logo
California GOP lawmaker faces taunts and jeers over Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill' at town halls

California GOP lawmaker faces taunts and jeers over Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill' at town halls

CNN9 hours ago
GOP Rep. Doug LaMalfa drew taunts and jeers at two raucous town hall meetings Monday over his support for President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.'
LaMalfa, whose district spans much of the state's northern interior, is the latest Republican to face harsh in-person criticism, as members of the party attempt to sell Trump's sweeping agenda back home during Congress' August break from Washington.
Last week, Nebraska Rep. Mike Flood – who also heeded the guidance of the NRCC, the House GOP's campaign arm, to focus the district work period on the president's massive domestic policy bill – met a largely hostile crowd as he was pressed on a range of issues, including the agenda bill that Trump signed into law July 4.
LaMalfa calmly address audience members throughout both town halls, even as some attendees cursed at him and railed against his support of the president, shouting 'Liar!'
While the morning crowd in Chico had been much louder, the audience in Red Bluff later in the evening was at times just as vocal, especially when LaMalfa expressed skepticism about the role of carbon dioxide in climate change.
At both town halls, LaMalfa was pressed over how Trump's agenda, which includes historic cuts to federal support for the social safety net, would affect rural hospitals, particularly those in his district. Other attendees asked questions about transparency around the so-called Jeffrey Epstein files. At the morning event, LaMalfa called it a 'bad look' to have Epstein-related information continue to be 'suppressed.'
Still other attendees warned the president's tariffs would harm farmers in California and attacked the congressman's credibility.
'If you're not here to either announce your resignation, why aren't you here to apologize to the farmers of the north state because of your support for the Trump tariffs?' one audience members said at the Chico town hall.
'I'm not gonna do either. Thanks,' LaMalfa replied. 'Do you actually want to talk about something productive?'
LaMalfa defended Trump's tariffs, insisting that the United States had been taken advantage of and that the tariffs were being used to negotiate better deals for American farmers.
'And you know, is it the ideal, perfect way to go? No, I hope these tariffs can end soon,' he said Monday evening. 'I want to believe at some point we'lll end up with very low or zero tariffs with all these countries.'
LaMalfa also addressed Texas' redistricting effort, warning it is going to start 'a grass fire all across the country.'
His comments come as California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, has urged lawmakers to draw a new map to put before voters in a November special election. The map, as CNN previously reported, could flip five of Republicans' nine seats in the state if voters approve it in a ballot initiative and could potentially target LaMalfa's seat.
For his part, LaMalfa said he didn't support either redistricting push.
'It's really ugly and no matter which side of the aisle you're on, it doesn't look good. It doesn't give you more faith in the political process if legislators draw the lines merely to have an outcome for a partisan win,' the congressman said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Explainer-How US marijuana reclassification could help cannabis companies
Explainer-How US marijuana reclassification could help cannabis companies

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Explainer-How US marijuana reclassification could help cannabis companies

(Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump's administration is looking to reclassify marijuana as a less dangerous drug, a shift that could ease criminal penalties and reshape the pot industry by lowering tax burdens and making it easier for firms to secure funding. Trump said on Monday a decision could come within the next couple of weeks. U.S.-listed cannabis-linked stocks rose in pre-market trading on Tuesday, led by a 13% jump in Canopy Growth. Organigram Global, SNDL, Aurora Cannabis and Tilray Brands gained between 3% and 12%. WHAT DOES RECLASSIFYING ENTAIL? Under the Controlled Substances Act, marijuana is listed as a Schedule I substance, meaning it has a high potential for abuse and no current accepted medical use. Reclassifying marijuana as a less dangerous drug could unlock banking access for pot producers, attract institutional investors, reduce tax burden and spur mergers and acquisitions. Securing funding remains one of the biggest challenges for cannabis producers, as federal restrictions keep most banks and institutional investors out of the sector, forcing pot producers to turn to costly loans or alternative lenders. Last year, the Biden administration asked the Department of Health and Human Services to review marijuana's classification, and the agency recommended moving it to Schedule III, a category for substances with a moderate to low risk of physical or psychological dependence. WHAT WOULD BE THE TAX IMPLICATIONS? One of the biggest benefits from a reclassification would be that cannabis firms would no longer be subject to Section 280E of the U.S. federal tax code. That provision prevents businesses dealing in Schedule I and II controlled substances from claiming tax credits and deductions for business expenses. WHAT COMES NEXT? TD Cowen analyst Jaret Seiberg said full legalization remains unlikely, citing a lack of meaningful support in Congress and limits on how far the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) can go through rescheduling alone. "It seems more likely to us that Trump would revive the effort at the DEA to move cannabis to Schedule III, which would permit the government to regulate it," said Seiberg. Some analysts, however, say a reclassification will not change much. Cannabis will remain federally illegal, interstate trade will not be allowed and the silo system of each state deciding their own market rules will still apply, according to equity research firm Zuanic & Associates. Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Inicia sesión para acceder a tu portafolio Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información

