Belfast council says it did not receive a planning application for Bobby Sands statue
Belfast City Council has said it did not receive a planning application for a Bobby Sands statue unveiled at the weekend and is investigating the circumstances.
The statue of the IRA hunger striker and MP was erected at the Republican Memorial Garden in Twinbrook on Sunday to mark the 44th anniversary of his death.
The council said on Wednesday it had not received a planning application for the sculpture and is investigating the matter.
A Belfast City Council spokesman said: 'Planning permission is normally required for outdoor public artworks, including sculptures and statues that are being installed on a long-term or permanent basis.
READ MORE
'As the council has not received a planning application for this statue to date, it is investigating the matter and cannot comment further at this time.'
Former Sinn Féin president Gerry Adams was among the dozens who attended the statue's unveiling at the weekend.
First Minister Michelle O'Neill said she visited the statue on Sunday and called it 'a powerful tribute'.
Sands died on May 5th during the 1981 hunger strike, aged 27. The father-of-one had been elected an MP for Fermanagh and South Tyrone less than a month before his death.
Seven IRA prisoners and three from the Irish National Liberation Army died during the hunger strike.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Daily Mirror
7 hours ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
The problem with Gerry Adams and Sinn Fein wanting to 'put manners' on media
Gerry Adams has always denied being a member of the IRA. There, that's that out of the way. These days it's good practice to get your disclaimer in early. Especially if you're in the journalism business. Anything else could be construed as bad manners. And 'manners' is what Gerry's €3 million libel battle with the BBC all boiled down to in his own words. The case he took in the Dublin High Court 'was about putting manners on the British Broadcasting Corporation' he announced minutes after a jury awarded him €100,000 in damages. They had agreed that a Spotlight programme had defamed Gerry by alleging he sanctioned the murder of IRA spy Denis Donaldson in 2006, eight years after the Good Friday Agreement had sealed his place among the peacemakers. Gerry's grandiose reaction to the decision was described as 'chilling' by the National Union of Journalists. For a man who has dealt in secrets during a lifetime of politics, it was certainly candid. This was Gerry saying the quiet part out loud. Because as long as the press has been around, there have been those in political power who fantasise about 'putting manners' on it. Not least the many other members of Sinn Fein who have taken libel actions against the Irish media in recent times, as they are of course entitled to do. They would also be entitled to ask the Press Ombudsman to adjudicate their grievances instead. It's a process that exists to put manners on journalists without damages or the €3 million tab for lawyers' fees. Weeks before Gerry's big win at the High Court, Sinn Fein TDs also voted in the Dail against the reform of Ireland's defamation laws. Their biggest issue was getting rid of juries like the one that gave Gerry a hundred grand last week. They take the view that a group of lay citizens are best qualified to stand judgement on that most precious of things to the Irish – our reputation. Over the years juries have deemed it to be vastly more valuable in compensation terms than literally losing life or limb. Sinn Fein believes that people should be summoned from their day jobs as butchers, bakers and candlestick makers, and asked to rule on this wickedly complex area of civil law that divides and defies legal experts. And be relied upon to not lose the run of themselves when awarding damages. I've been in the high court before when juries were asked not to lose the run of themselves. When advised to use the yardstick of a family holiday or a small car to assess damages, they have returned with eye watering six-figures sums. That's quite the family vacation. But there is a bigger problem I have with Gerry's swagger at sticking it to the BBC and Sinn Fein's general animosity towards the media. 'Putting manners' on the press has become a dark obsession among others who view journalists as 'the enemy of the people'. And they are willing to use far less legitimate methods than a high court jury to do it. Last year was the deadliest on record for media workers around the world with over 200 reporters killed, the vast majority in Gaza where the press have become legitimate targets. In the world's biggest democracy, the American media is bearing the brunt of an authoritarian crackdown. Respected outlets are banned for refusing to report a warped view of reality sanctioned by the ruling regime. Handpicked lackies and sycophants are favoured to replace experienced reporters because they ask the right questions. Amnesty international this week named Northern Ireland – where Sinn Fein leads the Government - as one of the most intimidating places to be a reporter because of threats from crime gangs. Meanwhile hatemongers attack and intimidate journalists 24 hours a day in the unpoliced laneways of cyber space where they replace news and facts with their own disinformation and conspiracies. Against that climate, we need political leaders to choose their words and actions carefully when they have a beef with the media. Politicians whose first instinct is not to join in the 'let's put manners on them' pile-on. And who remember there are alternatives to multi-million libel lotteries before you march to the High Court behind the battle cry: Tiocfaidh ár Law!
