Footprints lead to discovery of mystery 23,000-year-old culture in breakthrough
A "remarkable" archaeology breakthrough has placed humans in North America 10,000 years earlier than previously thought, upending decades of established understanding.
Researchers have analysed sets of fossilised footprints found in the arid White Sands National Park, a significant archaeological site in New Mexico, and discovered that a mysterious group of people walked the area's ancient lakebeds between 21,000 and 23,000 years ago. The new project has challenged a nearly 100-year-old consensus that the Clovis, an archaeological culture, were the first human inhabitants on the continent, with breakthroughs in 1929 suggesting the settlers had been present there 13,000 years ago.
READ MORE: Archaeologists baffled as they uncover 'mystery' 3,600-year-old Pharaoh's tomb in Egypt
Researchers involved in the study, which was published in Science Advances, used radiocarbon dating on ancient mud layers at the site which contained the footprints, and had their results corroborated by independent laboratories.
They found three types of material - mud, seeds and pollen - which were dated by three separate labs, all of which produced consistent results. For the latest study, lead researcher Vance Holliday, a University of Arizona archaeologist and geologist, and Jason Windingstad, a doctoral candidate in environmental science, returned to White Sands in 2022 and 2023.
There they dug a new series of trenches for a closer look at the geology of the lake beds, with Professor Holliday hailing the accuracy of the "remarkable" record.
He said: "It's a remarkably consistent record. You get to the point where it's really hard to explain all this away. As I say in the paper, it would be serendipity in the extreme to have all these dates giving you a consistent picture that's in error." Mr Windingstad said: "It's a strange feeling when you go out there and look at the footprints and see them in person.
"You realise that it basically contradicts everything that you've been taught about the peopling of North America." Professor Holliday said the footprints suggested early hunter-gatherers may have briefly visited the area, as they left no artefacts or settlements.
The discovery rewrites a significant chapter in the story of human migration to the Americas, offering the earliest direct evidence of people on the continent and prompting fresh debate about how and when the first Americans arrived. Researchers from Bournemouth University and the US National Park Service excavated the footprints in 2019 and published their paper in 2021.
They were formed in soft mud on the margins of a shallow lake that, in the 21st century, forms part of Alkali Flat, a large playa in the White Sands, Bournemouth University's study explained.
They appeared to have primarily come from teenagers andyounger children, with occasional adults interspersed among the crowd of travelling hunter-gatherers. Humans weren't the only people believed to have made tracks, however, with ancient megafauna also detected, including gian ground sloth, dire wolves and some birds.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Hair found in Inca device could change what's known about medieval civilisation
A hair strand uncovered from an Incan astronomical device suggests record-keeping in the empire was prevalent not only among elite individuals but also practiced by commoners. The finding, published in the journal Science Advances, changes what's known about numerical literacy among people in the medieval civilisation. Incas used knotted-string devices called khipus to maintain records, especially numerical information. These devices consisted of a main cord with numerous pendant cords attached, encoding information via the use of knots, their positions, and the colours. Sometimes human hair is found wound on a khipu as a 'signature' to indicate its creator. 'Hair in the ancient Andes was a ritually powerful substance that represented the individual from whom it came,' researchers explained. Until now, Spanish colonial-era documents have hinted that only male elites made khipus. It was thought that 'khipu literacy' was not widespread outside of bureaucrats charged with keeping records. 'On the basis of primarily Spanish-language colonial chronicles, it is thought that khipus were created exclusively by male bureaucratic elites,' researchers wrote. Much later in the 19th and early 20th centuries, the production of khipus was documented even among Andean labourers, peasant farmers, and female peasants. However, the latest analysis of human hair woven into a late 15th century khipu by its creator suggests that even then low-ranking Inkas made and used khipus. This particular khipu was found at a German auction with little documentation and later dated to 1498 AD. It's main cord was made of human hair about 104 centimetrers long, folded and twisted, representing about eight years of growth, researchers say. Scientists utilised advances in chemical analysis to make simultaneous measurements of levels of different elements, including carbon, nitrogen, and sulphur, from the hair sample. They found that the person who made the device ate a commoner's diet of tubers and greens, rather than a bureaucrat's diet of meat and maize. Further analysis, measuring oxygen and hydrogen values, determined that this low-ranking commoner likely lived in present-day southern Peru or northern Chile. 'Contrary to previous assumptions, commoners in the Inka Empire apparently created Inka-style khipus as well,' scientists wrote. The study results also corroborate other recent findings that women also made these recording systems, together challenging the idea that khipu literacy was the sole domain of male elites. 'Khipu literacy in the Inka Empire may have been more inclusive and widespread than hitherto thought,' researchers concluded.
