
UFC veteran Jared Cannonier refuses ‘gatekeeper' tag after emphatic TKO against Gregory Rodrigues
Cannonier is one of two UFC fighters, alongside Conor McGregor, to hold knockout wins at three weights. His fourth-round TKO of Rodrigues was his latest stoppage at middleweight, where he challenged for the title in 2022.
And Cannonier, despite his advanced age as far as sport goes, believes he can vie for gold again.
'I would like somebody ranked higher than me,' said the American, No 7 in the division, at a post-fight press conference. 'Unfortunately, all the people ranked higher than me are either in line to get a title shot, are gonna wait for a title shot, or [they] just beat me.
'Four people in the rankings ahead of me have beaten me. Dricus [Du Plessis] and Khamzat [Chimaev] are the only ones I haven't fought. As long as I keep winning, [I've got rematches ahead of me]. But I'm not gonna rule anything out. Shoot, if they say, 'Hey, Jared, we need you to fight Dricus next for the belt,' I'm like: 'Hell, yes, I'm ready.'
'I don't think anybody's put that [gatekeeper] tag on me, it was just when I was doing all these interviews, the way I was answering all these questions... it sounded as if I was a gatekeeper. You guys kept saying: 'You're fighting this up-and-comer,' 'You're fighting a second up-and-comer,' 'You're fighting another up-and-comer.' Doesn't that sound like, 'Hey, you're a gatekeeper'?
'That's not how I see myself, though. That's never how I'm gonna see myself, that's never what I'm going to be. I'm not a gatekeeper, I am – I don't know – a fighter. I couldn't come up with anything clever, so!'
Cannonier was dropped twice by Rodrigues in round one, before fighting back to almost finish the Brazilian in round three. 'I didn't hear the bell ring at the end of that round,' Cannonier revealed in the cage after the bout, 'so I thought I'd finished the fight. I got up and was looking around like, 'How come nobody's as excited as I am?' Then they reaffirmed that it was just the end of the round.'
Cannonier would ultimately seal the win in round four, dropping Rodrigues with a barrage of strikes against the fence.
'My corner continued to deliver the message of how they saw it on the outside,' Cannonier said. 'I had him against the ropes, he was hurt, he was slowing down, I was able to finish. My energy... I felt great, I could do this for five more rounds if we needed to – without getting hit, of course!
'I guess I was hurt enough [in round one] to get dropped on my ass a couple times, but naturally so: Gregory hits hard as hell, and he was slinging big f***ing shots. I was able to weather the storm and keep my composure even in those really tough spots, and work my way back up to my feet. I'd rather die on my feet than die on my back.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
White House UFC cage fight will take place on the South Lawn, Dana White says
'That is going to happen,' he told Wall Street Journal columnist Jason Gay on Monday. President Donald Trump, who has attended a number of UFC fights, said early last month that he would host a bout at the White House to mark 250 years since the signing of the Declaration of Independence. "Every one of our national park battlefields and historic sites are going to have special events in honor of 'America250' and I even think we're going to have a UFC fight," Trump said on July 3 during a speech in Des Moines, Iowa. Trump said at the time that White would organize the event, adding that it's going to be a "championship fight, full fight, like 20,000 to 25,000 people, and we're going to do that as part of '250' also.' Following his new agreement with Paramount, which is set to hand UFC $7.7 billion over seven years, White told The Journal that the event would be broadcast 'probably on CBS.' This comes as UFC's $550 million a year deal with ESPN comes to an end. White, who's a ally of Trump, told The Journal that several players in the media wanted a part in the future of UFC. There was consideration of splitting the franchise across a number of carriers, as the NBA and NFL have done. 'Last minute, these guys came in and said, 'You know what? We don't want to share. We want it all.'' White said of Paramount. 'What I do love about [the deal] is that the product is much more affordable for everybody,' he claimed. UFC doesn't have an athletes' union, and the fighters are independent contractors. When White was asked if the new agreement would prompt fighters to bargain collectively, he said, 'I can tell you this—since day one, fighter pay just continues to go up. Every new deal we get, it's definitely good for the fighters.' Looking ahead to next year, White said, 'Fighters will be warming up in the White House. It's incredible.' However, there are logistical problems to be solved. 'My Octagon is like 25,000 pounds,' White noted. UFC fights usually take place in large stadiums. 'I don't give a s*** if there's only one seat at this thing,' White told The Journal. 'This is so monumental and historical and just such a cool thing. All I care about is the Octagon on the lawn and the fight happening with the backdrop being the White House and the Washington Monument.' Asked if UFC fighters are already hoping to get the nod, White said, 'hell yes.' A number of UFC fighters, both current and former, have expressed interest in fighting at the White House. They include Conor McGregor, who hasn't fought since 2021, and Jon Jones, who has said that he may reverse his retirement to take part. However, Russian fighter Khamzat Chimaev recently played down his chances of getting to fight at the White House when speaking to MMA Junkie. 'Bro, look at my face,' he said. 'I don't think they would let me come or whatever.'


