
Democrats need to stop focusing on voters' skin colour, says party rising star
Adam Frisch would have to hurry, he realised, if he was to make his pitch to become the next vice-chair of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to every minority group on the schedule.
Starting the day at the Disability Caucus (10 - 11.30am), he and 18 other candidates were due at the Women's Caucus, the Black Caucus, the Hispanic Caucus, the American Asian and Pacific Islander Caucus and the Native Caucus all in the space of a single afternoon.
Mr Frisch, a 57-year-old former banker, was no stranger to hustling for votes. Over two runs for Colorado's 3rd District, a vast tract of land spanning ski slopes, cattle-farms and dusty plains, he had driven his red Ford-150 truck more than 77,000 miles.
In 2022, he came within 554 votes (0.16 per cent) of pro-Trump firebrand Lauren Boebert, despite predictions of a Republican walk-over typical in the state. She fled the area rather than face a re-run in 2024.
'I know you guys aren't looking for a straight, middle aged, white, fairly successful male to be running around the Democratic banner,' he told party officials ahead of his first run, but argued his unorthodox views would help him build a 'winning coalition'.
In 2024, he ran the Republicans surprisingly close again, buoyed by a willingness to break Democratic taboos. In one campaign advert he wielded a shot-gun on a hunting trip. His priorities were 'border security', 'inflation' and 'protecting our water'. And he was the first candidate to call for Joe Biden to step down after his semi-catatonic debate performance.
But when it came to the vote at the Gaylord National Resort and Convention centre on the outskirts of Washington DC, Mr Frisch's appeal fell flat.
On Feb 1, the 450 members of the Democratic National Committee, the group that organises the party's policy platform, voter outreach and fundraising, chose three other vice-chairmen, including David Hogg, the 24-year-old gun control activist.
As chairmen they elected Ken Martin, a staffer on Kamala Harris's campaign who argued that the party 'already has the right message' – it just needed to do better in delivering it.
The DNC vote supercharged many Democrats' fears that the party is failing to fully reckon with the electoral wipe-out it suffered against Donald Trump, a man it painted as a Nazi-sympathising felon.
'The Democratic Party is still slicing and dicing up the electorate in a way that the electorate is not voting anymore,' said Mr Frisch, who is running for Colorado's 3rd district again in 2026. 'Instead of looking at people as Americans and fathers and husbands, mothers and daughters,' it tries to break voters down into sub-groups defined by ethnicity or single-issue concerns, such as climate change or reproductive rights
Democrat support has collapsed among ethnic minorities, including every caucus group that Mr Frisch pitched to at the DNC vote. The only two groups whom Ms Harris boosted Democratic vote share against Mr Biden were university-educated whites and people making more than $100,000 per year.
Over three days at the Gaylord Hotel, 'there was never a conversation about, what should we do to try to figure out how to build a winning coalition?'
'There was no How-to-Win caucus,' or even one on 'What Happened' in 2024, Mr Frisch said.
'The lack of intellectual curiosity, or political curiosity about looking at some of the top performers [against Republicans], whether they've won or lost, is political malpractice,' he added.
One month into Mr Trump's second administration, the Democrats have been reduced to little more than by-standers. Polls show the party with its lowest-ever approval rating. Gone are the days of Mr Trump's first term, when young voters joined up in droves and tens of thousands took to the streets in protest.
To appeal once more to a scornful electorate, a long and painful process of minimising the influence of 'The Groups' must begin, Mr Frisch argues. In the parlance of Capitol Hill, 'The Groups' refers to the single-issue NGOs which have taken on huge influence within the Democratic Party, furnishing campaigns with staff and ready-made political programmes.
These organisations mushroomed after Mr Trump's first victory, with large numbers of voters donating to the progressive causes closest to their heart – be it Black Lives Matter, Planned Parenthood, or the Sierra Club, an environmental lobbying group. In just a few days after Mr Trump's 2017 'Muslim Ban', the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) raised $24.1 million from 350,000 online donations, almost half the entire annual expenditure of the Conservative Party.
