
Plastic pollution treaty talks fail to reach agreement
Delegates, who worked through the night in an extended session at the United Nations office in Geneva, say they failed to find an "acceptable outcome".
They remain deadlocked over whether the treaty should reduce the exponential growth of plastic production and put global, legally binding controls on toxic chemicals used to make plastics.
Oil and gas-producing nations and the plastics industry oppose production limits, instead calling for a treaty focused on better waste management and reuse.
"We are sorry to see that we, despite your efforts to bring us closer, will not be able to finalise negotiations on an acceptable outcome. We now have to explore our options going forward," said Andreas Bjelland Eriksen, Minister of Climate and the Environment of Norway.
This round of negotiations was supposed to be the final round, and to produce the first legally binding treaty on plastic pollution, including in the oceans.
But just like at the last meeting in South Korea last year, they're leaving without a treaty.
Two drafts were proposed by the chair of the negotiation committee, but the representatives from 184 countries did not agree to use either one as the basis for the negotiations.
No further action is being proposed at this stage on the latest draft, and next steps have not been decided yet, as delegates continue to meet on Friday. European Commissioner Jessika Roswall said the European Union and its member states had higher expectations for this meeting, and while the draft falls short of their demands, it provides a good basis for further negotiating sessions.
"The Earth is not ours only," she said. We are stewards for those who come after us. Let us fulfill that duty."
One of the drafts released on Friday did not include a limit on plastic production, but recognised current levels of production and consumption are "unsustainable".
The objective of the treaty was revamped to state that the accord would be based on a comprehensive approach that addresses the full lifecycle of plastics.
Each country came to Geneva with a lot of 'red lines,' said Magnus Heunicke, the Danish environment minister.
'To be very clear, a compromise means that we have to bend our red lines,' he said.
In 2025, the world is expected to consume more than 500 million tonnes of plastic, according to the UN Environmental Programme (UNEP).
It says the equivalent of 2,000 rubbish trucks of plastic are being dumped into the world's oceans, rivers and lakes every single day.
In addition, 13 million tonnes of plastic accumulate in the soil annually
Unlike natural materials, plastic does not decay; it merely continues to break down into smaller and smaller pieces known as microplastics.
Once in the environment, microplastics persist indefinitely and are virtually impossible to remove.
Despite a growing awareness of the problem, plastic pollution has continued to increase, with the World Wildlife Fund warning that global plastic pollution could triple by 2040 without immediate action.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Two-month-old baby girl and parents killed by Israel airstrike in Gaza while living in tent
The two-month old girl and her parents were killed during an Israeli airstrike on the area with neighbours speaking of their horror as Palestinians gathered to pray over their bodies A baby girl and her parents have been killed in Gaza after an Israeli airstrike on Saturday, hospital officials and witnesses said. The baby, who is said to have been two months old, was wrapped in blue as she was placed on top of her parents after the bombing as Palestinians stood over them and prayed. Motasem al-Batta, his wife, and the girl were all killed in their tent in the crowded Muwasi area. "Two and a half months, what has she done?" neighbour Fathi Shubeir asked. "They are civilians in an area designated safe." It comes as Israel's military said it is dismantling Hamas ' military capabilities and is taking precautions not to harm civilians. The country said it will not be commenting on the strike without more details. Muwasi is one of the most heavily populated areas in Gaza and is where Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said the country plans to widen its military offensive. The mobilisation of the country's forces is expected to take weeks, and Israel may be using the threat to pressure Hamas into releasing more hostages from the October 7, 2023, attack which sparked the war. Families of the hostages have said they fear the offensive further endangers the 50 remaining people in Gaza, just 20 of them thought to be alive. They, and other Israelis, were horrified when they saw the recent videos showing the hostages, speaking under duress, pleading for help and food. A group representing the families of the hostages in Gaza held by Hamas has urged the people of Israel into the streets on Sunday. The group said in a statement: "Across the country, hundreds of citizen-led initiatives will pause daily life and join the most just and moral struggle: the struggle to bring all 50 hostages home." The United Nations has warned that levels of starvation and malnutrition in Gaza are now at their highest since the war began with Palestinians drinking contaminated water as disease spreads. A further 11 deaths linked to malnutrition have occurred in the last 24 hours, Gaza's Health Ministry said on Saturday, with one child among the 11. The total malnutrition-related deaths during the war has now reached 251. The UN and partners said getting aid into the territory of two million people, and then onto distribution points, continues to be highly challenging with Israeli restrictions and pressure from crowds of hungry people. At least 1,760 people were killed seeking aid between May 27 and August 13, the UN human rights office said. 766 are said to have been killed along routes of supply convoys and 994 in the vicinity of "non-UN militarised sites" - a term used to reference the Israeli-backed and US supported Gaza Humanitarian Foundation which has been the primary distributor of aid in Gaza since May. The Hamas-led attack in 2023 killed around 1,200 people in Israel. Israel's retaliatory offensive has killed 61,897 people in Gaza, according to the Health Ministry, which does not specify how many were fighters or civilians but says around half were women and children. The ministry is part of the Hamas-run government and staffed by medical professionals. The U.N. and independent experts consider it the most reliable source on casualties. Israel disputes its figures but has not provided its own.


