The Rise of Virtual Physical Therapy for Pelvic Health Wellness
SAN DIEGO, June 12, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- The complex web that makes up the pelvic floor is central to daily human function. It also can be central to chronic pelvic pain, incontinence, and sexual function issues—for both women and men.
Once shrouded in silence because of embarrassment and overlooked as a part of normal pregnancy or aging, pelvic health awareness has become a trending topic. More and more, people are beginning to understand that by alleviating pelvic symptoms and improving pelvic-floor muscle function, they can boost their self-confidence and quality of life.
This rising awareness is empowering individuals to seek care, ask questions, and demand solutions that address not just the symptoms but the root causes of their pelvic health dysfunction and resultant quality of life disruption. Fortunately, health plans and employer groups have taken notice of this emerging demand.
"Any physical therapist who has studied the anatomy of the human pelvis could tell you the interconnectedness of the bones, muscles, connective tissues, and organs is nothing short of fascinating," says American Specialty Health (ASH) Senior Vice President of Rehabilitation Services and Digital Self Care Solutions Jaynie Bjornaraa PhD, MPH, PT.
Physical therapy, with its evidence-based approach and clinical techniques, has become an indispensable tool in the treatment of pelvic health issues. Specialized pelvic floor treatment focuses on assessing and rehabilitating the muscles, ligaments, and connective tissue in the pelvic region and beyond.
This rehabilitation with individualized patient education can provide relief to patients struggling with a wide array of conditions.
But there can be barriers to care, says Dr. Bjornaraa.
Physical therapy coverage for some of these conditions may be limited; and access to physical therapists who specialize in providing pelvic health specific rehabilitative care can be a challenge, especially in rural and more remote areas.
Thankfully, says Dr. Bjornaraa, the rise of virtual physical therapy is reshaping the landscape of pelvic health treatment, bringing accessibility and convenience to an even broader audience.
"Through innovative telehealth platforms, like my company's ASHCare™ program, patients can connect with specialists from the comfort of home," said Dr. Bjornaraa. "It also can remove such barriers as geographic limitations, transportation challenges, or the stigma often associated with seeking help for pelvic health issues."
Virtual physical therapy leverages technology to offer personalized care, allowing therapists to guide patients through exercises, provide education, and monitor progress in real time. This approach also helps balance access to treatment, ensuring that individuals in rural or underserved areas can receive expert advice without the need for extensive travel.
Further, virtual sessions empower patients to integrate therapy seamlessly into their daily routines, according to Dr. Bjornaraa, making it easier to adhere to treatment plans and achieve lasting results.
By combining convenience with professional oversight, virtual physical therapy is proving transformative for those tackling pelvic health challenges. Whether addressing postpartum recovery, incontinence, chronic pain, or other pelvic health issues, this model of therapy ensures that no one must suffer in silence or postpone care due to logistical hurdles.
About American Specialty Health
American Specialty Health Incorporated (ASH) is one of the nation's premier independent and privately owned specialty health organizations offering technology-enabled services for benefits management and administrative services for health plans, and partners with employers, associations, and others. ASH currently covers 62+ million eligible members nationwide. With offices in California and Indiana, ASH has more than 1,700 employees. For more information about ASH, visit ASHCompanies.com; follow us on LinkedIn and Facebook; or call 800-848-3555.
