logo
Kenya finance minister projects lower deficit and sustained growth

Kenya finance minister projects lower deficit and sustained growth

Zawya19 hours ago

NAIROBI - Kenya is on a trajectory of sustained economic growth but also faces potential risks from global trade sanctions, market volatility and extreme weather conditions, its finance minister said on Thursday.
The economy is projected to grow by 5.3% in both 2025 and 2026, John Mbadi told parliament while presenting his budget for the 2025/26 fiscal year.
"This growth is premised on a stable macroeconomic environment over the medium term," he said.
The fiscal deficit is forecast at 4.8% of gross domestic product compared with 5.7% in 2024/25, while overall spending is expected to reach 4.29 trillion Kenyan shillings ($33.27 billion) during the period, Mbadi added.
The budget is aimed at boosting revenues to service debt while avoiding tax measures that triggered the kind of deadly protests that rocked East Africa's biggest economy last year.
While Mbadi presented the budget, protests intensified in the capital following the death in custody of a political blogger, with vehicles set ablaze and police firing tear gas to disperse the demonstrators.
President William Ruto's administration has been struggling to narrow the fiscal deficit and govern under a heavy total debt-to-GDP ratio of around two-thirds, well above the 55% level considered a sustainable threshold.
The government is seeking new sources of funding after last year's countrywide protests forced it to pursue austerity measures and scrap planned tax hikes worth more than 346 billion Kenyan shillings ($2.7 billion).
"Kenyans cannot bear more tax," Mbadi said on Wednesday ahead of his presentation. "For the first time, we have not added taxes in the current finance bill as has been the case before."
INDIRECT TAXES
Critics have accused the government of using the budget to increase indirect taxes and infringe on privacy by empowering the tax authority to spy on people's bank accounts and mobile money transactions. But Mbadi said on Wednesday the revenue authority must be empowered to collect taxes to run the country.
In place of hiking individual taxes, Mbadi is looking to widen the tax base, improve compliance and cut spending, said John Kuria, a tax specialist and partner at Kody Africa.
Despite government attempts to curb expenditure and crack down on fraud, Kuria said, "I think we're still going to have a significant funding shortfall."
While the proposed budget outlines credible measures to reduce the fiscal deficit, the challenge lies in implementation, which Kenya has struggled with historically, said Shani Smit-Lengton, Senior Economist at Oxford Economics Africa.
This often results in mid-year revisions through supplementary budgets, which erode fiscal credibility, Smit-Lengton told Reuters via email.
Kenya said in March it had applied for a new lending programme from the International Monetary Fund after abandoning the final review on the previous IMF programme.
In February it joined a fast-growing club of African nations that have gone to the market to borrow cash to pay off maturing debts in a bid to smooth out liabilities and ring-fence critical expenditure such as health.
"This year, the stakes are higher: the government must demonstrate improved budget discipline to bolster its case for a new IMF programme, while also managing public sentiment to avoid social unrest," Smit-Lengton said.
($1 = 128.9500 Kenyan shillings)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Foreign Minister IWAYA's Meeting with H.E. Mr. Dileita Mohamed Dileita, President of the National Assembly of the Republic of Djibouti
Foreign Minister IWAYA's Meeting with H.E. Mr. Dileita Mohamed Dileita, President of the National Assembly of the Republic of Djibouti

Zawya

time11 hours ago

  • Zawya

Foreign Minister IWAYA's Meeting with H.E. Mr. Dileita Mohamed Dileita, President of the National Assembly of the Republic of Djibouti

