Communist Party membership shares the qualities of LinkedIn and the Legion of Mary
It had been a long time since we last met and although the traffic was bad and Xiang was going to be almost two hours late, we were determined to meet for dinner regardless. But before he arrived he told me there was something I should know.
'I'm very angry and sad,' he said.
Xiang worked at a forest park outside
Beijing
where he led a team of 12 people who spent their days planting, pruning and trimming. He enjoyed the work and loved being outdoors but on the day of our dinner, his boss had told him this idyll was about to end.
'I'm being transferred to the
Party
headquarters,' he said.
READ MORE
'I'm a Party member.'
The move was a promotion but it would mean working at a desk in an office every day, dealing with administrative processes. His boss had tried to persuade him to make the same move a couple of years ago but Xiang resisted and the plan was dropped.
'He's a kind man and he wants to help me but I don't want to move,' he said.
Xiang's best years in the forest park were during the coronavirus pandemic, when staff were put on half time and he worked one week and was off the next. On his weeks off, he would drive to an unfamiliar province, staying in cheap hotels as he explored the countryside.
'When I retire, I'm going to buy a camper van and drive all over
China
,' he told me,
The half-time working arrangement continued for a year after the end of zero-Covid restrictions but with one unwelcome modification. If Xiang wanted to leave the Beijing area during his week off, he would have to inform his superiors in advance of where he was going.
'I stopped going away. I didn't want to have to talk to them about it,' he said.
A couple of years earlier, Xiang and his colleagues were invited to hand in their passports to their superiors for safekeeping. If they wanted to travel outside the country, they only had to ask and the passport would be returned.
'Nobody does,' he said.
Such restrictions are among the drawbacks of Communist Party membership, which also carries advantages such as access to better jobs, housing and government benefits. Many of the Party's 98 million members joined with an eye on their career, although one of those who did so told me recently that he later became interested in the ideology and embraced it.
'It's like a religion. You have to believe in socialism and all of that,' my friend Song said.
Song is not a Party member but many of his friends are, most of them working in the arts and related fields. Bookish and bohemian, these people are nothing like the stereotype of a blank-faced communist bureaucrat but although they are not zealots, they don't seem too cynical about the Party and its purposes either.
The rewards of Party membership are most obvious in the public service and state-owned enterprises, where it is a prerequisite for holding positions above a certain level. Party members can help one another to make connections too, in private business as well as in universities, the professions and the broader state sector.
But they are also expected to volunteer for everything from disaster relief to organising neighbourhood clean-ups. And obligatory study groups for Xi Jinping Thought and self-criticism sessions mean that Party membership shares the qualities of LinkedIn and the Legion of Mary.
Over dinner, Xiang persuaded himself that he would once again escape his redeployment to Party headquarters and that his boss would intervene on his behalf. But over the next few days, his mood appeared to darken as he sent me pictures of empty McDonald's wrappers and told me he was drinking beer at noon on his days off.
When I heard from him again a few weeks later, he told me that the move had gone ahead and he had started his new job. I asked him how he was feeling about it.
'I'm not happy. I feel very sad,' he said.
'This weekend I'm going to buy some flowering plants. I can't change my job so I must change my mood.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
12 hours ago
- Irish Times
How a man described as ‘dumber than a sack of bricks' came to dominate global trade policy
Elon Musk called him 'a moron' and 'dumber than a sack of bricks' but he's probably the most consequential economist in the world right now. 75-year-old Peter Navarro is the intellectual driving force behind global tariffs and Donald Trump's attempt to rewire the global trading system. He wangled his way into Maga hearts with his 2011 book 'Death by China' (later a documentary) which paints China as the great Satan of world trade. In it, Navarro argues that Beijing engages in unfair trade practices, from intellectual property theft and currency manipulation to product dumping and abusive labour standards. READ MORE [ Donald Trump accuses China of violating US tariff truce Opens in new window ] And, more importantly, that the US worker is the chief fall guy. 'If the Chinese vampire can't suck the American blood, it's going to suck the UK blood and the EU blood,' he told the Daily Telegraph last month while accusing the UK of being a 'compliant servant of communist China'. The Massachusetts-born economist played a role in the first Trump administration but his push for a more aggressive stance on China was crowded out by free trade conservatives (the US did impose tariffs on Beijing but they were limited in scope). But Navarro is nothing but steadfast and he drinks the Maga Kool-Aid. He took part in the Rudy Giuliani-led campaign to have the 2020 US election result overturned and spent four months in prison last year for refusing to co-operate with the congressional inquiry into the January 6th attack on the US Capito l. His reward was to be appointed Trump's senior counsellor for trade and manufacturing and to have his tariff