Media Contacts:Jack ChirrickAmerican Specialty Health Inc.(619) 557-2361jackc@ashn.com
View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/the-rise-of-virtual-physical-therapy-for-pelvic-health-wellness-302479680.html
SOURCE American Specialty Health Incorporated
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Medscape
2 hours ago
- Medscape
Most Chronic Hepatitis B Diagnoses in US Are Late
More than 75% of chronic hepatitis B diagnoses in the United States occur late — within 2 years before or after the onset of a liver complication — highlighting the need for improved screening to prevent poor outcomes. METHODOLOGY: Late diagnosis of chronic hepatitis B represents a missed opportunity to intervene early and prevent liver-related complications. Researchers conducted a retrospective analysis of the Truven MarketScan database (2007 to 2021) to estimate the prevalence of late diagnosis of chronic hepatitis B in the US and associated liver complications. Eligible patients had chronic hepatitis B diagnosis and at least 12 months of insurance coverage prior to the first liver complication (cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC], or liver transplant). A diagnosis was defined as late if it occurred within 2 years before or after the first liver complication, and non-late if was made more than 2 years before the complication. TAKEAWAY: Of 2608 patients included (mean age, 54.83 years; 29.7% women), 76.6% had a late diagnosis of chronic hepatitis B; among these, 44.5% were diagnosed at or within 6 months of their first liver complication, and 75.5% lacked a documented visit to a medical provider prior to their first liver complication. Among those diagnosed > 36 months after the first liver complication, 46% already had another liver disease. Despite treatment advances, the rate of late diagnosis remained stable between 2010 (78.8%) and 2019 (89.3%; P for trend = . 438). for trend 438). Among patients with a late diagnosis, 91.0% had cirrhosis, 81.5% had decompensated cirrhosis, 30.8% developed HCC, and 14.4% underwent liver transplant. Independent predictors of late diagnosis included male sex, alcohol use, and having Preferred Provider Organization (PPO) or Health Maintenance Organization/PPO hybrid insurance. IN PRACTICE: 'Our study suggests that the majority of [hepatitis B virus] diagnoses in the United States are likely incidental from the work-up of a liver complication. These patients can be seen as 'missed opportunities' for treatment and intervention to prevent disease progression and adverse hepatic outcomes,' the authors wrote. SOURCE: This study was led by Michael Le and Joanne K. Liu, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California. It was published online in Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics . LIMITATIONS: This study excluded uninsured individuals and those covered by government insurance (eg, Medicaid), potentially underrepresenting higher-risk populations. Reliance on claims data may have affected the accuracy of diagnosis rates. Data on race, ethnicity, and foreign-born status were unavailable, preventing analysis of these important factors. DISCLOSURES: The authors received no specific funding for this work. No conflicts of interest were disclosed by the authors.
Medscape
2 hours ago
- Medscape
Adverse Events Post-Colonoscopy Rise With Age but Are Rare
Although adverse event rates within 30 days after surveillance colonoscopy increase with age, peaking among patients aged 76-85 years, they remain infrequent, occurring in < 1% of procedures. METHODOLOGY: Guidelines recommend surveillance colonoscopy for patients with precancerous adenomas due to an increased colorectal cancer risk but lack recommendations for stopping surveillance after the age of 75 years despite older adults experiencing increased comorbidities. Researchers analyzed data from 84,172 surveillance colonoscopies performed from 2010 to 2019 within a large integrated US healthcare system. Participants (59.5% men; 66.4% White individuals), aged 45-85 years, had a prior adenoma and were followed up to 30 days post-procedure for adverse events. Outcomes included emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths due to specific conditions (eg, colonic perforation and stroke), cardiovascular conditions, or any cause. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between age and adverse event risk, adjusting for various factors. TAKEAWAY: Adverse events occurred in < 1% of procedures, with gastrointestinal bleeding being the most common. Adverse event rates increased with age, with the highest rates observed in patients aged 76-85 years (69.6 events per 10,000 procedures), particularly for gastrointestinal bleeding (39.2 events per 10,000 procedures) and stroke (18.3 events per 10,000 procedures). Patients aged 76-85 years had significantly higher odds of adverse events than younger age groups in unadjusted analyses, but these odds were attenuated after adjusting for covariates. Significant risk factors for adverse events across all age groups included anticoagulant use, higher comorbidity scores, polypectomy, and advanced neoplasia detection during surveillance colonoscopy. IN PRACTICE: 'The findings suggest that the decision to perform colonoscopy surveillance after age 75 should be individualized based on patient preference, prior colonoscopy findings and procedure quality, comorbidities, and medication usage, rather than age alone,' the authors wrote. SOURCE: This study was led by Jeffrey K. Lee, MD, Kaiser Permanente Northern California in Oakland, California. It was published online in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology . LIMITATIONS: Findings may not be generalizable, as all participants were insured and had access to comprehensive care. The observational design lacked a noncolonoscopy comparison group, making it difficult to attribute adverse events directly to the procedure. Limited numbers of certain adverse events resulted in wide CIs, and potential confounders like polyp size or number and sedation type were not adjusted for. DISCLOSURES: This study was conducted within the National Cancer Institute-funded Population-based Research to Optimize the Screening Process consortium and supported by a career development grant from the same agency. The authors reported no relevant conflicts of interest.