The real risk from 'The Groups' is that they started to work together as a sort of Left-wing 'Supergroup', Mr Frisch said, discouraging candidates from speaking their own mind. Planned Parenthood's website still boasts of its support for Defunding the Police; a colleague of Mr Frisch's was told she would lose the support of a reproductive rights group if she did not soften her stance on immigration.
'Members of Congress are kind of afraid to talk about it publicly, just the amount of influence and money that goes into this', he said. And it has come at transparent electoral cost.
In recent years, 'The Groups' bombarded candidates with tick-box questionnaires, challenging them to prove their liberal bona-fides – and thus gain the support (or risk the opposition) of their large memberships. On the road, Mr Frisch regularly ignored the missives.
But it was a long-forgotten answer by Ms Harris to one of these questionnaires, sent out in 2019 by the ACLU, that became the focus of the Trump administration's last advertising blitz ahead of the November 5 vote.
'Kamala Harris is for they/them,' the advert said. 'President Trump is for you!'
In her reply to the questionnaire, Ms Harris had promised to support government-funded surgeries for transgender prisoners, as well as cut funding for ICE and end the detention of illegal immigrants. Viewers of the Trump campaign advert swung 2.7 per cent in favour of the Republicans, according to one poll.
Sending out the questionnaire was a 'step too far' for the ACLU, said David Golberger, a former lawyer for the organisation who famously defended the rights of Nazis to parade through the town of Skokie in 1977. 'That's getting involved in partisan politics,' Mr Goldberger told The Telegraph, lamenting his former employer's shift into the equivalent of a progressive pressure-group.
On a formal level, the Democratic Party does not yet appear to have learnt the lessons from its embrace of positions that only appeal to '10 or 20 per cent' of the electorate, Mr Frisch said.
At the Climate Caucus, he repeated his long-standing position that America should drill for its own gas. Colorado has plentiful supplies and it is cleaner, cheaper and less ethically dubious than importing energy from Russia or China. He was taken to task over lacking a long-term view of the risks of climate change.
'I said: 'I'm very aware of where the earth is now, and I'm very aware of where the earth is going to be in 20 years, but the vast majority of voters have 20 days to pay rent'.'
Ahead of the final vote for the DNC vice-chairmen, Jaime Harrison, the former chairman, announced that voting procedures would have to change to incorporate the entry of a non-binary candidate. Republican social media channels gleefully shared footage of Mr Harrison appearing to lose track of his words as he instructed members how to treat a person 'neither male nor female' without violating the DNC's requirement of gender-parity across seven VC positions.
In the audience, Mr Frisch said it was like watching a 'Saturday night level skit'.
The best-known of the three vice-chairmen elected ahead of him is Mr Hogg, who survived the 2018 Parkland High School massacre. Locked inside a classroom, Mr Hogg interviewed his terrified friends about their views on gun control as the gunman shot dead 17 pupils in the corridors outside.
Telegenic and Harvard-educated, the founder of 'March for our Lives' gun-control movement has gone on to create 'Leaders We Deserve', a PAC aimed at electing Generation Z candidates to political office. But his recipe for the Democratic Party's recovery does not track with Mr Frisch's.
When a pro-gun Democrat lost her race in Alaska last year, Mr Hogg celebrated the defeat as 'good riddance'. Within two weeks of taking office at the DNC, he had used its access to vast contacts lists to send out fundraising messages for Leaders We Deserve, the PAC from which he draws a $100,000 annual salary.
'I was just elected DNC Vice Chair!,' one text read. 'This is a huge win for our movement to make the Democratic Party more reflective of our base.'
For Mr Frisch, the Democratic Party, if anything, needs to head in the opposite direction – and become more open to winning the support of sceptical swing voters.
