Scottish Government refuses to rule out changes to pensioners' winter payment
A spokesperson for First Minister John Swinney said ministers at Holyrood were 'trying to understand the fiscal implications' of Monday's policy change by the UK Government.
After cutting the winter fuel payment for all but the poorest pensioners last year, Chancellor Rachel Reeves has now confirmed some nine million pensioners in England and Wales will receive the benefit this winter.
The payment, worth up to £300, will be restored to the vast majority of pensioners who previously received it, with those with an income of under £35,000 a year qualifying for the UK Government's payment.
Today we are expanding Winter Fuel Payments to benefit nine million pensioners this winter.
It is right that we continue to means-test this payment so that it is targeted and fair.
That's why we have acted to expand eligibility so no pensioner on a lower income will miss out.
— Rachel Reeves (@RachelReevesMP) June 9, 2025
In Scotland, ministers had already announced plans to ensure all pensioner households receive a payment.
The Pension Age Winter Heating Payment will see all pensioner households get at least £100, with poorer pensioners getting either £200 or £300 depending on their age.
Labour, however, challenged SNP ministers to ensure that 'no struggling Scottish pensioners will be left out of pocket under their plans'.
Mr Swinney's spokesperson confirmed that, as it stands, the policy in Scotland has not been changed.
But adding that ministers are 'trying to understand the fiscal implications' of what has been announced', the spokesperson refused to rule out future changes to the payments.
'We will always seek to support pensioners in Scotland the best we can, we are absolutely committed to that,' the spokesperson said.
The change in policy from the UK Government will bring additional money for the Scottish Government – with the spokesperson stressing SNP ministers are 'still trying to understand' how much extra cash could be due.
Here, the spokesperson stressed the Scottish Government's budget is 'set largely by Westminster', adding: 'We have to, frankly, read the tea leaves sometimes about what is going to happen to our block grant throughout the year.'
The comments from the First Minister's spokesperson came as Scottish Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville described the UK Government's handling of of the benefit as 'shambolic'.
Ms Somerville welcomed Labour's U-turn on the benefit cut, but said the decision should never have happened in the first place.
She told BBC Radio Scotland it was 'very difficult to try and run a devolved social security system when you're actually finding out some of the details on social media before you can actually find out the details from the Government'.
The Social Justice Secretary insisted that was 'no way for the Governments to work together,', adding she was 'deeply disappointed in the way that the UK Government have handled this once again with the Scottish Government'.
Scottish Secretary Ian Murray stressed the benefit was devolved to Scotland, saying: 'This is a devolved payment. There's lots of social security that is devolved in Scotland. It is up to the Scottish Government to develop that and come up with their own policy.'
The Labour MP also told BBC Radio Scotland the Scottish Government's winter fuel payments system meant that 'limited public money' will go towards helping millionaire pensioners with their heating bills.
He insisted the initial decision by the UK Government to scrap the universal payments had been the 'right thing to do at the time', but added that changes could be made to this now the economy has been 'stabilised'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
23 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Senedd called to act on 'existential crisis' of abuse
Plaid Cymru's Adam Price, the first out-gay man in his party to be elected to national office, warned prejudices based on sex, race and sexual orientation have been reinvigorated. He told the Senedd: "It is getting worse by the day, and it really represents an existential crisis for our democracy and our society." Mr Price said: "For our democracy to be effective, it has to be diverse. "Diversity trumps ability. "It's a piece of evidence in social science." The former Plaid Cymru leader called for a focus on representation of trans women and men, a community "under siege," to ensure their voices are heard in the Senedd. Mr Price highlighted harmful comments below news stories involving him in recent weeks. "That certainly won't deter me and I hope it won't deter anyone else," he said. "But we've got to do something about it collectively, haven't we?" Labour's Hannah Blythyn expressed concerns that Wales could go backwards in terms of equality of representation at the next Senedd election. Ms Blythyn told Senedd members: "I very much made an active decision when I had the opportunity to stand in this legislature because of the make-up – that there were more women here, that it was more representative." Jane Hutt, Wales' social justice secretary, acknowledged the rise of abuse, harassment and intimidation towards politicians, candidates and campaigners. She outlined voluntary diversity and inclusion guidance for political parties which aims to ensure democratic bodies are truly representative of all the people of Wales. Ms Hutt said safety costs will be exempt from spending limits for Welsh elections. Conservative Altaf Hussain warned guidance on equal representation risks crossing a dangerous line. He said: "Equality of access cannot come just by bureaucratic diktats or targets." Plaid Cymru's Sioned Williams said progress on underrepresentation of women in politics has slowed, warning the voluntary guidance was published "far too late." "Wales belongs to everyone," she said. "Everyone must have a voice in our nation's future."
