Woke row after train repainted to celebrate diversity
A train company has been accused of 'virtue-signalling nonsense' after repainting one of its trains in diversity-themed livery.
The Avanti West Coast train has been painted in bold artwork celebrating the ethnicity of the company's workforce and the communities it serves.
But Gareth Bacon, the Conservative shadow transport secretary, described the move as 'virtue-signalling nonsense' and claimed passengers deserved 'better than this farce'.
Baraka Carberry, a digital artist, who created the livery for Avanti, said it depicted 'scenes of people, culture, colours and joy'.
The Together We Roll design stretches across all seven carriages of a new Evero train, which is due to enter passenger service this summer. It was produced following a suggestion from the rail operator's frontline workers at Euston station, The Telegraph understands.
Mr Bacon said: 'Avanti West Coast can't run a train on time, but they can find the time and money for virtue-signalling nonsense. While passengers are stranded on platforms waiting for services that never show up, Avanti are busy patting themselves on the back for colourful train paint jobs.
'This nonsense won't fix the delays, cancellations, and endless chaos that Labour have caused with their 'no-strings' pay giveaway to the unions. Passengers need functioning rail services and deserve better than this farce.'
'Proud of this unique train'
Kathryn O'Brien, Avanti West Coast customer experience director, said: 'Nothing like this has been seen on the UK's railways. We're incredibly proud of this unique train and who it represents.
'By bringing to life the vibrant communities we serve and our employees, we hope to highlight the many people of different cultures, backgrounds and heritage who have a connection to the railway. This vibrant train marks our latest step towards this by sparking conversations about ethnicity and bringing a sense of togetherness across the west coast and beyond.'
Lord Hendy, the rail minister, said: 'Diversity is key to the success of any industry, and creative work like this goes a long way in sparking conversations, encouraging inclusion and may inspire more people to choose a career in rail.
'We still have a long way to go until we have a railway which reflects the society we live in, but Together We Roll shows Avanti West Coast's commitment to representing more of the communities they serve, and I look forward to seeing Baraka's artwork out on the track.'
Ms Carberry, who previously designed a Windrush-themed bus wraparound covering for Transport for London, described the Avanti train livery as 'a living, evolving artwork that has the potential to resonate with the public'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
29 minutes ago
- BBC News
BBC Learning English - Learning English from the News / Trump's tariffs
(Photo by) ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ The story US President Donald Trump has started imposing tariffs on imports into the USA. Tariffs make imports more expensive – a cost which is often passed onto consumers who have to pay more for imported products. Donald Trump has imposed 10% tariffs on all Chinese imports to the US. He had also threatened to impose 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico, but these have been suspended for 30 days. News headlines China announces tit-for-tat tariffs as US levies come into effect MSN As Trump's tariff pledge comes due, he vows to follow through on key campaign promise CNN Trump's tariffs are already bearing fruit The Telegraph Key words and phrases tit-for-tat describes an action done in retaliation You ate the last biscuit, so I'm going to eat your piece of cake - it's tit for tat. follow through (on) fulfil a promise I can't come. I said I'd help my friend move house, so I need to follow through on that promise. bearing fruit getting a positive result Well done on your exam results! All your hard work is now bearing fruit. Next Learn more English vocabulary from the news with our News Review archive. Listen to My Song, My Home here. Learn more phrasal verbs, like 'follow through', here.
New European
40 minutes ago
- New European
The chancellor has the worst job in government
Rachel Reeves is undoubtedly doing the job at a difficult time. Fourteen years of Conservative government left both the public finances and public services in a parlous state. Fixing the former requires a tight grip of the purse strings, while fixing the latter necessarily means loosening them. To make things worse, the disastrously brief reign of Liz Truss showed the perils of testing whether markets would tolerate a chancellor taking a chance with the public finances – and the markets resoundingly said 'no'. It is a wonder that anyone wants to be chancellor – and have no doubt, hundreds of MPs would chop off several fingers, perhaps even their own, for a chance at the job – because it is surely the worst job in government. You are near the apex of political power in the UK, and your job is to say 'no' to all of your colleagues and then explain to the public why they can't have nice things. That leaves the chancellor walking a dangerously narrow path, trying to find enough money to deliver the improvements her government has promised the public, without allowing the public finances to tip into a fresh crisis. Thanks to changing the fiscal rules, next week she will announce some £100bn in new investment over the next five years – new roads, rail, infrastructure of all sorts, as well as new defence spending. But this is likely to be overshadowed by reports of fresh rounds of austerity in key spending departments in their day-to-day finances. Labour is fighting mightily to make sure no-one uses the 'austerity' word, but this will surely be in vain. Spending cuts by any other name land just as uneasily with Labour MPs who feel this was the opposite of what they came into politics to do. No-one should suggest Rachel Reeves has an easy job, nor that she's been doing nothing – but a week out from revealing her spending plans, she has certainly made it easier for those who can't see any sense in what she is doing. Speaking on Wednesday, Reeves recommitted herself to her fiscal rules, to not raising VAT, income tax or national insurance, and to promising that the major tax hikes of her first budget are a 'one off' – and by implication, she committed herself