Woke row after train repainted to celebrate diversity
The Avanti West Coast train has been painted in bold artwork celebrating the ethnicity of the company's workforce and the communities it serves.
But Gareth Bacon, the Conservative shadow transport secretary, described the move as 'virtue-signalling nonsense' and claimed passengers deserved 'better than this farce'.
Baraka Carberry, a digital artist, who created the livery for Avanti, said it depicted 'scenes of people, culture, colours and joy'.
The Together We Roll design stretches across all seven carriages of a new Evero train, which is due to enter passenger service this summer. It was produced following a suggestion from the rail operator's frontline workers at Euston station, The Telegraph understands.
Mr Bacon said: 'Avanti West Coast can't run a train on time, but they can find the time and money for virtue-signalling nonsense. While passengers are stranded on platforms waiting for services that never show up, Avanti are busy patting themselves on the back for colourful train paint jobs.
'This nonsense won't fix the delays, cancellations, and endless chaos that Labour have caused with their 'no-strings' pay giveaway to the unions. Passengers need functioning rail services and deserve better than this farce.'
'Proud of this unique train'
Kathryn O'Brien, Avanti West Coast customer experience director, said: 'Nothing like this has been seen on the UK's railways. We're incredibly proud of this unique train and who it represents.
'By bringing to life the vibrant communities we serve and our employees, we hope to highlight the many people of different cultures, backgrounds and heritage who have a connection to the railway. This vibrant train marks our latest step towards this by sparking conversations about ethnicity and bringing a sense of togetherness across the west coast and beyond.'
Lord Hendy, the rail minister, said: 'Diversity is key to the success of any industry, and creative work like this goes a long way in sparking conversations, encouraging inclusion and may inspire more people to choose a career in rail.
'We still have a long way to go until we have a railway which reflects the society we live in, but Together We Roll shows Avanti West Coast's commitment to representing more of the communities they serve, and I look forward to seeing Baraka's artwork out on the track.'
Ms Carberry, who previously designed a Windrush-themed bus wraparound covering for Transport for London, described the Avanti train livery as 'a living, evolving artwork that has the potential to resonate with the public'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Telegraph
Public think Labour will use new online laws for censorship
New laws will be used by the Government to censor content posted online, a majority of the public believe. There is strong backing for the aims of the Online Safety Act to protect children from online harms but deep scepticism about the consequences for people's privacy and whether it will work in practice, a major poll of more than 2,000 adults by Ipsos has revealed. While 69 per cent supported age verification for platforms hosting harmful content, half of those polled were not confident it will stop under-18s accessing it, according to the poll, published exclusively today by The Telegraph. More than six in 10 (61 per cent) believe the Act will lead to personal data being compromised and a similar proportion (58 per cent) expected increased government censorship. More than four in 10 say it will threaten free speech online. It follows The Telegraph's disclosure of a secretive 'spy' unit which has been used by the Government to target social media posts criticising migrant hotels and 'two tier policing'. Last week the US state department criticised the Online Safety Act over its potential impact on free speech as it warned the British Government had 'repeatedly intervened to chill speech' after the Southport attack. The Act also sparked a political row after Reform UK leader Nigel Farage pledged to repeal the Act as a threat to free speech, prompting Labour to accuse him of being on the side of sex offenders like Jimmy Savile. Keiran Pedley, Ipsos director of UK politics, said the poll exposed a 'significant paradox in public opinion'. 'While there is a clear and broad desire to protect children online, reflected in the strong support for age verification, this is matched by deep-seated scepticism about whether the Act can deliver on its promises,' he said. 'Data breaches and the potential for censorship are highlighted, as the public doubt these measures will be effective against tech-savvy young people. This creates a major challenge for platform operators and regulator, Ofcom: how to implement robust age assurance systems that the public actually trusts and is willing to use.' Nearly half (48 per cent) believe the Act will enable parents to better protect their children from online harms and 46 per cent said it will enable adults to more easily block inappropriate material. However, 44 per cent believe it will limit free speech online, against 40 per cent who do not. A similar proportion (43 per cent) fear it will limit adults' access to 'non-harmful' information online. Half of those polled (48 per cent) said they would be likely to submit proof of age to access a platform or website, against 30 per cent who would not. However, this dropped to 14 per cent for porn sites and 19 per cent for dating apps. More than half (56 per cent) were comfortable with using their email as proof of age but the public drew a line at financial information, with fewer than one in five saying they would use a credit card or banking information. Almost seven in 10 Britons (69 per cent) believed it would be easy for children and young people to get around safeguarding procedures by social media platforms. More than half (51 per cent) feared that it would lead to children using less safe parts of the internet such as the dark web. Nearly a quarter (24 per cent) admitted that they used a VPN when browsing the internet, a technology that enables users to encrypt their communications and hide their IP address. A similar proportion (22 per cent) said they had considered or downloaded a VPN since the introduction of the Online Safety Act. Despite this, four in 10 (40 per cent) believed the Act would prevent children and under 18s from seeing illegal or harmful material, although 52 per cent did not believe it would. While 37 per cent believed the legislation would make platforms and websites remove harmful and illegal content, 51 per cent did not.
