Business Optimism Collapses Under Trump
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Business leaders' confidence in the U.S. economy has halved since the beginning of the year, according to JPMorgan Chase & Co., as companies grapple with the impact of President Donald Trump's tariffs and broader geopolitical uncertainties.
The financial services firm's latest Business Leaders Outlook Survey, released Wednesday, found that optimism for the economy fell to 32 percent in June from 65 percent in January. Additionally, 25 percent of respondents said they expect a recession to occur at some point this year, up from only 8 percent in January.
Why It Matters
Concerns over the trajectory of the U.S. economy have been fueled largely by Trump's trade agenda, which has led to significant stock market volatility and heightened fears of rising costs for both businesses and consumers. However, these anxieties have been somewhat tempered by the current pause on reciprocal tariffs, as well as the temporary easing of trading tensions between the United States and China.
While the survey was largely conducted prior to the most recent escalation in the conflict between Israel and Iran and America's entry in the form of target strikes over the weekend, this could contribute to these existing economic anxieties.
One expert told Newsweek that a re-escalation would represent "another adverse supply shock to the economy."
What To Know
JPMorgan's survey was conducted between June 4 and June 18, drawing responses from over 700 owners and executives representing middle-market businesses, defined as those with annual revenues ranging from $20 million to $500 million.
Four in 10 (44 percent) reported delaying their business plans to some extent this year, with 74 percent citing "policy uncertainty" as the reason for this decision. Of this group, 37 percent cited market volatility and shifts in customer demand, while 35 percent listed geopolitical events as a contributing factor.
Overall, the challenges highlighted by business leaders included uncertain economic conditions (55 percent), tariffs (41 percent), and revenue and sales growth (41 percent).
President Donald Trump speaks to reporters before boarding Marine One on the South Lawn of the White House on June 24, 2025.
President Donald Trump speaks to reporters before boarding Marine One on the South Lawn of the White House on June 24, 2025.
Evan Vucci/AP Photo
The results mirror those of the Conference Board's recent report on CEO confidence, which saw a 26-point decline in the second quarter to 34. This fell further below the 50-point threshold, indicating more negative responses than positive, and reached the lowest level since the end of 2022.
The New York-based think tank noted that this was the steepest quarterly decline in the survey's 48-year history. CEOs cited tariffs and geopolitical instability as the main sources of risk for their industries.
Tuesday also saw the release of the Conference Board's latest Consumer Confidence Survey. This closely monitored gauge signals shifts in consumer sentiment and consumer spending, a major contributor to the nation's economy.
The Consumer Confidence Index fell by 5.4 points in June to 93.0, despite consensus forecasts anticipating an improvement from May. The Present Situations Index, which measures consumers' perceptions of current business and labor market conditions, also fell, while the short-term Expectations Index dropped to 69.0, well below the 80-point threshold.
The think tank said this "typically signals a recession ahead."
"Tariffs remained on top of consumers' minds and were frequently associated with concerns about their negative impacts on the economy and prices," said Stephanie Guichard, senior economist for Global Indicators at The Conference Board.
What People Are Saying
Matt Sable, Co-Head of J.P. Morgan Commercial Banking, said: "Businesses are operating with caution in the current environment. Leaders are recalibrating where necessary to ensure they can continue to deliver for their clients and communities, highlighting their resilience and determination."
Matthew Martin, U.S. senior economist at Oxford Economics, told Newsweek: "When uncertainty is high, there is a strong incentive to defer such major business decisions, whether investment or staffing, until the situation is clearer. This is a major reason to expect private fixed investment to decline this year, contributing to slower growth overall, and a slower pace of business hiring, which will slow the rise in real income growth (and therefore consumer spending)."
Martin added, "Rising Middle East tensions represent another adverse supply shock to the economy. While for now the worst of scenarios seems to have been averted for now, any change in supply of oil into markets would have ramifications domestically."
