‘I was afraid for my life.' Adriana Blake homicide Scott County trial continues
Our Quad Cities News was in the courtroom when Scott County Attorney Kelly Cunningham asked Blake about details of taking an Uber to her uncle's house. Blake said she wasn't sure about some of the details and that she doesn't remember many details from that day. Blake said Braet had her cell phone the majority of the time between Jan. 14-16, 2024, and Braet used her phone to call for an Uber.
Cunningham told the court that personal items were carried into the uncle's home and Blake admitted taking a DVR from Goodwin's home. That DVR contained recordings from video cameras around the property.
Blake said she didn't know the password to the DVR, so Braet told her to take it, and they would figure out the password later. She said she did it because she was afraid for her life.
Blake said Braet thought Blake's ankle monitor was listening to them and recording them.
Cunningham asked how a gas can was removed from the home of Braet's mother. Blake said it might have taken by Goodwin and Braet to use while they were snow-blowing the property. Blake said the can might have been in a Dodge Nitro SUV they drove.
A witness said the Nitro smelled like gas, like a gas can had tipped over in it. Blake admitted she may have driven the Nitro for days with the gas smell.
Blake said she and Braet recruited a person to work on the SUV to repair the heater and broken headlight so as not to draw the attention of police.
But Blake said she probably wanted to draw police attention to the situation. When Cunningham suggested that Blake could have called police, Blake said 'By the time they got there I'd be dead.' Blake said she was too afraid of Braet to call, even when she was with her uncle.
Blake said Braet had accidentally fired a gun in the house when the firearm was in a backpack, and she was afraid to lock him out.
Her uncle's testimony didn't mention a gunshot or accidental discharge of a gun. He testified earlier that Blake and he had a falling out and hadn't talked in months, but Blake told the court they had been communicating on Facebook during that time. There were no phone call records between her uncle and Blake until early Jan. 15, 2024. The uncle said he didn't know Braet, but Blake said the two had met at her grandmother's house and that her uncle's testimony was incorrect.
Blake said she had no idea how Smith's identification ended up in Blake's wallet and that Blake was surprised to see this during discovery. Blake said there was no body-camera footage of police finding the identification. She said she didn't dispute that it was in the car, but she had no idea how it got in her wallet.
Testimony in the trial continues Thursday.
Blake spoke quietly and sometimes see,d embarrassed as she described the events leading up to the deaths of Smith and Goodwin. The jurors watched and listened attentively along with more than 20 other people seated in the courtroom.
A fire and two deaths in 2024
In January 2024, Brian Goodwin, 44, and Amy Smith, 44, were found dead after a fire in a home on the 5200 block of Division Street. Both had been shot, investigators found.
Blake faces two charges of first-degree murder, a Class A felony; two charges of first-degree robbery, a Class B felony; two charges of assault while participating in a felony, a Class C felony; dominion and control of a firearm by a felon, a Class D felony; two charges of going armed with intent, a Class D felony; two charges of abuse of a corpse – mutilate/dismember to hide a crime, a Class C felony; and first-degree arson, a Class B felony; along with misdemeanor charges.