to budget cuts across the next few years, too. This is certain to cause despair in policymaking circles, as well as on her own benches. Reeves's plans barely meet her rules, to the point that even just six months after her first budget she had to scrabble to find billions more in cuts or extra spending to meet the updated forecasts. Even in normal times, Reeves could expect to have to do the same twice a year for the rest of parliament, but these are not normal times. For one, the US president attempts to upend the rules of world trade several times a month. Despite all this abnormality, Reeves is trying to govern like a peacetime chancellor during a period of steady growth. More than that, if politics is the art of the possible, Reeves seems determined to ensure the range of what is 'possible' is narrow: in the first year of a government with a landslide majority, she has ruled out any kind of major tax reforms. Council tax doesn't work, isn't fair, and hasn't been reassessed since 1991, but Labour won't touch it. National insurance is unfair and benefits rich pensioners at the expense of poor working age adults, but it won't be touched. The interaction of the income tax and benefit systems is a complicated mess, and again will be left unreformed. Social care has been punted until the next parliament. Labour will never have an opportunity like this to fix some of the big challenges facing the British state, and Reeves and Starmer are making a deliberate decision to duck every hard decision. That leaves them tinkering around the margins, trying to make the sums add up, without changing anything fundamental. That is a choice they are free to make, of course, but it is the exact same choice as was made by their predecessors in government, and is likely to turn out just as badly. There is a truism in Westminster that Labour has no shortage of policies, but no overarching vision. With her approach to the Treasury, Reeves is ensuring that no vision can emerge, either – ministers will have to dream small, and hope they can do better than the last government with good intentions, and a little more capital spending. If there is such a thing as Reevesism, it is putting your head down, trying to make no mistakes, and hoping something comes along to make things better. There are surely worse philosophies, but it is not the stuff of which history is made. Unless Reeves is very lucky, it will not be enough to keep her in the Treasury for five years, either.
South Wales Guardian
2 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Deal on US steel tariffs to be in force ‘in a very short time', says PM
Sir Keir Starmer suggested to the House of Commons on Wednesday that the deal struck last month could come into effect 'in just a couple of weeks'. Once implemented, the agreement would effectively eliminate tariffs on British steel and aluminium exports to the US. Those tariffs currently stand at 25% after Mr Trump said he would 'provide different treatment' for the UK while he increased the levy to 50% for the rest of the world. But the situation could still change again in July, when the US is set to either increase the tariffs to 50% or introduce the quotas in the US-UK agreement, effectively eradicating the tax, depending on whether the deal is implemented. Challenged over the uncertainty during Prime Minister's Questions by Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch, Sir Keir said: 'We are the only country in the world that isn't paying the 50% tax on steel and that will be coming down. 'We are working on it to bring it down to zero, that is going to happen.' Responding to further questions from Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey, Sir Keir told MPs: 'We have a deal and we are implementing it and within a very short time I am confident we will get those tariffs down in accordance with the deal.' Adding that he expected MPs would be 'very pleased at the outcome of that', he said: 'Let's come back in just a couple of weeks when we have implemented it.' After Prime Minister's Questions, Downing Street said Sir Keir's confidence in finalising the deal was due to 'constant dialogue' with the US. But the Prime Minister's official spokesman would not guarantee that the deal would be in place by the July 9 deadline set by Mr Trump, telling reporters: 'Obviously our aim is to implement this deal as quickly as possible and you have just heard from the PM in the House that we are hoping to provide an update on that in weeks.' Earlier on Wednesday, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander told the BBC the Government would bring forward the legislation needed to implement the deal. Meanwhile, both the steel industry and trade unions have urged the Government to finalise the agreement with Washington. Gareth Stace, head of the industry body UK Steel, said Mr Trump's decision to keep tariffs on British steel at 25% was a 'welcome pause' but warned that continuing uncertainty was making US customers 'dubious over whether they should even risk making UK orders'. Alasdair McDiarmid, assistant general secretary of the Community union, also welcomed the 'reprieve' from the 50% rate, and added it was 'vital that the UK locks down the US trade deal to avoid punitive steel tariffs going forward.' But the Lib Dems urged Sir Keir to stand up to Mr Trump, saying the president had changed the terms of a deal he had already signed. Following Prime Minister's Questions, Sir Ed called on the Government to support his party's 'Buy British' campaign, saying: 'Donald Trump has taken our lunch money and is now coming back for more. 'Any deal he signs is already through the Oval Office shredder. 'It is time for the Government to admit that Trump's White House is not a reliable ally and get tough on ending this trade war by backing British businesses.' The Conservatives have said that Labour's 'botched negotiations have left businesses in limbo'. Shadow business and trade secretary Andrew Griffith said: 'Keir Starmer stood in front of the nation and insisted to the British public that his Labour Government had achieved a trade deal with the US – and now one month later our industries face a fresh tariffs blow. 'So once again it seems that Keir Starmer's promise was just like the rest: hollow and broken. Labour's botched negotiations have left businesses in limbo and this country simply cannot afford their continuing failure.'
