logo
From lip balm to sneakers, here's how Trump's China tariffs could raise prices

From lip balm to sneakers, here's how Trump's China tariffs could raise prices

NBC News05-02-2025

U.S. consumers could start seeing price hikes on a wide variety of goods made in China after the United States began collecting a 10% tariff Tuesday on all Chinese imports, reigniting a trade war between the two countries that's at r isk of accelerating.
President Donald Trump said he was instituting the tariffs until China took action to reduce the flow of fentanyl into the United States. China r esponded by announcing plans to put its own tariffs next week on certain U.S. products, including coal, oil, agricultural machinery and pickup trucks.
While the 10% tariff is smaller than the 60% tariff Trump had threatened during his campaign, investors and industry analysts expect the added cost to have a ripple effect across certain industries that rely heavily on Chinese manufacturing. It has also raised fears among retailers that it could be just the opening salvo in a prolonged tit-for-tat with China.
'There's just a lot of uncertainty about how to price goods, because it's a 10% tariff now on top of whatever duties we're already paying, but what will it be a month from now or two months from now?' said Matt Priest, president of the Footwear Distributors and Retailers of America. Priest said he was hearing a lot of confusion from companies at a trade show he was attending Tuesday in New York.
'It's almost impossible to confidently cost your goods without knowing where this duty plane will land,' he said.
Footwear
With more than half of footwear sold in the United States coming from China, Priest said, consumers are likely to see an increase in shoe prices, though some of the cost will be absorbed by retailers and other businesses throughout the supply chain. The typical sneaker already has around a 20% tariff on it, including a 7.5% tariff added during Trump's last term. With the additional 10% tariff, a midrange sneaker could ultimately have $18 to $20 added to the total cost, he said.
'This is a movie we've seen before, and it doesn't bring jobs back to the U.S., and it does raise costs, so it's a challenge for us to see the end game or the point,' Priest said. 'We do want to work with the administration to tamp down inflation — that was the president's mandate, and we agree with it — but this is not the way to go about doing that.'
Tariffs are paid by the U.S. company importing the goods from China, such as retailers or wholesalers, when those goods arrive at U.S. ports. Those companies will then have to decide whether to pass the higher costs on to consumers by raising prices or absorb the cost by taking lower profits or trying to cut costs elsewhere.
China's ret a liatory ta riffs on around $24 billion worth of U.S. products could also have an impact on U.S. workers if companies see significant declines in sales from Chinese customers.
China's countermoves
China also said it was launching an antitrust investigation into Google and took aim at two other U.S. companies: gene sequencing maker Illumina Inc. and PVH Group, the owner of the Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger brands, placing them on a blacklist limiting their ability to sell their products there.
But China's moves were more limited in scope than some companies had feared: They apply to around 14% of U.S. exports to China, while Trump's tariffs apply to all goods sold in the United States from China.
That could be an effort by China to send a signal that it is willing to target specific U.S. companies without escalating a trade war too quickly.
'The measures are fairly modest, at least relative to U.S. moves, and have clearly been calibrated to try to send a message to the U.S. (and domestic audiences) without inflicting too much damage,' Julian Evans-Pritchard, head of China economics at Capital Economics, wrote in an analysis note. 'But there is a risk that retaliation backfires by encouraging Trump to escalate tariffs further.'
On the campaign trail, Trump made tariffs central to his plan to revive the U.S. economy, arguing that putting significant duties on imports would encourage companies to move their manufacturing plants to the United States and protect industries from cheaper overseas competition. Trump has also proposed using revenue from tariffs to pay for other policy priorities.
But economists and businesses have warned that tariffs would be likely to have little effect on driving manufacturing back to the United States because of the costs, logistics, regulatory barriers and lack of labor many industries would face in moving production stateside. A study of Trump's tariffs during his first term found they reduced overall manufacturing employment by driving up costs for companies importing parts and materials from China.
Ahead of Trump's election, companies had been warning that they would be likely to raise prices in response to the tariffs if Trump carried through on his threats, including AutoZone, Columbia Sportswear and Black and Decker. None of the companies responded to requests for comment Tuesday on whether they planned to go through with those plans.
'If we get tariffs, we will pass those tariff costs back to the consumer, and we'll pass them through,' AutoZone CEO Philip Daniele told investors in September.
Clothing
Consumers are also likely to see higher prices on clothing, with about 30% of U.S. apparel coming from China. The tariffs could cause clothing prices to rise as much as 2% for some brands, according to Bloomberg Intelligence estimates.
Personal health and beauty products could feel the impact of the tariffs, as well. Cosmetics maker e.l.f. Beauty, which makes the vast majority of its products in China, may have to increase prices by around 3% unless it is able to offset those costs by negotiating concessions from suppliers or shifting more production out of China, Morgan Stanley analyst Dara Mohsenian said in a note to clients.
Tech and drug prices
Apple is among the technology companies most at risk from the tariffs with the vast majority of iPhones made in China.
During Trump's first term, Apple was able to mostly avoid having to pay Trump's tariffs by receiving government waivers. While Apple hasn't commented on how it will respond to the latest round of tariffs, analysts expect it to have to raise prices to compensate for the higher costs.
The tariffs could also drive up drug prices. About half of generic drugs taken in the United States are made entirely overseas, and China is increasingly playing a role in making those ingredients, according to data from United States Pharmacopeia, a nonprofit group that focuses on the safety of the drug supply chain.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says he is open to regime change in Iran
Trump says he is open to regime change in Iran

