Leading Employment Platform Urges New Zealand Businesses To Prepare For ‘Wage Secrecy' Changes
With New Zealands pay transparency bill gaining momentum, Employment Hero urges businesses to get ahead by doing three things – reviewing pay structures, updating employment contracts, and preparing clear explanations of how pay is determined.
Wellington
Global employment authority Employment Hero, a leading people, payroll and benefits software provider, has encouraged New Zealand employers to prepare for The Employment Relations (Employee Remuneration Disclosure) Amendment Bill before it comes into effect. The bill aims to prevent employers from enforcing pay secrecy clauses in employment contracts, making it legal for employees to openly discuss their salaries without fear of reprisal. The National Party backed the bill at its first reading and signalled during the second reading debate that it would maintain its support, increasing the likelihood that the bill will become law.
'The legislation is designed to promote greater pay transparency and equality, helping to identify and address unjustified pay disparities. While it's a welcome change that will bring New Zealand in line with countries that have implemented similar measures, such as Australia and the UK, employers should take proactive steps now to prepare for if the Bill passes,' said Sanam Ahmadzadeh Salmani, Employment Counsel at Employment Hero and workplace law commentator.
'This is an opportunity for employers to drive better pay transparency and better outcomes for both businesses and employees. Aligning with the legislation will not only ensure compliance if and when required but can also improve employee satisfaction and retention. Employees want to know they're being treated fairly and businesses that embrace this change will likely see stronger engagement and loyalty.
'By preparing and making any changes before the Bill passes, employers will be on the front foot and can avoid being caught out later down the track,' added Ahmadzadeh Salmani.
Ahmadzadeh Salmani highlights three key actions employers should take to prepare:
Conduct a pay review
'Start by reviewing your current pay structures – look for any discrepancies and understand the reasons behind them – whether it's due to role differences, experience or something else. Being proactive here will help you not only stay compliant, but to spot payroll red flags early,' advises Ahmadzadeh Salmani.
Review employment contracts
'Employers should also review employment agreements for any clauses that restrict pay discussions. These might not be labelled as 'pay secrecy' and they could be buried under general confidentiality or remuneration clauses. Having a clear plan of what needs updating now puts you in a better legal position once the Bill is passed,' adds Ahmadzadeh Salmani.
Prepare clear explanations
'Transparency doesn't stop at removing secrecy clauses. Employers need to be ready to explain how pay is determined and what data or criteria is used, how performance factors in and how employees can progress. This builds trust and reduces confusion or resentment,' she adds.
Employment Hero provides free resources to New Zealand businesses on employment law updates and compliance via its website. The latest resource, including Employee Remuneration Disclosure can be found here.
About Employment Hero
Employment Hero is revolutionising the world of work with the introduction of the world's first Employment Operating System (eOS), a solution designed to address the $20 billion problem of inefficient employment processes globally.
eOS is the next generation of employment technology, a revolutionary system that simplifies and automates complex employment processes, allowing businesses to streamline workflows, reduce administrative burden, and focus on growth
Employment Hero services over 300,000 businesses globally and its core platform reduces admin time by up to 80%. By launching employers toward their goals, powering more productive teams and taking employment to rewarding new heights, Employment Hero is revolutionising the employment marketplace.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
3 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Councillor Christine Fletcher slams Bishop's Auckland housing plan as ‘bully-boyish'
'We normally value a centre-right Government,' said the pair, who are members of the National Party's de facto local government wing in Auckland, Communities and Residents. They warned their constituents of the consequences from Bishop's 'excessive', 'vain' and 'steamroller fix from Lower Hutt'. Housing intensificaiton is a hot issue in Auckland/ Photo Doug Sherring 'Bishop will be the political bully historians recall for destroying Auckland's character area, heritage, and ending the coast-to-volcanic viewshaft amenity our city had prided itself on. 'National's continued erosion of local governance and its setting of housing targets, driven by Chris Bishop, is as bully-boyish as it comes,' they said. The article represents the views of the two politicians, not the council or the local board. It comes as the city wrestles with high house prices and falling rates of home ownership. While some pundits warn that promoting more intensification could destroy the city's special character areas, others argue we need to free up land, loosen restrictions and build more affordable terraced-style housing to cater for demand. Bishop said it was easy to write a column, but Fletcher had never sought a meeting with him to discuss the matter, and when he met with the council recently, she didn't raise the housing issue. 'Hyperbole aside, the column is littered with factual inaccuracies,' Bishop said. 'For example, the Government has not set housing targets yet. 'The simple reality is that housing in Auckland is some of the most expensive in the developed world and is holding the city back. The answer is to build more houses - and that's what our planning reforms will enable. 