
Ukraine Ups Its Arms Production, Asking Allies to Pay for It
Ukraine has been ramping up domestic arms production significantly, unable to rely as heavily as it once did on an increasingly uncertain supply of weapons from its allies. Last year, Ukrainian Armor, a private company that runs the armored vehicle factory, produced double the number of vehicles it did the year before, according to Vladislav Belbas, the chief executive.
'But that's not enough,' Mr. Belbas said during a recent visit to the factory, which also includes an assembly line for mortars. 'We need to produce more.'
His view reflects a growing sense of reckoning in Ukraine after three and a half years of war. President Trump's inconsistent support for Ukraine has called into question the continued backing of the United States, Kyiv's biggest arms supplier. The Trump administration recently paused some arms transfers but then reversed course, agreeing to sell weapons to European allies, which will then give them to Ukraine.
But even with greater certainty about the flow of Western weapons, it still does not match what Ukraine needs to fend off the Russian invasion.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump Turbocharges His Putin Threat After Being Relentlessly Humiliated
President Donald Trump said he will reduce a previous 50-day deadline he issued to Vladimir Putin to reach a peace deal with Ukraine after admitting the Russian leader seems to have no intention of complying with it. While speaking to reporters alongside British Prime Minister Keir Starmer during his visit to Scotland, Trump said he was 'disappointed' with Putin and warned the Russian president the already arbitrary deadline ending Sept. 3 he gave under threat of possible U.S. sanctions will be decreased by weeks. 'We thought we had [a ceasefire deal] settled numerous times, and then President Putin goes out and starts launching rockets into some city like Kyiv and kills a lot of people in a nursing home or whatever,' Trump said. 'You have bodies lying all over the street, and I say 'that's not the way to do it.' 'I'm disappointed in President Putin, very disappointed in him. I'm going to reduce that 50 days that I gave him to a lesser number, because I think I already know the answer to what's going to happen,' Trump added. Trump, who long vowed to end the Russia-Ukraine conflict within one day of returning to the White House, is now saying Moscow has a deadline of 10 to 12 days for taking steps in agreeing a ceasefire, reported Reuters. Trump warned Putin on July 14 that Russia will face 'very severe tariffs' of up to 100 percent unless Moscow agrees to a ceasefire and stop killing civilians within 50 days. The threat has been widely ignored by Putin, who has been trying to take over Ukraine since Feb. 2022. Shortly after Trump issued his original 50-day threat, Russia bombarded the Ukrainian cities of Kryvyi Rih, Vinnytsia, Kharkiv, and Dobropillia, in a deadly large-scale drone and missile attacks. Other high-profile Russian officials even mocked Trump for issuing the threat alongside the 50-day deadline. 'Trump issued a theatrical ultimatum to the Kremlin. The world shuddered, expecting the consequences. Belligerent Europe was disappointed. Russia didn't care,' Dmitry Medvedev, the former Russian president and close Putin ally, posted on X on July 15. It is unclear if Trump's original plan of imposing 100 percent tariffs against Russia if they do not meet the new deadline is still in place, or if harsher sanctions are now threatened. The Kremlin did not immediately respond to a request for comment from the Daily Beast. Solve the daily Crossword


Fox News
3 hours ago
- Fox News
Putin has miscalculated here, Gen. Jack Keane says
Fox News senior strategic analyst Gen. Jack Keane discusses President Donald Trump's demand for a ceasefire in the Russia-Ukraine war on 'The Story.'


New York Times
5 hours ago
- New York Times
How Netanyahu Played Trump for a Fool in Gaza
On July 26 the Israeli newspaper Haaretz ran this headline: 'Israel at War Day 659. Gaza Medical Sources: At Least 25 Killed by Israeli Gunfire, Some While Waiting for Aid.' If you had been following this Gaza story closely, you would know that Haaretz was running a similar headline almost every day for weeks — only the number of Palestinians killed while waiting for food aid handed out by Israel in Gaza changed. As I watched these stories pile up, the thought occurred to me that roughly a month earlier Israel had managed to assassinate 10 senior Iranian military officials and 16 nuclear scientists sitting in their homes and offices. So how was it that Israel had the capacity to destroy pinpoint targets in Iran, some 1,200 miles from Tel Aviv, and could not safely deliver boxes of food to starving Gazans 40 miles from Tel Aviv? That did not seem like an accident. It seemed like the product of something deeper, something quite shameful, playing out within the extremist government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Key figures in Bibi's extreme-right ruling coalition, like the national security minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, openly pushed a policy that would result in the starvation of many Gazans — to the point where they would leave the strip entirely. Bibi knew the United States wouldn't let him go that far, so he provided just the bare minimum of aid to prevent being toppled by the Jewish supremacist thugs he'd brought into his government. Alas, that turned out to be a little too bare, and terrible pictures of malnourished children started emerging from Gaza, prompting even President Trump to declare on Monday that there is 'real starvation stuff' happening in Gaza. 'You can't fake that. We have to get the kids fed.' How did we get here, where a Jewish democratic state, descended in part from the Holocaust, is engaged in a policy of starvation in a war with Hamas that has become the longest and most deadly war between Israelis and Palestinians in Israel's history — and shows no sign of ending? My answer: What makes this war different is that it pits what I believe is the worst, most fanatical and amoral government in Israel's history against the worst, most fanatical, murderous organization in Palestinian history. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.