NATO chief says Ukraine remains vital at summit despite Zelenskyy's absence from leaders' meeting
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte insisted Monday Ukraine would remain a vital topic at an alliance summit this week despite President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's absence from a leaders' meeting aiming to seal an agreement to boost military spending.
'You will see important language about Ukraine, including connecting the defense spending up to 2035 to Ukraine, and the need for Ukraine to stay in the fight,' Rutte told reporters on the eve of the two-day summit. 'This is a clear commitment by allies.'
But the Ukrainian leader hasn't yet publicly confirmed he'll attend a dinner laid on for leaders attending the NATO summit, where his country has had a diplomatic downgrade from previous alliance meetings, even as leaders stress that their militaries need to muscle up to counter the threat of Russia.
It's a big change since the summit in Washington last year, when the military alliance's weighty communique included a vow to supply long-term security assistance to Ukraine, and a commitment to back the country 'on its irreversible path' to NATO membership.
But with Zelenskyy's relationship with U.S. President Donald Trump still strained since a testy Oval Office meeting earlier this year, finding a place for the Ukrainian leader at NATO's top table has proved a bridge too far.
There are other meetings scheduled for Zelenskyy at the summit, but the doors remain shut to the leaders' working meeting Wednesday, even as Rutte acknowledged how heavily the war weighs on the leaders.
'Of course, the most significant and direct threat facing this alliance remains the Russian Federation," he said. "Moscow continues to wage war against Ukraine with the support of North Korea, Iran and China, as well as Belarus.'
Rutte stressed that the alliance is underwriting Ukraine's defense to the tune of billions of euros.
European allies and Canada, 'will provide over €35 billion of additional security assistance to Ukraine for the year ahead,' he said. 'So in a couple of months, we went from €20 billion to €35 billion. And I think that is great news.'
Meanwhile, Moscow bombarded Ukraine with 352 drones and decoys, as well as 11 ballistic missiles and five cruise missiles overnight Monday, Ukraine's air force said, killing at least 14 people and injuring several dozen others.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
5 minutes ago
- Times
How did Britain get it so wrong on Trump and Iran?
Shortly before 11pm on Saturday Sir Keir Starmer received an unexpected call. The US, the prime minister was informed, had decided to bomb nuclear facilities in Iran. B-2 stealth bombers had already been dispatched, and the targeted bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities would begin shortly. He did not have to wait long. At around 11.40pm the lead B-2 dropped two 30,000lb 'bunker-buster' bombs on the Fordow enrichment facility, Iran's heavily fortified nuclear site built inside a mountain. Over the next 25 minutes, there was a succession of massive ordnance strikes aimed at destroying Iran's nuclear ambitions. Trump confirmed the attack on social media shortly afterwards, once the US aircraft were on their way back. The prime minister, who was staying at Chequers, stayed up until 2am, got a few hours' sleep, then started work again on dealing with the aftermath. • Operation Midnight Hammer: how the US strikes on Iran unfolded Trump's decision took the prime minister and the wider government by surprise. Starmer and David Lammy, the foreign secretary, had been convinced that there was a 'window of opportunity' to attempt to de-escalate the conflict. They appeared to have taken Trump at his word when the White House suggested on Thursday there would be a pause to ensure that there was a 'chance for substantial negotiations'. Ministers point to the fact that few in the US administration knew about the plans, with Trump's sheer unpredictability being a significant factor. 'The point is Trump's mind changes on a two-hourly basis,' one government source said. Another claimed that the UK was the only ally outside Israel given advance notice of the airstrikes, even if it was just an hour's warning. But the fact that the government's fundamental calculation — that there was time for negotiations — was clearly wrong raises questions about both the prime minister's judgment and the UK's broader relationship with the US. The government was effectively blindsided on a matter of huge geopolitical importance. On Tuesday, Starmer had been adamant that Trump would not intervene in Iran, saying he had 'no doubt' about the matter after sitting next to him at dinner at the G7 summit in Canada, despite very public indications to the contrary. The comments were unusually forthright for Starmer, who is generally far more cautious. His view changed a few hours later when Trump took to social media, threatening to kill Iran's supreme leader. As Starmer flew back to London, a Cobra emergency meeting was hastily arranged for Wednesday afternoon to consider options. The meeting discussed preparations to protect British citizens and soldiers