The Independent
a day ago
- The Independent
Which choices contribute most to climate change? Most people miss the mark, one study found
It turns out many Americans aren't great at identifying which personal decisions contribute most to climate change. A study recently published by the National Academy of Sciences found that when asked to rank actions, such as swapping a car that uses gasoline for an electric one, carpooling or reducing food waste, participants weren't very accurate when assessing how much those actions contributed to climate change, which is caused mostly by the release of greenhouse gases that happen when fuels like gasoline, oil and coal are burned. " People over-assign impact to actually pretty low-impact actions such as recycling, and underestimate the actual carbon impact of behaviors much more carbon intensive, like flying or eating meat," said Madalina Vlasceanu, report co-author and professor of environmental social sciences at Stanford University. The top three individual actions that help the climate, including avoiding plane flights, choosing not to get a dog and using renewable electricity, were also the three that participants underestimated the most. Meanwhile, the lowest-impact actions were changing to more efficient appliances and swapping out light bulbs, recycling, and using less energy on washing clothes. Those were three of the top four overestimated actions in the report. There are many reasons people get it wrong Vlasceanu said marketing focuses more on recycling and using energy-efficient light bulbs than on why flights or dog adoption are relatively bad for the climate, so participants were more likely to give those actions more weight. How the human brain is wired also plays a role. 'You can see the bottle being recycled. That's visible. Whereas carbon emissions, that's invisible to the human eye. So that's why we don't associate emissions with flying,' said Jiaying Zhao, who teaches psychology and sustainability at the University of British Columbia. Zhao added it's easier to bring actions to mind that we do more often. ' Recycling is an almost daily action, whereas flying is less frequent. It's less discussed,' she said. 'As a result, people give a higher psychological weight to recycling.' Of course, there is also a lot of misleading information. For example, some companies tout the recycling they do while not telling the public about pollution that comes from their overall operations. 'There has been a lot of deliberate confusion out there to support policies that are really out of date," said Brenda Ekwurzel, a climate scientist with the Union of Concerned Scientists, a nonprofit. Why dogs have a big climate impact Dogs are big meat eaters, and meat is a significant contributor to climate change. That is because many of the farm animals, which will become food, release methane, a greenhouse gas that contributes to climate change. Beef is especially impactful, in part because around the world cattle are often raised on land that was illegally deforested. Since trees absorb carbon dioxide, the most abundant greenhouse gas, cutting them to then raise cattle is a double whammy. 'People just don't associate pets with carbon emissions. That link is not clear in people's minds,' Zhao said. Not all pets are the same, however. Zhao owns a dog and three rabbits. 'I can adopt 100 bunnies that will not be close to the emissions of a dog, because my dog is a carnivore,' she said. The owner of a meat-eating pet can lower their impact by looking for food made from sources other than beef. Zhao, for example, tries to minimize her dog's carbon footprint by feeding her less carbon-intensive protein sources, including seafood and turkey. Pollution from air travel Planes emit a lot of carbon dioxide and nitrogen oxides, also greenhouse gases. Additionally, planes emit contrails, or vapor trails that prevent planet-warming gases from escaping into space. A round-trip economy-class flight on a 737 from New York to Los Angeles produces more than 1,300 pounds of emissions per passenger, according to the International Civil Aviation Organization, a United Nations agency. Skipping that single flight saves about as much carbon as swearing off eating all types of meat a year, or living without a car for more than three months, according to U.N. estimates. Other decisions, both impactful and minor Switching to energy that comes from renewable sources, such as solar and wind, has a large positive impact because such sources don't emit greenhouse gases. Some of the biggest climate decisions individuals can make include how they heat and cool their homes and the types of transportation they use. Switching to renewable energy minimizes the impact of both. Recycling is effective at reducing waste headed for landfill, but its climate impact is relatively small because transporting, processing and repurposing recyclables typically relies on fossil fuels. Plus, less than 10% of plastics actually get recycled, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. Other decisions with overestimated impact, including washing clothes in cold water and switching to more efficient light bulbs, are relatively less important. That is because those appliances have a relatively small impact compared to other things, such plane flights and dogs, so improving on them, while beneficial, has a much more limited influence. Experts say the best way to combat the human tendency to miscalculate climate-related decisions is with more readily available information. Zhao said that people are already more accurate in their estimations than they would have been 10 or 20 years ago because it's easier to learn. The study backs up that hypothesis. After participants finished ranking actions, the researchers corrected their mistakes, and they changed which actions they said they'd take to help the planet. 'People do learn from these interventions,' Vlasceanu said. 'After learning, they are more willing to commit to actually more impactful actions.' ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