On June 13, commencing at 5:15 p.m. for approximately 20 minutes, Mr. IWAYA Takeshi, Minister for Foreign Affairs, held a meeting with H.E. Mr. Dileita Mohamed Dileita, President of the National Assembly of the Republic of Djibouti. At the outset, Minister Iwaya welcomed President Dileita's visit to Japan, and stated that Djibouti, located along with the important sea lanes linking Europe and Asia, is a strategically important partner in promoting a 'Free and Open Indo-Pacific (FOIP)', and that it is a pleasure to witness the steady deepening of cooperation between the two countries in the field of maritime security. Referring to the good relations between the two countries and his own special attachment toward Japan, President Dileita expressed his appreciation and gratitude for Japan's development cooperation in various fields and for the Self-Defense Force (SDF) facility in Djibouti, and explained the strategic importance of Djibouti. The two sides also exchanged views on issues, including regional situation in Africa and in East Asia such as their policies toward North Korea including on the nuclear and missile issues as well as the abductions issue, and concurred to further strengthening bilateral relations and cooperation in regional and international arena, with a view to the TICAD 9 to be held in August and Expo 2025 Osaka, Kansai, Japan. Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan.

The LA protests were exactly what Donald Trump has been waiting for
The LA protests were exactly what Donald Trump has been waiting for

The National

time11 hours ago

  • The National

The LA protests were exactly what Donald Trump has been waiting for

It's a real-life film noir in the City of Angels. US President Donald Trump is once again hurling Americans through the looking glass, this time – fittingly – in Los Angeles. It feels lifted from 1930s hard-boiled pulp fiction in which nothing is as it appears and everything is the inverse of what powerful men assert. It's genuinely shocking, while also seemingly inevitable, that US military forces are being deployed to major cities with the express purpose of trying to intimidate, quash and, ultimately, violently confront Americans who dare raise their voices against Mr Trump's policies and practices. It is one of the most significant inflection points since the last election took America on the road away from constitutional democracy and towards the kind of repressive lawlessness this President admires in other leaders and is seeking to emulate in the US. Yet the astonishing gap between rhetoric and reality, and what this underlying system of untruth versus truth reveals, bears precise unpacking. It reveals much about the current national condition and trajectory. Mr Trump says Los Angeles has been invaded, and so it has. But not by the protesters, who appear to be almost entirely Southern California locals outraged that federal immigration authorities are now using school pickup zones, areas where men gather seeking day labour, and, worst of all, routine immigration check-ins – thereby punishing the law-abiding – for seemingly arbitrary deportations. The evolving "system" typically lacks due process – or any legal process whatsoever. That this outrages communities that directly overlap with targeted or threatened migrants and their (often US citizen) families is hardly surprising. But it has shocked consciences sufficiently to bring out thousands of protesters in Southern California and gain the rest of the country's attention in the process. It's exactly what Mr Trump has been waiting for, not just for months or even years, but very possibly decades, if his rhetoric on immigration over his adult lifetime is taken seriously. The President didn't wait for the situation to get out of hand or even become remotely challenging to local authorities and systems. Los Angeles police and other authorities were having no apparent difficulty in handling largely peaceful crowds. These were mainly made up of chanting protesters relying on words and not deeds, punctuated by the occasional extremist, hothead or agitator employing excessive rhetoric and engaging in vandalism. By all accounts, including countless independent live video streams flowing online beyond the control of any content creator or editor, the protests were almost entirely peaceful and manageable. Some youths threw bottles, rocks and concrete at police, but few if any major injuries, and no deaths, have occurred. It really wasn't a big deal and certainly no crisis. There was never a question of either the California governor or Los Angeles mayor – albeit both are liberal Democrats – requesting federal troops. The soldiers weren't wanted and they clearly weren't needed. Some youths threw bottles, rocks and concrete at police, but few if any major injuries, and no deaths, have occurred. It really wasn't a big deal and certainly no crisis Yet Mr Trump jumped at the soonest opportunity to deploy federal troops under his control to a staunchly Democratic city experiencing angry protests against his policies. Six thousand federalised California National Guard troops and 700 Marines were dispatched to deal with Americans who Mr Trump called "animals" who "hate our country". Offering the usual complete absence of evidence, he accused California Governor Gavin Newsom of financing the protests, presumably because he called the troop deployment 'unconstitutional' and "authoritarian". California is suing the White House, hoping a court orders Mr Trump to remove his forces. The president preposterously countered that without the soldiers, Los Angeles would be "burning to the ground right now" as it did when wildfires ravaged the city in January. The deeper purpose of the deployments – and especially the open-ended executive order authorising them that apparently applies to any protest or even potential protests anywhere in the country in the coming weeks – is to acculturate Americans and their political system to the use of the military to suppress peaceful political demonstrations. It's likely Mr Trump is anticipating a growing wave of such protests over the next three years, and he's probably not wrong. During his first term, Mr Trump wanted to deploy federal troops against protesters insisting that "black lives matter" after the murder of George Floyd in May 2020. He was rebuffed by then-defence secretary Mark Esper and military Chief of Staff Mike Milley. But both men and all the other "adults in the room' during the first Trump term are gone, replaced by personal loyalists without any evident allegiance to US institutions or even the Constitution beyond this president's personal and political interests. This same lack of institutional or personal restraints has led the military to disgracefully agree to stage a highly provocative, entirely improper military parade through the streets of Washington DC on Saturday – Mr. Trump's 79th birthday. In his first term, he was bluntly told that the US military did not perform such sycophantic spectacles, which are incompatible with American republican traditions. Now, Mr Trump is getting everything he wants, at least from all of his executive branch subordinates, no questions asked. Mr Trump knows that peaceful street protests are a highly effective tool against would-be strongmen, and he's making it clear at the earliest possible opportunity to let everyone know that he intends to use the military to suppress street-level opposition to his policies and rule. They could, after all, be the nucleus of an American "colour revolution," in the style of European and Asian societies that resisted their own aspiring caudillos not merely at the ballot box but also the barricades. Mr Trump has been clear that, unlike most previous presidents, he doesn't regard peaceful protests as legitimate opposition, threatening that, "those people that want to protest, they're going to be met with very big force". Once upon a time in America, peaceful demonstrations constituted free speech and assembly, steeped in the finest traditions of a country literally founded upon political protests. But Mr Trump wants protesters who burn US flags to express outrage – which the Supreme Court repeatedly found to be protected speech – to be subjected to an 'automatic' year in prison. The land of the free is certainly 'going through some things'. As Los Angeles, home of Hollywood and setting of many of the greatest films noir, famously explained about arbitrary power, "forget about it, Jake. It's Chinatown".

