
Some Ontario mayors against communities' financial incentives to attract doctors
Several Ontario mayors have been calling on the province to ban financial incentives municipalities use to lure in doctors, saying the recruitment tactic is harming communities that can't pony up the cash – especially those in rural and northern regions.
But Sault Ste. Marie Mayor Matthew Shoemaker is going even further, suggesting the federal government should outlaw the practice from 'coast to coast.'
'I think it should be banned across the country actually,' he said in a recent interview. A doctor wears a lab coat and stethoscope in an exam room at a health clinic in Calgary, Friday, July 14, 2023.THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh
Shoemaker said his city needs 40 more doctors, including 18 to practise family medicine, and while it does offer a moving allowance of up $10,000, it is not in a position to compete with municipalities that are offering doctors tens of thousands of dollars to relocate.
'We think incentives are bad and we don't agree with them, and so we're not at this point supportive of getting into a competition on incentives because it is a competition we will lose,' he said.
Shoemaker said he asked Ontario's health minister to intervene and stop the practice during a meeting they had last August. But he said there seems to be no appetite for such a move in Ontario unless there is 'more widespread acceptance of banning of incentives' across the country.
'We don't want to become the place that is having all its doctors taken away from us,' he said.
A Ministry of Health spokesperson said the government has made big investments to connect more Ontarians with doctors, but didn't directly respond to a question on whether it would consider banning municipalities' financial incentives.
Shoemaker isn't the only one raising concern over the use of incentive-based programs to address Ontario's doctor shortage.
Todd Kasenberg, the mayor of North Perth, is also encouraging the province to ban cash incentives, which he calls a 'mistake.'
'We've entered an arms race and typically there aren't any winners in an arms race,' he said in an interview.
Kasenberg said around 3,000 of 17,000 people in his town north of London, Ont., are currently without a family doctor. With expected retirements in the next few years, the doctor shortage will be severe if officials can't recruit fast enough.
'So it's a substantial issue and met with a lot of frustration in the community, a lot of anxiety,' he added.
He said the town is expected to welcome four medical residents from Western University this year. Council approved spending $50,000 to provide housing support for those residents, even though Kasenberg said he was personally 'uncomfortable' with the move.
He hopes the recruits will stay in town beyond their residency period.
London Mayor Josh Morgan and Peterborough Mayor Jeff Leal have also publicly criticized municipalities' financial incentives for doctor recruitment.
Ontario's long-standing shortage of primary care providers affects millions of patients in every corner of the province, but advocates say rural communities are hit harder because they have fewer hospitals and walk-in clinics.
Experts have long warned that hefty financial incentives offered to doctors are widening the health-care access gap between poorer rural towns and richer urban centres.
Some say while the incentives might work, particularly in recruiting new graduates and medical residents who have education loans to repay, they don't serve to retain doctors in those communities.
'I think it is much more effective to be able to, from a retention standpoint, to support new grads by helping them to manage their schedule, add work slowly, avoid the risk of burnout,' said Dr. Sarah Newbery, a family physician in Marathon, Ont., a rural community 300 kilometres east of Thunder Bay.
'If they're too busy from the get-go, they will not be easy to retain.'
Newbery knows a thing or two about retention – she was one of six young physicians who moved to Marathon nearly three decades ago and ended the town's chronic doctor shortage.
At that time, Marathon was about to lose its only emergency department and the fate of the entire hospital was up in the air. The local physician recruitment committee even had burlap sacks ready to cover the hospital signs on the nearby highway.
'It was probably the most underserviced community certainly in the province, maybe in the country,' Newbery said.
She said the town gave the entire group $10,000 in bonuses — a little over $1,600 each — and housing support that included two years of free rent for some. But those incentives were not a deciding factor for Newbery and her partner to stay in Marathon for 29 years.
She said what kept that group of physicians in town was a collective commitment to provide better care for the community as well as an understanding of a healthy work and life balance. Marathon is home to six physicians now, and has only one doctor vacancy at a time when other rural communities are in a health-care crisis.
Instead of offering cash bonuses, Newbery suggested the money should be invested in making towns more welcoming and appealing to doctors in the long run.
Around 525,000 Ontarians who live in rural areas have no access to primary care, and that number is increasing four times faster compared to urban centres, according to data provided by the Rural Ontario Municipalities Association.
Christy Lowry, the association's chair, said improving access to health care, recruiting physicians and medical workers, and making sure local emergency rooms remain operational are 'top priority' for the association.
'All of those pieces are part of what we're focused on right now, and we can see how the lack of these services are negatively impacting our communities and the well-being of our communities,' she said.
Lowry, who is also the mayor of Mississippi Mills, a rural community east of Ottawa, said while her town has a modern hospital with 'tremendous service,' the shortage of primary care providers is a problem for residents, some of whom are travelling as far as Kingston to see their doctors.
The association estimates Ontario municipalities are spending nearly half a billion dollars on health care annually.
'Property tax dollars should be going to core municipal priorities. They were never designed to pay for health services,' Lowry said in a recent interview.