agenda elevated to the heart of US trade policy, the source of so much global turmoil at present. According to the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal, Navarro was the brains behind Trump's reciprocal tariff formula presented by the president on a cardboard chart in the White House Rose Garden. The formula, which has no precedent in economic theory, took the US goods trade deficit with a specific country, divided it by that country's exports to the US, turned it into a percentage and then cut it in half to produce the tariff rate. It generated weird outcomes. Madagascar, one of the poorest countries in the world, qualified for a punitive 47 per cent tariff on a modest $733 million of exports of vanilla, metals and clothing to the US. Navarro is spearheading this protectionist drive or at least providing an economic rationale for Trump's isolationist tendencies. His standing in academic circles took a hammering a few years back when it emerged that he had fabricated one of the people frequently quoted in his books. 'Ron Vara' is cited in several of Navarro's books mainly to make the case against China but Ron Vara was an anagram of Navarro, and was in fact Navarro citing himself. He defended the fabrication as a 'whimsical device' but it seems even his co-authors weren't in on the joke and publishing companies are now adding advisory notes to his books. Like many in the current Washington administration, Navarro was a fringe figure (he used to write get rich quick investment books) before being anointed by Trump. If his views on tariffs are in the minority, his representation of China as the chief villain of the global trading system has become more mainstream and resonates strongly with Trump's voter base. The US has lost close to 5 million manufacturing jobs since 2001, the year China joined the World Trade Organisation (WTO). The decline has been unprecedented by US standards and has created, or at least compounded, what's often referred to as a Rust Belt from the Midwest to the Great Lakes, an area that spans from western New York to Michigan and north Illinois and encompasses states like West Virginia, Ohio and Indiana. It was once the backbone of US industry, but it has now become synonymous with economic decline, population loss and urban decay. You could argue that the US backlash against globalisation and politics currently playing out in Washington is largely a product of Rust Belt economics. Navarro penned a chapter in Project 2025 (reputedly the ultraconservative blueprint for Trump's second term) called 'the case for fair trade' in which he makes the argument for action against what he describes as China's 'institutionalised aggression'. And why the US's big trade deficits (in goods) with other countries (Ireland is highlighted as having the seventh biggest) has been so damaging. 'These trade deficit statistics implicitly measure the large amounts of America's manufacturing and defense industrial base and supply chains that have been offshored to foreign lands,' he says. 'Such offshoring not only suppresses the real wages of American blue-collar workers and denies millions of Americans the opportunity to climb up the rungs of the ladder to the middle class, but also raises the spectre of a manufacturing and defense industrial base that, unlike our experience in World Wars I and II, will not be able to provide the weapons and material that would be needed should America enter another major world war or seek to assist a major ally like Europe, Japan, or Taiwan,' he says. The above passage encapsulates why many in the US see globalisation as a betrayal of the American dream and a fundamental attack on US hegemony.
Irish Times
14 hours ago
- Irish Times
China accuses US secretary Pete Hegseth of ‘vilifying' remarks at defence forum
China has protested to the United States over 'vilifying' remarks made by secretary for defence Pete Hegseth , the ministry for foreign affairs said on Sunday, while accusing it of deliberately ignoring calls for peace from regional nations. China has objected to Mr Hegseth calling it a threat in the Indo-Pacific, the ministry added, describing his comments at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore on Saturday as 'deplorable' and 'intended to sow division'. 'Hegseth deliberately ignored the call for peace and development by countries in the region, and instead touted the Cold War mentality for bloc confrontation, vilified China with defamatory allegations, and falsely called China a 'threat',' the ministry said on its website. 'The United States has deployed offensive weaponry in the South China Sea and kept stoking flames and creating tensions in the Asia-Pacific, which are turning the region into a powder keg,' the ministry said. READ MORE Mr Hegseth had called on allies in the Indo-Pacific region , including key security ally Australia , to spend more on defence after warning of the 'real and potentially imminent' threat from China. Asked about the call to boost defence spending, Australian prime minister Anthony Albanese said his government had pledged an extra 10 billion Australian dollars (€5.6 billion) to defence. 'What we'll do is we'll determine our defence policy,' Mr Albanese told reporters on Sunday, a transcript of his remarks showed. As part of Washington's long-standing defence ties with the Philippines, the US military this year deployed Typhon launchers that can fire missiles to hit targets in both China and Russia from the island of Luzon. China and the Philippines contest sovereignty over some islands and atolls in the South China Sea, with growing maritime run-ins between their coast guards as both vie to patrol the waters. The ministry also warned the US not to 'play with fire' on the Taiwan question. In his speech at Asia's premier forum for defence leaders, military officials and diplomats, Mr Hegseth said any attempt by China to conquer Taiwan 'would result in devastating consequences'. China has vowed to 'reunify' with the separately governed island, by force if necessary. Taiwan's government rejects Beijing's sovereignty claims, saying only the island's people can decide their future. – Reuters