Braet will be tried separately.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Buzz Feed
2 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
37 Infuriating People Who Don't Think They're A Problem
This entitled mom who thinks the world (and this cake, apparently) revolves around her: This person, who can probably stop wondering why they're still on a dating app: This American who didn't like when their logic was used against them: The hotel that advertised this "Kids Eat Free" breakfast that was, uh, not free to say the least: The person who wrote this question, because everyone knows a shared ping pong table at work is way more important than a livable wage: This aunt who decided to hijack a relative's Facebook post announcing the birth of their literal child, because her great grandson turned 1 month old on the same day: The hotel owner who decided that "breakfast included with stay" means a Pop-Tart, some Sunny D, and a bag of Ruffles: This a-hole who is so out of touch, he literally responded to his friend being short on cash by saying, "Come have some LOBSTER with us": This girlypop who will not be impressed unless you break the bank to woo her: The passive-aggressive coworker who put up these signs about *checks notes* sniffling: This CAT shampoo that says "cat" in the title, in the instructions, AND has a massive cat on the bottle, but in teeny tiny font says, "for use on dogs only": This absolutely bonkers HOA with a policy requiring all dog owners to register their dogs' DNA for $86 each so they can test any poop they find in the neighborhood: Here's what the letter says:"Dog Registration Policy All dogs that live in or visit the [REDACTED] are required to be registered in a DNA database. This program is run by [REDACTED] for Poo Prints and works by creating a unique DNA profile for each dog in the community. The DNA is collected by swabbing the inside of the dog's mouth to collect cheek cells. The DNA profiles of all the dogs in the community are entered into a database stored by [REDACTED] Lab. When a waste sample is found, it is collected by our management company and sent to the lab. The DNA in the dog's feces is matched to a dog in the system and the violator is fined and charged for the cost of the analysis. New and existing dogs and visiting dogs of existing owners are required to be registered within 2 weeks of program implementation or occupancy or visit. The cost for the DNA program registration is $86.14 per dog. This cost covers the DNA swabbing, DNA collection kit, and database registration. Payment can be made with your regular monthly assessment. Pet Registration is [REDACTED] regular scheduled times at the community clubhouse or by appointment at [REDACTED]. Please email DNA Program Manager [REDACTED] with any questions or to make an appointment. FINE SCHEDULE First Fine = Analysis and test fee and postage Second Fine = $150 plus analysis fee and postage Third Fine = $150 plus analysis fee and postage Analysis fee and postage = $147.30 Failure to register a dog within 2 weeks of move in = Progressive fines starting at $150, up to $500 per month." This Uber driver who is putting both of their lives in jeopardy because he can't go ten minutes without watching a TikTok: This mom who got mad at her kid for "stealing her birthday weekend" (spoiler alert: it was her idea and she didn't remember, so she decided to make it everyone else's problem): This (hopefully ex) friend who was certainly not happy that his "bro" thoughtfully commissioned some art of him and his recently deceased dog instead of getting something more flashy for his birthday: The genius who asked for a photo of the item missing in this person's order (which they can't get a refund or replacement without): The bank employee who saved this girl's number when she opened an account and texted her to go dancing?? As if she'd find that anything other than wildly creepy?: This supervisor who apparently has never heard someone say, "Your poor planning does not constitute an emergency for me.": This Airbnb host who tried to charge a customer ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLARS for turning down the thermostat: The grinches, I mean, residents of this apartment complex who went to a building-wide game night and stole all the games and snacks so nobody else could have fun: This person who not only took three years to pay their friend back, but also did in in the pettiest way possible: This shopper who said, "Oh, you know where I should leave this raw chicken I picked up and no longer want? In the food warmer!" like an entitled a-hole: The landlord who is renting out a $1,200 apartment with NO KITCHEN: This landlord who agreed to give the tenant leaving the house a 24-hour warning before bringing new tenants for a decidedly did not: The chef who put sausage and peppers on the appetizer then proceeded to plate them like this: This waiter, who really tried to sneak an $87 tip from a customer on an order that was $38: For context, the tip was intended to be $7, and the order total was written as $45.23 on the receipt. The fast-food employee who read "extra cheese" and maliciously complied: This online shop that asks for tips at checkout, because apparently, we do that everywhere now: This Facebook Marketplace seller who had a customer driving 45 minutes to purchase a bookshelf, but decided to sell it to someone else while the original customer was on the way: This grocery store bakery that could really use an in-house editor: This Amtrak employee who said, "I can't see the problem, so there is none, bye!" This boss who asked an employee to work a 17-hour shift (3:30 p.m. to 8:30 a.m.) on the 4th of July so he didn't have to work for 12 hours: This company that sent out a whole ass package that definitely could've just been an email: The designer who wrapped a bunch of planks together, called it a table, and said, "Here, damn!": The person who left this warning on someone's car literalllllly right in front of the "visitors parking" sign: The neighbor who saw absolutely nothing wrong with blocking the street for several days so other people can't access their homes while they renovate their own: And finally, this person, who expressed feelings for their roommate (who is in a long-term relationship), was expectedly turned down, then decided to send them a cute little text out of the blue saying they need to move out:
