
Universities must not be ‘comfort blankets of cancellation', says Lord Hague
Universities must not be 'comfort blankets of cancellation', Lord Hague insisted in his inaugural speech as the new chancellor of Oxford University.
The former Conservative Party leader promised to make Oxford the 'home of free speech' and to lead the university into a new era as he takes over from Lord Patten, who stepped down from the role last year.
In a speech at the Sheldonian Theatre on Wednesday, Lord Hague said protecting freedom of speech would be 'of paramount importance… in an age in which ideas will change so rapidly'.
'We cannot prepare for the turbulent decades to come by shielding ourselves from inconvenient arguments, wrapping ourselves in comfort blankets of cancellation, or suppressing minority views because they conflict with the beguiling certainty of a majority,' he said.
'Oxford is a home of free speech within the law… Our university is a place where we can disagree vigorously while sheltering each other from the abuse and hatred that are so often a substitute for rational opinion.'
Tensions around debates at universities including Oxford have heightened in recent months. Last week, protesters staged a walkout at a discussion at Oxford University by Helen Joyce, a gender-critical author, while 600 people signed a petition 'protesting transphobia' at the institution.
Lord Hague praised the Government for reinstating Tory free speech laws for universities designed to protect academics from so-called cancel culture.
Bridget Phillipson, the Education Secretary, announced last month she would revive the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act, despite Labour sources previously describing it as a 'Tory hate speech charter'.
It means universities will soon face punishments if they fail to uphold free speech and academic freedom for academics under a new complaints scheme as part of the Act.
But Lord Hague appeared to suggest Oxford would not be drawn into political matters such as ongoing conflicts or the US administration under his stewardship.
'We do not need to agree on everything, indeed we should not. I am pleased to say we do not need a foreign policy: we are not a country,' he said.
'AI the greatest ever challenge'
The chancellor also warned about the threat to universities posed by artificial intelligence, which he said would likely come to define his 10-year tenure.
'The arrival of artificial intelligence along with engineering biology and the accompanying pace of technological change is the greatest ever challenge for the modern state,' he said in his speech.
'It will also be the greatest ever challenge for the modern university.'
The Oxford alumnus, who studied philosophy, politics and economics at Magdalen College, becomes the university's 160th chancellor in the role's 800-year history.
Though a largely ceremonial position, Lord Hague will face a difficult inheritance becoming chancellor of a world-leading institution at a time when the university sector is facing serious financial pressures.
The Tory peer was elected as Oxford chancellor in November after beating rival candidates including Lord Mandelson, the former Labour advisor who has since been appointed by Sir Keir Starmer as the UK ambassador to the US.
Lord Hague also defeated three other final-round candidates, including Lady Angiolini, the Scottish lawyer who led the Sarah Everard inquiry, Dominic Grieve, an ex-Tory minister, and Baroness Royall, the current principal of Somerville College, Oxford.
The chancellor paid tribute to his predecessor, Lord Patten, who was among the audience at Oxford's Sheldonian Theatre on Wednesday.
Lord Patten, who was the last governor of Hong Kong, announced his retirement in early 2024, making him the first Oxford chancellor not to die in post since the second Duke of Ormonde in 1715.
Usually a role for life, statute changes confirmed last year mean that Lord Hague will serve a reduced term of a decade in the position, which is part time and unpaid.
Tackling anxiety and loneliness a priority
The chancellor said his term would also see Oxford serve on 'the front line of fighting the darker side of the new technological age' as he promised to tackle a surge in 'anxiety and loneliness, especially among young people'.
'This new age will only turn out well if it allows us more scope to enjoy being human, rather than form our relationships with machines,' he said.
'In Oxford we have the great strengths of personal tuition, college communities and high achievements in sports and music. It should always be a place where we seek each other's company, not stare into smartphones.'
The chancellor is the titular head of Oxford University and presides over several key ceremonies. In addition to formal duties, they also undertake advocacy, advisory and fundraising work and chair the committee for the selection of vice-chancellor.
Lord Hague graduated from the university in 1982 and has insisted that the institution transformed his life, having arrived from a comprehensive school in South Yorkshire and going on to become president of the Oxford Union.