June 12: Tinubu serious about laying foundation for balanced Nigeria
June 12: Tinubu serious about laying foundation for balanced Nigeria

Zawya

time15 hours ago

  • Zawya

June 12: Tinubu serious about laying foundation for balanced Nigeria

The founder, One Love Family, Sat Guru Maharaj Ji on Thursday, said that President Bola Tinubu is more serious about laying the critical administrative foundation for realistic, fair, and balanced economic growth in Nigeria. Maharaj Ji who made this known in a statement to mark this year's Democracy Day in Nigeria, noted that there is a need for some Nigerians to give Tinubu his due respect. He declared that Nigerians should rally around President Tinubu and equally ignore those bent on distracting the President from moving Nigeria forward. He frowned at the alleged series of comments on President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, by some Nigerians including Hakeem Baba Ahmed's. 'President Tinubu is not a saint, but he is certainly more serious than the entire ruling elites of the nation about laying critical administrative foundation for realistic, fair, and balanced economic growth in Nigeria. 'There is a very big difference between President Bola Tinubu and Bola Tinubu. The former is the current occupier of the highest office in Nigeria, while the latter is a regular citizen of Nigeria. 'If he has any axe to grind against the person of Bola Tinubu, he should wait till after Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu's tenure as President of Nigeria expires. So long as Bola Ahmed Tinubu exists as President of Nigeria, Hakeem Baba Ahmed must give him his due respect as President, not as his political colleague or as his Muslim comrade. 'President Tinubu is the winner to save the race, whilst Atiku, El-Rufai, Kwankwaso, Aregbesola, Pat Utomi, Pastor Ayodele, Oyakhilome, are asked to cooperate with our President in the anti-corruption drive,' he stated. Copyright © 2022 Nigerian Tribune Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store