logo
Muhammad Yunus wants women's rights in Bangladesh. First rein in Islamic radicals

Muhammad Yunus wants women's rights in Bangladesh. First rein in Islamic radicals

The Print19-05-2025

That one common mistake is the inability or, in some cases, the lack of intention to rein in the radicals.
But like most of his predecessors, from Sheikh Mujibur Rahman to Sheikh Hasina, Yunus has made the one mistake that makes it difficult not only to give women equal rights, but also to bring stability to Bangladesh's turbulent society and politics.
Muhammad Yunus is a man in a hurry. At 84, he doesn't just want history to remember him as the premier who tried to steer Bangladesh from chaos to stability after the fall of the Sheikh Hasina government on 5 August 2024. He also wants to be seen as a modern leader in a Muslim-majority country who tried to give Bangladeshi women equal rights, including those related to property.
Also Read: After Operation Sindoor, why India must keep an eye on Bangladesh too
The veil comes off
On 19 April 2025, the Women's Affairs Reform Commission—set up by the Yunus administration last November to prepare a report on ways to give Bangladeshi women equal rights and reduce discrimination—submitted 433 recommendations to the government.
Among the recommendations were the introduction of equal property rights for women, a uniform family code, a separate and permanent women's affairs commission, elimination of all discrimination in public spaces and family laws, legal recognition for sex and domestic workers, and increasing the total number of seats in parliament, with half reserved for women via direct election.
After members of the commission submitted the report to Yunus at the state guest house Jamuna in Dhaka, he directed the concerned ministries and divisions to quickly implement those recommendations that could be actioned right away. He also said the recommendations would be taken up with all political parties through the National Consensus Commission.
It is not as if the 10-member Women's Affairs Reform Commission had expected these recommendations to face no pushback once out in the public domain. Women's rights activist and commission chief Shireen Parveen Haque told the Bangladeshi media outlet New Age that these recommendations might ignite some controversies, which the commission would welcome, as people should discuss these issues. She added that the commission had made the recommendations after considering the constitution, laws, policies, institutions and programmes, and 15 specific issues.
Haque also said some of the recommendations could be implemented during the tenure of the interim government, some would remain for the next government to execute, while some were quite simply the expectations and dreams of the women's rights movement in Bangladesh.
Others, meanwhile, pointed to a deepening hostility on the ground.
A local media report quoted Fauzia Moslem, president of Bangladesh Mahila Parishad, a women's rights organisation, as saying that misogyny has become public since the mass uprising that led to the fall of the Sheikh Hasina government.
'It was inconspicuous before. Violence was present before, with no political rights for women, no social rights. But a moral policing has been underway since the uprising due to misogyny. 'You can't wear such dresses, can't walk like this, can't put on tip (bindi), you'll be beaten to death if you play football, houses would be demolished',' she said.
Expectedly, the recommendations ignited heated debates. Popular Bangladeshi YouTuber Pinaki Bhattacharya called Haque and other members of the commission Islamophobes and said Yunus has an inherent bias towards NGOs.
'Have you ever seen Yunus so excited about recommendations from any other commission apart from the women's commission? He has said the recommendations should be printed and distributed as pamphlets. If that happens and people get to read it, government officials will be thrashed on the street,' he said.
Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami Ameer Shafiqur Rahman said some of the recommendations made by the women's commission would destroy the values of all religions and that the people of Bangladesh would reject them. 'Some of the recommendations are clear violations of the Quran and Hadith,' Rahman added.
While such pushback was expected, what drew global attention were the events of 3 May, when thousands of supporters of Hefazat-e-Islam, a powerful radical group in Bangladesh, rallied in Dhaka to demand the scrapping of the commission, claiming it conflicted with Islamic principles.
'More than 20,000 followers of the group rallied near Dhaka University, some carrying banners and placards reading 'Say no to Western laws on our women, rise up Bangladesh,'' an AP report said.
Threatening mass agitation, members of Islamist parties like Jatiya Olama Mashayekh Aemma Parishad warned that the Yunus-led government would face severe consequences and would not get 'even five minutes to escape' if it proceeded with the reforms.
Also Read: How Pakistan envoy's exit from Bangladesh amid 'honeytrap scandal' risks the 2 nations' improving ties
Radicals' day out
While Yunus's plans to bring in equal rights for the women of Bangladesh are indeed commendable, expecting that his government would be able to implement such reforms while giving a free rein to Islamists defies logic.
When Yunus took over as caretaker of the interim government, he was expected to first address the chaos that had gripped the country and then ready it for the next round of elections by bringing in electoral reforms. Instead, Yunus has postponed elections and banned Sheikh Hasina's party Awami League. Worse, he has given a rather long rope to the radical elements in Bangladeshi society that Hasina had, to some degree, reined in.
Bangladeshi journalist Sahidul Hasan Khokon told ThePrint that Jamaat-e-Islami and its student wing, Islami Chhatra Shibir—which had played a central role in the mass uprising against the Hasina government—have been empowered by the interim government to such an extent that they are behind most of the important decisions the administration now takes. Khokon pointed to the incarceration of popular Hindu religious leader Chinmoy Krishna Das Brahmachari and the continuing attacks on minorities, along with the government's inaction or inability to stop them.
A high-level intelligence source told me that there has been a rejig in the Bangladeshi army, and Islamist officers have been promoted by the Yunus administration. Earlier this year, Bangladesh Army chief General Waker-uz-Zaman said there is political rot and anarchy within the country and warned Islamist forces to stand down or else the country's freedom would be at risk.
If Yunus wants Bangladeshi women to enjoy equal rights as men, he would have to address growing radicalism in his country first. Running with the hare and hunting with the hounds won't help.
Deep Halder is an author and a contributing editor at ThePrint. He tweets @deepscribble. Views are personal.
(Edited by Asavari Singh)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Disbanding Awami League Could Lead To Identity Crisis For Bangladesh
Disbanding Awami League Could Lead To Identity Crisis For Bangladesh

