Potential cuts to Medicaid aren't an option for these metro Detroiters
It was the first in a series of sparsely attended afternoon and evening meetings scheduled around metro Detroit on Tuesday to focus on the passage of a U.S. House Republican-led congressional budget resolution calling for the Committee on Energy and Commerce to cut $880 billion from its budget over the next 10 years.
More: House passes GOP funding bill backed by Trump. Now a showdown looms in Senate.
The committee oversees Medicaid. And while the resolution doesn't specifically single out Medicaid for cuts, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office says the Republicans can't finance their budget cuts unless they cut from Medicaid.
The energy and commerce committee's reductions are among trillions of dollars in cuts in the budget plan that are to be used to fund an extension of President Donald Trump's 2017 tax cuts. The U.S. Senate has yet to take up the resolution.
About 72 million people across the nation, or roughly 1 in 4, rely on Medicaid, according to government statistics. Around 2.6 million, or 26%, of Michigan residents rely on Medicaid.
Also the budget resolution calls on the House Committee on Agriculture to cut billions in spending, leaving many concerned the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) ― which feeds almost 42 million people — will be part of the cuts if House Republicans get their way.
"You may be here because you're angry. Maybe you're a little frustrated ... and perhaps, even afraid. But you're also here because you care," Sherri Masson, an organizer from Indivisible Huron Valley, which hosted the Milford rally, told people gathered there.
"You care about the sick, the elderly and the children who currently rely on Medicaid and SNAP food programs for survival. We're here because President Trump, Elon Musk and his MAGA followers ... want to cut the federal budget by trillions to give billionaires a tax cut. "
Another speaker, Mindy Denton, who is 56 and lives in Milford, told the group that a cut in Medicaid would be catastrophic for people like her 25-year-old son, Jared Denton, who is intellectually disabled and will rely on Medicaid for insurance next year. 'Although he has worked for years and will continue to do so, it is unlikely he will earn enough to receive private insurance benefits through his employment,' she said.
'Medicaid and SNAP not only advanced greater opportunity and the empowerment to succeed, they offer an investment in the health of our community, promoting broader social and economic goals — that's a win for us all," she said.
Later that evening, at a town hall meeting at the Faith Redemption Center Church of God in Christ in Detroit, about 40 people gathered to learn what might be next. How is it possible Medicaid wouldn't be touched, some wondered.
Among those in attendance: Michelle Tucker, a 57-year-old Detroit resident, who is concerned about a number of topics regarding the Trump administration and the empowerment of Musk. They include: threats to the Department of Education, an immigration crackdown, and potential cuts to Medicaid. "It doesn't take a blind person to see this is white supremacy," she said.
Still, these actions will have a ripple effect and white people will be affected, too, she added.
Said Nick Clarke, 67, of Wixom: "In a country like America, nobody ... should go hungry and nobody should go without health care."
Organizers of the event encouraged people to contact their congressional representatives and U.S. senators. They even put a QR code on a screen and images of legislators to contact.
"In every single historical point of oppression there was a point of resistance," said DuJuan Bland, a lead organizer with the community group MOSES and a minister at Faith Redemption.
This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Angry, betrayed: metro Detroiters rally against possible Medicaid cuts
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's when the economic data may start showing the tariff impact
The US economy will undoubtedly feel the impact of President Trump's tariffs. But when might it start showing up in the data? Morgan Stanley chief global economist Seth Carpenter took a closer look to get a rough idea. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Catalysts. You, of course, along with everybody else has been following the effects of tariffs here in the US and globally. Um, we know that there is a lag, uh, because of when and how the tariffs have been instituted. This is something that Chair Powell has been talking about. What's your view on the question of when we will start to see it more and whether that effect is going to be sustained? Yeah, I know. It's a key, key question here, and so we tried to do a bunch of work looking at what happened in 2018, for example, looking at everything we can scrounge from, uh, looking at changes in prices for supply chains. Looks like, uh, in a macro sense, it's about three, four months after tariffs get implemented that you start to see it in the inflation data, and then it's probably two, maybe three quarters until you start to see the effects of tariffs pushing down economic growth. If you remember back in 2018, uh, when President Trump was president before, tariffs on China were imposed the second half of 2018. We saw some disruption to manufacturing because two-thirds of what we import from China are either capital goods or intermediate goods that go into manufacturing in the US. So the tariffs are just taxes on US manufacturing. We saw manufacturing and industrial production start to fall in the second half of 2018 and keep falling for 2019. So where are we this time around? Well, we know that we just got some inflation data for the month of June, and it looks like the most of the tariff-sensitive categories started to show that