Medscape
3 hours ago
- Medscape
Nivolumab Plus Chemotherapy Improves Survival in Lung Cancer
Adding nivolumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved 5-year overall survival among patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), according to findings from a phase 3 trial presented at the recent American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2025 annual meeting. The survival benefit was more pronounced in patients who achieved a pathologic complete response or a presurgery clearance of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). METHODOLOGY: The phase 3 CheckMate 816 trial has shown that compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, nivolumab plus chemotherapy improvespathologic complete response rates and event-free survival in patients with stage IB-IIIA resectable NSCLC. Based on these findings, this regimen was approved for this patient population in the US, EU, and other places. compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, nivolumab plus chemotherapy improvespathologic complete response rates and event-free survival in patients with stage IB-IIIA resectable NSCLC. Based on these findings, this regimen was approved for this patient population in the US, EU, and other places. Researchers are now reporting the final, prespecified analysis of overall survival. In the trial, 358 patients with stage IB-IIIA resectable NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive either nivolumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy or platinum-based chemotherapy alone every 3 weeks for three cycles. Surgery was performed within 6 weeks of completing neoadjuvant treatment. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or both were permitted. Primary endpoints were event-free survival and pathologic complete response. Overall survival was the key secondary endpoint. The median follow-up duration was 68.4 months. TAKEAWAY: The 5-year overall survival rate was 65.4% with nivolumab plus chemotherapy vs 55.0% with chemotherapy alone. Nivolumab plus chemotherapy reduced the risk for death by 28% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; P = .048). = .048). Among patients who received the combination therapy, the 5-year overall survival rate was 95.3% for those who achieved a pathological complete response vs 55.7% for those who did not. Overall, 24% of patients in the nivolumab group achieved a pathological complete response vs only 2.2% in the chemotherapy group. ctDNA clearance before surgery was a strong prognostic indicator, regardless of treatment. At 5 years, overall survival was 75.0% among patients with ctDNA clearance vs 52.6% in those without (HR for death, 0.38 in the nivolumab group and 0.39 in the chemotherapy-only group). The combination therapy was associated with consistent survival benefits across disease stage and PDL-1 expression levels. The 5-year lung cancer-specific survival rate was 74.9% with nivolumab plus chemotherapy vs 65.1% with chemotherapy alone (HR, 0.65). No new safety concerns emerged, and there were no new deaths related to a trial treatment. IN PRACTICE: 'In this trial, we found that the use of neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy resulted in significantly longer overall survival than chemotherapy alone, along with long-term benefit regarding event-free survival,' the authors wrote. 'These findings support the hypothesis that neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy can have a profound impact on the course of a patient's life when paired with the curative potential of surgical resection.' SOURCE: This study, led by Patrick M. Forde, MB, BCh, PhD, Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland, was published online in The New England Journal of Medicine and presented at ASCO. LIMITATIONS: Although the overall survival with nivolumab plus chemotherapy achieved statistical significance, the margin was narrow. Additionally, several subgroups in the exploratory analyses were too small for adequate statistical comparison, requiring cautious interpretation of these results. Black patients were underrepresented, which may have affected the generalizability of the findings. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Bristol Myers Squibb. Five authors declared being employees of Bristol Myers Squibb, with some holding stock or stock options with the company. Several authors declared working as consultants or having other ties with various sources including Bristol Myers Squibb.
