Charlamagne tha God slams 'liberal media' for ignoring Bill Clinton's ties to Epstein
"You know, it's interesting, too, 'cause it's just funny how the news works 'cause Bill Clinton, you know, wrote a letter to Jeffrey Epstein as well for his birthday, but nobody's talking about that. And Jeffrey Epstein had a picture of Bill Clinton in a dress in high heels in his New York mansion, but nobody's talking about that," Charlamagne said.
He continued, "My thing is this. I don't care who's on the list. Everybody got to go. Burn it all down. Like, that's just simple as that. Mutually assured destruction. Whoever's on that list need to go. Nobody needs to be protecting pedophiles."
Charlamagne's comments, which were first flagged by Mediaite, came after President Donald Trump said that those asking about the late financier Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking case should direct their attention to Clinton and former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers.
Trump's remarks come a day after U.S. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche met with Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell in Florida amid heightened scrutiny about the case after the Trump administration announced it would not unseal investigation materials concerning Epstein.
"You ought to be speaking about Larry Summers. You ought to be speaking about some of his friends that are hedge fund guys," Trump told reporters Friday while departing for Scotland.
"They're all over the place. You ought to be speaking about Bill Clinton."
Trump then accused Clinton of visiting Epstein's private island. Trump said he'd never visited the island before.
Clinton has also denied that he has ever visited the island. In his new memoir "Citizen," released in 2024, Clinton said he'd never gone to the island and that he wished he'd never even met Epstein in the first place.
Spokespeople for Summers and Clinton did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital.
Summers previously served as treasury secretary for Clinton, as well as the director of the National Economic Council for former President Barack Obama.
Neither Summers nor Clinton have been accused of engaging in any illegal conduct in connection with his ties to Epstein.
Charlamagne said party affiliation is irrelevant to the issues associated with Epstein. The co-host of "The Breakfast Club," Morgan Wood pushed back on Charlamagne.
"And you know, to that point though, you know, Clinton is not the president right now. You know, if he was, you think that. Anyway, I think he would still be under scrutiny if he was the president right now," Wood said.
"I don't care what party they are. No. Period. No, he wouldn't because liberal media wouldn't push the issue. Oh, okay. Well, this comes as, speaking of liberal media," Charlamagne responded.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
These Pictures Of Trump's Finished White House Rose Garden Patio Are Going Viral For All Of The Wrong Reasons
As you all know by now, Donald Trump has paved over the White House Rose Garden lawn. Why? Because it's being modeled after his Mar-a-Lago property in Florida, duh. The famous garden was redesigned by Jackie Kennedy in the 1960s to add that lawn, some trees, and more flowers. That layout has remained largely unchanged, like here's a picture from the 2010s: Here's Obama on it: And then, as you may remember, Melania Trump did her own remodel of it in 2020 when she took out some trees and added in that limestone path: Well, now we've got a patio. ABC News' Chief Washington Correspondent posted pictures of the "new Rose Garden:" jonkarl/Twitter: @jonkarl As you can see, the sewer drainage is mini American flags. And it's A LOT of concrete. Perfect for those DC summers! Needless to say, people aren't big fans. "'Garden.' I do not think that word means what you think it means," one person pointed out. "Who in god's name thought this was a good idea?" another person asked. And a bunch of people are wondering what the heck is up with the hatred of grass: "Why do they hate grass?" Then you have the comparisons. This person said it looked like a food court during Covid. Another person said it looked like a drained pool at a bankrupt casino. And this person said it reminded them of an "overpriced wedding venue in New Jersey." One small detail people are pointing out is the position/design of the sewer drain, "Trump put his Presidential seal right next to a sewer drain. Feels right." "The 'Stars & Stripes' drainage seems appropriate.'" And finally, you have the people hoping the next President tears it up: "We're tearing it out and putting the roses back in beginning on January 21, 2029, right?" "The next president should rip this up and put the garden back. He really has no sense of taste, and I say this as a guy whose house is a monument to my love of kitsch and mid-century American barcaloungers." Thoughts?
