its account integrity page state that the company reserves the right to restrict or disable accounts that risk 'imminent harm to individual or public safety.' Solnit is the author of more than 30 books, including 'Infinite City: A San Francisco Atlas' and the children's book 'Cinderella Liberator,' which Marin Shakespeare Company
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Anti-Trump protests planned June 14. Here's what Ohio protesters can, can't do under the law
Ongoing demonstrations in Los Angeles and some areas of Ohio continue this week in response to recent ICE raids as the Trump administration ramps up its detention and deportation of immigrants. More large-scale protests are expected in Ohio and nationwide on June 14. Trump has since deployed the National Guard and Marines in LA, calling the protests 'violent, insurrectionist mobs' and 'lawless riots' on Truth Social. Local law enforcement has also issued a curfew for the area. Peaceful protest and assembly are protected under the First Amendment, but local or statewide restrictions may still apply. Here's what Ohio protest attendees should know ahead of the June 14 rallies, including how some Ohio protest laws changed in 2022 in the wake of George Floyd's 202 death. The First Amendment protects freedom of speech, assembly, and petition. Typically, demonstrations can happen in public places like streets, sidewalks, and parks. However, your freedom of expression could have limitations if it incites riots or violence. While not an exhaustive list, here are a few rules Ohio protestors must follow, according to the ACLU of Ohio and the Legal Aid Society of Cleveland. You can't protest on private property without permission from the owner. You cannot stop others from using the public space, such as blocking traffic or pedestrian walkways. No fighting, rioting, or 'disorderly conduct' under Ohio law. Law enforcement can implement "time, place, and manner' restrictions like enforcing noise levels or permits. You may need a permit for events that block traffic or close down streets, or if you use amplifiers, such as bullhorns. Demonstrators are allowed to wear a mask as part of their protest, but they may be required to provide information if suspected of a crime. It is a federal crime to threaten to harm the president, the vice president, or a major candidate. Do not physically or verbally antagonize the police or law enforcement. Avoid carrying any drugs or weapons to protests. If arrested, you could face additional charges for possession. Refusing to provide information or providing false information when stopped is illegal. If you are arrested, the ACLU of Ohio provides additional guidance on what to do, such as not resisting arrest and your right to hire an attorney. More protests are planned across the country on Saturday, June 14, 2025, the same day as President Trump's military parade and birthday celebration. According to USA TODAY reporting, the upcoming "No Kings Day" rallies are expected to be the largest and most widespread protests since Trump took office in January. In response, Trump said he planned to address any protests, including against his June 14 military parade, with "force." In the wake of the nationwide ICE protests, Vice President JD Vance defended Trump, stating on X that the administration "will not be intimidated by lawlessness" and that "Trump will not back down" as ICE enforces immigration laws. This article originally appeared on The Columbus Dispatch: Protesters plan more anti-Trump rallies. What Ohioans can, can't do


USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Trump is fine with peaceful protests during military parade, White House says
Trump is fine with peaceful protests during military parade, White House says 'Of course the president supports peaceful protests,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said during a June 11 briefing with reporters. 'What a stupid question.' Show Caption Hide Caption Trump warns military parade protesters will be met with 'big force' President Donald Trump warned people against protesting in Washington, D.C., to celebrate the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary. WASHINGTON ― The White House sought to reject any notion that President Donald Trump doesn't support peaceful protests, one day after he warned "any protesters" who interrupt his upcoming military parade in Washington will be "met with very heavy force." "Of course the president supports peaceful protests," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said during a June 11 briefing with reporters. "What a stupid question." Trump issued his threat to "any protesters who want to come out" during the June 14 parade, which will commemorate the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army while also falling on Trump's 79th birthday. Trump did not distinguish between peaceful protests that are protected by the First Amendment and violent riots that violate laws. More: Trump warns would-be protesters on Army's 250th birthday celebration of 'heavy force' "For those people who want to protest, they're going to be met with very big force," Trump said on June 10. "And I haven't even heard about a protest. But you know, these are people who hate our country. But they will be met with very heavy force." Trump's warning came after he's deployed National Guard troops and Marines to Los Angeles to counter protests that erupted over his administration's deportation efforts targeting immigrants in the country illegally. Trump critics have organized "No Kings Day" protests in more than 1,800 communities on the day of the military parade. It is expected to be the largest and most numerous protests since Trump's second term began, dwarfing the Hands Off protests in early April that drew as many as 1 million Americans to the streets at more than 1,000 rallies. "The president absolutely supports peaceful protests," Leavitt said at the June 11 press briefing. "He supports the First Amendment. He supports the right of Americans to make their voices heard. He does not support violence of any kind. He does not support assaulting law-enforcement officers who are simply trying to do their job." More: 'No Kings Day' protests planned for June 14 with aim to reclaim the American flag On his first day of his second term, Trump issued sweeping pardons for more than 1,600 people convicted of crimes ‒ including assaulting law enforcement officials ‒ for their roles in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack at the U.S. Capitol. The riot was waged by Trump supporters who hoped to stop the certification of Trump's election loss to Joe Biden. The military parade, estimated to cost $40 million in taxpayer dollars, is set to include Abrams tanks, vintage World War II warplanes and some 7,000 soldiers marching in period uniforms to mark the nation's battles from the Revolutionary War to the present. A reviewing stand has been erected for Trump to the south of the White House. Contributing: Sara Wire of USA TODAY. Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.