Bill requiring app stores to verify age for minors in Alabama stalls in House committee
A bill that would require app stores to verify the age of individuals creating accounts in Alabama will likely not become law this year.
The House State Government Committee was set Tuesday to consider SB 187, sponsored by Sen. Clyde Chambliss, R-Prattville. But the committee did not have a quorum for its scheduled meeting, preventing a vote on the bill.
With just two days left in the 2025 legislative session, the committee would have to meet Wednesday to give the bill a chance of passage on May 14, the last scheduled day of the session, but Rep. Chris Sells, R-Greenville, the chair of the committee, indicated that legislation will be worked on over the summer to be introduced in the next legislative session.
The bill would require app stores to obtain parental consent for users identified as minors before they can download or purchase apps or make in-app purchases. The bill would have also prohibited developers from enforcing disclosures or terms of service on minors without parental consent.
'Apps would have to be approved by the parent and be age-appropriate for the child, so that would take care of the problem of the phones that are already out there, and that's what this is about, protecting children,' said Sells, who sponsored a similar bill in the House.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
A companion bill, SB 186, also sponsored by Chambliss, was passed by both chambers and sent to Gov. Kay Ivey Thursday. It will require smartphones and tablets manufactured on or after June 1 and activated in Alabama include a pre-installed filter capable of blocking obscene material. Sells said that 'will address the issue going forward.'
Justin Hill, a spokesperson for NetChoice advocating for limited internet government control, free speech and enterprise across the country aid 'we all agree on the why' for the bill, but disagreed on the basis of free speech. He suggested that the bill could face legal challenges.
'There are 17 states where this bill was filed, they run afoul of the First Amendment in our belief. And we do a lot of work in this space. We have a litigation team that litigates a lot of similar bills. This one has not made it to the point of litigation yet,' Hill said.
NetChoice has sued or is in litigation with at least 12 states. Georgia was sued in March after passing a law that would require children to acquire parental consent to use social media.
Melea Stephens, a Birmingham marriage and family therapist and a board member of the National Center on Sexual Exploitation, claimed to have seen cases in her private practice of children 'being exploited on commonly used apps.' She said that minors are entering contracts with 'multibillion dollar companies when they sign up for an app without parental permission.'
'We do not allow minors to go into a bank and sign a contract because they cannot comprehend the risk involved,' Stephens said, adding that the legislation is 'based on contract law, not content moderation or free speech issues.'
Rachel Holland, a spokesperson for Meta, a vocal proponent of the legislation, said in an email after the bill's passage that they look forward to working with lawmakers on this legislation.
'Parents want a one-stop shop to verify their teen's age and grant permission for them to download apps in a privacy-preserving way. The app store is the best place for it, and one-third of US states and the US Congress have introduced bills recognizing the central role app stores play,' she said in a statement.
Holland also cited a poll from the Alabama Policy Institute, a conservative think tank, suggesting 83% of voters support parental approval in app stores.
Rep. Russell Bedsole, R-Alabaster, said that 'whether or not this legislation is the right piece,' he feels that parents need help monitoring children's behavior online. He said that he uses a service that requires his children to ask for permission before downloading an app on their phone. Despite approving apps that seemed harmless to his children, Bedsole said there was still some unwanted content in the form of advertising or surveys.
Bedsole said that despite these concerns, lawmakers should work with groups like NetChoice to address them because of their complexity.