Stephanie Guichard, senior economist for Global Indicators at The Conference Board, said: "Consumer confidence weakened in June, erasing almost half of May's sharp gains. The decline was broad-based across components, with consumers' assessments of the present situation and their expectations for the future both contributing to the deterioration. Consumers were less positive about current business conditions than May."
Peter Simon, professor at Northeastern University's Department of Economics, told Newsweek that economic uncertainty "is still a big issue in the world given the new war between Israel and Iran and especially now that the US is involved."
"Of course, the risk of inflation and recession (stagflation) are on the rise because of the oil issue with Iran," Simon said, adding that measured declines in consumer confidence are also a grave concern, as "when consumers are uncertain of the economy they stop buying."
What Happens Next
Despite declining optimism and growing fears over a recession, 78 percent of respondents in JPMorgan's survey also said they expect revenue and sales to either increase or remain the same this year.
Last week, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said the economy was "in solid shape," after the central bank opted to hold off on interest rate cuts.
However, Powell warned of "very high uncertainty" due to the impact of tariffs, adding: "Everyone that I know is forecasting a meaningful increase in inflation in coming months from tariffs."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
18 minutes ago
- Newsweek
NATO's United Front Tested As Trump Hammers Spain
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. NATO, together, has an "ironclad commitment" to its collective defense. Or, at least, that's what a long-awaited, if brief, communique published by the alliance on Wednesday said, as it rounded off its biggest summit of the year. Article 5 — perhaps the ultimate sign of unity — is fully intact, the alliance said. Trump, a notorious NATO skeptic, has at several points heaped doubt on just how seriously he takes Article 5, including as he set off on his journey to The Hague. Article 5 is part of NATO's founding treaty, meaning if one country is attacked, all other nations must see it as an attack on the whole alliance and respond as they see fit. Trump has not been shy or reserved in his criticism of European allies and Canada, whom he deemed were not pulling their weight in NATO. The U.S.'s allies agreed, trying to present a united front for months by pledging to raise defense spending, partly to keep the Americans on side. But it was not Trump who cast doubt on NATO solidarity this week in The Hague and what he termed a "highly productive" summit in a "beautiful" country. It was Spain, whose prime minister, Pedro Sánchez, announced in the run-up to the summit that Madrid would not be raising its defense spending to 5 percent of GDP. This is the figure Trump and his senior officials have demanded. It is also the number that was considered completely unrealistic even a few months ago. Even during the Munich Security Conference in February, when Vice President JD Vance eviscerated European politicians from the stage in front of them, there was little indication that 5 percent could be deemed feasible in the near future. But NATO rubberstamped a commitment on Wednesday to dedicate 3.5 percent of GDP to the military, plus another 1.5 percent to defense-related areas like cyber or infrastructure. President Donald Trump meets NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte at the NATO summit in The Hague, Netherlands, Wednesday, June 25, 2025. President Donald Trump meets NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte at the NATO summit in The Hague, Netherlands, Wednesday, June 25, 2025. AP Photo/Alex Brandon "It was not easy but we've got them all signed onto 5 percent!" NATO chief Mark Rutte said in screenshots of texts to Trump, posted by the president to social media on Tuesday. All but Spain. Madrid said again on Wednesday that it will be able to fulfil the new targets each country has been set without reaching 3.5 percent of GDP on core defense spending. Rutte told journalists