pickup. So that's kind of that three or four month lag that we had in mind. So we expect, uh, the inflation data to keep showing increases in tariff-sensitive, uh, categories for the next several months, really, uh, pushing up inflation for the third quarter quite notably. And then, you know, the fourth quarter, we're probably going to see a big drag on the economy coming in from tariffs, augmented by the drag that the immigration restriction is doing. So we're seeing everything play out in the data now as we had anticipated. And so Seth, that implies that people on the street who were waiting for the Fed to cut rates, they might be disappointed for a while, not to mention the president himself. Yeah, I think that's right. Our base case, once we had the announcement of tariffs coming in faster, bigger, sooner than we had originally thought, they all came in really aggressively in the beginning of the year, we changed our forecast. We said if that's the way it's going to work out, the Fed probably won't cut rates at all this year in 2025. The logic being, and it's very consistent with what, uh, Chair Powell said yesterday, inflation is still above target, and the labor market for now is just fine. And so there's no reason for the Fed to cut in that circumstance. If inflation goes higher from here, well, that gives them all the more reason to stay where they are with policy slightly restrictive. And even if and when we start to see some degradation in the economy, some slowdown in the labor market, if inflation is still now high and rising at that point, the bar for them to cut rates has got to get worse, uh, as long as inflation is rising. So that's how we get to the idea that they're probably not going to cut rates this year. Uh, the market was in a very different place from us, uh, a month ago, two months ago, uh, judging from where things are now, the market's putting a little bit less than even odds on a cut in September, reducing the expectation for cuts this year. Uh, so I'd say the market is coming to the same view that we have. Um Seth, sort of looking at it as a case study, I know you're looking at autos and auto pricing, which has not seen sort of the effect of tariffs. Um, so could you walk us through that just as an example to sort of illustrate how they you get these these lags and the effect? Absolutely. Now, the auto industry is very much the the exception that proves the rule in this case. Uh, it's a industry very, very large, and yet dominated by a much smaller number of firms. And what we think we're hearing anecdotally and possibly seeing in the data is that for now, some of the larger firms are are waiting. They're absorbing some of the costs in their margin until they get a better sense of exactly where these tariffs are going to end up. There's also a sense that they can wait and see if, you know, maybe they can take some market share, uh, because, um, you know, other other firms are facing higher costs. And if you can keep your prices down for a while and take some market share while the rest of the industry is is suffering, then that's another possibility. So I do think the auto industry is about a bit of pain now in terms of absorbing the costs in the margin, that can't last forever. And so we expect those prices and autos to start to come up in the next few months as well, maybe a bit more of a delay than the rest of the economy. Related Videos US GDP Grows by 3% in Second Quarter IMF's Gourinchas Says Tariffs Causing Tepid Growth Job openings data falls short of estimates Goldman's Kaplan Says Fed Should Ready for September Cut Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's 40% Penalty for Tariff Dodging Missing Key Details
(Bloomberg) -- President Donald Trump has threatened to pile an additional 40% tariff on any product that Washington determines to be 'transshipped' through another country, a punishment aimed at stopping goods mainly from China dodging US duties. The World's Data Center Capital Has Residents Surrounded An Abandoned Art-Deco Landmark in Buffalo Awaits Revival We Should All Be Biking Along the Beach Budapest's Most Historic Site Gets a Controversial Rebuild San Francisco in Talks With Vanderbilt for Downtown Campus That penalty was included in the White House announcement Thursday evening that laid out global tariff rates from 10% to 41%. But many countries are still missing the 'rules of origin' details necessary to determine what the US considers transshipped. 'It is still not clear how this will be implemented in practice,' Leah Fahy, chief economist at Capital Economics, said in a note Friday. A decision on those rules will be made in the coming weeks, a senior US official said in Washington on Thursday. The US had earlier said the issue would be resolved before Aug. 1. The details are particularly important for countries in Southeast Asia, such as Vietnam, which have emerged as key suppliers of goods to the US. Many of the firms and factories had shifted from China in response to Trump's first trade war with Beijing and most still rely on Chinese inputs for production. Thailand's Deputy Minister of Commerce Chantawit Tantasith, for instance, said the country's 19% tariff rate allows it to maintain a competitive edge, as it's on par with Malaysia, Indonesia, Cambodia and the Philippines, and below Vietnam's 20%. However, the transshipment issue is still unresolved. 