Born in Rotherham in 1961, he worked for consulting firm McKinsey & Co after leaving Oxford, before being elected as the MP for Richmond, Yorkshire, at the age of 27.
He served various ministerial roles in his 26 years as an MP and became leader of the Conservative Party in 1997, a role he held for five years.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
23 minutes ago
- BBC News
Call for rethink of possible homes on Highworth ex-golf course
Councillors have called for a rethink of a decision to progress a proposal for housing on a former golf Conservative members of Swindon Borough Council used a rare protocol known as a call-in to ask the council to re-examine its decision surrounding land in Highworth, offered a number of reasons, claiming cabinet members admitted to not reading the report before voting and alleging council leader Jim Robbins failed to count the votes before announcing the Robbins said he was "stunned" by the claims, adding there was a video of him counting and cabinet had been included in conversations on the site. He said the Labour-run council understood "the passion" some residents felt for the site and the fact they were "resistant" to seeing potential housebuilding there."We are quite happy for local councillors to use their right to call-in the decision but we are very surprised by the reasons that they have chosen," Mr Robbins added. A call-in is a rarely used procedure whereby councillors can demand the ruling cabinet reconsider their decision if they feel protocols have not been properly Highworth residents groups and the town council want to see the land officially become a nature has been left for recreation since the golf course closed and a survey said it was home to 300 species of animals and land has been owned by councils since the looking at options, council officers recommended a plan for 700 homes, which would include some of the area set aside as a reserve. The council said it would help meet affordable homes needs and provide better returns for a council meeting, it was voted to progress these plans further, but more work is needed before a planning application is councillors who put forward the call-in not only listed ways in which they felt protocol had not been properly followed, but also said the cabinet had not fully considered other options, the history of the site or consulted the public Robbins said public questions in the meeting were extended from 15 minutes to two hours and said he would be happy to discuss the matter further at a scrutiny committee. He said the decision had been for a "pre-application discussion with the planning team" to take place, rather than a final decision on the homes."We are confident that we are taking the prudent action of getting as much information as possible before making a final decision on what to do with the golf course land, and will make a decision that we believe to be right for the people of Swindon," Mr Robbins added.


Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Kemi was at her best skewering Labour on grooming gangs
Yvette Cooper had come to the House of Commons to shut, as loudly and with as much gusto as she could manage, a stable door long after the horse had bolted. The government was finally doing what it had long derided as 'a far-right bandwagon' and agreed to a national inquiry into the Pakistani rape gangs which blighted small-town England for decades. On the bench next to her were Bridget Philistine – who branded Tory calls for an inquiry 'political opportunism', Big Ange, whose new rules on Islamophobia would probably have made any of the journalism which exposed the gangs illegal, and Lucy Powell – the tin-eared, suet-brained embodiment of Blob-think who claimed that mentioning the gangs was a 'dog whistle'. To have this cavalcade of guilty women lined up as the inquiry was announced was almost insulting. Mrs Badenoch, by contrast, had turned up in the House of Commons. She was angry The detail was repugnant. Gangs had targeted children as young as ten, specifically grooming those with learning difficulties and those in care. 'Perpetrators' Cooper told us, 'walked free because no one joined the dots'. Or rather, they did join the dots, but the prevailing orthodoxy told them to ignore what they saw for fear of being branded racist? That sounds more accurate. Cooper admitted that the report had 'identified over-representation of Asian and Pakistani heritage men' in the gangs. This was like someone earnestly telling the house that they had needed a lengthy and costly investigation to tell them that the sky was blue. Don't worry though: having finally realised what was wrong, Ol' Sherlock Cooper assured the house that she had a plan of action. Inevitably this looked like mashing the same buttons again and again, like an impatient pedestrian at a zebra crossing. They would be 'new laws' and 'new police operations'. If only someone had tried these things before? Keir Starmer was on his way to Canada for the G7; exactly the sort of self-congratulatory environment he prefers to dealing with the country's problems. Mrs Badenoch, by contrast, had turned up in the House of Commons. She was angry. 'Three times Labour MPs voted against an inquiry', she yelled as the members opposite squealed and squirmed. In parliamentary terms this was probably the best the Leader of the Opposition has been: passionate, coruscating and unambiguously in the right. It's just a shame it took such shameful behaviour from the government to bring it out. The depths had not yet been plumbed, however, until an intervention by Labour MP for Telford, Shaun Davies, who condemned Rishi Sunak for 'refusing to provide a statutory inquiry into' grooming gangs in Telford – before promptly scuttling away. As leader of Telford and Wrekin Council in 2016, Davies himself signed a letter calling for the then-prime minister and home secretary to reject calls for an inquiry into child sexual abuse in the town. There are many things we could say about Mr Davies, a typical Labour 2024 backbencher: so lightweight and ridiculous he might as well be made of helium. We might suggest that his weaselling self-preservation efforts imply a lack of conscience. We might say that his own track record in local government suggests, at best, a lack of competence. We might observe that his attempt today to smear his opponents while simultaneously claiming to 'take this out of the party-political field' suggests that he has no spine. However, one thing we cannot suggest that he lacks, in turning up and daring to speak at a moment like this, is a brass neck.


Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Dutch identify obstacle to Nato's defiance of Putin: geese
The rearmament of Nato is being undermined by European Union rules on emissions and the welfare of seals and geese, according to a leaked Dutch report. European members of the alliance are under pressure from President Trump to increase military spending and are seeking to bolster defences against the threat from Russia. A conference in the Hague next week will set higher spending targets. However, EU red tape is seen as strangling operational plans to expand barracks and hold exercises, a report by the TNO, a Dutch government scientific advisory body, has said. Many Cold War-era military bases in the Netherlands and beyond are close to nature reserves, putting their expansion in breach of emissions and environment certificates and in some cases preventing fighter jet pilots from training there. The report, which was leaked to De Telegraaf, noted that plans to station F35s at Lelystad airport faced environmental protests and legal challenges because of noise and disruption to nearby breeding grounds for geese. North Sea naval exercises, meanwhile, have been constrained because of concerns about the impact on marine wildlife, especially seals, of underwater explosions. The report said finding ways to bypass the rules was 'an operational necessity and a strategic and political priority', adding that they limited 'national and allied defence capacity and thus affect the collective defence of Dutch and Nato territory. 'If there is less space to train and house people, if equipment maintenance can no longer be carried out, or if new equipment cannot be deployed sufficiently, this has a direct impact on the personnel and equipment readiness of the armed forces.' Recent judicial rulings on emissions in the Netherlands are seen by the TNO as limiting new permits for extra equipment, such as tanks or jets, that runs on fossil fuels. EU climate change legislation may also affect future fighting ability by restricting the mining of metals critical to military hardware. Jakub Jaworowski, the Polish minister responsible for defence procurement, said Europe's adversaries, such as Russia, or rivals like China, were not constrained in this way. 'It is a real dilemma. You have the defence of Europe on one side, and on the other side, legitimate environmental objectives,' he said. 'We need to defend Europe. Our adversaries do not care much for the environment.' Nato military planners have previously complained that EU red tape, particularly customs forms, have stood in the way of military manoeuvres, cross-border convoys and vital ammunition shipments to Ukraine. Each item of equipment requires sheaves of paperwork and authorisation can take months. Earlier this month 11 countries, including Germany, signed a letter demanding that the European Commission 'address the legal obstacles for operational readiness of our armed forces and defence organisations, in addition to addressing legal obstacles to the defence industry … Some EU legislation forms a direct obstacle to the armed forces for fulfilling their tasks.' Highlighting clauses in the EU treaty to stop European legislation from preventing 'armed forces from carrying out necessary activities to become operationally ready', the letter concluded: 'Right now, it does.' Ruben Brekelmans, the Dutch defence minister, said in a Paris speech two months ago: 'The EU should cut the red tape preventing us from going faster and being better than any adversary. Certain EU environmental legislation prevents the military from conducting exercises and from expanding our bases. Of course the environment is important and should be protected, but Putin won't be deterred by a sign warning him that he's about to enter a nature reserve.'