on Monday the alliance was "absolutely convinced" it could not. Attendees at The Hague expressed a hope that Spain will eventually come around and increase its spending. If Madrid starts "lagging behind because they're not willing to spend enough, then there will be a serious discussion with Spain, and there will be much more pressure," retired Admiral Rob Bauer, who until last year served as the head of NATO's Military Committee, told Newsweek. Trump, meanwhile, appears to have opted for punishment of the U.S.'s ally. "They want to stay at 2 percent—I think it's terrible," Trump said during his press conference, which closed the summit on Wednesday. "I don't know what the problem is. I think it's too bad." Trump said he would "make them pay twice as much" in a trade deal currently being negotiated. Spain, as of 2024, did not meet the current 2 percent threshold each alliance member is, on paper, supposed to reach. It is not considered a major military powerhouse in Europe. "It doesn't really matter if Spain misses a target," one prominent attendee remarked. "It's a minor dent on an unimportant part of the vehicle." But the PR value does matter, at least to the U.S. Spain recusing itself from the 5 percent pledge is a "big problem," Secretary of State Marco Rubio told Politico. "I don't think that the agreement that Spain has reached is sustainable, and frankly it puts them in a very tough spot with regards to their other allies and partners," he added. One of these allies could be Estonia, a country staring down Russia that committed to spending 5.4 percent on defense on average for the next four years — or an extra $3.2 billion. Tallinn would try to meet NATO's new capability targets "as quickly as possible," the government said as it announced the decision in April. Exact NATO capability targets, assigned to each country and decided in early June, are classified and separate from the spending goals. If Spain had said it would not meet the capability targets, this would have been a much bigger concern, Bauer said. "Of course, I would have been more happy that everybody's following exactly the same standards," said Margus Tsahkna, Estonia's foreign minister, when asked about Spain's defense spending. But "unity is important as well," Tsahkna added to Newsweek. Publicly, there were enthusiastic nods to unity. Photos featuring smiling NATO leaders nodded to it, said Jim Townsend, a former Pentagon official. But NATO "has had fractures, always," he told Newsweek. "There's never been a totally unified NATO to begin with." Even still, he added, "all the nations want to have unity here." "There's always something," said Bauer. Attendees in The Hague have framed the defense spending pledge and snappy communique as a response to the threat of Russia, not just the biting condemnation of the U.S. president. "The biggest change for me was not President Trump," said Bauer. "The biggest change was the development of the threat — which is Russia, which was terrorist organizations," he added. On the horizon, too, is China, the former military committee chief said. "Time is against us — the Russian threat is real," said Ulysse Ellian, a Dutch lawmaker from the People's Party for Freedom and Democracy, previously led by Rutte. "For most of the allies, they do feel the sense of urgency," he told Newsweek. "It's natural some of them don't, and then we have to convince them." Even now, some countries still need cajoling, Tsahkna said. The countries forming the spine of NATO's eastern flank, brushing up against the Russian border, have surged defense spending far quicker than Western and Southern Europe. Spain, geographically far from Russia, looks south to Africa more than toward the north and east. Across most parts of NATO, though, there is a widespread feeling that defense spending across the board must rise, and rapidly. This year's concise communique, homing in on defense and tossing other topics to the wayside, "highlights that Europe's need to spend more on defense is one thing all Allies can agree on," said Rachel Rizzo, a non-resident senior fellow with the Atlantic Council's Europe Center. But now the hard work begins, Rizzo said. "It's a long road ahead."