Irish Times
16 hours ago
- Irish Times
Death In Derry - Martin McGuinness and the Derry IRA's War Against The British: Strong on candour, weak on analysis
Death In Derry: Martin McGuinness and the Derry IRA's War Against The British Author : Jonathan Trigg ISBN-13 : 978-1785375477 Publisher : Merrion Press Guideline Price : €19.99 This book is a valuable contribution to the literature of the Troubles period and the history of the IRA. Jonathan Trigg has secured interviews with several former British soldiers and IRA members, many under pseudonyms. This is new material. The weaknesses in the book are that it is not strong on political analysis and that it accepts simplistic versions of key events such as the Battle of the Bogside and the Falls Road rioting of August 1969. He says, for instance, that the 1971 internment raids were not extended to loyalists because of unionist pressure. Actually, this was on legal advice that such a measure could not be used against a force that did not threaten the state – the same logic by which the Irish government refused to intern IRA members at the same time. READ MORE Trigg is happy to describe the period of violence as a war, accepting terminology favoured by the IRA themselves. He writes of IRA activists in a tone bordering on admiration, apparently as one soldier respecting others. [ A former British army officer and author on former IRA members opening up to him: 'Trust is a huge issue' Opens in new window ] That will grate with some who will prefer a more moralistic approach and will not like to read of murders being described as 'successes'. Trigg is a military historian. His strengths are in understanding military culture and warfare. It is almost endearing how he admits to occasional failings in his research. One IRA man refuses to tell him what he was jailed for and he leaves it at that, when another researcher might have gone into the newspaper archives and found out. He misses some important nuances. In a chapter about the south Derry IRA centred around Bellaghy, he attributes the reduced level of republican militancy in the area to the presence of the literary centre Seamus Heaney HomePlace, and the 'thousands of tourists wandering around with their camera phones'. Clearly he hasn't been to Bellaghy lately. However, he has secured the candour of several former Provos and soldiers, and this factor provides an understanding of their actions and their thinking that earns the book a place on the shelves of any serious future researchers or writers on the period. One amusing detail is that the British army developed a remote control camera system for monitoring suspects but had to scrap it because those suspects would hear the click and the whirr of the film winder. That wouldn't be a problem with the technology of today.
Irish Times
a day ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on Israel's international reputation: sliding ever downward
Slowly but perceptibly, the relentless flow of images of horror and suffering from Gaza is hardening opposition to Israel's actions there, even among those traditionally considered the country's staunchest supporters. The shift will be unacceptably slow for anyone desperate to stop the killing, while it appears to have had little effect as yet on the brutal tactics of Israeli forces. But it represents a change of attitude among international political leaders and their voters that could have far-reaching consequences for the region. A YouGov poll this week showed support and sympathy for Israel in western Europe at its lowest ever level. Less than 20 per cent of respondents held a favourable opinion of the country. In what the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz described as 'a rebuke typically reserved for pariah regimes,' the UK has suspended free trade negotiations. Along with Canada and France, it has also threatened 'concrete actions' in response to what Keir Starmer describes as Israel's 'appalling' actions. Even Germany issued its harshest criticism since the war began with the Hamas attack of October 7th 2023, Chancellor Friedrich Merz saying he 'no longer understands' Israel's goals in Gaza. Ireland has been among the most vociferous EU opponents of the war and a further landmark arrived this week with Trinity College Dublin's decision to sever all ties with Israeli companies and universities. It remains to be seen whether other institutions follow suit, but the move, while largely symbolic, is significant nonetheless. READ MORE Supporters of Binyamin Netanyahu's government are quick to paint such gestures as anti-Smitic. It is true that the scourge of anti-Semitism can be found among some elements of the anti-war movement, as recent violent attacks in the US have shown. But the accusation that all protests are driven by hatred of Jews rather than humanitarian concern does not stand up to scrutiny. The charge wears even thinner given opposition in Israel itself. Former prime minister Ehud Olmert has described his country's actions as a war crime. Hundreds of former operatives of the intelligence agency Mossad, including three retired heads, have accused Netanyahu of continuing the violence for selfish political reasons, to satisfy far-right members of his government. These comments may reflect a rising awareness among some of the country's elite that what is happening in Gaza is not just an appalling tragedy for Palestinians. It also threatens to become a disaster for the state of Israel. With the governing coalition under the sway of far-right racist ministers who have no respect for international law or for the human rights of those they deem 'barbarians', Israel drifts ever further away from the liberal democratic values it purports to share with its increasingly sceptical friends and allies.
