Scottish Labour MPs join rebellion against Starmer's welfare reforms
Nine Scottish Labour MPs have signed their names to a Commons bid to halt the Government's welfare reforms in their tracks, enough to threaten Sir Keir Starmer's majority.
Some 108 MPs' signatures appear on a reasoned amendment declining to give the welfare reform Bill a second reading when it returns to the Commons on July 1.
Among them are Scottish Labour MPs Patricia Ferguson, Elaine Stewart, Lilian Jones, Scott Arthur, Euan Stainbank, Brian Leishman, Richard Baker, Kirsteen Sullivan, and Tracy Gilbert.
The rebellion, the Prime Minister's largest yet, would be enough to defeat the Government's plans if opposition MPs joined the Labour rebels.
The amendment, published on Tuesday's order paper, notes there is a 'need for the reform of the social security system'.
But it calls for the Commons to decline to continue scrutinising the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill 'because the Government's own impact assessment estimates that 250,000 people will be pushed into poverty as a result of these provisions, including 50,000 children'.
There has been no formal consultation with disabled people who will be impacted by the changes, the MPs said.
They also point to the fact that an analysis of the impact of the reforms on employment from the Office for Budget Responsibility will not be published until the autumn.
Several Labour select committee chairs were among those who put their name to the amendment, including chairwoman of the Treasury committee Dame Meg Hillier, and Debbie Abrahams, chairwoman of the work and pensions select committee.
The MPs who signed the amendment 'want the Government to listen and to think again on this Bill', Ms Abrahams said.
She added: 'We are being asked to vote for this Bill before disabled people have been consulted, before impact assessments have been conducted and before we have given enough time to some of the Government's key policies – investing in the NHS, to the right to try, and to work coaching – (to) have been able to bed in.'
Vicky Foxcroft, the former Government whip who resigned over the welfare plans, has also signed the amendment.
Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle would need to select the amendment when MPs debate the legislation at its second reading.
Under the proposals in the Bill, ministers will limit eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limit the sickness-related element of Universal Credit (UC).
Ministers have previously said the reforms could save up to £5 billion a year.
Amid the growing threat of rebellion, Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden warned on Tuesday morning it would be a 'very serious thing' for Labour MPs to effectively vote down the Bill at its first major outing in the Commons.
He added: 'You're right to point out that this phrase reasoned amendment isn't just a small tweak. It would stop the legislative process if it succeeded.'
Mr McFadden insisted the growing costs of welfare were unsustainable, as a 'city the size of Leicester' was being added to the population on benefits each year.
'I don't think as the party of labour, the party of work, we can sit back and be relaxed about so many people going on to long-term sickness and disability benefits,' he added.
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall spent Monday night speaking to backbench MPs about the reforms at a meeting of the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP).
Those leaving the meeting insisted there was broad consensus in the room, with only few MPs standing up to make their opposition known.
The Work and Pensions Secretary told the PLP that the plans are 'rooted in fairness'.
She argued they are about ensuring the survival of the welfare state so there is always a safety net for those in need of it.
Ms Kendall added: 'Above all, they are about our belief that everyone can fulfil their potential and live their hopes and dreams when, collectively, we provide them with real opportunities and support.
'This is the better future we seek to build for our constituents and our country.'