News18

time34 minutes ago

  • News18

Disbanding Awami League Could Lead To Identity Crisis For Bangladesh

Last Updated: Awami League led a long political struggle for Bangladesh's emancipation. By rejecting this legacy, Bangladesh might end up shooting itself in the foot On May 10, 2025, the interim government in Bangladesh further amended the International Crimes (Tribunals) Act, 1973 through ordinance no. 20, 2025. It thus authorised the tribunal to suspend and prohibit the activities of any political party (including its front organisations), cancel its registration and confiscate its property if found guilty of aiding, inciting or conspiring in any crimes mentioned in the statute. The Yunus administration, however, was unwilling to wait for the tribunal's verdict. On the same day, it hastily announced a ban on all activities of Awami League, pending the disposal of cases against it. On May 8, the Yunus administration had created a second three-member tribunal with former High Court judge Nazrul Islam Chowdhury as its chairman. The existing three-member tribunal under Justice Mohammed Ghulam Murtaza Mazumdar has been re-designated as International Crimes Tribunal-I (ICT-I). The interim government has redefined the objective of the tribunal, established on March 25, 2010. Its original purpose was to prosecute and punish those guilty of genocide and crimes against humanity during the Bangladesh Liberation War, 1971. A second tribunal was created on March 22, 2012 to expedite pending trials, but the two were merged on September 15, 2015, after the caseload decreased significantly. The tribunal was essentially created by Sheikh Hasina's administration (though its conception dates back to her father Mujibur Rahman's government). Ironically, she now finds herself subject to its scrutiny. There was initial disagreement on whether approximately 1,400 lives lost in police firing during anti-quota protests (15 July to 5 August 2024) constituted genocide. The father of a student belonging to Students Against Discrimination filed a complaint with the ICT against nine people, including deposed Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina. Professor Asif Nazrul, Advisor on Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs in the interim government, opined that the July killings qualified for trial by the tribunal. The tribunal had previously ruled that crimes against humanity need not be specific to war. Banning political parties is not new in Bangladesh. Sheikh Mujibur Rahman initiated this practice. Not content with Awami League's overwhelming majority (307 out of 315 seats) in Bangladesh's first general election (March 7, 1973), Mujib amended the 1972 Constitution on January 25, 1975, changing the government from parliamentary to presidential. Mujib, as Marcus Franda (1982) states, 'was vested with all executive power and authorized to declare Bangladesh as a one-party state. In subsequent months he abolished all political parties, stripped the supreme court of its powers to enforce fundamental rights, created special courts and tribunals directly answerable to him, and closed down all but four daily newspapers (two in English, and two in Bengali). All four of the newspapers that were allowed to exist were either government or party owned". (Bangladesh: The First Decade, p. 55). On June 6, 1975, 40 days before his assassination in a coup, Mujib formally ended multiparty democracy in Bangladesh by establishing one-party rule under Bangladesh Krishak Sramik Awami League (BKSAL). Bangladesh subsequently fell under the rule of military dictators General Ziaur Rahman and General H.M. Ershad, who governed for 15 years combined. In the last 50 years, Bangladesh has experienced coups, military dictatorships, controversial elections, political violence, and attempts to create an Islamist state. Even the two-party democracy in place since 1991 devolved into confrontational politics, often dubbed the 'battle of the Begums". In 2007, under the caretaker government of President Iajuddin Ahmed, a controversial 'minus two" formula was devised to restore democracy by excluding both Sheikh Hasina and Begum Khaleda Zia from politics. Both leaders were arrested. This unpopular formula faced backlash and was abandoned. It resurfaced recently when BNP General Secretary Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir mentioned it disapprovingly. III Both Sheikh Mujib and Sheikh Hasina exhibited authoritarian tendencies, seeking to eliminate political opponents. Their personalities often overshadowed the party itself. However, the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) has demonstrated similar tendencies. When in power (e.g., 1991-96 and 2001-06), the BNP attempted to manipulate elections, leading to the introduction of caretaker governments, demonstrating the immaturity of Bangladeshi democracy. Yet, banning Awami League is different. It threatens Bangladesh's identity. Ahmed Sofa (1943-2001), the late Bangladeshi essayist, poet and public intellectual, suggested that while Awami League's triumph might signify the victory of a few leaders, its defeat represents a