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
Lee Jae-myung: The man set to take over South Korea's turbulent democracy
The crowd outside Seoul Children's Grand Park was a few hundred strong, many of them holding blue balloons and some with flags on flexible poles about 10 metres tall. The mood was buoyant, principally because their Democratic Party candidate, Lee Jae-myung (61), was more than 10 points ahead in the polls. He is on course to win South Korea's presidential election next Tuesday. Warm-up speakers reminded supporters that early voting was under way (more than 20 per cent of eligible voters had cast their ballots by Friday morning) and led chants of the candidate's name. Then local politicians dressed in the blue-and-white campaign uniform joined younger activists in a K pop-style dance to welcome Lee onstage. READ MORE Lee, who survived an assassination attempt last year, campaigns in a bulletproof vest and he spoke from a lectern behind three protective screens with personal protection officers on either side of him. Narrowly defeated by Yoon Suk Yeol of the conservative People Power Party in 2022, Lee's second tilt at the South Korean presidency has come two years ahead of schedule following Yoon's impeachment in April over his declaration of martial law last December . 'I never imagined that martial law would be declared in broad daylight for no apparent reason. I couldn't believe it,' Lee told the crowd at Seoul Children's Grand Park. 'This country, which is one of the world's top 10 economic powers and even called a cultural powerhouse, so that people all over the world sing Korean pop songs, watch Korean dramas, eat Korean food, and want to visit Korea ... would anyone believe that such a country would have a coup and become a military dictatorship where soldiers run the country?' Yoon Suk Yeol, then South Korean president, makes a televised briefing on December 3rd in which he declares martial law. Photograph: Ahn Young-joon/AP Yoon, frustrated by what he saw as illegitimate obstructionism by the Democratic Party's majority in the National Assembly, declared martial law in a televised announcement at 10.30pm on December 3rd. He suspended all political activity, put the media under state control and deployed hundreds of armed troops to the legislature in an attempt to prevent it from meeting. Crowds gathered at the National Assembly building to stop the military from occupying it and helped legislators to climb over barriers to go inside. By 4.30am, they voted by 190 votes to zero to overturn the martial law declaration. Six hours after he made it, Yoon revoked it. The legislature voted to impeach Yoon on December 14th and he was arrested a month later for abuse of power, prompting a riot by his supporters. Last month, the constitutional court unanimously confirmed Yoon's impeachment, opening the way to next week's presidential election. Lee has dismissed the conservative People Power Party's candidate Kim Moon Soo as 'Yoon's avatar', warning that his victory could see a return of the former president and those around him. Political scientist Kim Woo Sang said: 'The impact is that the framing of this presidential election is the one the Democratic Party is making, that we have to do away with the so-called treacherous and treasonous forces, and that they are the democrats which will turn the country around.' Kim Moon Soo, centre, the candidate for South Korea's People Power Party, arrives to cast his ballot during early voting for the presidential election on Thursday. Photograph: Jung Yeon-je/Getty A former adviser to Kim Dae-jung, the Democratic Party's most successful president of South Korea, Kim Woo Sang also served as a member of the National Assembly. But he is suspicious of Lee, whom the conservative People Power Party accuse of having dictatorial tendencies. 'If he becomes a dictator, he will be a dictator because he already has the legislature doing his bidding, constitutional or not. They say that he can do no wrong,' he said. 'So if he becomes president, he will push through Bills as he sees fit. He's already been blackmailing and threatening the judiciary, which was the only leftover of the so-called free system.' Born into poverty in a remote mountain village, Lee skipped secondary school to work in a factory where an industrial accident caused a permanent injury to his arm at the age of 13. He went back to school later, winning a scholarship to university to study law and going on to work as a human rights lawyer. A former mayor of Seongnam, a city of one million people and governor of Gyeonggi province, Lee has faced investigations for corruption, bribery and conflicts of interest. Last November, he was convicted of making false statements during the 2022 presidential election campaign, but the conviction was overturned by the Seoul high court in March. The supreme court overturned that decision on May 1st, sending the case back to the high court. His Democratic Party has floated a proposal to expand the supreme court from 14 justices to 30 or even 100, including non-lawyers. Lee has played down the proposal during the campaign, but reforming the judiciary is among the proposals in his party's official platform published this week. The platform also includes proposals for democratic control over the president's right to declare martial law and plans to punish those who supported Yoon's actions last December. Although Yoon's invocation of martial law was a shock to South Korea's democracy, his fall from grace is part of a pattern. Since the introduction of democracy in the late 1980s, almost every president has ended up being impeached or jailed. 