Responding to the text, the former currency trader sighed: 'That's God's gift to Fox News,' he said.
'Getting to the base is not the problem,' he said. 'It's adding people to your base' that the Democrats need to focus on, if they are not to face long years in the political wilderness. That is the message he will continue to take over thousands, if not tens of thousands more hard miles of driving the highways of Colorado.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
18 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
JD Vance reveals how President Trump really feels about Elon's attacks and reacts to awkward call for impeachment
Vice President JD Vance revealed behind-the-scenes details of Elon Musk 's blow-up on social media on Friday and President Donald Trump 's reaction. Vance spoke about the incident in a podcast interview with comedian Theo Von that was recorded on Thursday as the fight between the pair of billionaires escalated. The vice president found himself reacting in real time to some of Musk's posts on X during the interview, including an awkward post where Musk endorsed the idea of impeaching President Trump and installing Vance as president. 'I just think the idea that the president should be impeached, I'm sorry, it's insane. It's totally insane, Vance said, describing Musk's social media tirade as 'not helpful.' He said that obviously Musk had the First Amendment right to disagree with the president but that it was a mistake for him to attack Trump. Vance also shot down Musk's claim that the president was 'in the Epstein files' even though he admitted he hadn't even seen the post before the interview. 'Absolutely not. Donald Trump didn't do anything wrong with Jeffrey Epstein. Like, there's the guy is whatever the Democrats and the media says about him, that's totally BS,' he said. The vice president was with the president when Musk's criticism of Trump began, but had not seen all the posts as he traveled to Nashville for the interview with Vonn. Theo Von asks JD Vance about Elon Musk's attacks against President Trump 'I know the president, for a couple of days, I'll tell you, I don't want to reveal too many confidences, but he was getting a little frustrated, feeling like some of the criticisms were unfair coming from Elon,' he said. Vance said that Trump was actually quite restrained in his response to Musk, again asserting that Musk's attacks were not good for the country. 'But I think it's been very restrained because the president doesn't think that he needs to be in a blood feud with Elon Musk. I actually think if Elon chilled out a little bit, everything would be fine,' he said. Musk signaled his opposition to the 'Big Beautiful Bill' on Thursday and posted criticism of the president on social media. Trump responded to Musk in real time, speaking to reporters during his meeting with the German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio sat beside the president as he spoke, but did not speak about Musk themselves. The president's comments in the Oval Office further aggravated Musk, after clips of the news conference made their way to his social media feed. The highly-anticipated interview between Vance and Von was the first time the vice president spoke on camera about the feud. He reserved his public reaction for several hours as Musk fumed on social media about the president. The vice president defended President Trump on social media Friday morning. 'There are many lies the corporate media tells about President Trump. One of the most glaring is that he's impulsive or short-tempered,' Vance wrote on X. 'Anyone who has seen him operate under pressure knows that's ridiculous. It's (maybe) the single biggest disconnect between fake media perception and reality,' he continued. The vice president teased his interview with Von on social media, joking that he had no idea what they would talk about. Musk shared the post with a laugh-crying emoji, suggesting that the vice president had lightened the mood. Vance also posted a statement in support of Trump late in the evening. 'President Trump has done more than any person in my lifetime to earn the trust of the movement he leads. I'm proud to stand beside him,' Vance wrote at 10:30 pm EST on X. Vance has sided with Trump, but has demonstrated caution about attacking Musk, as he is still a very powerful and influential political donor. The vice president considers Musk a friend, and he defended the unpredictable billionaire as he prepared to exit the administration as a special advisor. 'I am going to miss him. Elon's become a very good friend,' Vance told Newsmax host Greg Kelly in an interview last week. Vance and Musk already had a relationship prior to the campaign, but their friendship has deepened since the election. 'He and his kids have come to our house and had dinner with our kids. I'm very close to him,' Vance said.