Telegraph
8 hours ago
- Telegraph
‘Plumbers earn more than many graduates': do you think university is still worth it?
With A-level results released on Thursday, students in England, Northern Ireland and Wales will be considering their next step – whether it is pursuing higher education, entering the workforce or taking a gap year. On Monday, Roger Bootle argued in The Telegraph that going to university in Britain is a scam. He wrote: 'For many young people, their life prospects would be brighter if they didn't go to university.' His sentiment sparked a lively debate among readers. In response, we asked whether you believe going to university is worthwhile today. Of more than 15,000 respondents, 72pc said no – citing the devaluation of degrees due to over-subscription, the growing importance of learning a trade and the rising influence of AI. What is your view? Vote in our poll below, and read on for the best of the debate. Apprenticeships are a common alternative to attending university, and an option respondents strongly supported. Reader Christine McIntyre's son went to a grammar school, 'but decided at 14 that he was not going to university as he didn't want student debt and he wasn't interested in studying for a degree which likely would serve no useful purpose'. Instead, he began an apprenticeship to become a cabinet maker – and 12 years later, after acquiring an understanding of specific aspects of the building trade, 'he has progressed to working for a company in London and is involved in negotiating high-end contracts for commercial premises'. Highlighting the financial benefits of apprenticeships, Jim Stewart said: 'Young people who took trades from the late '90s onwards are financially outperforming their peers. Young people need mentors and apprenticeships, not brainwashing and meaningless qualifications.' Meanwhile, Cheshire CG offered a word of warning with the advancement of AI: 'In the new world of artificial intelligence, I'd think very carefully about whether the subject you want to study at university is going to provide the jobs you expect on graduation. Many jobs in professional careers will be reduced significantly as AI takes further hold.' Alongside AI's role in limiting available jobs, university qualifications no longer help job applicants stand out, according to Susan Jones. She said 'higher degrees [are] given out like candy'. Achieving a first in a challenging subject, she said, 'used to invoke awe and respect and not many achieved it'. 'Now everyone who goes seems to get a top-class degree, whether they can string a sentence together or not.' 'University is just a three-year holiday' Hu McG weighed in on student debt: 'For many of these 'graduates', they are not saddled with the debt, the taxpayers are. 'A large percentage of graduates never earn enough to have to pay back the funding they get. For them, university is just a three-year holiday at the taxpayer's expense.' Brenda Harrison said: 'You can go into accountancy after A-levels and work on the job while you qualify. 'There was not a shortage in nursing until the last Labour government decided nurses needed a degree. Again, on-the-job training with opportunities for advancement to specialise is offered along the way,' she explained. 'Plumbers' earning potential is significantly higher than a lot of post-graduate jobs, as well as many other skilled trade work. 'There are a number of degrees not worth the paper they are written on,' she asserted. Andrew Rowe, a former Russell Group lecturer, described how he 'got out 20 years ago when academia became an international 'pile 'em high' business more interested in activism than academic practice'. Despite his feelings, his daughter 'will be going to university as you can be disadvantaged at any point in your career if you didn't participate in the scam', he said. 'She will graduate with costs of £100,000 while her same-aged apprentice tradesman boyfriend will probably have a similar amount in the bank by then.' 'Intangible benefits' However, a minority of readers still championed university. They highlighted the independence it fosters and its role in helping young people shape their identities. Reader Sue Tudor reflected on her experience at Oxford University, where she studied history and theology. She acknowledged that 'the effect on my marketability' was 'zero or less' – however, she said, 'the intangible benefits [were] huge'. 