Fox News
15 minutes ago
- Fox News
MIKE DAVIS: Confirmation of Emil Bove a triumph of new over old
The Senate's confirmation this week of President Trump's pick, Emil Bove, to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit with a razor-thin 50–49 vote was a huge win for conservatives, despite the cheap shots from Democrats and nominal Republican senators Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski. Bove isn't just qualified, he's exceptional. He clerked for top judges and made his name as a sharp, tough prosecutor in New York. Even the left-leaning American Bar Association gave him their highest rating: "Well Qualified." That's a big deal coming from an organization that rarely plays fair with conservative nominees. So why all the pushback? Simple. Bove stood up when it mattered. When President Trump was under constant legal attack, Bove was one of the few who fought back. He played a key role in keeping the radical left from throwing Trump in prison on bogus charges. That alone made him a target for Trump-haters across the spectrum: Democrats, Never Trumpers, and the establishment legal elite. As principal associate deputy attorney general, Bove also helped stop the politically motivated prosecution of New York City Mayor Eric Adams. And he did it by standing up to out-of-control federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York, the ones who like to pretend they run their own "sovereign district" separate from the rest of the country. Bove told them to follow orders or leave. They left. That's leadership. Some in the conservative legal world weren't thrilled with Bove's confirmation to a lifetime term, either. The Wall Street Journal recently ran a piece worrying that Bove's confirmation might make some Republican-appointed judges refuse to retire. Here's the truth: Those judges had their chance to retire during Trump's first term and didn't. That's on them, not Bove. Others breathlessly claimed Bove's confirmation marked the end of the conservative legal movement. That's nonsense. If Kamala Harris had won wthe presidency and stacked the courts with left-wing radicals, the damage would've been catastrophic. Instead, President Trump is putting solid, constitutionalist judges on the bench, judges like Emil Bove. Of course, the opposition resorted to the same tired smear tactics they always do. So-called "whistleblowers" came forward with flimsy claims. One former DOJ lawyer, Erez Reuveni, accused Bove of telling officials to ignore court orders, then turned around and signed legal documents confirming the orders were followed. On top of that, Reuveni undercut the Trump administration's immigration cases and violated attorney-client privilege. He was fired, and rightfully so. This is who the anti-Bove crowd chose as their star witness. Two more "whistleblowers" popped up just before the final vote — classic last-minute character assassination. One had no firsthand knowledge. The other's allegations were never made public by Senate Democrats. Sound familiar? It should. It's the same playbook they used against Justice Kavanaugh. Remember the ridiculous accusations, including the one about a gang-rape boat? All lies. All desperate. All failed. The Article III Project proudly fought for Bove's confirmation. This wasn't just about one seat. This was about pushing back against the old guard — the milquetoast Republicans and the liberal machine — and ushering in a new generation of bold, fearless constitutionalists. Tuesday's vote showed the old tricks don't work anymore. The left couldn't smear their way to a win. The establishment couldn't stall this one. Trump's nominee made it through. They'll keep trying to derail the president's agenda, especially when it comes to the courts. But we'll keep fighting. Because what's at stake isn't just the next judge. It's the future of the Constitution, the rule of law, and the rights of the American people. The old guard lost. America won. And this is only the beginning. Mike Davis is the founder and president of the Article III Project.
CBS News
15 minutes ago
- CBS News
Appeals court largely keeps restrictions on immigration raids in Los Angeles area
An appeals court late Friday mostly kept in place restrictions on "roving" immigration raids in the Los Angeles area, agreeing with a lower court judge who found that sweeps conducted by the Trump administration in Southern California appeared to have been predicated on people's race and other factors, like speaking Spanish. A panel of judges at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit largely denied a Trump administration request to suspend the lower court ruling, which required federal immigration officials to have reasonable suspicion that someone is in the country illegally before detaining them. The immigration raids at the center of the legal battle triggered massive protests in the Los Angeles area in June, as well as widespread fears among the region's large Latino community. While most demonstrations were peaceful, instances of violence led President Trump to deploy National Guard troops and U.S. Marines to Los Angeles with orders to protect federal buildings and the immigration agents enforcing his far-reaching crackdown on illegal immigration. Most of them have since been demobilized. Those high-profile immigration arrests in California have continued, led by Customs and Border Protection agents who have been assigned to help Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers with furthering the Trump administration's mass deportation campaign — in some cases, far away from the U.S.-Mexico border. Beyond requiring CBP and ICE to have reasonable suspicion before detaining someone, the July order from U.S. District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong prohibited federal agents from basing arrests on people's race or ethnicity, the fact that they speak Spanish or have an accent, their presence in a location, or their occupation. Frimpong stated that any immigration arrests that relied exclusively on these factors violated the U.S. Constitution's 4th Amendment, which protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures. "We agree with the district court that, in the context of the Central District of California, the four enumerated factors at issue — apparent race or ethnicity, speaking Spanish or speaking English with an accent, particular location, and type of work, even when considered together — describe only a broad profile and 'do not demonstrate reasonable suspicion for any particular stop,'" the 9th Circuit panel wrote in its opinion Friday. The panel was comprised of Circuit Judges Ronald M. Gould, Marsha S. Berzon, and Jennifer Sung, appointees of former Presidents Bill Clinton and Joe Biden. The cases cited in the lawsuit against the Los Angeles-area immigration sweeps involved arrests in June near a car wash, a tow yard and other locations where U.S. citizens were among those questioned about their legal status and detained by federal agents. Advocates have described the operations as "roving patrols." The 9th Circuit did alter one part of Frimpong's ruling, removing an exception to her ban on using the four factors that include people's race and vocation when making arrests. The panel said that an "except as permitted by law" clause in her order was too vague. Pro-immigrants advocates hailed Friday's ruling, denouncing the Trump administration's immigration sweeps as indiscriminate raids that have instilled fear in the Los Angeles area. "Every person, regardless of immigration status, has the right to live, work, and belong in their community without being hunted, harassed, or locked away," said Lindsay Toczylowski, president of the Immigrant Defenders Law Center, a Los Angeles-based group that represents those facing deportation. The Trump administration has maintained in court that federal officials rely on intelligence packages and certain information — like "past experiences" that immigrants living in the U.S. illegally frequent or work at certain locations — when carrying out immigration enforcement operations. CBS News reached out to representatives for the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees ICE and CBP, to request comment on Friday's order.