Western Telegraph
23 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Land value tax in Wales could replace council tax and rates
The former first minister said the Welsh Government continues to explore the feasibility of LVT as used in countries such as Denmark and Singapore. Professor Drakeford has long supported a LVT, arguing those who have the privilege of ownership should pay something back for that privilege. LVT is levied on the value of the land rather than the property itself. Proponents argue LVT is easier to collect, more efficient and difficult to avoid, while discouraging speculation and encouraging people to bring idle land back into use. Professor Drakeford told the Senedd: "I am anxious to see this discussion move beyond the theoretical and into the realms of the practically possible. He explained that the Welsh Government has invited tenders to test approaches to valuing land, with submissions for every aspect of the work. The finance secretary said: "I want to use the coming months to test the boundaries of what might be possible in the next Senedd term. "Let's open the door to more radical, fundamental and progressive reform in the future." He added: "The current system is unfairly weighted against those who experience difficulty in paying. "I want to shift the focus from harmful escalation towards supportive prevention." He stated ministers will introduce a new council tax appeals process by April 2026 that will be "easier to navigate and provide a better, modern system for taxpayers". Peter Fox agreed that council tax is regressive by nature "and that it will never really become a fair local tax". Mr Fox accused the Welsh Government of increasing tax on families "by stealth" through underfunding councils which, in turn, pass on the shortfall to people. He called for reform of the "outdated and flawed" funding formula. Professor Drakeford replied: "Almost every local authority in Wales will agree that the formula needs revision – nobody can agree on how that should be done. "The 22 local authorities each believe that the formula uniquely disadvantages them."
Telegraph
27 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Reeves's review was a sobering experience for hard-pressed taxpayers
SIR – Listening to the Chancellor's long list of extra government spending pledges, I thought to myself: 'Some poor sods are going to have to pay for all this.' Then I realised that I shall be one of them. J Alan Smith Epping, Essex SIR – After the promises announced by Labour in the spending review, the alleged inherited £22 billion black hole looks like a drop in the ocean. Roger Gentry Weavering, Kent SIR – Labour is forever trotting out that its aim is to help 'working people', with policies designed to improve their quality of life. In the past, the phrase covered manual workers, such as miners and steelworkers, but those industries no longer exist. So who are modern-day working people? Arguably, everyone who works, but Labour's definition is probably much narrower: any workers who vote Labour. Sandy Pratt Storrington, West Sussex SIR – The Chancellor's ambitions have numbers and dates attached, but there is no evidence that she has carried out any logistical analysis. Building requires trained personnel, materials and space. Schools need qualified teachers. The health service needs experienced medics. Power plants and grids must have thriving industries to supply and maintain them. Merely allocating money does not fulfil the ambition. Michael Marks Leominster, Herefordshire SIR – Rachel Reeves clearly lacks confidence in her plans, as throughout the spending review she took shots at opposition parties, using their alleged failings to justify her decisions. She should let her proposals speak for themselves. Given the poor state of the economy and its dismal growth on her watch, it was striking that the Chancellor did not fully explain how she will pay for her commitments. She said about her policies: 'These are my choices. These are this Government's choices. These are the British people's choices.' I don't think this claim would stand up if a general election were held today. Peter Williman Chatteris, Cambridgeshire SIR – When the next general election comes along, the only thing opposition parties will have to do to relieve the present administration of its responsibilities is remind the electorate of the Chagos and winter fuel fiascos. These offer sufficient evidence of incompetence – though plenty more is likely to be provided over the next four years. John Firrell Litton Cheney, Dorset Covered faces SIR – Reform UK and Kemi Badenoch are right to trigger a debate rather than campaign for a ban on all face coverings, including the burka. Jack Straw, as a Cabinet minister in Tony Blair's government, did the same thing in 2006. Both Mr Straw and Mrs Badenoch have said that they were not comfortable speaking to people whose faces were covered, and expressions therefore obscured, in their constituency offices. Surely the same concerns apply to teachers and students, judges and witnesses in court, and to medical professionals and patients, where it is essential to see each other properly. This should not be an outright ban, nor confined to religious apparel. B Brodkin Edgware, Middlesex SIR – I write to plead for open faces for men, women and children on behalf of the millions who, to a greater or lesser degree, rely on reading faces to grasp people's communications. I cannot talk with anyone of any background who has even a partially closed-off face. That's not rudeness – it's a practicality. And there are many millions like me, as nature is remarkably casual with hearing. Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne (Con) London SW1 Why we need nuclear SIR – Ed Miliband, the Energy Secretary, and Labour deserve credit for deciding to build Sizewell C and invest in small modular reactors (report, June 10). We need these to provide clean, reliable energy and help us move away from fossil fuels, and to tackle climate change. More nuclear power will lead to well-paid jobs and greater energy security. Many environmentalists oppose nuclear power, but this is naive and unrealistic. Germany showed how closing nuclear plants and investing solely in renewables leads to burning more fossil fuels, as well as more expensive energy. Nuclear has high energy density and so requires less land and fewer materials. It is very good news that Labour stood up to the environmentalists, and, by investing in nuclear power, it is doing what is best for the country as well as the climate. Mark Dawes London E11 Space to remember SIR – Charles Moore (Notebook, June 10) writes about Holocaust Memorial Day and the risk of the concept being watered down. In January this year, I was surprised to see that this day was not printed on my calendar, so I emailed the company concerned to ask why. The reply stated that it wasn't able to include every important date, and this was partly so that there would be enough space in the boxes for customers to write in. Not only was another single entry printed for that date (Holiday, Australia), but room had also been found elsewhere in the calendar for Waitangi Day, Juneteenth and Presidents' Day. Priorities? Sue Thomas Monmouth Brotherly love SIR – My nephew, the second of my sister's three sons, sent his mother a card for Mother's Day (Letters, June 11) with the caption: 'If at first you don't succeed, try again. Love from your second son.' His older brother's reaction was not recorded. Prep school closures SIR – The announcement that two more private schools, in Putney and Kingston, are to close (report, June 7) following the Government's imposition of VAT on fees must be hugely upsetting for the children and parents involved. There are also 11,000 fewer pupils in private schools compared with a year ago. It has become obvious just how unpleasant this policy is. It highlights how the Left simply does not understand ambition, or parents' desire to do the best for their children. Which is the 'nasty party' now? Richard Allison Edinburgh Exasperating NHS SIR – I received an envelope from the NHS containing two sheets of paper. One said: 'This envelope contains a letter.' The other had details of an important appointment. It also told me that, if I needed to change the appointment, I would have to telephone the number provided, or I would be deleted from the list. But there was no number. About 20 minutes later, on my fourth try, I got to speak to a person. He didn't know that the number was not on the letter. Roger Hart Sheffield, South Yorkshire SIR – I am a blood donor (Features, June 7). We used to be able to book our next session on the same day we gave blood. Now we have to do it later online. It was so easy before. This is probably why donors don't always rebook and donations are wider apart. George Martin Warmington, Northamptonshire Lunch with Freddie SIR – I read Simon Heffer's article about his friend Freddie Forsyth (Features, June 11) with some sadness. In the early 1980s I was working in Hong Kong in Sutherland House, opposite the Hong Kong Club. One day I returned from lunch and, entering the lift to the 10th floor, I recognised Freddie, who was obviously going to the Foreign Correspondents' Club on the 11th floor. I had often been jealous of its members, as they invariably staggered out in the late afternoon, after a boozy lunch with colleagues, just as I was leaving the office. Each time I read his letters to The Telegraph, I found myself agreeing with his views. I would have given anything to have had lunch with him and put the world to rights. Neville Dickinson Morpeth, Northumberland Keeping churchyards trim – with a little help SIR – Grass and weeds in churchyards need controlling, but what is the best way of doing this? Strimmers and motorised mowers require energy and produce unattractive heaps of cut grass, and strimmers can damage gravestones. In theory, the parson can use the grass for hay-making, but that is probably uneconomic. Goats and sheep (Letters, June 11) require fenced churchyards, which must be properly managed. Helpfully, they consume wreaths and cut flowers, which have a finite life and need removing before they become unsightly. Grazing at regular and stated times is ideal. David J Critchley Buckingham The fundamental flaw in ID card proposals SIR – Robin Nonhebel (Letters, June 10) believes that identity cards should be introduced to help curb illegal immigration and abuse of the benefits system. However, for an ID card scheme to be appealing, voters would have to trust the state. Along with millions of others, I don't. Anyhow, I have an ID card already – it's called a passport or driving licence. William Rusbridge Tregony, Cornwall SIR– Robin Nonhebel is quite correct. You have to ask why migrants want to come to the UK, bypassing Germany, France and other European countries. Could it be because those countries have national ID cards? These let holders use government services, and are required to obtain work and access healthcare and other state benefits. ID cards would improve government efficiency, removing the need for multiple other forms of identification. Yet we think we know best, and so the debate continues ad infinitum. R Jones Northwood, Middlesex SIR – An ID card scheme would surely offer an opportunity for people-traffickers to enhance their income further by selling forged cards. Carole Doggett Milford, Hampshire SIR – The idea of having to prove yourself to the state day in, day out is objectionable. Why should I – a private citizen – have to verify who I am to a policeman, when the policeman should rightly show his warrant card to me? Letters to the Editor We accept letters by email and post. Please include name, address, work and home telephone numbers. ADDRESS: 111 Buckingham Palace Road, London, SW1W 0DT EMAIL: dtletters@ FOLLOW: Telegraph Letters @LettersDesk
