logo
Geert Wilders' asylum protest triggers collapse of Dutch government

Geert Wilders' asylum protest triggers collapse of Dutch government

Times2 days ago

The clash between European Union law and populist demands to stop asylum seekers caused the collapse of the Dutch government on Tuesday, triggering early elections.
To the shock of even his own ministers, Geert Wilders withdrew his hard-right Party for Freedom (PVV) from the cabinet less than a year after the government was formed, making it one of the most short-lived in the country's history.
An ultimatum from the veteran hard-right leader to curb asylum claims and to deport refugees with a criminal record had split the coalition and threatened to put the Netherlands at odds with the EU, illustrating wider European tensions as national governments try to toughen border controls.
Emergency talks lasted only ten minutes and failed to resolve the situation. 'No signature for our asylum plans. PVV leaves the coalition,' Wilders, 61, announced on the social media platform X on Tuesday morning.
A few hours later, Dick Schoof, the prime minister, a technocrat and former senior civil servant who led the uneasy alliance of mainstream conservatives and populists, handed his resignation to King Willem-Alexander. Elections are expected this autumn.
'As far as I'm concerned, this wasn't necessary,' Schoof said. 'This country has major problems, so decisiveness is required. We have worked hard on the implementation in recent months. But if one party lacks the will, you cannot continue together.'
The PVV was the election winner in November 2023 and dominated the coalition. However, support for Wilders was sliding in the opinion polls as the government struggled to enact migration measures that, lawyers warned, would breach EU asylum law.
Wilders has repeatedly expressed his anger over the past four months that the coalition, while pledging the 'toughest ever' policy on migration, had failed to deliver. He demanded on Monday that the Netherlands suspend all asylum claims because most of the claimants come from the safe neighbouring countries of Belgium and Germany.
He has previously summarised his policy as: 'Close the borders for asylum seekers and family reunifications. No more asylum centres opened. Close them.'
His demands have widespread popular support, especially among followers of the coalition parties, and Wilders is gambling that new Dutch elections would give his party, which still leads in the opinion polls, a bigger share of the vote.
But he was accused of 'betrayal' by former coalition allies and populists who fear that elections might trigger a swing back towards the centrist, pro-European left. 'I promised the voters the strictest asylum policy ever. But that was blocked,' Wilders said. 'I could do nothing but withdraw support for this cabinet.'
Ingrid Coenradie, the PVV security minister, said she was 'certainly not with' Wilders after his 'reprehensible' decision. 'I always had the hope that we could have finished a whole term. That is not possible now because Wilders has decided to pull the plug,' she said.
Caroline van der Plas, the leader of the populist, rural BBB party in the coalition, was also furious, accusing Wilders of a reckless 'power play'.
After a brief meeting on Tuesday morning, Dilan Yesilgoz, leader of the mainstream conservative VVD, stormed out of Wilders' office. 'He is choosing his own ego and his own interests,' she said. 'I am astonished. He is throwing away the chance of a right-wing policy. This is super-irresponsible.'
Schoof, 68, the country's former spy chief who was drafted in as independent prime minister from outside parliament, will stay on as caretaker prime minister alongside ministers from the mainstream, conservative VVD and NSC parties, along with the BBB. 'We can do everything to take the decisions that are necessary,' Schoof said.
The political crisis comes as other European countries, such as Germany and Italy, have been hindered by EU asylum policies or human rights law when attempting to limit net migration.
In total, 44,055 asylum seekers and their following relatives entered the Netherlands last year, followed by 11,000 in the first four months of this year. Although the figures are far lower than the peaks recorded in 2015 at the height of the Syrian civil war, and more recently in autumn 2023, polling at the weekend showed that 76 per cent of coalition voters, a majority nationally, backed Wilders' demands for migrants or asylum seekers to be expelled if they were convicted of a serious crime.
Eighteen months after his shock election win, Wilders's PVV is also leading polls of party support on 31 per cent. But a left-wing coalition led by Frans Timmermans, a former EU commissioner, is now just one point behind. 'We want elections as soon as possible,' said Timmermans on Tuesday.
In third place is the VVD, the traditional party of the Dutch government for decades, on 25 per cent, meaning any forthcoming election is likely to be a close battle.
The collapse is a major blow to Dutch prestige only three weeks before the Hague is due to host a summit of Nato