'How many people get to sit in the Bodleian Library reading, in Latin, a medieval book that is not even available in English? It is a rarefied pleasure.' Alongside the potential for pleasure that studying can offer, another reader pointed out that 'living away from home is an important part of university'. 'For probably the first time, the student is responsible for managing virtually all of their life as an adult and prepares them for life away from their own town.' Having worked for the Ministry of Defence and a major US corporate defence contractor for several years after college, reader Billy Rubin soon found his promotion path barred by a lack of a degree. He went to university because he 'had no other choice'. Now working at a university himself, he explained how his graduates 'regularly enter the workplace above the point where I left it, despite having no work experience'. He concluded: 'Unless young people get a trade, university is no longer optional. Raw intelligence, experience and ability is no longer enough. It hasn't been enough for 20 years or more.'
Telegraph
9 hours ago
- Telegraph
Former Tory MPs ‘won't get free run' at next election under new rules
Former Tory MPs 'won't get a free run' at the next election under a tightening of party rules for the selection of candidates. There will now be no 'automatic right' for former Conservative MPs to stand as candidates in the next general election, according to party sources familiar with the changes. Previously, the party had a habit of allowing defeated MPs to stand again, but under changes to the process, a senior party source said 'everyone will be screened'. The future careers of former Conservative MPs have become a prominent issue in recent months, thanks to the rise of Reform UK. Nigel Farage's insurgent party has attracted media attention with a series of high-profile defections by ex-Tory MPs. Around three-quarters of former Conservative MPs are hoping to return to parliament, according to a survey by the group Conservatives Together. A number of senior Tory figures lost their seats at the last election and many are expected to launch political comebacks. They include Dame Penny Mordaunt and Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg. The source said: 'We want to be in a position where people are brought in for the right reason. The plan is that previous MPs who lost their seats will be required to go through a selection process so that we've encouraged everyone who wants to come back to express interest and put their applications in.' 'The reason is that there will be many ex-MPs who say, 'Yes, I want to stand, but I don't want to stand in my old constituency, I want to stand in a different one'. In which case they can apply and go through the selection process but they won't automatically get a free run,' a party source familiar with the changes said. 'There is also an issue around certain well-known people wanting to come back who have never been through the current process for selection and validation of candidates because it started after they were originally selected,' they added. Autumn conference Preliminary forms to express interest in standing again at the next election were sent to former MPs in July, The Telegraph understands. Approvals and possible rejections are due to start following the party's conference in autumn, according to those familiar with the process. Last month, Sir Jake Berry, a former party chairman who lost his seat to Labour at the general election, announced that he was joining Reform. Others include Andrea Jenkyns, a former minister who was elected as the Reform mayor of Lincolnshire in May, and David Jones, the former Secretary of State for Wales. Two weeks ago, Adam Holloway was the latest former Tory MP to defect, bringing the total number to 13. Only one sitting Conservative MP has ever defected to Reform, Lee Anderson, who did so in 2023, becoming the party's first MP. He won re-election as a Reform candidate last July. The Conservative Party has previously had a tradition of giving defeated MPs 'second acts' by allowing them to stand again, often in safer seats than those they previously held. They include Andrew Mitchell and Michael Fallon, both of whom returned to parliament after a defeat and went on to become cabinet ministers. Michael Portillo, a leadership favourite who suffered a shock defeat at the 1997 general election, was returned to parliament within two years as a Conservative by-election candidate. The move could cause a backlash from former Tory MPs hoping for another stint in parliament who have not yet decided whether to stay loyal or defect to Reform.