'It's actually that simple. I hope one day she can see that,' Bishop said. Ōrākei Local Board member Troy Churton. The pair of local politicians were responding to directives from Bishop, who holds the housing and RMA reform portfolios, for greater density across the city, including 'much, much higher' buildings of up to 15 storeys around City Rail Link stations. The Government has given the council until October 10 to finalise a plan to enable greater density. As part of negotiations, Bishop has allowed the council to opt out of the previous Government's Medium Density Residential Standard (MDRS) for builds of three homes of up to three storeys high on most sites - a move supported by Fletcher, an MP from 1990 to 1999, and Churton. The pair noted that the Auckland Unitary Plan allowed for the development of about 900,000 new homes, but said Bishop was proposing a capacity for 2 million 'feasible' homes over the next century. They believed this was an excessive growth target that would require unlocking large areas of land with infrastructure constraints. Chris Bishop wants much taller buildings around the City Rail Link stations. 'Bishop's demand-based growth targets create a strong risk of oversupply and over-investment, ruining character areas in the process,' Fletcher and Churton said. 'His prescriptive RMA amendments are blunt and disproportionate, spawning intended consequences without quality.' Today, the pair said Auckland was supporting intensification through significant changes to the Unitary Plan, including along corridors. 'Auckland should be planned by Auckland councillors and local boards for Auckland, not by Lower Hutt and Wellington housing idealists like Bishop,' they said. In 2021, Fletcher landed herself in hot water after likening Labour and National's then housing policy for Auckland to 'gang rape'. 'Councillor Fletcher's views on housing are well known, given her previous use of disgusting and offensive terms to describe housing intensification in Auckland,' Bishop said. 'I am unsurprised that she believes more housing in Auckland could result in an 'oppressive, politically-imposed collapse'.' The Herald reported this month that 100,000 homes had been built since higher-density planning rules came into force in 2016. Auckland Council's chief economist Gary Blick said housing supply was showing good signs of meeting population growth, but affordability was still not great. Blick said the median price for a house in Auckland was now about $1 million, or 7.5 times the median household income. In 2000, houses cost about five times the median household income. Sign up to The Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Scoop
3 hours ago
- Scoop
Review Condemns Taranaki Regional Council Treaty Principles Bill Decision-Making
, Taranaki Whanganui regional correspondent An internal review has condemned the Taranaki Regional Council's handling of its decision not to make a submission on the Treaty Principles Bill and not to debate the matter. It found the December 2024 decision-making process inconsistent with standing orders, meeting protocols and broader principles of good governance, transparency and natural justice. There was evidence of pre-meeting discussion and agreement among councillors to oppose making a submission and to curtail debate, which contributed to a perception of predetermination and bias. The handling of a related deputation by New Plymouth District councillor Dinnie Moeahu also fell short of the expected standard of engagement and caused offence. Chief executive Steve Ruru undertook the Council Conduct Review which made a raft of recommendations to improve decision-making and rebuild trust with iwi. He found the consequences of the December 2024 meeting "were severe, as it damaged the Council's reputation, resulted in a loss of trust and confidence in the elected Council from iwi partners and strained internal relationships". Council chair Craig Williamson welcomed the recommendations in the report. "It has been a challenging period for everyone and as a council we have taken time to reflect on what happened and how we can be better moving forward. "This review has identified constructive ways we can do that, and I am confident the council will be stronger as a result." Ruru's review looked at what happened before, during and after the meeting as well as the surrounding circumstances and processes. "Important lessons have been learned and the report includes several key recommendations that the council will consider at its 5 August meeting. "Firstly, it endorses the decision the council made in February to apologise to Mr Moeahu, the Taranaki community and councillors who were denied the opportunity to speak." It recommended training and professional development for councillors on Te Tiriti o Waitangi and its application to the council's work, mātauranga Māoriand tikanga of iwi in Taranaki. It also recommended structured training around standing orders and meeting procedures, to ensure these were clear and consistently applied. Ruru said the tight timeframe for submitting on the Bill meant it could not go before the Policy and Planning Committee first as it usually would. His report said the draft submission should have instead been emailed to committee members for comment - even though that might not have changed the outcome. It also recommended the council make greater use of additional meetings outside the set meeting cycle where necessary. Transparency and public input were also areas for improvement with a recommendation that all council and committee meetings be held in venues where they can be livestreamed and recorded. Ruru said his focus was now firmly on the future and the start of a new triennium after October's election was an opportunity for a fresh start. "I have recommended practical steps for the incoming council to consider as well as learning opportunities for councillors. I have also looked at where council officers and I can provide more support and advice to elected members. "When councillors meet after the election, they have the opportunity to implement better procedures, increase their understanding of Treaty and iwi issues and start the mahi to repair relationships and regain the full confidence of our community." Ruru wanted to report to the new council on options for allowing greater public input at meetings.