loss for all of Bangladesh (Bangali Musalmaner Mon, p. 17). This is due to the party's historical roots in the struggle of the people of East Bengal. Sofa acknowledged Awami League's shortcomings, including its superficial secularism, which he considered a political tool incapable of addressing obscurantism and dogmatism within Muslim society, hindering Bangladesh's social progress. Nevertheless, Awami League spearheaded nation-building in East Pakistan, culminating in Bangladesh's independence. Founded as Awami Muslim League Party on 23 June 1949 under Maulana Abdul Hamid Khan Bhashani (1880-1976), its initial leadership comprised dissidents from the Pakistan Muslim League (formerly All India Muslim League). Before partition, the All India Muslim League prioritised the creation of Pakistan, neglecting governance issues that later plagued the new state. The party became an exclusive clique, restricting membership, which fuelled discord. The East Pakistan Awami Muslim League (estd. 1949) was among several dissident parties emerging from the Muslim League. By the end of 1949, according to Shyamali Ghosh (1990), around 20 opposition parties existed in Pakistan, including 13 in Punjab, eight formed by dissident Muslim Leaguers (The Awami League 1949-1971, p. 2). The Awami Muslim League's influence grew. In the 1954 provincial elections, its alliance with the Krishak Sramik Party, led by A.K. Fazlul Huq, and other smaller parties, campaigning on a 21-point demand (commemorating the Bengali language martyrs of 21 February 1952), decisively defeated the Muslim League, which secured only nine seats compared to the United Front's 229. The United Front's manifesto, essentially Awami Muslim League's charter of demands, was condensed from 42 to 21 points by journalist and lawyer Abul Mansur Ahmad. 'Neither in the manifesto of Awami League nor in that of Krishak Sramik Party", notes Justice Muhammad Munir (1979), 'was there any reference to Islam or the Quran and Sunnah" (From Jinnah to Zia, p. xvii). At its Dacca session from October 21-23, 1955, Awami Muslim League dropped 'Muslim" from its name. The Awami League (1956) advocated for abolishing separate electorates, a colonial legacy. Prime Minister H.S. Suhrawardy, leading a coalition of Awami League and the Republican Party, piloted the Joint Electorate Bill on 10 October 1956. Joint electorates were introduced in East Pakistan, but separate electorates remained in the west, highlighting Pakistan's internal divisions. 'In spite of economic backwardness", comments Badruddin Umar, 'East Bengal was an advanced region in respect of social, cultural and political developments. Owing to its cultural and political backwardness and predominantly feudal composition of leadership in West Pakistan they cling to old prejudices" (The Emergence of Bangladesh Vol-1, p. 329). On 3 April 1957, the East Pakistan Legislative Assembly adopted a resolution on regional autonomy, moved by Mohiuddin Ahmad of Awami League and addressed by his party colleague and United Front minister Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. Mujib described regional autonomy as crucial for East Bengal. The resolution demanded full autonomy for East Pakistan except for currency, foreign affairs, and defence, which would remain with the Centre. Mujib elaborated on regional autonomy and democracy in his booklet 'Six-Point Formula — Our Right to Live" (March 1966), published during Field Marshal Ayub Khan's military dictatorship (1958-69) after the 1965 Indo-Pakistani War. This Six-Point Formula became Awami League's programme. Ayub Khan attempted to implicate Mujib in the Agartala Conspiracy Case (1968), alleging collusion with India to divide Pakistan. However, he withdrew the case under pressure from public agitation in East Pakistan, compounded by his precarious position in West Pakistan. The 1969 agitations in East Bengal foreshadowed the 1971 uprising. Awami League thus prepared the ground for Bangladesh's independence. It won 167 of 169 East Bengal seats in the 1970 National Assembly elections (total strength 313). Whether Bangladesh would have emerged if Yahya Khan had allowed Mujib to become Prime Minister is debatable. However, the March 1971 uprising demonstrated East Bengal's determination to achieve sovereignty, with or without Mujib, who was imprisoned in Mianwali jail in West Pakistan. top videos View all Awami League's governance has been authoritarian at times, but so has that of the BNP and General Ershad. In a democracy, parties naturally cycle in and out of power. However, banning Awami League creates an identity crisis for Bangladesh. Denying its historical heritage could lead the nation in unpredictable directions. The writer is the author of 'The Microphone Men: How Orators Created a Modern India' (2019) and an independent researcher based in New Delhi. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely that of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views. Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: June 11, 2025, 14:32 IST News opinion Opinion | Disbanding Awami League Could Lead To Identity Crisis For Bangladesh