South Wales Guardian

time23 minutes ago

  • South Wales Guardian

Trump says he is open to regime change in Iran

'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change???' Mr Trump posted on social media. 'MIGA!!!' The posting on Truth Social marked something of a reversal from defence secretary Pete Hegseth's Sunday morning news conference that detailed the aerial bombing on three of the country's nuclear sites. 'This mission was not and has not been about regime change,' Mr Hegseth said. "The damage to the Nuclear sites in Iran is said to be 'monumental.' The hits were hard and accurate. Great skill was shown by our military. Thank you!" –President Donald J. Trump — The White House (@WhiteHouse) June 22, 2025 Secretary of state Marco Rubio warned on Fox News that any retaliation against the US or a rush toward building a nuclear weapon would 'put the regime at risk'. Mr Trump's warning to Iran's leadership comes as the US has demanded that Iran not respond to the bombardment of the heart of a nuclear programme it spent decades developing. The Trump administration has made a series of intimidating statements even as it has simultaneously called to restart negotiations, making it hard to get a complete read on whether the president is simply taunting an adversary or using inflammatory words that could further widen the war between Israel and Iran that began earlier this month. Up until the president's post on Sunday afternoon, the coordinated messaging by Mr Trump's vice president, Pentagon chief, top military adviser and secretary of state suggested a confidence that any fallout would be manageable and that Iran's lack of military capabilities would ultimately force it back to the bargaining table. Mr Hegseth had said that America 'does not seek war' with Iran, while Vice President JD Vance said the strikes have given Tehran the possibility of returning to negotiate with Washington. But the unfolding situation is not entirely under Washington's control, as Tehran has a series of levers to respond to the aerial bombings, which could intensify the conflict in the Middle East with possible global repercussions. Iran can block oil being shipped through the Strait of Hormuz, attack US bases in the region, engage in cyber attacks or double down on a nuclear programme might seem like more of a necessity after the US strike. Mr Trump, who had addressed the nation from the White House on Saturday night, returned to social media on Sunday to lambast Republican Congress member Thomas Massie, who had objected to the president taking military action without specific congressional approval. 'We had a spectacular military success yesterday, taking the 'bomb' right out of their hands (and they would use it if they could!)' Mr Trump said as part of the post on Truth Social. At their joint Pentagon briefing, Mr Hegseth and Air Force General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said 'Operation Midnight Hammer' involved decoys and deception, and met with no Iranian resistance. General Caine indicated that the goal of the operation — destroying nuclear sites in Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan — had been achieved. 'Final battle damage will take some time, but initial battle damage assessments indicate that all three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction,' he said. While US officials urged caution and stressed that only nuclear sites were targeted by Washington, Iran criticised the actions as a violation of its sovereignty and international law. Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi said Washington was 'fully responsible' for whatever actions Tehran may take in response. 'They crossed a very big red line by attacking nuclear facilities,' he said at a news conference in Turkey. 'I don't know how much room is left for diplomacy.' China and Russia, where Araghchi was heading for talks with President Vladimir Putin, condemned the US military action. The attacks were 'a gross violation of international law,' said Russia's Foreign Ministry, which also advocated 'returning the situation to a political and diplomatic course.' A Turkish Foreign Ministry statement warned about the risk of the conflict spreading to 'a global level'. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said the United Kingdom was moving military equipment into the area to protect its interests, people and allies. His office said he talked on Sunday with Mr Trump about the need for Tehran to resume negotiations, but Mr Trump would have posted his remarks about regime change after their conversation. The leaders of Italy, Canada, Germany and France agreed on the need for 'a rapid resumption of negotiations.' France's Emmanuel Macron held talks with the Saudi Crown Prince and the Sultan of Oman.