'We've got to have someone who represents the development of these apps to be at the table, because the technology behind it is so complex that, as a parent alone, I need some help,' Bedsole said.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
5 hours ago
- Axios
DeSantis directs some flags at half-staff for "Hulk Hogan Day in Florida"
Gov. Ron DeSantis declared Friday "Hulk Hogan Day in Florida" and directed the famed wrestler's home county to fly flags at half-staff. State of play: The memo to state and local leaders comes a week after Hogan's death July 24 at his home on Clearwater Beach. It orders the U.S. and Florida flags to be flown at half-staff at the State Capitol in Tallahassee and at local and state buildings in Pinellas from sunrise to sunset Friday. The latest: The Pinellas-Pasco Medical Examiner's Office determined that Hogan died of a heart attack, NBC News reported. What they're saying:"His larger-than-life personality will be missed, as the 'Hulkster' was an icon for many who grew up in the 80s and 90s as well as today," DeSantis wrote. "He was a true Floridian through and through." Between the lines: Hogan, who grew up in Tampa as Terry Bollea, also had his share of controversy. A recording of Hogan using the n-word surfaced in 2015. In apologizing, he cited his Tampa upbringing, claiming use of the word "was part of the culture and the environment I grew up in." Hogan also successfully sued the media outlet Gawker after the website published a portion of a video of Hogan having sex with the wife of radio personality Bubba the Love Sponge Clem. The lawsuit, backed financially by tech billionaire Peter Thiel, had lasting impacts on privacy and First Amendment rights.
Business Upturn
8 hours ago
- Business Upturn
Orthodox Synagogue in Orlando, FL Sues for Religious Discrimination
Orlando, FL, July 31, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — The Orlando Torah Center (OTC), an Orthodox synagogue in Orlando's Sand Lake Hills neighborhood, filed a federal lawsuit today against Orange County and its Board of County Commissioners after they unfairly denied the synagogue's application to expand. According to OTC's counsel, this case is about ensuring that minority faith institutions are not held to a different standard and that religious freedom is fully protected under the law. The Orlando Torah Center's lawsuit seeks to defend its rights under the First Amendment, the federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), and Florida's Religious Freedom Restoration Act. 'Religious freedom is not optional; it is a constitutional guarantee,' said counsel Roman Storzer of Storzer and Associates, a leader in First Amendment and RLUIPA law. 'OTC has every legal and moral right to exist, expand, and serve its community without undue burden or discrimination.' The Orlando Torah Center, located along South Apopka Vineland Road in an area locally known as 'Church Row' for its concentration of more than a dozen churches, has served a walkable congregation since 2015. While numerous churches, a public school, and a daycare center have all received similar zoning approvals in similar zoning districts, OTC's request to expand for its religious use faced intense public opposition, including antisemitic remarks during public hearings, and was ultimately denied by the Board of County Commissioners on July 1, 2025, according to the legal complaint. 'Individuals of all faiths have a right to worship without outside interference,' said Mr. Storzer. 'OTC members have been part of their neighborhood for more than a decade. They have operated peacefully and built lasting relationships with families of all faiths. Disappointedly, they were denied the same rights routinely granted to others.' OTC seeks to expand its facility to accommodate increased attendance, children's programs, and enhanced safety measures—especially important given the rise in antisemitic attacks targeting Jewish institutions across the country. According to the lawsuit, OTC members face severe hardship due to lack of space, including families having to participate in religious activities outdoors in the Florida heat, children being unable to attend holiday programs, and attendees being exposed to safety risks due to the inability to secure the building. The case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Case No. 6:25-cv-014. To read the full complaint, please click here. For media inquiries, please contact [email protected]. About Orlando Torah Center Founded in 2011, the Orlando Torah Center (OTC) is an Orthodox synagogue committed to fostering a vibrant, welcoming community rooted in Torah learning, prayer, and acts of kindness. Serving a diverse and growing congregation, OTC offers educational programs, youth activities, and spiritual guidance for individuals and families at every stage of observance. As part of Orlando's thriving Torah infrastructure, OTC plays a central role in supporting Jewish life and continuity in the region. Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same. Ahmedabad Plane Crash
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
The head of the FCC is now the (second) most dangerous man in America