Full speech: Jaishankar in Europe, stuns West with straight talk- 'Many problems of…'
Full speech: Jaishankar in Europe, stuns West with straight talk- 'Many problems of…'

Hindustan Times

time44 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Full speech: Jaishankar in Europe, stuns West with straight talk- 'Many problems of…'

India's foreign minister Dr. S. Jaishankar addressed the Indian community in Belgium and Luxembourg, where he highlighted the changing geopolitical landscape of Europe. The top Indian diplomat had a sharp message on how Europe should deal with its problems, financial, political or otherwise. Jaishankar also highlighted the India-EU ties and also apprised the community about India's recent Operation Sindoor. Watch his full briefing here.

11 years of Modi govt full of lies, unfulfilled promises: Rajasthan LoP Tika Ram Jully
11 years of Modi govt full of lies, unfulfilled promises: Rajasthan LoP Tika Ram Jully

India Gazette

timean hour ago

  • India Gazette

11 years of Modi govt full of lies, unfulfilled promises: Rajasthan LoP Tika Ram Jully

Jaipur (Rajasthan) [India], June 11 (ANI): On the 11th anniversary of the Modi government, Tika Ram Jully, leader of the Opposition in the Rajasthan Legislative Assembly, slammed the government, saying that the past 11 years have been filled with lies, mislead, and harassment of the common man. Jully criticised the government for failing to fulfil its promises, including providing 2 crore jobs every year, depositing Rs 15 lakh in people's accounts, bringing back black money, cleaning the River Ganga, and making diesel, petrol, and LPG cheaper. While speaking to ANI on Wednesday, Jully said, 'Look, the 11 years of Modi ji have been full of lies, misleading the public, harassing the common man. The promises made to the public, whether it is the promise of giving 2 crore jobs every year, or the promise of depositing 15 lakhs in the accounts, or the promise of bringing back black money within 100 days, or the talk of cleaning the Ganga Maayya, or the talk of making diesel, petrol and LPG cheaper, or the talk of making the dollar equal to the rupee. Or the talk of ending corruption and terrorism, all remained unfulfilled. Whether it is doubling the income of farmers, giving concrete houses to every poor, hundreds of such promises were made by Modi ji, none of which were fulfilled. Not even one came to reality.' The Leader of Opposition in Rajasthan also questioned the government's focus on 2047, saying that the public had given them only 5 years to work. 'Now they have started talking about who has seen 2047. The public had given you 5 years; you have to work within that. Today, you have started talking about 2047, but the public did not give you the opportunity to 2047. Tell us your action plan for the next 5 years, so that the public gets relief,' Jully demanded. Julie further criticised the government's foreign policy, citing Operation Sindoor and the treatment of Indians in the US. The LoP also praised Indira Gandhi's courage, implying that the current government lacks the same level of leadership. 'You saw Operation Sindoor, no country in the world stood with us. Modi ji did so many foreign trips in 11 years, despite that, not even a single country stood with us. Now our children who have gone to America they being treated like terrorists. Pakistan is getting support everywhere in the world, but people are not standing with us. This is a serious issue; only talk will not work, you will have to show it by working. One should have courage like Indira Gandhi ji,' he said. (ANI)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store