Abrego Garcia ordered released pending trial on migrant smuggling charges
Abrego Garcia ordered released pending trial on migrant smuggling charges

Reuters

time30 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Abrego Garcia ordered released pending trial on migrant smuggling charges

NEW YORK, June 22 (Reuters) - A U.S. judge on Sunday ordered Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the migrant returned to the U.S. in early June after being wrongfully deported to his native El Salvador, released on bail pending his criminal trial on migrant smuggling charges. But the decision by U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes in Nashville, Tennessee does not necessarily mean Abrego, as he prefers to be known, will go home to his family. The judge had acknowledged at a June 13 court hearing that Abrego was likely to be placed in immigration detention even if he is released. Abrego, a Maryland resident whose wife and young child are U.S. citizens, was deported on March 15 to El Salvador, despite a 2019 immigration court ruling that he not be sent there because he could be persecuted by gangs. Officials called his removal an "administrative error," but for months said they could not bring him back. Critics of President Donald Trump pointed to Abrego's case as evidence his administration was prioritizing increased deportations over due process, the bedrock principle that people in the U.S., whether citizens or not, can contest governmental actions against them in the courts. Trump, who has pledged to crack down on illegal immigration, has said Abrego belongs to the MS-13 gang - an accusation that his lawyers deny. The Justice Department brought Abrego back to the U.S. on June 6 after earlier securing an indictment charging him with working with at least five co-conspirators as part of a smuggling ring to bring immigrants to the United States illegally. Prosecutors say Abrego, 29, picked up migrants from the U.S.-Mexico border more than 100 times, and also transported firearms and drugs. Abrego has pleaded not guilty. His lawyers say the Trump administration brought the charges to cover up their violations of Abrego's rights, and say the alleged co-conspirators cooperating with prosecutors should not be trusted because they are seeking relief from deportation and criminal charges of their own. In her ruling Sunday, Holmes said the government failed to show that Abrego posed a danger to the community or was unlikely to appear in court, scheduling a hearing for Wednesday. In a separate civil case, Greenbelt, Maryland-based U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis is investigating whether the Trump administration violated her order to facilitate Abrego's return from El Salvador. The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously upheld that order.