So much has been written and said about Paramount's settlement of a $20 billion lawsuit Donald Trump filed against "60 Minutes." I know this because I feel like I've written and said about half of it, and read whatever's left. You can break the whole ridiculous thing down to three words that start with C: coercion, capitulation and cowardice. You might as well throw in Colbert while you're at it. CBS announces the biggest coincidence a couple of weeks after the $16 million settlement: It was canceling "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert," citing "purely financial" reasons. Maybe they just discovered those reasons all of a sudden, and the decision had nothing to do with Colbert being a frequent and vicious critic of Trump. It's all terrible, a real warning sign that Trump is trying to control not just the flow of information, but the information itself ― what actually gets covered. (Only things that put him in a positive light, naturally.) It's tinpot strongman stuff and if it doesn't scare you, it should. Does the head of the FCC believe in free speech? Does Trump? We know this. But what's really scary is what Brendan Carr, Trump's handpicked human rubber stamp of a Federal Communications Commission chairman, has been going around saying after the settlement. It's really ominous, at least if you believe free speech is a pillar of democracy. Which I do. Does Carr? You wouldn't know it by what he's been telling people after the FCC approved a merger between Paramount and Skydance, a media company. "Americans no longer trust the legacy national news media to report fully, accurately, and fairly. It is time for a change," Carr said in a statement after the approval. "That is why I welcome Skydance's commitment to make significant changes at the once storied CBS broadcast network. In particular, Skydance has made written commitments to ensure that the new company's programming embodies a diversity of viewpoints from across the political and ideological spectrum." At least Anna Gomez is fighting back The problem is that Carr's idea, which, let's face it, is really Trump's idea, of what accurate and fair means is whatever is positive about Trump and negative about his perceived enemies. That's what is at the heart of the ridiculous lawsuit, which accused "60 Minutes" of editing one of Kamala Harris' answers in an interview before the election, a practice that is routine. Why settle? Because Paramount wanted the FCC approval. It's disturbing, but hardly unexpected. And Anna Gomez, the lone Democrat on the FCC board, certainly didn't back down. "Even more alarming, (the FCC) is now imposing never-before-seen controls over newsroom decisions and editorial judgment, in direct violation of the First Amendment and the law,' Gomez said in a statement after the approval. Maybe she's exaggerating? Maybe not. Skydance CEO David Ellison pledged to eliminate DEI programming, whatever that is ― I can guess who gets to decide ― and to create an ombudsman to handle complaints of bias. I wonder if the White House will have a direct line to make them? Or will CBS be so hobbled by fear it won't need one? It doesn't end there. On a recent appearance on Fox News ― everybody wants to party with their friends ― Bill Hemmer asked Carr if "The View," the liberal-leaning talk show on ABC, was "in the crosshairs of this administration." Now, in normal times, if you can remember those, this is the kind of question that would get a quick, "Of course not, we don't target anyone specifically, we just follow the FCC practice of responding to complaints." Nope. "Look, it's entirely possible that there's issues over there," Carr said. "And stepping back, this broader dynamic, once President Trump has exposed these media gatekeepers and smashed this facade, there's a lot of consequences. I think the consequences of that aren't quite finished." What is all this "exposed" and "smashed" garbage? What Trump has done is bully news operations into submission. It's not brave. It's not useful. It's scary. Of course there's more. Whining about accurate coverage isn't courage. It's sick "If you step back, what's happening here is, you know, I think President Trump is fundamentally reshaping the media landscape," Carr said in an interview on CNBC's "Squawk Box On the Street." And the way he's doing that is when he ran for election, he ran directly at these legacy broadcast media outlets, ABC, NBC, CBS." Yes, by whining about their accurate coverage to a base of supporters only too eager to hear it. "For years, you know, government officials just allowed those entities with execs sitting in Hollywood, in New York, to dictate the political narrative," Carr said. "And he has fundamentally changed the game. And you see that really having consequences that are just rushing all through the media." Yes, we do. And it is chilling. In what possible way does this constitute free speech? How does shaping the narrative to bolster your own interests and suppress those you disagree with fit that definition in any way? At that point it's propaganda. At any other time Brendan Carr would be the most dangerous person in America. Given the circumstances, however, he'll have to settle for second place. 'South Park' excoriated Trump: The White House comeback is just sad Reach Goodykoontz at Facebook: Media commentary with a side of snark? Sign up for The Watchlist newsletter with Bill Goodykoontz. This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: How the head of the FCC is selling out free speech | Opinion