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

BRYONY GORDON: I was fat-shamed at eight and quickly learned my value was based on my dress size. It plunged me into a world of depression, OCD and eating disorders... this is how I finally snapped out of it
BRYONY GORDON: I was fat-shamed at eight and quickly learned my value was based on my dress size. It plunged me into a world of depression, OCD and eating disorders... this is how I finally snapped out of it

Daily Mail​

time13 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

BRYONY GORDON: I was fat-shamed at eight and quickly learned my value was based on my dress size. It plunged me into a world of depression, OCD and eating disorders... this is how I finally snapped out of it

When I was only eight years old, I heard the words that all girls growing up in the 1980s and 1990s dreaded. 'Gosh, hasn't Bryony got an appetite on her?' It was bellowed by a friend of my father's, who had come round for Sunday lunch. At the time, such comments about female bodies were so normalised that it barely registered on anyone else's radar. But to me it felt completely humiliating.

Survey reveals the exact demographics behind Reform's growing support
Survey reveals the exact demographics behind Reform's growing support

The Independent

time18 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Survey reveals the exact demographics behind Reform's growing support

Recent voting intention polling from YouGov (May 27) shows Reform UK in first place, 8% ahead of Labour and 10% ahead of the Conservatives, who are now in third place. The rising popularity of Nigel Farage 's party is an unprecedented threat to the major parties. This was driven home in recent local elections in England, where Reform won 677 seats and took control of 10 local authorities. But where does this support come from? The survey compares respondent voting intention to their votes in the 2024 general election. If we look at Conservative voters, 27% of them have switched to Reform in their voting intentions, while 66% remain loyal. Alarmingly for Labour, only 60% of their 2024 voters have remained loyal, and 15% intend to vote for Reform, while 12% switched to the Liberal Democrats and 9% to the Greens. Labour has been squeezed from both sides of the political spectrum, but the loss to the left is significantly larger than the loss to the right. In contrast, 73% of Liberal Democrat voters have remained loyal to the party, with only 7% switching to Reform and 8% going to Labour. Not surprisingly, 91% of Reform voters have remained loyal, with 5% going to the Conservatives and 3% going to the Greens. None of the Reform voters have switched to Labour or the Liberal Democrats. Reform's rise has led the Labour government to take more hardline stances on key issues, particularly immigration and asylum – which around half of YouGov respondents say is the most important issue facing the country. And with small boat crossings on the rise again, it remains to be seen whether the government's recent proposals to reduce net migration will be enough to hold onto wavering supporters. Social backgrounds and party support If we probe a bit further into the social characteristics of voters, only 8% of 18 to 24-year-olds support Reform, compared with 35% of 50 to 64-year-olds and 33% of the over-65s. Some 34% of the younger group support Labour, 12% the Conservatives, 15% the Liberal Democrats and 25% the Greens. As far as the 50 to 64-year-olds are concerned, 19% support Labour, 16% the Conservatives, 16% the Liberal Democrats and 9% the Greens. There is currently a significant age divide when it comes to party support. With respect to class (or 'social grade' as it is described in contemporary surveys), 23% of the middle-class support Reform compared with 38% of the working class. The latter were the bedrock of Labour support a couple of generations ago, but now only 19% support Labour, with 17% supporting the Conservatives and 12% the Liberal Democrats. Current support for the parties among middle-class voters, apart from Reform, is 22% for Labour, 21% for the Conservatives and 17% for the Liberal Democrats. Again, the middle class used to be the key supporters of the Conservative party, but at the moment the party is running third behind its rivals in this group. Finally, the relationship between gender and support for the parties is also interesting. Some 35% of male