'The problem is there's a shortage. (We) don't have enough, so it becomes this competition between one community and the next.'
In northern communities, more than 350 doctors — including more than 200 family physicians — are needed to fill current vacancies, and that number is much higher if retirements expected over the next five years are factored in, according to the Ontario Medical Association.
The association's former president, Dr. Dominik Nowak, said that's 'unacceptable.'
The shortage had led to fierce competition for physicians.
'There are winners and losers when we have a situation like this and oftentimes the communities that can't afford to recruit and retain are northern and rural communities,' he said last month before his tenure ended.
Nowak said while municipalities should help create a welcoming environment for doctors and their families, ultimately it is the province's job to ensure communities have proper access to health care.
'It's a symptom of a larger problem,' Nowak said of incentive-based programs. 'The larger problem is that family practice is no longer seen as a viable career choice for new graduates.'
Winnipeg Free Press | Newsletter
Winnipeg Jets Game Days
On Winnipeg Jets game days, hockey writers Mike McIntyre and Ken Wiebe send news, notes and quotes from the morning skate, as well as injury updates and lineup decisions. Arrives a few hours prior to puck drop. Sign up for The Warm-Up
The Ministry of Health said the province has added 15,000 doctors and increased the number of family physicians by 10 per cent since 2018.
Ministry spokesperson Ema Popovic said the government is adding close to 1,500 family doctors in rural and northern areas as part of two different programs, which include bringing in foreign-trained doctors and providing education funds for students interested in working in those communities.
She said Ontario aims to connect everyone in the province to a primary care provider by 2029 as part of a $1.8-billion investment.
The province recently said there will be 'significant investments' in the Rural and Northern Physician Group Agreement primary care model. There will also be a new program called the Rural Emergency Medicine Coverage Investment Fund, which is meant to ensure appropriate doctor staffing levels year-round, and it replaces a now-expired temporary program that incentivized doctors to fill those shifts in rural and northern ERs.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 8, 2025.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Vancouver Sun
3 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Opinion: Exercise improves cancer survival — and a Canadian study leads the way
Last week, history was made in the world of cancer research — not with a new drug, but with something far more accessible and powerful: exercise. A landmark study published in The New England Journal of Medicine has confirmed, for the first time in a randomized controlled trial, that a structured exercise program can significantly improve survival for people treated for early-stage colon cancer. The Challenge trial showed that a three-year structured exercise program initiated after chemotherapy reduced the risk of cancer recurrence or death by 28 per cent, and improved overall survival by 37 per cent. Compared to health education alone, this was a 7.1 per cent improvement in the likelihood of being alive at the eight-year mark. Let that sink in: Brisk walking a few times a week can improve survival as much — or more — than many modern cancer drugs, with none of the side effects and at a fraction of the cost. A daily roundup of Opinion pieces from the Sun and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Informed Opinion will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. For years, observational studies hinted that physically active cancer survivors tended to live longer and feel better. But these studies were limited by their design — confounded by the fact that healthier people might be more likely to exercise. Now, the Challenge trial provides the gold-standard evidence we've been waiting for — led by Drs. Christopher Booth and Kerry Courneya through the Canadian Cancer Trials Group, this 'first-in-class' trial enrolled 889 patients in Canada, Australia, and the UK and confirmed that supervised exercise with behaviour change support improves both disease-free and overall survival, while enhancing physical functioning and quality of life. This has profound implications for cancer care — and for our health system. First, it's time to redefine 'treatment.' Cancer care has long focused on surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. But what happens after treatment is often an afterthought. Survivors may be left with side effects, fatigue, and fear of recurrence, and limited resources to support them. The Challenge trial flips that paradigm: recovery isn't passive. Exercise is not a 'nice to have' — it is a powerful, life-prolonging intervention. Second, access to structured exercise programs are not currently a standard-of-care for cancer survivors in Canada. That must change. These programs require relatively modest investment compared to the high costs of systemic therapies — yet they deliver survival benefits on par with expensive drugs. And unlike drugs, exercise can also reduce cardiovascular risk, improve mental health, and enhance overall quality of life. Third, this is a Canadian success story. The Challenge trial was conceived, led, and executed by Canadian investigators. The Canadian Cancer Society, together with global partners, funded this 15-year effort — a testament to the power of sustained investment in publicly funded clinical research. At a time when Canada's health research ecosystem faces financial strain, the success of Challenge highlights what's possible when we back bold ideas with the resources they deserve. Finally, the findings call on all of us — policymakers, cancer agencies and clinicians — to act. We must embed exercise into survivorship care across the country and simply telling people to exercise is not enough. This will require funding to support exercise professionals in cancer centres and the community, build incentives for survivor-focused programming, and eliminate structural barriers to participation. Survivorship care is not optional — it's essential. Of course, exercise is not a cure-all. Some patients may be unable to participate due to comorbidities or limitations. But for the majority, supervised aerobic activity like walking or cycling can and should be part of the care plan. Importantly, the Challenge program was designed to be adaptable and accessible — guided by behavioural science, delivered by trained consultants, and tailored to each patient's fitness level. We should applaud the Challenge investigators, the Canadian Cancer Trials Group, and the hundreds of patients who participated in this transformative trial. Their commitment will change how we support people after cancer — not just in Canada, but around the world. Now, it's our turn to rise to the challenge. Dr. Sharlene Gill is a medical oncologist at B.C. Cancer, professor of medicine at the University of B.C., and chair of the GI Disease Site for the Canadian Cancer Trials Group.