South Wales Guardian
3 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Putin ‘rewarded' for Ukraine invasion with Trump summit, experts warn
The summit, which took place at a military base in Anchorage in the US's northernmost state, was aimed at kick-starting a peace process to end the war in Ukraine. Very little appears to have been materially resolved as a result of the meeting. Mr Trump has insisted 'some great progress' was made, with 'many points' agreed and 'very few' remaining. Sir Keir Starmer, meanwhile, commended the US president's efforts to make peace, and said Mr Trump had 'brought us closer than ever before' to an end to the war in Ukraine. Leading foreign affairs and military experts have however claimed the summit's main effect has been to lend legitimacy to Mr Putin, who has been considered a pariah by many world leaders since the invasion began in 2022. Orysia Lutsevych, deputy director of the Russia and Eurasia programme and head of the Ukraine forum at the Chatham House think tank, said: 'After six bilateral Trump-Putin phone calls, five trips of Trump's envoy (Steve) Witkoff to Moscow, the Alaska summit, watched globally with so much anticipation and anxiety, failed to produce any tangible outcome to stop Russian aggression against Ukraine. 'Russia has received a reward for its invasion. 'Trump called Russia a 'great country' and said there is strong mutual understanding between the two parties. 'This represents a further fissure in the already shaky Transatlantic alliance, the rupture of which is a primary Russian aim. 'The Alaska summit represents another step towards this goal.' Keir Giles, an associate fellow of the Russia and Eurasia programme at Chatham House, meanwhile suggested there were 'two dangers' which could emerge from the summit. The first is that Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky may now be perceived by Mr Trump as a 'softer target where he is more willing to exert leverage', and that the US president could 'once again try to strongarm Zelensky into compromising the future of his country'. The second danger is that European leaders 'might once again think the immediate danger has passed' and become complacent, after their scramble to speak to Mr Trump ahead of the summit. Dr Neil Melvin, director of international security at the Royal United Services Institute (Rusi) meanwhile suggested Mr Putin would walk away considering the summit a success. Dr Melvin said: 'Vladimir Putin came to the Alaska summit with the principal goal of stalling any pressure on Russia to end the war. 'He will consider the summit outcome as mission accomplished.' He added: 'Russia's war aims have not changed since it launched its invasion of Ukraine in 2022. 'At the summit, Putin was clear that he wants to address first what he calls the root causes of the war. 'The Kremlin identifies these as Nato enlargement, the emergence of governments in Ukraine resistant to Russian integration projects, and challenges to Russian claims about territory and ethnic Russians in Ukraine. 'This is Russia's precondition and underpins Putin's demand for a 'comprehensive peace deal'. 'This agenda would lead to the subjugation of Ukraine. 'Putin made no concessions at the summit. 'Moreover, he succeeded in presenting himself as a legitimate equal to the US president. 'He will also consider it a victory that he was able to marginalise Zelensky and European leaders from the central discussion about the future of European security.' Elsewhere, party political leaders in the UK warned against lending Mr Putin legitimacy. Sir Ed Davey, the Liberal Democrat leader said: 'It's clear Putin doesn't want peace. 'Trump's attempt to sweet talk him into a deal has failed, so it's time for Trump to finally get tough. 'The UK should seize Russian assets to help Ukraine today, and press the US to do the same.' Green Party MP Ellie Chowns meanwhile said the world was 'left where we started' by the summit, adding: 'A brutal war caused by Russia's aggression and no real solution in sight. 'Any lasting peace plan without Ukraine's full participation and consent will fail. 'When you compare how Trump rolled out the red carpet for Putin to his publicly humiliating Zelensky, it's clear that the only winner from these talks is Putin. 'He was handed the credibility of a seat at the top table while his forces continue their attacks on Ukraine.'