Opposition mounts as Colorado lawmakers hunt for cash
Opposition mounts as Colorado lawmakers hunt for cash

Axios

time25 minutes ago

  • Axios

Opposition mounts as Colorado lawmakers hunt for cash

Colorado lawmakers are eyeing new revenue streams to close a looming $1 billion budget gap. Why it matters: The controversial move to raise taxes, opposed by conservatives, could force Colorado residents to open their wallets. State of play: Ahead of the late-August special session, state lawmakers are considering legislation to decouple from federal tax law and refuse the tax cuts in President Trump's "big, beautiful bill." As Axios Denver first reported, state lawmakers started this effort earlier this year when they approved a little-noticed provision to require residents to pay state income taxes on overtime, even though Trump's bill made it exempt. It amounts to $180 million to $290 million in additional revenue for 2026. The latest: Now, lawmakers are looking at requiring state income taxes on tips, which are exempt at the federal level, as well as other penny-pinching options. Yes, but: Conservatives are looking to block the moves. In July, conservative group Advance Colorado filed a lawsuit against the state-level tax on overtime, saying it violates the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights because it amounts to a tax hike without voter approval. The same organization is pursuing a 2026 ballot measure to repeal the Colorado law that put the tax on overtime. What they're saying:"Hardworking families in Colorado shouldn't be burdened with an excessive tax simply because politicians can't balance their budget and are looking for additional sources of revenue," said Advance Colorado president Michael Fields in a statement.

Nebraska Republican: Trump's Nvidia and AMD China agreement ‘not a good deal'
Nebraska Republican: Trump's Nvidia and AMD China agreement ‘not a good deal'

The Hill

time25 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Nebraska Republican: Trump's Nvidia and AMD China agreement ‘not a good deal'

Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) said Monday evening that President Trump's unusual agreement with major chipmakers Nvidia and AMD to share some of their revenue from chip sales in China is 'not a good deal.' 'We've got to realize we're in an intellectual war, a technology war with China, and we're in an AI [artificial intelligence] competition,' Bacon said during an appearance on NewsNation's 'The Hill' with host Chris Stirewalt. 'Having NVIDIA providing this technology to China is a mistake.' 'I was weary of doing the Chips Act, because that was a $270 billion giveaway to one industry, and now we're seeing some of this stuff's going to China,' the lawmaker, who is not running for reelection and has often criticized Trump and some of his Cabinet members, continued. 'Chris, I oppose it. Taiwan's our friend.' He added, 'We have to help protect them, because they're where most of this high technology is at. I'd like to encourage you coming here, but China getting our chips is not a good deal.' Both Nvidia and AMD reached a deal with the Trump administration to share 15 percent of their revenue generated from sales of advanced AI chips to Beijing to secure their export licenses. AMD will share 15 percent of its revenue from MI308 chip sales, while Nvidia will share the same portion from selling H20 chips in China. The agreement came after Nvidia's CEO Jensen Huang met with the president at the White House last week, according to multiple news outlets. The agreement has raised constitutional questions among experts. 'It's bizarre in many respects and pretty troubling because Congress didn't have anything to say about this,' said Gary Hufbauer, a nonresident senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. 'It's just the president's own negotiating with the individual companies,' he continued. 'That's not how historically we've done business in this country.' The analysis also comes as Trump signed an executive

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store