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
A UFC fight at the White House? Dana White says it's happening as part of deal with Paramount
Hours after Paramount and UFC announced a billion-dollar rights deal, Dana White said he had yet to hear from his friend, President Donald Trump, on his thoughts about the fight company's new streaming home. That was fine with White. The UFC CEO was set to travel to Washington on Aug. 28 to meet with Trump and his daughter, Ivanka, to catch up and discuss logistics on the proposed Fourth of July fight card next year at the White House. Trump said last month he wanted to stage a UFC match on the White House grounds with upwards of 20,000 spectators to celebrate 250 years of American independence. 'It's absolutely going to happen," White told The Associated Press. 'Think about that, the 250th birthday of the United States of America, the UFC will be on the White House south lawn live on CBS.' The idea of cage fights at the White House would have seemed improbable when the Frittata brothers purchased UFC for $2 million in 2001 and put White in charge of the fledging fight promotion. White helped steer the company into a $4 billion sale in 2016 and broadcast rights deals with Fox and ESPN before landing owner TKO Group's richest one yet — a seven-year deal with Paramount starting in 2026 worth an average of $1.1 billion a year, with all cards on its streaming platform Paramount+ and select numbered events also set to simulcast on CBS. ESPN, Amazon and Netflix and other traditional sports broadcast players seemed more in play for UFC rights — White had previously hinted fights could air across different platforms — but Paramount was a serious contender from the start of the negotiating window. The Paramount and UFC deal came just days after Skydance and Paramount officially closed their $8 billion merger — kicking off the reign of a new entertainment giant after a contentious endeavor to get the transaction over the finish line. White said he was impressed with the vision Skydance CEO David Ellison had for the the global MMA leader early in contract talks and how those plans should blossom now that Ellison is chairman and CEO of Paramount. 'When you talk about Paramount, you talk about David Ellison, they're brilliant businessmen, very aggressive, risk takers,' White said. 'They're right up my alley. These are the kind of guys that I like to be in business with.' The $1.1 billion deals marks a notable jump from the roughly $550 million that ESPN paid each year for UFC coverage today. But UFC's new home on Paramount will simplify offerings for fans — with all content set to be available on Paramount+ (which currently costs between $7.99 and $12.99 a month), rather than various pay-per-view fees. Paramount also said it intends to explore UFC rights outside the U.S. 'as they become available in the future.' UFC matchmakers were set to meet this week to shape what White said would be a loaded debut Paramount card. The UFC boss noted it was still too early to discuss a potential main event for the White House fight night. 'This is a 1-of-1 event,' White said. There are still some moving parts to UFC broadcasts and other television programming it has its hands in as the company moves into the Paramount era. White said there are still moving parts to the deal and that includes potentially finding new homes for 'The Ultimate Fighter,' 'Road To UFC,' and 'Dana White's Contender Series.' It's not necessarily a given the traditional 10 p.m. start time for what were the pay-per-view events would stand, especially on nights cards will also air on CBS. 'We haven't figured that out yet but we will,' White said. And what about the sometimes-contentious issue of fighter pay? Some established fighters have clauses in their contracts that they earn more money the higher the buyrate on their cards. Again, most of those issues are to-be-determined as UFC and Paramount settle in to the new deal — with $1.1 billion headed the fight company's way. 'It will affect fighter pay, big time,' White said. 'From deal-to-deal, fighter pay has grown, too. Every time we win, everybody wins.' Boxer Jake Paul wrote on social media the dying PPV model — which was overpriced for fights as UFC saw a decline in buys because of missing star power in many main events — should give the fighters an increased idea of their worth. 'Every fighter in the UFC now has a clear picture of what the revenue more PPV excuses,' Paul wrote. 'Get your worth boys and girls.' White also scoffed at the idea that the traditional PPV model is dead. There are still UFC cards on pay-per-view the rest of the year through the end of the ESPN contract and White and Saudi Arabia have teamed to launch a new boxing venture that starts next year and could use a PPV home. White, though, is part of the promotional team for the Canelo Álvarez and Terence Crawford fight in September in Las Vegas that airs on Netflix. 'It's definitely not run it's course,' White said. 'There were guys out there who were interested in pay-per-view and there were guys out there that weren't. Wherever we ended up, that's what we're going to roll with.' White said UFC archival footage 'kills it' in repeat views and those classic bouts also needed a new home once the ESPN deal expires. Just when it seems there's little left for UFC to conquer, White says, there's always more. Why stop at becoming the biggest fight game in the world? Why not rewrite the pecking order in popularity and riches and go for No. 1 in all sports? 'You have the NFL, the NBA, the UFC, and soccer globally,' White said. 'We're coming. We're coming for all of them.' ___


