Gauteng DA accuses provincial govt of failing to prioritise residents' safety
The party believes this has contributed to delays in the repair of South African Police Service (SAPS) vehicles, which often leads to a shortage of crime-fighting resources.
DA's Shadow MEC of Gauteng Community Safety said this undermines crime prevention efforts.
"This is unacceptable and shows that the Lesufi-led government is not prioritising the protection of the people of Gauteng or addressing unemployment. Many crimes could have been prevented if these positions had been filled, helping police combat crime by ensuring that vehicles are readily available for policing.'
Meanwhile, in response to DA's questions, Premier Panyaza Lesufi wrote that the posts can only be filled by applicants who have the required skills and qualifications.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
Mkhwanazi ad hoc committee adopts draft terms of reference in ‘marathon', ‘poorly managed' meeting
The final draft of the terms of reference is expected to be circulated to MPs within two days. Parliament's Ad Hoc Committee investigating KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) Police Commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi's explosive allegations has adopted draft terms of reference after over 10 hours of deliberation. The committee, which met virtually on Monday, was tasked with considering and adopting the framework that will guide how MPs conduct their inquiry. The document, initially presented last week, outlines the purpose of the process, procedures for witness testimony, and other operational details. The committee, which has until 31 October to conclude its work, will operate independently of the judicial commission of inquiry, which is also set to investigate Mkhwanazi's claims. The commission will be chaired by former acting deputy chief justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga. Mkhwanazi ad hoc committee debates terms of reference The meeting, scheduled to run from 11am to 2pm, stretched late into the night as MPs debated which clauses should remain, be amended, or be removed. Parliament's legal services division presented the initial draft terms of reference, while political parties also made their submissions. The document's table of contents covered areas such as the legal framework, the objectives and scope of the inquiry, provisions for public participation, allocation of resources, the timeframe, and the venues for meetings. After adopting the first section, MPs debated proposals by the MK party relating to the legal framework, including how to handle classified and sensitive information. ALSO READ: Parties question ANC MP's election in Mkhwanazi ad hoc committee, logistics concerns raised Most members agreed that the committee should adhere to existing National Assembly protocols. 'There is a process for documents that are classified to be declassified legally, and I would like this committee to unravel whatever criminality. 'We do know that documents pretty much get classified to cover up criminality. So there is legislation available to us,' said EFF MP Leigh‐Ann Mathys. The MK party also suggested that the committee refer matters to relevant authorities rather than determining criminal liability, to preserve the separation of powers. Watch part one of the meeting: Objectives of the inquiry The Democratic Alliance (DA) proposed that monthly progress reports be submitted to the National Assembly. However, parliamentary legal adviser Andile Tetyana reminded members that the committee is only mandated to submit a final report by the end of October. He also noted that the DA's suggestion to probe possible human rights abuses and the role of unions in shielding compromised police officers would require expanding the committee's scope. READ MORE: 'Same as Phala Phala' – Police committee member not optimistic about Mchunu investigations 'This falls outside of the scope of the House resolution,' Tetyana said. DA MP Ian Cameron defended the idea of regular updates. 'It is a good principle to have consistent feedback, especially when there might be a frustration due to previous inquiries, whether in or outside Parliament, that people, particularly the public, feel that they are not taken into confidence.' Scope and logistics MPs then debated the scope of the inquiry. The ANC proposed that Mkhwanazi's allegations form the basis for identifying witnesses. The committee's chairperson, Soviet Lekganyane, confirmed that the KZN police commissioner would ideally be the first witness, with others called depending on his testimony. DA MP Lisa‐Maré Schickerling supported the approach but urged careful wording. 'We don't have an issue with it; however, we cannot only say that we are going to base everything on one person because other information is going to come out.' External legal counsel will be limited to collecting, organising, and presenting evidence. READ MORE: Ramaphosa says Madlanga commission mustn't take more than one year They will also determine the questioning format for witnesses, in consultation with the chairperson and committee. The MK party's proposal to appoint an external forensic investigator was rejected. According to Tetyana, public participation will be key to the process. Hearings are expected to begin in Johannesburg before resuming in Cape Town after the parliamentary recess. Watch part two of the meeting: On venues, the terms of reference recommend physical sittings in the parliamentary precinct or another suitable location. Virtual and hybrid sessions were ruled out. MPs also agreed that extensions could be sought from the Speaker or through a parliamentary resolution if needed. Detailed timelines will be set out in a draft programme by parliamentary staff, rather than being included in the terms of reference itself. 'Marathon meeting' Some MPs expressed frustration with how the meeting was managed. 'In my view, the proceedings have been wholly inadequate and have done less to support the virtual work of this committee and more to frustrate what should have been a clear and coherent process in adopting the terms of reference. 'We moved haphazardly from page to page between vastly different and unrelated submissions in a manner that was neither coherent nor streamlined, leaving the process unnecessarily confusing,' ActionSA MP Dereleen James said. James also accused some MPs of undermining the decorum of the meeting with constant interjections. 'This meeting was poorly managed,' she added. MK party MP David Skosana described it as a 'marathon meeting'. The final draft of the terms of reference is expected to be circulated to members within two days. NOW READ: Here are some of the rules outlining Parliament's Mkhwanazi allegations probe
The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
Cartoon of the day: 19 August 2025
The government has been accused of trying to control the process around the National Dialogue. The National Dialogue has been criticised after the ANC was accused of hijacking what was supposed to be a process led by civil society. Six legacy foundations, as well as the DA and Freedom Front Plus, pulled out of the National Dialogue after complaining that the government was trying to control the process. Before the National Dialogue properly got underway, the Thabo Mbeki Foundation, Steve Biko Foundation, FW de Klerk Foundation, Chief Albert Luthuli Foundation, Oliver & Adelaide Tambo Foundation and Desmond & Leah Tutu Legacy Foundation all pulled out. President Cyril Ramaphosa, however, brushed off their absence, saying that he has to be 'allowed to be the president'. READ NEXT: National Dialogue has big gaps in it
Daily Maverick
11 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
After the Bell: New reform tracker helps answer the question, ‘Will SA be okay?'