in the Middle East, with 14 RAF Typhoons stationed at RAF Akrotiri in Cyprus and soldiers in Iraq put on a high state of readiness. It was attended by Lord Mandelson, the US ambassador, who, by coincidence, had flown to the UK earlier in the week for his first visit back to London since starting the role in February. As well as meetings with ministers, he was there to attend the rededication of the George Washington statue in Trafalgar Square. At Cobra, Mandelson highlighted the growing impatience of the US with Iran. Also on the table was the legal advice of Lord Hermer, the attorney-general, who warned that the UK would be at risk of breaching international law if it allowed the US to use the Diego Garcia base in the Indian Ocean to launch its bombing the wake of the meeting, Lammy headed to Washington, accompanied by Mandelson, who cut his pre-planned trip short. During the flight, Mandelson briefed the foreign secretary on America's thinking. On Thursday, Lammy met Senator James Risch, a close ally of Trump and an Iran hawk. He left them in no doubt of the desire of the US administration for action. Their second meeting later in the afternoon was with Marco Rubio, the US secretary of state and national security adviser. Mandelson was also in attendance. The mood ahead of the Rubio meeting was bleak, with ministers and officials increasingly convinced that the time for talking was over. However, that changed when the White House issued a statement suggesting that it was going to pause, to conduct negotiations with Iran. The White House statement was carefully worded, stating that a decision would be taken 'within the next two weeks'. Nonetheless, it was met with relief in No 10 and taken at face value, with Rubio appearing to reinforce the message. Rubio asked Lammy to act as an interlocutor between the US and Iran, passing on an uncompromising message demanding surrender to bring about peace talks. Lammy emerged from the meeting, which was also attended by US special envoy Steve Witkoff, convinced that Trump 'genuinely wants a deal'. He flew to Geneva on Friday to meet Abbas Araghchi, the Iranian foreign minister, alongside his French, German and EU counterparts. • Offer of talks went unanswered — so Trump sent bombers instead The talks did not go well. Lammy spent three hours pressing the US position but received a forthright response from Araghchi, who stated in no uncertain terms that Tehran was unwilling to return to talks until the US had called on Israel to stop its attacks. Lammy stressed the point that it was not unusual for opposing sides to undertake diplomatic talks even while hostilities were continuing. But there was no middle ground. Lammy flew back to the UK, and the US was informed that Iran was unwilling to stand down. The US B-2 bombers took off from Missouri shortly after 5am BST, but for most of the day the government was unaware. Contingency plans were stepped up after suggestions that the bombers were en route to Guam in the Pacific, but the truth — that they were on a direct mission to bomb Iran — was far from the government's radar.
Telegraph
11 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Putin ‘avoiding' Iran intervention to appease Trump
Vladimir Putin will not intervene in his ally Iran's war with Israel, in order to appease Donald Trump, Moscow insiders have revealed. They said that Putin did not want to provoke the US president, to avoid a tougher line from the White House on Russia's war in Ukraine. The Telegraph spoke to four current Russian officials and diplomats, as well as several retired officials. They all spoke on condition of anonymity. The Kremlin had calculated that Mr Trump would not risk starting a war with Iran, they said, but was re-evaluating its appraisal of the mercurial, America First president after the US air strikes on the Islamic republic. On Monday, Putin hosted Abbas Araghchi, the Iranian foreign minister, in Moscow two days after Mr Trump sent bomber planes to strike Iran's three main nuclear sites. The Russian president told Mr Araghchi in televised comments: 'The absolutely unprovoked aggression against Iran has no basis and no justification.' Putin may have condemned the US strikes when hosting the chief diplomat of a key ally in the war with Ukraine, but away from the cameras the Russians are far more cautious. The bombing of Iran 'broke the pattern of thinking in Moscow, where officials had assumed Trump wouldn't so readily abandon his self-proclaimed image as a peacemaker', a serving Russian diplomat told The Telegraph. 'For us, first Israel's decisive strike on Iran and the US's active involvement was a cold shower and a game changer. Now the situation looks dangerous to us,' said another envoy. Putin would prefer to appease Mr Trump so his illegal war in Ukraine can continue, despite the two leaders ostensibly holding peace talks over the conflict. One Russian diplomat told The Telegraph: 'Some officials believe that if we stay flexible and avoid pressing the Iran issue too hard, we might get some relief from the United States on the Ukraine front. 