Watch: Major shake-up of building consents announced
Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk said the regime is "sluggish" and holding the building sector back.
"Right now, councils are hesitant to sign off on building consents and inspections because they could be held liable for all defects, leaving ratepayers to foot the bill," Penk said.
"This often happens when one of the parties responsible cannot pay for repairs, for example, if a business goes bust."
Penk said building owners could currently claim full compensation from any responsible party and it was often councils, with the deepest pockets and no ability to walk away, that ended up footing the bill.
"The risk-aversion this creates leads to frustrating delays and extra cost for builders and homeowners," Penk said.
The government is scrapping the existing 'joint and several liability' regime in favour of a 'proportionate liability' one.
Under the new model, each party will only be responsible for the share of work they carried out.
"Building owners will be protected if things go wrong and we're exploring options such as requiring professional indemnity insurance and home warranties, similar to arrangements in Australia," Penk said.
The minister pointed to a 2015 case in Queenstown, where the the Oaks Shores body corporate filed a $160 million claim for weathertight defects, as an example of system failure.
"The developer had been placed into voluntary liquidation and was not sued, leaving ratepayers exposed to the entire claim," Penk said.
"If the case hadn't been settled privately, ratepayers could have faced rates increases of $300 a year for 30 years. It's time to put the responsibility where it belongs."
The government has also announced it will allow councils to voluntarily consolidate their Building Consent Authority (BCAs) functions with each other.
"It is ridiculous builders, designers and homeowners must navigate 67 different interpretations of the Building Code, because of the number of council BCAs across the country," Penk said.
"Builders can be rejected on paperwork that would be accepted by a neighbouring authority simply because each BCA applies the rules differently."
Chris Penk said councils will also be allowed to voluntarily consolidate their Building Consent Authority (BCAs) functions with each other.
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
Penk said many councils had asked for the ability to consolidate.
"I expect they will seize the opportunity to consolidate, share resources like building inspectors and IT systems, and pass the savings on to ratepayers," he said.
"We know the sector is behind us. New Zealand Certified Builders have said that this is the most significant change for the building industry in a generation, that it has been a long time coming and the change is welcomed by the industry."
Building Industry Federation chief executive Julien Leys told
Midday Report
a shift to proportionate liability in the building consents system would have a "massive" impact on the sector.
"We're going to see builders that will have to have mandatory insurance, there'll be auditing. That risk is going to be transferred. That means the councils will not be living under this fear of litigation and ultimately that's going to enable much faster, more efficient processing of consents," Leys said.
Leys was supportive of the move to open up consolidation for the country's 67 BCAs.
"I think the move is going to be to say, look we've got 67 Building Consent Authorities in the country, far too many, and we're seeing far too much inconsistency between those councils.
"Let's look at the options: we can either get those councils to consolidate, bring their resources together, we could have one big overarching national point of contact.
"I think the drive is to have consistency and reduce time. One of the options was to ensure we actually have 80 percent of consenting done in three days. It's going to speed up the whole process and bring down cost."
He said the building sector would welcome any changes that made it easier and cheaper to build.
"It has certainly been a tough period that's highlighted the fact that we need efficiencies in the sector. It's been 21 years since we've had any major reforms of the code as well so it's timely.
"Anything where we can address cost and delays is welcome. I say bring it on."
Leys said high eligibility standards, mandatory insurance and ongoing auditing and bigger fines for non-compliance would ensure the changes didn't lead to another leaky homes crisis.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
5 hours ago
- Scoop
ACT Welcomes Game-changing Building Consent Reforms
ACT Housing, Building and Construction spokesman and Licensed Building Practitioner Cameron Luxton is celebrating moves to end joint and several liability and to allow for mergers of Building Consent Authorities. 'Tradies have been railing for years against cost and delays caused by badly incentivised councils. The joint and several liability system leaves councils and ratepayers on the hook for other people's defective work. Under these conditions, it's a miracle when a council signs off on anything. 'ACT has campaigned to fix this madness, and now we're getting there. Moving to proportionate liability, where each party is responsible for their own work, will cut the risk-averse red tape that turns small projects into headaches. "Of course, this leaves the question of what local councils will actually be left liable for, and how far the councils' liabilities will extend in practice if they remain liable for inspections. I look forward to seeing how the legislation handles this. "ACT also welcomes moves to allow mergers of Building Consent Authorities. We've repeatedly highlighted the madness of having 66 different BCAs, each with their own interpretation of the Building Code, meaning a builder's paperwork can be rejected in one district but accepted in the next. "Some councils have maintained positive relationships with builders while others have struggled to keep up, and home builders have had issues with poorly skilled council staff assessing consents. Consolidation will allow poorly performing councils to adopt best practice from their neighbours, and pooling resources will help to ensure a more consistent level of professionalism in processing consents. 'Whether you're building, buying, or renovating, these reforms are good news. Both owners and buyers have a stake in clearing the consenting quagmire. If we want a property-owning democracy, we need a system that's faster, fairer, and less costly. These changes move us closer to that vision, and ACT is proud to see our advocacy reflected in this overhaul. 'With ACT in Government, we're tackling big challenges with positive sum thinking. It would be easy to say the solution to expensive housing is to finger-point and to whack homeowners and investers with new taxes. Instead, we're getting bureaucracy out of the way so Kiwis can build more homes and create the conditions for prosperity.'