Finally, we are getting a live report card to help us answer this question. Last week, I was asked to be MC at the two launches of the Business Leadership SA Reform Tracker. It has a rather grand title. But, unlike so many other names in the economic and political space, it does what it says on the tin. It is tracking our reforms. Not quite minute by minute, but not far off. As someone who identifies as a 'journalist' and watches everything that happens as much as I can, I'm often asked certain questions by people I bump into, or audiences I speak in front of. The questions are wide-ranging, from 'who should I vote for' to 'should I emigrate', to 'will our economy start to grow now that…' I could go on. But in reality, they're the same question. Everyone who asks me one of those questions is asking something much more fundamental. They're asking, really: 'Will South Africa be okay?' It was a question summed up incredibly well by my old journalistic colleague and friend, Jan-Jan Joubert. He wrote a very well-researched answer and published it as a book. There is something almost peculiar to the South African middle class about this question. I don't think people in New Zealand or, dare I say it this particular Monday, Australia ask themselves this. Or people in the UK or Spain — despite the fact that in both those countries there are serious economic and political problems. But, considering the era of State Capture we have come from, I think it's fully understandable. I mean, look around. In Johannesburg, the mayor blames the DA for the state of the city while he himself has not appointed a finance head, or someone to actually manage the roads. That pothole that you see twice a day? There is actually no one in charge of fixing that right now. Our economy is still growing incredibly slowly, and it seems that people are putting more energy into arguing about the definition of employment than actually making changes that will result in more jobs. Just this weekend we saw a liar, someone who was central to the Guptas, who has been able to use the Hawks to have his ex-wife literally locked up in jail, still mouthing off about the state of the ANC? Malusi Gigaba should be in court. Not being given interview after interview as the chairperson of a portfolio committee in Parliament. But as we all know, there are virtually no Zondo prosecutions. And institutions such as Transnet are still battling to recover from State Capture. Progress However, it's important to note that there is progress. Finally, we are getting a live report card to help us answer the question: 'Will South Africa be okay?' Last week, I was asked to be MC at the two launches of the Business Leadership South Africa Reform Tracker. It has a rather grand title. But, unlike so many other names in the economic and political space, it does what it says on the tin. It is tracking our reforms. Not quite minute by minute, but not far off. Now, when I was at school, my reports were written in quite dry, dull text. They were very different from my tests, in which red was a prominent feature. Here, you get red, yellow and green. So at a glance, you can see how we are doing. But you can also click on each little tile and read what has been written about that sector. It might be that there is progress but still work to do; the story might be a lot more complicated than a single colour can indicate. And, wonderfully, there is also a way for you, perhaps as someone working in one of these sectors, to send some feedback. You might know that something has changed, or that in fact there has been more progress than the tracker is showing. Now, as a journalist, it's tempting to look for the red and start to get a little stroppy with a few politicians. Journalistic instincts But Dr Stuart Theobald, the founder and chairperson at Krutham who put the whole thing together, tells me that we should just wait a little before people like me go back to our journalistic instincts. He acknowledges that, yes, some reforms have stopped because of political problems, or opposition. And some have just failed. But some have been stopped deliberately, because the reform no longer makes sense. In other words, yes it's stopped — but for a good reason. So, if you are interested, it does make sense to actually go a little deeper into each sector, just to see how things really are. I know that one of the reasons you really read this is because you are searching for an answer to that question: 'Will South Africa be okay?' I mean, there is a lot to be worried about. Just as there is in the US, or China, or many, many other places right now. It might be worth just checking in with this tracker from time to time. Perhaps put it on your browser dashboard or something.