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
27 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Britain to expand nuclear deterrent fleet of new fighter jets
The UK is set to buy a fleet of new fighter jets capable of carrying nuclear weapons, in what Downing Street has called the 'biggest strengthening' of Britain's posture 'in a generation'. Britain will buy 12 F35A jets and join Nato's airborne nuclear mission in the move, which was confirmed while Sir Keir Starmer is at the alliance's summit in The Hague. The jets, a variant of the F35Bs the UK already uses, can carry conventional weapons, but can also be equipped with nuclear bombs. The Prime Minister has said that the UK 'can no longer take peace for granted' and that the move shows ministers are 'investing in our national security'. Sir Keir is gathered with leaders of other Nato nations – including Donald Trump – in the Hague, where they are expected to formally agree a 5% of GDP defence and security spending pledge. The Prime Minister said: 'In an era of radical uncertainty we can no longer take peace for granted, which is why my government is investing in our national security, ensuring our armed forces have the equipment they need and communities up and down the country reap the benefits from our defence dividend.' The decision on the jets represents a victory for the Royal Air Force, which has long pushed for a return of its nuclear capabilities since the last British air-dropped nuclear weapon was withdrawn from service after the end of the Cold War. Since then, the UK's nuclear deterrent has been carried exclusively by the Royal Navy's submarines, which the Government has also promised to invest in renewing with four new vessels. Nato's nuclear mission involves allied aircraft being equipped with American B61 bombs stockpiled in Europe. Seven nations currently contribute so-called 'dual capability aircraft' to Nato's nuclear mission, but the use of nuclear weapons would require the authorisation of the alliance's nuclear planning group as well as the US president and British prime minister. Alongside the nuclear announcement, the UK is set to provide 350 air defence missiles to Ukraine as Sir Keir and Defence Secretary John Healey push for Nato to provide Kyiv with further support. The delivery will be funded by £70 million raised from the interest on seized Russian assets. Sir Keir said: 'Russia, not Ukraine, should pay the price for Putin's barbaric and illegal war, so it is only right we use the proceeds from seized Russian assets to ensure Ukraine has the air defence it needs.' Mr Trump is also among the world leaders at the summit, and told reporters on the way to the Netherlands that it would depend 'on your definition' when asked if he would commit to Nato's Article 5, which requires members to defend each other from attack. Wednesday is expected to see Nato allies formally sign up to the target of spending 5% of the GDP on defence. It is a significant jump from the current 2% Nato target, and details of what counts towards it are due to be set out during this week's summit, but it is likely to include spending on energy and border security as well as intelligence agencies. On Tuesday, Sir Keir said that the UK would stick to its commitment not to raise taxes to reach the new target. 'Clearly we've got commitments in our manifesto about not making tax rises on working people and we will stick to our manifesto commitments,' the Prime Minister told reporters in the Netherlands.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Here's what we learned from John Curtice's new polling report
It comes in response to figures in a new report penned by Professor John Curtice and published by the National Centre for Social Research as part of the latest British Social Attitudes survey, released on Wednesday. Curtice's report, titled Repairing Britain, found that almost two-thirds of the public (63%) were likely to vote to rejoin the European Union in a second referendum. When the public are given more than a binary option, Curtice reported that 'only 21% say that the UK should be outside the EU, the lowest proportion to do so since 2008'. READ MORE: Pressure piles on Anas Sarwar as 10th Scottish Labour MP joins rebellion The polling expert further reported that the 'latest survey shows that as many as 69% believe that the economy is worse off as a result of Brexit, well up on the 40% who anticipated such an outcome in 2015'. He noted that Labour were aiming to win over pro-Brexit voters who had backed Boris Johnson in the 2019 General Election, but added: 'However, Labour's support came overwhelmingly from those who say they would vote to rejoin the EU.' Elsewhere, a majority of the UK public (61%) said they believed that the tax burden on people with low incomes was 'too high', up nine points on 2016. Conversely, a plurality (44%) said that the tax burden on the UK's highest earners was too low, up ten points on 2016. Only one in 10 UK adults support spending less on disability benefits (Image: PA) The report also said that, by 45% to 11%, people think the UK Government should spend more – not less – on disability benefits. However, the support for spending more is at a 'record low', down 22 points on 2017. The Labour Government is currently facing down the biggest rebellion of Prime Minister Keir Starmer's leadership, with more than 100 MPs opposing plans to cut disability benefit spending by £5 billion per year. Elsewhere, the report found: A record 26% of people say they are struggling to live on their current income, up from 16% before the pandemic. Satisfaction with the health service has plummeted in the wake of the pandemic. A record 59% are now dissatisfied with the NHS, compared with just 25% in 2019. In total, 40% of people now support increasing taxes and spending more on health, education, and social benefits, down from 55% in early 2023. However, this is still above the 31% support reported in 2010, when taxes were a lower proportion of GDP than currently. 58% of those who voted Labour in 2024 are in favour of increasing taxes to spend more on health, education and social benefits. 'NIMBYism' is on the rise: the proportion of people who support building more homes in their local area has fallen from 57% in 2018 to 41%. Conversely, 32% are opposed, up from 23% over the same period. SNP MSP Clare Adamson said: "This report shows what we all already know – that Britain is broken beyond repair. "Whether it's on EU membership, taxation, or cuts to welfare, the UK Government and the rest of the political bubble is totally out of step with voters. "What Scotland really needs isn't a change of Government in Edinburgh or London – it's a full change of the system with independence." Scottish Green co-leader Patrick Harvie also took aim at Labour over Brexit, saying there was 'no question' that leaving the EU had contributed to 'higher bills, poorer services, and a struggling economy'. READ MORE: Jonathon Shafi: West's imperial arrogance takes propaganda to farcical levels 'It's no surprise that an overwhelming majority across the UK now support rejoining the EU,' he went on. 'Yet despite this, Labour refuses to acknowledge the harm it's done and begin taking the urgent action we need to reverse it. 'Like on so many issues, whether it be immigration, tax or Brexit, they ignore the public and the good of the country in order to pander to a small number of right-wing newspapers and Reform voters.' The campaign group Yes for EU said the high support for rejoining the EU was 'no surprise', with a spokesperson adding: 'What is surprising, indeed scandalous, is that the UK Labour Government continues to reject calls to rejoin.' Scottish Green MSP Ross Greer further hit out at Labour over taxation, calling for a more progressive UK system. 'Labour claim there isn't enough money to end cruel policies like the two-child benefit cap and rape clause, yet in the recently published Rich List we saw that the top 1% increase their net worth yet again,' he said. 'Working and middle class people are struggling with the cost of living, but super-rich elites are doing better than ever. Scottish Green MSP Ross Greer (Image: NQ) 'Keir Starmer was elected on a commitment to end at least one tax avoidance loophole enjoyed by some of these billionaires, but he dropped that as soon as he got the keys to Downing Street and instead he is slashing the support provided to disabled people to 'balance the books'.' Curtice, a senior research fellow at the National Centre for Social Research, said: 'The public are well aware of Britain's problems – not least those of a failing health service and an economy in which many are struggling to make ends meet. Yet rather than turning their back on the state, for the most part, the public are still inclined to look to government to provide solutions. And while they feel that most people on low and middle incomes are already paying enough tax, they suspect that some of the better off could pay more. 'As a result, while voters have perhaps now begun to react against the marked increase in the size of the state during the last Parliament, that reaction is still, it seems, relatively muted – and especially so among those who voted Labour. READ MORE: Tommy Sheppard: SNP must woo voters to turn our indy hopes into reality 'Yet this does not mean that voters are necessarily ready to back the various remedies that Labour have been offering to overcome the country's difficulties. They are not necessarily prepared to embrace a dash for more infrastructure building, including perhaps not least anything that appears in their own backyard. 'Tightening up on disability benefits is potentially controversial too, as the government has already discovered. 'The political difficulty with these policies is there are potentially identifiable winners and losers, and it is often the losers who shout the loudest. Pursuing economic growth rather than tax rises as the route out of fiscal constraint will not necessarily be the easier path for Labour to tread.'