Daily Mail
3 days ago
- Daily Mail
Scientists baffled by mysterious new statue emerging on Easter Island: 'This is a first'
A new statue has emerged from the dirt of a recently dried-up lakebed on Easter Island, baffling scientists who said it should not be there. Easter Island is considered a mystery due to its 1,000 large stone heads, known as moai, which are 700 to 1,000 years old. Terry Hunt, professor of archaeology at the University of Arizona, told Good Morning America: 'We think we know all the moai, but then a new one turns up, a new discovery, and in this case, it's in the lake, at the statue quarry. 'There have been no moai found in the dry lakebed before, so this is a first.' The newly discovered moai is among the smallest found, suggesting that many more could be hidden within the reeds. Each moai honors a person, usually a leader, and many are topped with eye stones at their resting place. The largest stands over 30 feet tall and weighs up to 86 tons. Salvador Atan Hito, vice president of Ma'u Henua, the Indigenous group managing the island's national park, said: 'For the Rapa Nui people, this is a very, very important discovery. 'Because it's here in the lake and nobody knew it existed, even our ancestors, our grandparents didn't know about this one.' Hunt and Hito said the current dry conditions may help archaeologists discover more moai in the lakebed. 'Under the dry conditions that we have now, we may find more,' Hunt told GMA. 'They've been hidden by the tall reeds that grow in the lake bed, and prospecting with something that can detect what's under the ground surface may tell us that there are more moai in the lakebed sediments. 'When there's one moai in the lake, there's probably more.' Due to its remote location, Easter Island is traditionally assumed to have remained socially and culturally isolated from the wider Pacific world. This idea is reinforced by the fact that Easter Island's famous Moai statues, estimated to have been built between AD 1250 and 1500, are unique to the location. For the past decade, Hunt and his colleagues and students have created an inventory of 981 moai on the island, complete with precise GPS locations and measurements. Many moai remain in a quarry near Rano Raraku, the now-dry crater lake where the newest statue was found, in various stages of completion. The largest, called Te Tokanga or 'The Giant' in the Rapa Nui language, was never finished and lies on its back, measuring 63 feet long and weighing an estimated 90 to 100 tons. The team made a similar discovery in 2023, finding another new moa that measured five feet by six inches long and was found face up in the ground. Hunt said the statue's eye sockets had been carved, which is historically the final step in a moai's construction before display. The base is also flat, rather than sloped, to help with moving the statue. Researchers believed that the ancient Rapa Nui people likely moved the moai statues by 'walking' them upright using ropes to rock and pivot the statues forward in a controlled, rocking motion. This method, supported by experiments and oral traditions, allowed them to move these massive statues across the island without dragging them on sleds or rollers. Hunt frequently uses cell phones and drones for 3D imaging of the moai. He is also exploring the use of ground-penetrating radar to detect hidden moai or structures underground, particularly in the Rano Raraku lakebed. Historically, the original inhabitants, known as the Rapa Nui, were believed to have been completely shut off from the wider world. However, a study released in July by researchers in Sweden challenged the long-held narrative. They said the 63.2-square-mile island in the southern Pacific was not quite as isolated over the past 800 years as previously thought. The island was populated with multiple waves of new inhabitants who bravely traversed the Pacific Ocean from west to east. 'Easter Island was settled from central East Polynesia around AD 1200-1250,' study author Professor Paul Wallin at Uppsala University told the Daily Mail. 'The Polynesians were skilled sailors, so double canoes were used.' For their study, the team at Uppsala University compared archaeological data and radiocarbon dates from settlements, ritual spaces and monuments across Polynesia, the collection of more than 1,000 islands in the Pacific Ocean. The experts point out that ahu stone platforms were historically constructed at Polynesian islands further to the west. These rectangular clearings were communal ritual spaces that, in some places, remain sacred to this day. 'The temple grounds ahu [also known as marae] exist on all East Polynesian islands,' Professor Wallin added. The team agreed that an early population of people spread from the west of the Pacific to the east before encountering Easter Island and populating it around AD 1200. They argued that Easter Island was populated several times by new seafarers, and not just once by a single group that remained isolated for centuries, as previously assumed. 'The migration process from West Polynesian core areas such as Tonga and Samoa to East Polynesia is not disputed here,' they say in their paper. 'Still, the static west-to-east colonization and dispersal suggested for East Polynesia and the idea that Rapa Nui was only colonized once in the past and developed in isolation are challenged.' Based on their evidence, they also think ahu originated on Easter Island before the trend spread east to west across other western Polynesian islands during the period of AD 1300-1600. It was only after this that the Polynesian islands, including but not limited to Easter Island, might have become isolated from each other.