Belfast Telegraph
21 minutes ago
- Belfast Telegraph
Donald Trump and Elon Musk urged by Republicans to end feud
At a minimum, the explosion of animosity between the two powerful men could complicate the path forward for Republicans' massive tax and border spending legislation that has been promoted by Mr Trump but criticised by Mr Musk. 'I hope it doesn't distract us from getting the job done that we need to,' said representative Dan Newhouse, a Republican from Washington state. 'I think that it will boil over and they'll mend fences.' As of Friday afternoon, Mr Musk was holding his fire, posting about his various companies on social media rather than attacking the president. Mr Trump departed the White House for his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey, without stopping to talk to reporters who shouted questions about his battle with Mr Musk. 'I hope that both of them come back together because when the two of them are working together, we'll get a lot more done for America than when they're at cross purposes,' senator Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican, told Fox News host Sean Hannity. Senator Mike Lee, a Republican from Utah, sounded almost pained on social media as Mr Trump and Mr Musk volleyed insults at each other, sharing a photo composite of the two men and writing, 'But … I really like both of them.' 'Who else really wants @elonmusk and @realDonaldTrump to reconcile?' Mr Lee posted, later adding: 'Repost if you agree that the world is a better place with the Trump-Musk bromance fully intact.' So far, the feud between Mr Trump and Mr Musk is probably best described as a moving target, with plenty of opportunities for escalation or detente. We need your consent to load this Social Media content. We use a number of different Social Media outlets to manage extra content that can set cookies on your device and collect data about your activity. One person familiar with the president's thinking said Mr Musk wants to speak with Mr Trump, but that the president does not want to do it – or at least do it on Friday. In a series of conversations with television news presenters on Friday morning, Mr Trump showed no interest in burying the hatchet. Asked on ABC News about reports of a potential call between him and Mr Musk, the president responded: 'You mean the man who has lost his mind?' Mr Trump added in the ABC interview that he was 'not particularly' interested in talking to Mr Musk at the moment. Still, others remained hopeful that it all would blow over. 'I grew up playing hockey and there wasn't a single day that we played hockey or basketball or football or baseball, whatever we were playing, where we didn't fight. And then we'd fight, then we'd become friends again,' Mr Hannity said on his show on Thursday night. Acknowledging that it 'got personal very quick,' Mr Hannity nonetheless added that the rift was 'just a major policy difference'. House of Representatives speaker Mike Johnson projected confidence that the dispute would not affect prospects for the tax and border bill. 'Members are not shaken at all,' the Republican said. 'We're going to pass this legislation on our deadline.' He added that he hopes Mr Musk and Mr Trump reconcile, saying 'I believe in redemption' and 'it's good for the party and the country if all that's worked out.' But he also had something of a warning for the billionaire entrepreneur. 'I'll tell you what, do not doubt and do not second-guess and don't ever challenge the president of the United States, Donald Trump,' Mr Johnson said. 'He is the leader of the party. He's the most consequential political figure of this generation and probably the modern era.'