23 minutes ago
Trump gets 'golden share' power in US Steel buyout. US agencies will get it under future presidents
HARRISBURG, Pa. -- President Donald Trump will control the so-called 'golden share' that's part of the national security agreement under which he allowed Japan-based Nippon Steel to buy out iconic American steelmaker U.S. Steel, according to disclosures with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The provision gives the president the power to appoint a board member and have a say in company decisions that affect domestic steel production and competition with overseas producers. Under the provision, Trump — or someone he designates — controls that decision-making power while he is president. However, control over those powers reverts to the Treasury Department and the Commerce Department when anyone else is president, according to the filings. The White House didn't immediately respond to questions Wednesday about why Trump will directly control the decision-making and why it goes to the Treasury and Commerce departments under future presidents. Nippon Steel's nearly $15 billion buyout of Pittsburgh-based U.S. Steel became final last week, making U.S. Steel a wholly owned subsidiary. Trump has sought to characterize the acquisition as a "partnership" between the two companies after he at first vowed to block the deal — as former President Joe Biden did on his way out of the White House — before changing his mind after he became president. The national security agreement became effective June 13 and is between Nippon Steel, as well as its American subsidiary, and the federal government, represented by the departments of Commerce and Treasury, according to the disclosures. The complete national security agreement hasn't been published publicly, although aspects of it have been outlined in statements and securities filings made by the companies, U.S. Steel said Wednesday. The pursuit by Nippon Steel dragged on for a year and-a-half, weighed down by national security concerns, opposition by the United Steelworkers and presidential politics in the premier battleground state of Pennsylvania, where U.S. Steel is headquartered. The combined company will become the world's fourth-largest steelmaker in an industry dominated by Chinese companies, and bring what analysts say is Nippon Steel's top-notch technology to U.S. Steel's antiquated steelmaking processes, plus a commitment to invest $11 billion to upgrade U.S. Steel facilities. The potential that the deal could be permanently blocked forced Nippon Steel to sweeten the deal. That included upping its capital commitments in U.S. Steel facilities and adding the golden share provision, giving Trump the right to appoint an independent director and veto power on specific matters. Those matters include reductions in Nippon Steel's capital commitments in the national security agreement; changing U.S. Steel's name and headquarters; closing or idling U.S. Steel's plants; transferring production or jobs outside of the U.S.; buying competing businesses in the U.S.; and certain decisions on trade, labor and sourcing outside the U.S.
San Francisco Chronicle
32 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
USA Surfing gets new financial backing in a bid to be recertified for its hometown Olympics
LOS ANGELES (AP) — USA Surfing says it has secured a multimillion-dollar endowment as part of its push to be recertified as the nascent Olympic sport's national governing body after losing its status four years ago over financial issues. USA Surfing executive director Becky Fleischauer told The Associated Press on Wednesday that the investment is a major step toward the organization's goal to return to the Olympic movement. 'We have a new board, new leadership, and we've been delivering more value to our surfers than has ever been provided in the past,' Fleischauer said. 'There's a lot of energy. This investment is a declaration of confidence in the future of surfing from those who know it best.' USA Surfing has struck multiyear deals for financial backing from Kamaka Responsible Development, which builds housing communities, and with Orange County-based surf company Resin Services. Kamaka also plans to develop a wave pool that can be used for year-round training for USA Surfing athletes. Fleischauer spoke from the USA Surfing Championship at Lower Trestles, the iconic surf break near San Clemente, California, that will also host the Los Angeles Olympics surfing competition in 2028. USA Surfing, which is based in San Clemente, has crowned its under-18 national champions at Trestles for decades. 'Trestles is our backyard,' Fleischauer said. 'It's where our surfers train. It's where our coaches coach. It's really a global hub for surfing, and we reside right here, so that puts us in a really strong position to know our surfers, know our break, and to be able to lift up the entire community by having the Olympics here.' Surfing made its Olympic debut at the Tokyo Games in 2021, but USA Surfing had already run into trouble with the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee by then over numerous concerns about the organization's financial management. USA Surfing voluntarily decertified as the sport's national governing body in December 2021, although it remained the American representative to the International Surfing Association. USA Surfing is reapplying to be the NGB again, but the U.S. Ski & Snowboard Federation has also applied to manage the Olympic surf team. The well-funded winter sports organization is run by Sophie Goldschmidt, the former chief executive of the World Surf League. One governing body managing multiple sports is an accepted practice in some countries, but hasn't been the norm in the U.S. Olympic movement since the Amateur Sports Act in 1978. The USOPC is evaluating both groups' filings and is expected to resolve the situation within the next few months. While Ski & Snowboard has ample Olympics experience, USA Surfing has the backing of the ISA and even the World Surf League itself, according to its filing with the USOPC. U.S. Olympic gold medalists Caroline Marks and Carissa Moore were among several top surfers who submitted letters of support for USA Surfing. USA Surfing has kept operating without funding from the USOPC since its decertification, still staging competitions and aiding American surfers in their preparation for international events. The body has since made large changes to its leadership, appointing Fleischauer and adding several new members to its board of directors in January 2024.