'To all intents and purposes, it's a democracy. But its democracy has a particular characteristic where the emphasis is on the rule by the people as opposed to the rule by the institutions,' said Michael Breen, the author of The New Koreans, who has lived in Seoul for more than 40 years. 'There's a word called minshim, which means public sentiment, but in the Korean meaning it's something more visceral. It's like a collective emotional feeling. What happened when democracy came is that authoritarianism went out of the window and moving into its place was this idea of the voice of the people.' Protesters take part in a demonstration last December in Seoul against Yoon Suk Yeol, then president. Photograph: Ezra Acayan/Getty As a former correspondent for British and American newspapers, Breen has watched the same pattern unfold during each South Korean presidency. The president can only serve one five-year term in office and each one starts with a high approval rating. 'Then it goes down, down, down. And by the end, their own party's candidate to succeed them doesn't want their support it because it's just poison, he said. 'And what we've had added into that mix of that pattern now is impeachment. So when the Democratic Party won a majority last year in the assembly, they interpreted that as a message from the people. Their stated objective was to get rid of Yoon, and then he obliged by being a jerk.' Despite his legal problems, Lee may be protected from the threat of impeachment by the majority his Democratic Party commands in the national assembly and the lack of legislative elections for the next three years. So he has a good chance of implementing the policies he has campaigned on, including on foreign affairs and relations with North Korea . Yoon took a hard line towards Pyongyang, downgrading the institutional framework that is supposed to be preparing for reunification and focusing instead on bolstering South Korea's defence. He drew close to the United States and, more controversially, Japan and adopted a more confrontational approach to China and Russia . A woman in Seoul walks past a banner showing Lee Jae-myung, the presidential candidate for the Democratic Party, and Kim Moon Soo, the People Power Party's contender. Photograph: Anthony Wallace/Getty Lee has promised to reduce tensions on the Korean peninsula by restoring communication lines with Pyongyang, although he has acknowledged there is no immediate prospect of dialogue. This is because North Korea has formally abandoned its aspiration for unification and declared South Korea its enemy. Lee made clear this week that one motivation for his wish to renew engagement with North Korea is to ensure that Seoul is not cut out of talks if Donald Trump revives his negotiations with Kim Jong Un . Trump met the North Korean leader during his first term in the White House and they exchanged numerous letters, but denuclearisation talks ended in failure. 'The North Korean denuclearisation process has long since stalled. The North's nuclear and missile capabilities are growing stronger every day. We can no longer stand idly by,' he said. 'North Korea policy should not be a political tool. We should only think about how to achieve peace and unification.' Lee has also advocated a reset of South Korea's relationships with China and Russia, along with other Brics countries, a prospect that causes unease in some European capitals. He defended his approach this week as a pragmatic response to a shifting geopolitical landscape. 'China is South Korea's important trading partner and a key influence on the security of the Korean Peninsula. I would stabilise the relationship between China, which has reached its lowest point under the previous administration,' he said. 'US-Russia relations and the war in Ukraine are entering a new phase. I would treat our relations with Russia from a national interest-first perspective, contribute to the reconstruction of Ukraine and conduct pragmatic diplomacy for the security of Korea and our businesses.' Voters in Seoul queue to cast their ballots on Friday during early voting in the presidential election. Photograph: Anthony Wallace/Getty Trump has threatened to impose a 25 per cent tariff on all Korean goods, although he has postponed its implementation for 90 days along with his 'reciprocal tariffs' on other countries. Reports from Washington suggest that his administration is also considering cuts to the US military presence in South Korea and demanding that Seoul pays more to keep them there. 'I would say if Trump pulls troops out and raises the tariffs like that, I think public opinion towards the US will certainly not be good,' Kim said. 'And then if Lee Jae-myung is president, he will use that to oppose the US, reorient and grow closer to China and Russia. I think that's how it's going to work out.' Breen is more sanguine and although he has his doubts about Lee's commitment to real political reform that could limit his powers as president he believes fears about a shift in foreign policy are overblown. 'I think he's a pragmatist. He's talked about the importance of the American relationship and it's the most important relationship,' he said. 'He might make an effort towards China, but he'll have to be careful not to be embarrassed by them because they will want something more than he's able to give. 'I think every country is having this problem now because of where Trump is going with tariffs and stuff. You've got to be on the right side of that in a very pragmatic way.'