Daily Mail
25 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Elon Musk makes stunning Epstein U-turn after taking on Trump in war that cost him $27billion
Elon Musk has deleted the extraordinary claim from his X profile that implicated President Donald Trump as being 'in the Epstein files'. As the commander-in-chief and the X boss battled it out in a war of words over social media, Musk said 'it was time to drop a really big bomb'. In doing so he posted: '@RealDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public,' Musk wrote. 'Have a nice day, DJT!' The post has since disappeared from his X profile and he has appeared to backtrack on some of the remarks he made against Trump earlier this week. On Friday Trump had said he would look into canceling the loans and subsidies, telling reporters: 'I would certainly think about it, but it has to be fair.' He had also told reporters that he wished the South African businessman 'well', to which Musk replied in a post to X saying: 'Likewise'. Musk had also responded to the clip of Trump talking about canceling his grants, saying: 'Fair enough'. Trump had threatened to cut off huge federal loans and subsidies to Musk's companies after they fell out over the 'Big Beautiful Bill'. Elon Musk dramatically charged that President Donald Trump's name appears in the files of known pedophile Jeffrey Epstein The calmed remarks from Musk came after he lost around $27 billion from his net worth when the Tesla stock price tanked on Thursday. Trump didn't directly respond to Musk's Epstein charge, instead posting what amounted to a shrug on Truth Social, while also continuing to back the 'big, beautiful bill.' 'I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago,' Trump wrote. 'This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress.' Following the outbreak of their feud, Trump and his allies have said Musk turned on the bill because it cuts the subsidies. Musk has said he doesn't need them anyway. The fallout between Trump and Musk - who were political allies for a little less than a year - started in recent weeks when the billionaire started resisting Republicans' 'big, beautiful bill,' arguing that the spending wiped out DOGE's cost-cutting efforts. Then, on Thursday, when Trump was supposed to be hosting the new German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office, he was asked about Musk's recent criticism. From there the dam broke. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will any more, I was surprised,' Trump told reporters. The president suggested that Musk was angry - not over the bill ballooning the deficit - but because the Trump administration has pulled back on electric vehicle mandates, which negatively impacted Tesla, and replaced the Musk-approved nominee to lead NASA, which could hinder SpaceX's government contracts. 'And you know, Elon's upset because we took the EV mandate, which was a lot of money for electric vehicles, and they're having a hard time the electric vehicles and they want us to pay billions of dollars in subsidy,' Trump said. 'I know that disburbed him.' Over the weekend, Trump pulled the nomination of Jared Isaacman to lead NASA. Isaacman had worked alongside Musk at SpaceX. Musk posted to X as Trump's Q&A with reporters was ongoing. 'Whatever,' the billionaire wrote. 'Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill,' he advised. 'In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that [is] both big and beautiful. Everyone knows this!' Musk continued. 'Either you get a big and ugly bill or a slim and beautiful bill. Slim and beautiful is the way.' The spat quickly turned personal with Musk then posting that Trump would have lost the 2024 election had it not been for the world's richest man - him. Musk publicly endorsed Trump on the heels of the July 13th assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania and poured around $290 million into the Republican's campaign. The billionaire also joined Trump on the campaign trail when he returned to the site of the Butler shooting in early October, a month before Election Day. After his meeting with Merz, Trump continued to throw punches online. He asserted that he had asked Musk to leave his administration and said he was 'CRAZY!' 'Elon was "wearing thin," I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Trump wrote. It was after that post that he then threatened to pull SpaceX and Tesla's government contracts. Musk then taunted Trump to act. 'This just gets better and better,' he wrote. 'Go ahead, make my day …' In a follow-up post, Musk said he would 'begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.' Trump continued his 'crazy' remarks on Friday when speaking with CNN Anchor and Chief Political Correspondent Dana Bash. He said: 'I'm not even thinking about Elon. He's got a problem. The poor guy's got a problem.' Their explosive feud comes after a report from the New York Times in which he was accused of using a cocktail of drugs on the campaign trail. The Tesla CEO has previously said he was prescribed ketamine for depression and was taking the drug roughly every two weeks. But insiders allege Musk, 53, was taking the powerful anesthetic, which is known to have hallucinogenic properties, so frequently that it was affecting his bladder, the bombshell report claims. He also took ecstasy, psychedelic mushrooms and travelled with a daily pill box that contained about 20 different drugs, including Adderall, sources allege. Those around him claim that his consumption blurred the lines between medicinal and recreational, with Musk allegedly having taken drugs at private gathering across the US and in at least one foreign country, according to the NYT report which was based on a series of texts the outlet reviewed, as well as interviews with insiders. Musk has claimed in interviews that he only takes 'a small amount' of ketamine and that 'I really don't like doing illegal drugs', but his erratic behaviors, including making an apparent Nazi salute at Trump's election day event, seemingly suggest otherwise.