Otago Daily Times
19 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Homeowners could be left with costs after consent changes
A property lawyer says homeowners could be left vulnerable to costs when building projects go wrong under changes to the building consents regime. The government is moving to a proportionate liability system for the Building Act, so each party is liable for the share of work they carry out. It says councils have been reluctant to sign off building consents because they're liable for defects, causing unnecessary delays in the construction process. Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk said the government would be exploring mechanisms to protect homeowners, such as indemnity insurance or home warranties. Property lawyer James Wollerman told RNZ it was not clear how that would work. Under joint and several liability a homeowner could claim full compensation for a botched building project from the council, he said. Under the new scheme of proportionate liability - if the council and builder were sharing liability by 50 percent each - the homeowner would be left carrying that 50 percent if the builder went missing. He said there was an option of an insurance scheme, but it was not clear who would underwrite that insurance. "We've seen that insurers are not generally prepared to insure for weather-tightness defects. "So there's a big question out there as to what the government's going to be able to put forward in terms of an insurance scheme that would provide some sort of protection for homeowners." Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour said Australia had had a proportionate liability scheme since the 1990s. He said it made sense to shift liability away from councils, which was creating high rates for ratepayers and a risk-averse culture in construction. "If you're a council, and you know that you can end up liable for an entire project, then you get increasingly stressed and often obstructive, when it comes to allowing more innovative building materials, more innovative techniques. "And as a result, we end up with high rates and little innovation in building and high building costs," Seymour said. He said the shake-up of the building consents regime would cut delays and costs for construction projects. "Moving to a regime where the various people involved, those who provide the materials, those who do the work, perhaps those who do the design, and those who do the consent, have liability when things go wrong, is not a scary or different thing. "It takes us to where most of the world is." Labour Party leader Chris Hipkins told RNZ the current rules were introduced in the early 2000s during the leaky home saga. "Are they slowing things down? Yes they probably are. So I think the government are making the right steps, you know they are heading in the right direction. "The issue will be getting consumer protection right." Hipkins said that the government believed if it pushed house prices up the economy would be fixed. "House building sure creates jobs but the housing market is not the totality of our economy."
RNZ News
19 hours ago
- RNZ News
Homeowners could be left with costs under building consents changes
Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone A property lawyer says homeowners could be left vulnerable to costs when building projects go wrong under changes to the building consents regime. The government is moving to a proportionate liability system for the Building Act, so each party is liable for the share of work they carry out. It says councils have been reluctant to sign off building consents because they're liable for defects, causing unnecessary delays in the construction process. Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk said the government would be exploring mechanisms to protect homeowners, such as indemnity insurance or home warranties. Property lawyer James Wollerman told Morning Report it was not clear how that would work. Under joint and several liability a homeowner could claim full compensation for a botched building project from the council, he said. Under the new scheme of proportionate liability - if the council and builder were sharing liability by 50 percent each - the homeowner would be left carrying that 50 percent if the builder went missing. He said there was an option of an insurance scheme, but it was not clear who would underwrite that insurance. "We've seen that insurers are not generally prepared to insure for weather-tightness defects. "So there's a big question out there as to what the government's going to be able to put forward in terms of an insurance scheme that would provide some sort of protection for homeowners." Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour, Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii Deputy Prime Minister David Seymour said Australia had had a proportionate liability scheme since the 1990s. He said it made sense to shift liability away from councils, which was creating high rates for ratepayers and a risk-averse culture in construction. "If you're a council, and you know that you can end up liable for an entire project, then you get increasingly stressed and often obstructive, when it comes to allowing more innovative building materials, more innovative techniques. "And as a result, we end up with high rates and little innovation in building and high building costs," Seymour said. He said the shake-up of the building consents regime would cut delays and costs for construction projects. "Moving to a regime where the various people involved, those who provide the materials, those who do the work, perhaps those who do the design, and those who do the consent, have liability when things go wrong, is not a scary or different thing. "It takes us to where most of the world is." Labour Party leader Chris Hipkins told Morning Report the current rules were introduced in the early 2000s during the leaky home saga. "Are they slowing things down? Yes they probably are. So I think the government are making the right steps, you know they are heading in the right direction. "The issue will be getting consumer protection right." Hipkins said that the government believed if it pushed house prices up the economy would be fixed. "House building sure creates jobs but the housing market is not the totality of our economy."