Starmer left blindsided as the US goes it alone on Iran attack
Starmer left blindsided as the US goes it alone on Iran attack

Times

time32 minutes ago

  • Times

Starmer left blindsided as the US goes it alone on Iran attack

The decision by the Americans to strike Iran unilaterally, without any request of assistance from the UK or the use of their joint Diego Garcia airbase, will give Sir Keir Starmer only a small ­moment of relief. While it leaves Britain out of the conflict for now and is likely to spare it from the immediate threat of retaliation from Tehran, it exposes the limit to which the prime minister and his top ministers can influence or even second-guess President Trump's actions. UK government officials admit that Trump's comments and actions in the past week have put a significant strain on the 'special relationship'. Starmer, who spent the weekend at Chequers, refused to explicitly say whether he supported Trump's decision to bomb Iran as he warned of the 'risk of escalation'. Jonathan Reynolds, the business secretary sent out to speak for the government, made clear that while Britain welcomed the setback to Iran's nuclear capabilities, it had wanted a diplomatic means to those ends. • Can Iran still build nuclear weapons after the US bombing? UK government officials said that the US did not make a request to use ­Diego Garcia as a staging post for its airstrikes on Iran. Trump would have required Starmer's approval to use the military base in the Indian Ocean because it is under the UK's sovereign control. If it had granted that permission, the UK would effectively become a participant in the war. A UK government source said: 'Diego Garcia is a joint military base, so it's not surprising that they used their own personnel and air base given it was unilateral action.' It may have been that the use of ­Diego Garcia was simply not necessary, given the bombers were able to refuel mid-air and fly to Iran without stopping. Pausing at Diego Garcia could have ruined the element of surprise. However, there is also the possibility that the UK would not have approved and some believe the US made this calculation in deciding to go it alone. Lord Hermer, the attorney-general, had explicitly advised that joining the US would be a potential breach of international law because it would stray ­beyond the definition of self-defence under Article 51 of the UN Charter. The article allows for the use of force if it is deemed necessary and proportionate and an attack is 'imminent'. Although Starmer has avoided the invidious decision of whether to join the conflict, there will be serious doubts about the degree of influence he holds over the US. On Friday afternoon his aides were confident they had bought more time to drag Iran back to the ­negotiating table. They believed they had a crucial window after Trump announced that he would make a decision whether to bomb Iran 'within the next two weeks'. But at the same time, American B-2 Spirit stealth bombers were being readied at Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri for one of the boldest missions in recent US military history and barely 24 hours later Starmer was told shortly before the operation was carried out. • Who are Iran's allies — and will any help after the US strikes? The fact that Trump went ahead with the strikes will be seen as embarrassing for Starmer. Just days earlier, he had sat with Trump at the G7 summit in Canada. He said afterwards that 'there's nothing the president said that suggests that he's about to get involved in this conflict'. Government officials have admitted it was a miscalculation to ­expect Trump to hold off. 'We didn't even get the short window that we thought we might get. They were already moving their assets,' one said. They said closer attention should have been paid to the wording of Trump's comments, pointing out that the president and his press secretary had said he would decide 'within' two weeks rather than 'in' two weeks. The writing was already on the wall on Friday afternoon after David Lammy and his French and German counterparts met the Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi as part of efforts to get Iran back to the negotiating table. Lammy had flown from the White House where he had been briefed on the American position by Marco Rubio, the secretary of state, and Steve Witkoff, Trump's Middle East envoy. In his meeting with Araghchi, Lammy hammered home the American position that Iran must stop its attacks on Israel and return to the negotiating table over its nuclear programme. His Iranian counterpart was forthright in stating that Tehran was unwilling to return to talks until the US had called on Israel to stop its attacks. John Healey, the defence secretary, has increased protection for the armed forces and UK personnel in the region to its highest level ever as British forces brace for retaliatory strikes from Iran. Healey has not ruled out sending in more fighter jets and refuelling aircraft. On Sunday Lammy was back on the phone to Araghchi, reiterating the UK's opposition to Iran ever acquiring a ­nuclear weapon. But Britain's role as the direct interlocutor between the US and Iran has been made immeasurably harder by the American airstrikes. Trust in diplomatic talks has broken down on both sides and there are concerns that the UK's voice in the conflict is decreasing in relevance. Starmer will be reeling from yet another week of ­uncertainty that has left him blindsided by Trump's unpredictability. The decisions he takes on how closely he aligns Britain with Trump's actions could prove critical for his premiership and national security.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store