Otago Daily Times
12 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Jackson accuses govt of rigging next election
By Craig McCulloch of RNZ Labour MP Willie Jackson has accused the government of trying to rig next year's election through its move to block people from being able to enrol for 12 days before voting day. The claim - made during Parliament's general debate today - goes further than Labour's official position which has been that electoral changes would make it harder to vote. Jackson also used his speech to criticise Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour as the "biggest dropkick of all" following Seymour's use of the term to disparage late enrollers. "I don't know what's more offensive," Jackson told MPs. "The gerrymandering of our voting rules to rig the election, or the deputy prime minister referring to 600,000 people as dropkicks." Seymour last week told reporters he was "sick of dropkicks that can't get themselves organised to follow the law". More than 600,000 people enrolled or updated their enrolment details after writ day in 2023, including 110,000 on election day itself. In a fiery speech today, Jackson poured contempt on the "disgraceful, rotten, useless government", accusing it of actively suppressing the vote and "vandalising democratic participation". He pointed to official advice which noted that young people, Māori, Pasifika and Asian communities would be disproportionately affected by the changes. "It's racist disenfranchisement," Jackson said. "It's a breach of democracy... this government risks being accused of rigging the next election." Jackson commended Attorney-General Judith Collins as "one of the most principled National Party members" for standing up to her "weak and useless leader" by warning that the voting changes breached human rights. "She's had the courage to call these voter suppression powers what they are: discriminatory." Jackson concluded his speech by taking at aim at Seymour, calling on him to apologise for his "disgraceful" description of some voters as dropkicks. "He's the most dangerous politician of the last generation... not only a disgrace as the deputy prime minister, but surely the biggest dropkick of all." Ministers brush off Jackson comments Speaking to RNZ, Seymour laughed off Jackson's description of him as a dropkick: "To be honest, I was always an open side flanker. Didn't really do a big drop kick, although, on a good day, I could nail one from just outside the 22." Seymour said Jackson's claims were "wrong and insane" but he could not help but like the man because "you know he doesn't mean it". "He's more a figure of fun for me," Seymour said. "Although I do worry a little bit about - you know - a man of his age - the old ticker can give out if he hyperventilates too much at work in the House." In a statement to RNZ, a spokesperson for Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith said Jackson was prone to "hyperbole and mangling of the facts". "People are not being disenfranchised, they are merely being required to enrol," the spokesperson said. The government's legislation banning same-day voter enrolment passed its first reading in Parliament on Tuesday and will now be considered by select committee. During the debate, Goldsmith told MPs the change was required because the increasing number of special votes was delaying the final vote count. "The final vote count used to take two weeks. Last election, it took three," Goldsmith said. "The advice I received is that if we leave things as they are, it could well take even longer in future elections." Goldsmith flatly rejected the claim that people were being disenfranchised, saying the 110,000 people who updated their details on election day in 2023 only did so because they had been told they could. "The message will be different this election. People will be told they need to be enrolled well before voting starts. It's not that hard, and people are capable of doing these things." Justice officials, however, recommended against the move and warned it could result in lower turnout and reduce confidence in the electoral system. "Its impact on reducing special votes is uncertain, while its impact on democratic participation could be significant," officials said. The move has also been criticised by the Chief Human Rights Commissioner and electoral law experts Andrew Geddis and Graeme Edgeler. Since 2019, voters have been able to turn up to the booth at any time during the advance voting period and enrol at the same time, as well as on election day, with their vote being counted as a special vote.