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Using an election as plebiscite referendum is just not going to fly
Most of us, I bet. But fun as it is to see those who only a few short years ago were proclaiming themselves to be 'All4Unity' – and now failing to find much unity among themselves – Galloway endorsing the right of voters in Scotland to choose to be independent is no longer the political showstopper that it could have been a couple of decades ago. Far more predictable was Labour minister Douglas Alexander popping up on BBC Scotland at the weekend and refusing – despite being asked three times – to say how Scotland can voluntarily leave the Union should they wish. READ MORE: Palestine Action activist rejects Home Secretary's Glasgow protest claim It's the question which is guaranteed to leave any Unionist spokesperson spinning towards the ground belching puffs of acrid smoke in their wake, because there's really no good answer they can give. Which of course is all the more reason to keep asking it. The fact is that most Scots, pro-independence or not, accept without question our right to self-determination. Implying or even stating that no such right exists, or dodging the question as Alexander tried to do, only serves to get right up people's noses. While it's not a strategy for independence, it's nevertheless a useful way to put some people on the spot and get the people of Scotland in general talking about the rights and wrongs of the matter. And let's face it, the more people who accept our right to choose independence and who start to consider that the question deserves to be put again, the more likely it is to happen. Short of a 'black swan' event which turns people so decisively against the Union that any vote becomes redundant, independence will probably only happen through a standalone referendum to begin a legal process of becoming independent. And even in the unlikely event of that black swan flying overhead, you'd still likely want a referendum to ratify and legitimise the outcome. So, having said that, let's recognise that using an election as a plebiscite referendum is just not going to fly. Not now. Probably not ever. I'm always puzzled how so many who argue that we absolutely must take this route can argue with 100% certainty that any UK government will say no to another referendum on independence, yet can still believe the same UK government would just roll over and say yes to actual independence in the face of a positive election result. The truth is this – in the unlikely event of being able to win 50% of the vote in a multi-party election, the best anyone in the UK Government will ever do is congratulate us on our result. It will only have effect in their eyes if we fall short, when in a twist on that classic Edinburgh expression, it will be a case of 'you'll have had your referendum'. And independence then really will be off the agenda for another generation. (Image: Supplied) What should matter more to independence supporters than what Westminster thinks is what the Scottish people think. And by that, I mean what people in Scotland really think, rather than what we might wish they thought instead. If anyone spends any time talking to voters in Scotland just now about what is important to them, they would find that even independence supporters are still overwhelmingly going to be voting first and foremost for a government, no matter what anyone else might want them to do. In the present circumstances, if the SNP were to try to use the next Scottish Parliament election as a proxy referendum, then you can probably say hello to a thumping Unionist majority at Holyrood. That's not because there's a thumping majority or anything like it out there for the Union, because there isn't. Rather, it'll be because most people – even independence supporters – will rightly conclude that there are lots of other pressing issues also needing decided. By standing on a platform not of 'independence, nothing less' but instead 'independence and nothing else', Scotland's main pro-independence party would be showing that it was no longer capable of being both pro-independence and being a government at the same time. And good luck getting Scotland to independence without having a pro-independence Scottish Government taking decisions in Scotland. There are a couple of reasons why Alex Salmond embraced the idea of a pre-legislative referendum as part of his moves to professionalise the SNP that he led. (Image: JASON REDMOND) Firstly, it was to help decouple independence supporters from their (then) loyalty to the Labour Party. But also, it was to allow people who wanted SNP representation to vote for the party, knowing that if it came to it, independence could be only decided later on in a separate vote for that purpose. While it was that first group who helped take Scotland so close in 2014, it was the second group of 'soft' SNP supporters who were instrumental in the 2011 SNP landslide which made that referendum possible at all. It was a shrewd move from a man who knew exactly what he was doing when he did it. And it was informed by the hard data that had come in from SNP canvassers all over the country, which had started to show that support for independence was not always the same as support for the SNP and vice versa. So by all means let a thousand flowers bloom in our strategic thinking. But let us always be realistic, grounded in reality and looking outwards to those we still need to persuade, rather than trying to set a political course based solely on what might make us feel good personally.