Indianapolis Star
2 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
Indianapolis councilor Nick Roberts denies claims he groped 18-year-old woman against her will
Another Indianapolis city councilor is pushing back on accusations of sexual misconduct after a woman alleged that he groped her while she tried to push him away during a second date. An 18-year-old woman filed a report with Fishers police accusing City-County Council member Nick Roberts, 24, of grabbing her breasts and butt as she tried to pull away during a kiss on July 12 in downtown Fishers, according to allegations reported by Mirror Indy. Roberts, who has not been charged with a crime, denied the allegations in a Facebook video posted July 29, saying he did "absolutely nothing wrong." "I just wanted to completely deny the allegation of doing anything inappropriate," said Roberts, a Democrat. "Quite frankly, I'm not sure why this slanderous post was made about me, but it's incredibly hurtful not just to me but to my entire family and everyone who knows my character. I was raised to respect all people and I would never engage in unwanted physical contact with a woman without her consent." The allegation against Roberts — lauded by the Indiana Democratic Party as the youngest councilor to win in any major American city after his election in 2023 at just 23 years old — is the latest in a series of sexual misconduct claims made against Democrats in city and state politics. Roberts represents District 4, comprising parts of Castleton and Geist in northeast Marion County. Perhaps the most salient allegations are three women's accounts to IndyStar that Thomas Cook, a former top aide to Indianapolis Mayor Joe Hogsett, pressured them into unwanted sexual encounters while dangling career growth before them as their superior. Two of the women have also criticized Hogsett himself for sending text messages that made them uncomfortable and allowing Cook to work as an unpaid adviser during a 2023 mayoral campaign despite his knowledge of past issues. More recently, City-County Council member Keith Graves was accused of physical and sexual assault by a woman 30 years younger than him, according to an IndyStar investigation. Council Democrats have promised to make reforms to the city's sexual harassment policies and reporting systems, including an overhaul of the human resources department and the creation of an inspector general to independently investigate alleged policy violations. Critics have said they doubt their intentions, however, after Council President Vop Osili ordered the forcible removal of one Cook accuser from a council meeting. Indy politics: Joe Hogsett wants to move past harassment scandal. Many aren't sure he can The accounts from Roberts and the woman, whom Mirror Indy did not name because she claims she's a victim of sexual assault, are aligned in some respects. But what differs starkly is their interpretation of a kiss during a second date. The two agreed to meet for brunch on July 5 after they matched on the dating app Hinge, Roberts said. Both say the first date went well, according to her text messages and comments to Mirror Indy. As they prepared to leave, Roberts hugged her and kissed her on the cheek. She later texted Roberts to say she "had a really good time" and "especially appreciate[d] the kiss on the cheek," according to Roberts. Roberts responded that she could get another "(and maybe more)" next time, by which he says he meant a kiss on the lips. Although the woman told Mirror Indy the remark made her uncomfortable, she responded, "I hope so, I'd like that :)" — meaning another kiss on the cheek. The two met in downtown Fishers a week later, on July 12, for ice cream and an evening stroll along the Nickel Plate Trail. During that walk, Roberts admits that he kissed her on the lips for a few seconds. The woman claims that Roberts pulled her off onto a side trail, where he began kissing and groping her while she pushed him away and told him to stop. He eventually loosened his grip, she said, apparently because someone walked by along the main trail. Roberts denies her account of those events, he said. He told Mirror Indy that the pair walked onto a side trail and kissed for a few seconds. He claims only to have put his hands on her hips. "While on our walk, because of those text messages, I kissed her on the lips for a few seconds," he said in a written statement reviewed by IndyStar. "During the kiss, she did not push me away or ask me to stop. If she had done either, I would have stopped immediately. We then walked for approximately another 30 minutes, and we had a conversation with nothing out of the ordinary." While Roberts described the following moments as unremarkable, the woman told Mirror Indy she was visibly shaken afterward. When they arrived back at their cars, Roberts said, "she leaned in so I could give her a kiss on her cheek and we said goodnight." The woman decided to file a police report soon after the date. Fishers police told Mirror Indy that the investigation is ongoing and refused to comment further. Roberts said he's cooperating fully with the police investigation and will continue to focus on his work as a councilor. "I have faith in the process and believe the facts will prove my innocence," Roberts said in the Facebook video, "and I remain committed toward working for our council district in the meanwhile."
Epoch Times
2 hours ago
- Epoch Times
Labor Government Expands Under-16 Social Media Ban to YouTube
YouTube will be included in Australia's incoming social media ban, with the federal Labor government going back on an earlier policy. This means children under the age of 16 will be prohibited from having an active account on the video-sharing platform, along with other popular social media apps such as Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, and X from early December 2025.