North Wales Chronicle
2 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Sporting merit rendered meaningless – Palace hit out at Europa League demotion
The FA Cup winners were demoted to the Conference League by European football's governing body UEFA on July 11 after it determined that, as of March 1, American businessman John Textor had control or influence at both Palace and French club Lyon. Palace appealed, but on Monday the CAS announced the London club had lost their appeal, with Nottingham Forest expected to take the place in UEFA's second-tier competition. At a time when we should be celebrating our victory in the Community Shield at Wembley, the decision by UEFA and followed by the Court of Arbitration for Sport shows that sporting merit is rendered meaningless. Full statement 👇#CPFC — Crystal Palace F.C. (@CPFC) August 12, 2025 A statement from the Eagles read: 'At a time when we should be celebrating our victory in the Community Shield at Wembley, the decision by UEFA and followed by the Court of Arbitration for Sport shows that sporting merit is rendered meaningless. 'When we won the FA Cup against Manchester City on that momentous day in May, our manager and players earned the right to play Europa League football. 'We have been denied that opportunity. 'It appears that certain clubs, organisations and individuals have a unique privilege and power. 'This growing and unhealthy influence has shattered the hopes and dreams of Crystal Palace supporters, and does not bode well for aspirational teams all over Europe competing to progress when rules and sanctions are unevenly applied in the most flagrant way.' UEFA and the CAS have been contacted for comment by the PA news agency. UEFA regulations state that where one or more clubs are found to have shared ownership, they cannot play in the same competition, and Lyon held on to the Europa League spot by virtue of their higher league position. Textor has since sold his shares to New York Jets owner Woody Johnson, a purchase completed in late July. The Eagles' stance, as outlined in a July statement, was that 'it's clear for everyone to see that we are not part of a multi-club operation and never have been'. On Tuesday, Palace wrote in their statement: 'Multi-club structures hide behind the charade of a 'blind trust' while clubs such as ours, who have no connection to another club whatsoever, are prevented from playing in the same competition. 'To compound the injustice, clubs that appear to have huge informal arrangements with each other are also allowed to participate and even possibly play against each other. 'While we respect the CAS tribunal members, the process is designed to severely restrict and, in our case, make it almost impossible to receive a fair hearing. 'The denial of all disclosure requests to obtain correspondence between the relevant parties, the refusal to allow witness testimony from those involved, and the general lack of formality and respect for law mean decisions cannot be properly challenged, leading to pre-determined outcomes.' Palace have called for UEFA to consider both its regulations and the application of those rules. A post shared by Crystal Palace Football Club (@cpfc) The club statement concluded: 'UEFA's decision has wider implications for the governance of the sport. A combination of poorly conceived regulations and their unequal application means our brilliant fans will be deprived of the chance to watch this team compete in the Europa League for the first time in our history. 'This should be a turning point for football. 'UEFA must fulfil its mandate to pass coherent rules which are properly communicated and applied, with reasonable cure periods to resolve uncertainty and consistent sanctions, treating all clubs equally with a proper appeal process. 'The European Court of Justice has made it clear that rulings similar to this will be under greater scrutiny from national courts in future. Only then will fairness and due process be granted to every team. 'Although we continue to take legal advice on the next steps, we will compete in the Conference League with the same determination and will to win that characterises this incredible club.' A full CAS explanation, with grounds, will be published in due course unless parties request confidentiality. The CAS statement on Monday explained: 'After considering the evidence, the panel found that John Textor, founder of Eagle Football Holdings, had shares in CPFC and OL and was a board member with decisive influence over both clubs at the time of UEFA's assessment date. 'The panel also dismissed the argument by CPFC that they received unfair treatment in comparison to Nottingham Forest and OL. The panel considered that the UEFA regulations are clear and do not provide flexibility to clubs that are non-compliant on the assessment date, as CPFC claimed.'