'We must await further clarification from the US regarding the negotiation process and rules of origin,' Chantawit said Friday in a statement. The country's Finance Minister Pichai Chunhavajira said in a separate statement that local content should be more than 40% to be classified as a Thai product, but that the country hasn't reached an agreement with the US on those details. While it didn't provide specifics, the White House release Thursday said the US would publish every six months a list of countries and 'specific facilities used in circumvention schemes' to help public procurement, commercial due diligence and national security reviews. The unspoken target of the rule has been China, which Trump has blamed for abusing free-trade rules to hollow out American manufacturing and jobs with cheaper imports. Trump is set to make the final call on maintaining a tariff truce with China before it expires in two weeks. Stephen Olson, a former US trade negotiator now with the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute in Singapore, sees the transshipment issue complicating those talks. 'China will correctly perceive the transshipment provisions as directed against its interests,' Olson said. 'And it will inevitably spill over into its ongoing trade negotiations with the US.' Beijing called out the issue on social media, highlighting the 'very significant' impact it might have on Vietnam. 'The current US restrictions on 'transshipment' will make foreign companies hesitant to continue investing, affecting the layout of industrial parks and foreign investment in Vietnam,' said Yuyuan Tantian, an account affiliated with China's state broadcaster that's frequently used to signal Beijing's thinking on trade issues. Some analysts expect the punitive tariff to have little impact on China or the ability of its manufacturers to get goods to American buyers — directly or indirectly. 'Enforcement is likely to be challenging,' Fahy wrote. 'Even if outright rerouting is reduced, trade diversion will continue to dampen the impact of US tariffs on China's aggregate export performance.' --With assistance from Jasmine Ng, Jenni Marsh, Josh Xiao and Claire Jiao. (Updates with detail from executive order in 10th paragraph.) Burning Man Is Burning Through Cash Russia Builds a New Web Around Kremlin's Handpicked Super App Everyone Loves to Hate Wind Power. Scotland Found a Way to Make It Pay Off It's Not Just Tokyo and Kyoto: Tourists Descend on Rural Japan Cage-Free Eggs Are Booming in the US, Despite Cost and Trump's Efforts ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Associated Press
13 minutes ago
- Associated Press
US envoy visits distribution site in Gaza as humanitarian crisis worsens
DEIR AL-BALAH, Gaza Strip (AP) — U.S. President Donald Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff visited southern Gaza on Friday during international outrage over starvation, shortages and deadly chaos near aid distribution sites. Witkoff and U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee toured one of Gaza Humanitarian Foundation's distribution sites in Rafah, Gaza's southernmost city, according to an official involved with the visit. The official requested anonymity because he was not authorized to brief the media. All four of the group's distribution sites are in zones controlled by the Israeli military and throughout their months in operation have become flashpoints of desperation, where starving people scramble for scarce aid. Hundreds have been killed by either gunfire or trampling. The Israeli military says it has only fired warning shots at people who approach its forces, and GHF says its armed contractors have only used pepper spray or fired warning shots to prevent deadly crowding. Witkoff's visit comes a week after U.S. officials walked away from ceasefire talks in Qatar, blaming Hamas and pledging to seek other ways to rescue Israeli hostages and make Gaza safe. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday that he was sent to craft a plan to boost food and aid deliveries as part of an effort 'to save lives and end this crisis,' while Trump wrote on social media that the fastest way to end the crisis would be for Hamas to surrender and release hostages. International organizations have said Gaza has been on the brink of famine for the past two years. The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, the leading international authority on food crises, said recent developments, including a complete blockade on aid for 2 1/2 months, mean the 'worst-case scenario of famine is currently playing out in Gaza.' Though the flow of aid has resumed, including via airdrops, the amount getting into Gaza remains far lower than what aid organizations say is needed. A security breakdown in the territory has made it nearly impossible to safely deliver food to starving Palestinians, much of the limited aid entering is horded and later sold at exorbitant prices. In a report issued Friday, Human Rights Watch called it 'a flawed, militarized aid distribution system that has turned aid distributions into regular bloodbaths.' Israel's military and prime minister's office did not respond to request for comment on the report. A July 30 video published Thursday by the U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs showed an aid convoy driving past a border crossing as gunfire ricocheted off the ground near where crowds congregated. 'We were met on the road by tens of thousands of hungry and desperate people who directly offloaded everything from the backs of our trucks,' said Olga Cherevko, an OCHA staff member. The war between Israel and Hamas started when Hamas attacked southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing around 1,200 people and abducting 251 others. They still hold 50 hostages, including around 20 believed to be alive. Most of the others have been released in ceasefires or other deals. Israel's retaliatory offensive has killed more than 60,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. Its count doesn't distinguish between militants and civilians. The ministry operates under the Hamas government. The U.N. and other international organizations see it as the most reliable source of data on casualties. ___ Metz reported from Jerusalem and Frankel from Tel Aviv, Israel.