'They hope the White House will understand, that there will be no serious new sanctions, and that Trump will tolerate the continuation of the special military operation as it is now.' Another diplomat said: 'Our relationship with the US is already complicated because of Ukraine, and there is already some frustration and irritation from Trump about our stance.' Avoiding risk 'Adding a Middle East disagreement on top of that is seen as an excessive political risk we would rather avoid,' a different diplomat added. It is unlikely that Putin would jeopardise his 'romantic relationship' with Mr Trump for the sake of preserving ties with the ayatollahs, Arkady Dubnov, an independent Russian political analyst, said. The war in Ukraine continues to drain Moscow's military, economic, political and diplomatic resources, sharply limiting its capacity to act elsewhere, including in a conflict where it has significant economic stakes and in a region where it has historically wielded influence. Since Mr Trump entered the White House, Russia has routinely offered itself as a mediator in talks over Iran's nuclear programme, according to a government official familiar with foreign policy planning. Before the recent escalation, Mr Trump had not rejected the idea outright. But he has since come out against it in strong terms. Putin's offer to mediate in the conflict between Israel and Iran was swiftly dismissed by both Israel, which has a large Russian-speaking community, and the United States. Russia might have once acted as a guarantor, but today it lacks the leverage even to influence Tehran directly. A former senior Kremlin official said: 'Negotiating only works when you have something to bargain with. We can hardly influence Iran's position right now. We simply do not have the tools. 'And if we are talking about surrender, what kind of terms can we possibly secure for that country?'
Telegraph
11 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Putin will be terrified by how easily Iran's Russian air defences went down
The debris is beginning to settle after the dynamic US strike on Iran's nuclear weapons sites. Operation Midnight Hammer, an incredible demonstration of US military power – and Israeli operations before it – have made plain the fragility of Russian air defence systems. These events will be shaking the very foundations of the Russian military. The simple fact is that Israeli jets have been operating at will in Iranian airspace for some time. Now a huge US strike package including seven B-2 bombers, 75 cruise missiles and no doubt numerous other jets have arrived without difficulty, delivered 14 Massive Ordnance Penetrators with pinpoint accuracy. All of this has been completely unaffected by Iranian air defences based around Russian S-300 missiles, Russian fighter jets and a Russian concept of operations. This has to be causing panic in Moscow. The war in Ukraine has been very different from that between Iran and Israel. Above Ukraine the air defenders – or 'cloud punchers' as they're known in the British forces – seemingly rule the skies. Neither side dares to send aircraft even near the enemy front lines, let alone across them: Russian jets manage to deliver effective strikes using standoff glide bombs and cruise missiles, and Ukraine has retaliated with drones and limited supplies of long-ranging Western missiles. The mission of Suppression of Enemy Air Defences, which has been carried out so effectively by Israel against Iran, has proved unachievable for both sides. But it is clear that it can be done, at least by well-equipped Western nations against Russian defences – and that will be striking fear into Putin's heart. Russia to be sure has moved on to the more capable S-400 (and in some cases the very newest S-500), but the S-400 was merely an upgrade to the S-300 and the S-500 is probably more hype than substance. The Russian dictator and his advisers must now have realised that their defences could easily be suppressed if the Ukrainians – or another opponent such as Nato – had the right tools. Of course we have come to understand that Putin and the Russian high command have virtually no regard for casualties. We have just seen over one million Russian military dead and wounded in Ukraine. But we can be sure that Putin and his generals will be concerned for their own personal safety. The comprehensive US and Israeli intelligence networks that we have seen in Iran – which even allow them to pinpoint and assassinate key leaders and nuclear scientists almost at will – will have terrified the Kremlin hierarchy, the more so as Ukraine appears to have similar reach inside Russia. Operation Spider's Web, in which Russia's strategic air fleet was decimated several times over, stands testament to their effectiveness. It is now even clearer that America has total overmatch against Russia's forces, and if Trump chose to he could inflict total battlefield defeat on Putin – or eliminate him personally – by equipping Ukraine with the same weapons that Israel has. Hopefully, now Trump is buoyed by his success in Iran, this demonstration of superior military power to the Kremlin – backed by some suitably robust messaging – will convince Putin to come to the negotiation table. If Trump achieves this, he may well get the Nobel peace prize he so covets, and he would deserve it.