Global News
7 hours ago
- Global News
Cost of living has half of Canadian pet owners skipping vet visits: survey
Half of Canadian pet owners are skipping visits to the veterinarian's office because of financial concerns, a new survey shows. According to a survey conducted by PetSmart Charities of Canada and Gallup, half (50 per cent) of Canadian pet parents have either skipped or declined necessary veterinary care for their pets. Financial pressure was the leading cause of people skipping the vet's office, the survey of 2,033 dog and cat owners from the 10 provinces in Canada found. Of those who said they were declining or skipping those visits, 67 per cent said they did so because it was not affordable, they did not believe the services were worth the cost or a combination of both. 0:59 Global Okanagan Adopt A Pet: Diesel The rate of pet parents skipping the vet was higher among younger Canadians (59 per cent). Story continues below advertisement Even higher-income Canadians were facing financial pressures in dealing with pet care, with 27 per cent of pet owners who make more than $90,000 a year saying they have skipped vet visits. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Of the Canadians who declined pet care, 21 per cent said their veterinarian offered them a payment plan and 66 per cent said an interest-free plan could double what they are able to spend on life-saving care for their furry friends. Another major reason for Canadians skipping pet care is that their vet is simply too far away. Just under half (46 per cent) of those who travel under 10 kilometres to the veterinarian report skipping or declining care, but that figure rises to 54 per cent for those who travel more than 10 kilometres. 2:48 Global Peterborough's Shelter Pet Project June 6 Nearly one in five (18 per cent) pet owners said they rely on non-vets when their pet is sick. This includes consulting the internet, friends or pet professionals, such as trainers and groomers. Story continues below advertisement Four in 10 pet owners said they would be open to services like telemedicine or home visits by vets. 'These data suggest that services like community clinics and telemedicine — where permitted and available — could help make care more accessible, and many pet parents would use them if they could. But awareness and regulation of these services still vary across regions, pointing to opportunities for expanded infrastructure and support,' said Julie Ray, Gallup's managing editor for world news. A recent Ipsos poll showed that inflation and cost of living was the top issue for Canadians. That issue was considered the top domestic news story in Canada by 71 per cent of Canadians, according to the polling conducted exclusively for Global News on what people considered the biggest stories of this year. 4:44 Adopt a Pet: New Hope Dog Rescue fostering dogs for wildfire evacuees Results for the PetSmart Charities of Canada-Gallup State of Pet Care study are based on a combined web- and phone-based survey conducted with 2,033 dog and cat owners from the 10 provinces in Canada. Gallup surveyed 1,804 Canadian adults who indicated they currently owned at least one dog or cat via a web-based survey Nov. 28-Dec. 31, 2024. Gallup also surveyed an additional 229 dog and cat owners via a telephone survey Dec. 5-23, 2024, to reach pet owners who may not have access to the internet. For results based on the total sample of 2,033 Canadian dog and cat owners, the margin of sampling error is ±2.3 percentage points at the 95 per cent confidence level. Margins of error for subgroups are larger.


Cision Canada
8 hours ago
- Cision Canada
Cutting more than 40 front-line registered nurses at University Health Network will harm patient care, say nurses
TORONTO, June 11, 2025 /CNW/ - The Ontario Nurses' Association (ONA) is sounding the alarm as the University Health Network (UHN) cuts more than 40 registered nurses (RN) from front-line patient care, amidst an ongoing severe nursing shortage. In what UHN calls "system efficiency," RN cuts are happening on several units across Toronto General Hospital and Toronto Western Hospital including its hemodialysis unit and coronary intensive care unit. UHN is rejigging its general internal medicine unit to make a 28-bed alternate level of care (ALC) unit, with only one RN onsite to support registered practical nurses and personal support workers. "These cuts will be catastrophic for patients. At a time when we desperately need more registered nurses, not fewer, UHN has made the decision to cut the expert care provided by front-line RNs," says Erin Ariss, RN, and ONA Provincial President. "While UHN claims this is to improve the model of care, I think we all know that this is really about dollars and cents. There is no scenario where fewer RNs means better or more timely care for patients." Ontario has the lowest number of RNs per capita in the country, requiring more than 25,000 RNs just to reach the national average. Adds Ariss: "We can expect more RNs to leave due to understaffing, impossible workloads and mental distress because they can't provide the care that they know patients need and deserve." "The Ford government must step up and fully fund our public health-care system so such foolish RN cuts can be avoided. Employers must stop trying to balance the books at the expense of the expert, front-line care Ontarians need." ONA is the union representing more than 68,000 registered nurses and health-care professionals, as well as 18,000 nursing student affiliates, providing care in hospitals, long-term care facilities, public health, the community, clinics and industry.