North Wales Chronicle
3 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Zelensky must be at future peace talks, Starmer says after Trump-Putin summit
The Prime Minister said the US president's actions had 'brought us closer than ever before' to an end to the war in Ukraine. But he insisted insisted Ukraine's leader must take part in future peace talks after speaking with Mr Trump and Nato allies in the wake of the US president's negotiations with Vladimir Putin. The American leader had hoped to secure a peace deal from the talks in Alaska, but both he and his Russian counterpart walked away without agreement on how to end the war in Ukraine. Mr Trump, however, insisted 'some great progress' was made, with 'many points' agreed and 'very few' remaining. Ukraine's president Mr Zelensky is due to fly to Washington DC on Monday to meet Mr Trump, with the aim of paving the way to further talks. Sir Keir spent Saturday morning speaking to western allies in the wake of the Anchorage summit. Following the round of calls, the Prime Minister said: 'President Trump's efforts have brought us closer than ever before to ending Russia's illegal war in Ukraine. His leadership in pursuit of an end to the killing should be commended. 'While progress has been made, the next step must be further talks involving President Zelensky. The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without him.' Overnight, the Ministry of Defence said British troops now stand ready to police a future peace deal as soon as one is agreed. The allied peacekeeping effort, the so-called coalition of the willing, would rely upon a 'security guarantee' of air support from the US to prevent future Russian aggression in Ukraine. Sir Keir suggested such an arrangement was now in place, something which Mr Trump has previously been reluctant to publicly confirm. The Prime Minister welcomed 'the openness of the United States, alongside Europe, to provide robust security guarantees to Ukraine as part of any deal'. 'This is important progress and will be crucial in deterring Putin from coming back for more,' he added. In a joint statement with leaders from key Nato allies including France, Germany, Italy, Poland and Finland, Sir Keir also said the coalition of the willing is 'ready to play an active role'. The leaders added: 'No limitations should be placed on Ukraine's armed forces or on its co-operation with third countries. Russia cannot have a veto against Ukraine's pathway to EU and Nato.' Allies plan to 'keep tightening the screws' on Mr Putin with 'even more sanctions', Sir Keir also said. Mr Zelensky, who spoke with Mr Trump in a one-on-one call on Saturday morning before European leaders joined, laid out what he wanted to see from an end to fighting. Today, following a conversation with President Trump, we further coordinated positions with European leaders. The positions are clear. A real peace must be achieved, one that will be lasting, not just another pause between Russian invasions. Killings must stop as soon as… — Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) August 16, 2025 Writing on social media site X, he said: 'A real peace must be achieved, one that will be lasting, not just another pause between Russian invasions.' A ceasefire must include an end to fighting on land, in the sea and the air, he said, and all prisoners of war, as well as captured civilians – including children – must be returned. Sanctions on Moscow 'should be strengthened if there is no trilateral meeting or if Russia tries to evade an honest end to the war', Mr Zelensky added. After the summit with Mr Putin at an air base in Anchorage, Alaska, the US president suggested there were only a few major stumbling blocks holding up the prospect of a peace deal. Speaking to Fox News, he said it was up to Mr Zelensky to 'make a deal' to end the war. Writing on his Truth Social platform after the summit, Mr Trump said he hoped Monday's meeting with his Ukrainian counterpart in the Oval Office could pave the way for three-way talks with Mr Putin. The American leader added: 'Potentially, millions of people's lives will be saved. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' Experts, meanwhile, lined up to warn that the summit risked lending legitimacy to Mr Putin's war effort. Orysia Lutsevych, deputy director of the Russia and Eurasia programme and head of the Ukraine forum at the Chatham House think tank, said: 'Russia has received a reward for its invasion. Trump called Russia a 'great country' and said there is strong mutual understanding between the two parties. 'This represents a further fissure in the already shaky Transatlantic alliance, the rupture of which is a primary Russian aim. The Alaska summit represents another step towards this goal.' Dr Neil Melvin, director of international security at the Royal United Services Institute, suggested Mr Putin would walk away considering the summit a success. He said: 'Vladimir Putin came to the Alaska summit with the principal goal of stalling any pressure on Russia to end the war. 'He will consider the summit outcome as mission accomplished.'