respondents support Reform compared with only 24% of female respondents. In contrast, 21% of both men and women support Labour. The figures for the Conservatives are 16% of men and 22% of women, and Liberal Democrat support is 14% from men and 16% from women. There is also notable support for Reform among those who voted Leave in the 2016 Brexit referendum in the YouGov survey. Altogether 53% of Leave voters in the EU Referendum opted for Reform and 24% supported the Conservatives, with 8% supporting Labour, 8% the Liberal Democrats and 4% the Greens. In the case of Remain voters, 10% chose Reform, 17% went for the Conservatives, 30% for Labour, 23% for the Liberal Democrats and 14% for the Greens. Not surprisingly, Reform takes the largest share of Brexit voters, but just over half of them – indicating that a lot of change has occurred in support since the 2016 referendum and Farage's role in the Leave campaign. The fact that 10% of Remain voters switched to Reform and 20% of Leave voters have switched to Labour, the Liberal Democrats or the Greens shows that it is not just a simple case of support for Brexit leading to support for Reform. Voting and volatility Before Nigel Farage starts picking out curtains for Number 10, it is worth looking at another volatile moment in British political history - the effects of the split in the Labour party in 1981, when the Social Democratic Party was formed by the 'gang of four' breakaway Labour politicians, Shirley Williams, Roy Jenkins, David Owen and Bill Rodgers. The newly formed party agreed to an electoral pact with the Liberals, which continued until the 1983 election. A Gallup poll published in December 1981 shows a massive lead for the SDP-Liberal Alliance. And yet, Margaret Thatcher's Conservatives won that election. Labour came second by a small margin ahead of the SDP-Liberal Alliance and remained the main opposition party. The point of this example is that a massive lead in the polls for the SDP-Liberal Alliance shortly after it was established did not provide a breakthrough in the general election two years later. Reform may be in the lead now, but this does not mean that it will win the general election of 2028-29. That said, there is a real risk for Labour continuing to lose support to both the left and the right – something which it needs to rapidly repair. Rachel Reeves 's 'iron chancellor' strategy, in which the government announces fiscal rules which it claims to stand by at all costs, is no longer credible. As the Institute of Government points out, every single fiscal rule adopted since 2008 has subsequently been abandoned. A strategy of continuing austerity by making significant cuts in the welfare budget to calm financial markets is likely to fail, both in the economy and with voters. Paul Whiteley is a Professor in the Department of Government at the University of Essex.

Madeleine McCann search officially ENDS: Agony as JCB, radar & fingertip trawl of Brueckner's ‘rat run' turns up nothing
Madeleine McCann search officially ENDS: Agony as JCB, radar & fingertip trawl of Brueckner's ‘rat run' turns up nothing

The Sun

time20 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Madeleine McCann search officially ENDS: Agony as JCB, radar & fingertip trawl of Brueckner's ‘rat run' turns up nothing

Could ground-penetrating radar help find Madeleine? As the latest search for Madeleine McCann enters a crucial phase, police appear to be using ground-penetrating radar in a fresh attempt to uncover long-buried clues. The operation, spanning 120 acres of scrubland and abandoned buildings near Praia da Luz, has seen officers clearing vegetation, wearing protective gear, and using a digger to shift rubble — all in a bid to access hidden terrain. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) sends electromagnetic pulses into the ground, detecting changes in material and potential buried objects without the need for large-scale excavation. It's a method often used to locate graves and burial sites. While previous searches have turned up no evidence, hopes remain that the advanced technology could help detectives locate something vital in the hunt for answers — 18 years after Madeleine disappeared. With just two days left in the current operation, Portuguese police remain tight-lipped, offering conflicting signals about how successful the search has been so far.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store