A5 upgrade won't jeopardise net zero goals, court told
Counsel representing the Department for Infrastructure rejected claims it acted irrationally by approving the dual carriageway scheme without a proper action plan to ensure carbon emission targets are met.
The 53-mile project on the main corridor between Londonderry and Aughnacloy in County Tyrone was given the go-ahead by Stormont ministers in October last year.
With more than 50 deaths recorded on the A5 since 2006, campaigners have been pressing for the improvements to be carried out.
The upgrade, which forms part of a proposed key cross-border business route linking Dublin and the north west, has already been held up by previous legal actions.
A group of local residents, landowners and farmers are now mounting a fresh challenge against the decision to begin construction work.
The umbrella group, known as the Alternative A5 Alliance, contend it will breach legislative targets set out in the Climate Change (Northern Ireland) Act 2022 to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.
Part of the case centres on Planning Appeals Commission recommendations against proceeding with the scheme unless the department was satisfied it would not undermine those goals.
No reasonable authority could have concluded there was enough information to demonstrate the targets would still be met if the scheme was approved, according to the Alliance's case.
But responding for the department, Paul McLaughlin, KC, confirmed that none of the allegations were accepted.
"The obligation on the department was to act consistently with the climate targets," he said.
"In this case, the department did satisfy itself through thorough analysis that the authorisation of this project was consistent with the achievement of those targets."
Mr McLaughlin added: "At the very least, the authorisation of the scheme would not prejudice achievement of those targets.
"The result is that the department did not act irrationally, it had ample information through which to satisfy itself and it therefore did not act in breach of (the act)."
The hearing continues.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Plans to repair creek's 'poor' flood defences
Proposals to repair "poor" flood defences to protect a town and combat coastal erosion have been lodged as part of a multimillion-pound plan. Flood defences at Greatham Creek and Greenabella Marsh, off Tees Road, near Hartlepool, had been badly damaged since they were built in the late 19th Century, the Environment Agency said. The creek flooded in 2014 and has been damaged by drought, erosion and a rise in sea levels. But plans submitted to Hartlepool Borough Council said the repairs would "increase adaptability and resilience to climate change", as well as create a new habitat that would enrich biodiversity. Greatham Creek is home to various wildlife, including a seal colony and several species of bird. The Environment Agency's work, as part of their tidal flood risk management strategy, would include the breaching and re-alignment of Greenabella embankment and the reprofiling of the existing Greatham Creek embankment, including increasing the crest level. It would also see excavation works at Marsh House Farm to provide the clay material for the construction of new and repaired embankments. The EA report said the defences protected major chemical and petrochemical plants and infrastructure that were "important economically on a national scale". Hartlepool MP Jonathan Brash stressed the importance of the scheme and lobbied ministers over the issue in the House of Commons in March. He said while the defences had been maintained over the years, their age meant they could fail, putting "communities at severe risk". In a letter to Secretary of State for Environment Steve Reed, he said: "Without dedicated funding for the repair and future-proofing of the Greatham Creek flood defences, we risk undermining broader flood mitigation efforts in the area." The government said it was investing £2.65bn over two years to improve flood resilience. A decision is expected to be made on the proposals by Hartlepool Borough Council in November. Follow BBC Tees on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram. More on this story Environment Agency gives £68m for flood protection Spending on flood defences set to rise to record levels Flood defences mended for thousands Flood defence repair work complete Related internet links Environment Agency Hartlepool Borough Council Local Democracy Reporting Service
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Essex council asks High Court to remove migrants from hotel
An Essex council has asked the High Court to stop migrants being housed at a hotel, following weeks of protests. Epping Forest District Council applied on Tuesday for an interim High Court injunction to prevent the Bell Hotel being used to accommodate asylum seekers. The council is requesting that the ban take effect 14 days after the injunction is approved. It is citing "the clear risk of further escalating community tensions" and calls for the present situation "to be brought under control" urgently. The council is also requesting a declaration that using the Bell Hotel to house asylum seekers is not the same as using it as a regular hotel, and therefore is not permitted under planning rules. "The current situation cannot go on. If the Bell Hotel was a nightclub we could have closed it down long ago," said Cllr Chris Whitbread, leader of Epping Forest District Council. "So far as the council is aware, there is no criminal record checking of individuals who might only have been in the country a matter of days before being housed at the hotel." Cllr Whitbread pointed out there are five schools and a residential care home within the vicinity of the hotel, and that the use by the Home Office of the premises for asylum seekers could further escalate community tensions that are "already at a high", as well as "the risk of irreparable harm to the local community". "This will only increase with the start of the new school year. We are frustrated that the Home Office continues not to listen," he said. Weeks of protests Demonstrations began on 13 July after an asylum seeker was charged with allegedly attempting to kiss a 14-year-old girl. An Ethiopian man, who had only recently arrived on a small boat, has been charged with three counts of sexual assault of a girl. Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, 38, denies sexual assault and is due to stand trial this month. Essex Police recently implemented dispersal orders before some protests, allowing officers to order anyone suspected of causing anti-social behaviour to leave the area. The force said 25 people have been arrested in connection with the protests, and a total of 16 people have now been charged. 'Unprecedented' levels of disruption Epping Forest council said it has resorted to this latest action due to the "unprecedented levels of protest and disruption" in the community. The protests have placed the police "under severe pressure", as additional police officers had to be drafted in from other forces, it said. Read more: At a recent council meeting in July 2025, Epping Forest councillors voted unanimously to call on the Home Office to "immediately" close the Bell Hotel. They also called for the phased closure of the Phoenix Hotel in North Weald, which is also providing temporary accommodation for asylum seekers. "We are doing this on behalf of our local community. We are a small district council. We have tried to help the Home Office see the situation cannot go on, but central government is not listening," Cllr Whitbread said. "We should not have to take this fight to the High Court, but we are left with no choice. It is now up to the judge," he added.
E&E News
8 hours ago
- E&E News
Dems to EPA: Reinstate workers who signed dissent letter
House Democrats are calling on EPA to reinstate dozens of employees who raised alarm about the agency's direction under President Donald Trump. In a letter sent Monday to Administrator Lee Zeldin, more than 100 lawmakers, led by Rep. Sean Casten (D-Ill.), requested EPA bring back staffers who signed an open dissent letter that criticized Trump administration policies on climate change and scientific research as well as its treatment of the federal workforce. Soon after, several of those employees were placed on administrative leave by the agency and have been told they're under investigation. 'We are deeply concerned that placing these employees on administrative leave was a violation of their First Amendment rights,' the Democratic members said in the letter. Advertisement They added, 'The abrupt sidelining of these employees appears to be without consideration of the Agency's workload and the impact their removal from the workplace will have on public health and our environment.'
