logo
Could comet 3I/ATLAS be alien technology? Controversial Harvard astrophysicist says yes

Could comet 3I/ATLAS be alien technology? Controversial Harvard astrophysicist says yes

USA Today30-07-2025
An interstellar object whizzing through our solar system was widely determined to be a comet. But a trio of researchers led by Avi Loeb recently posed a different idea.
One thing about 3I/ATLAS is for certain: It's definitely not from Earth's solar system.
But what exactly is the intriguing interstellar object discovered speeding through our cosmic neighborhood? Most astrophysicists widely agree that 3I/ATLAS displays all the tell-tale signs of an icy comet.
Now, a trio of researchers led by Avi Loeb, a controversial astrophysicist from Harvard University, are positing a very different theory: What if 3I/ATLAS isn't just some random space rock that incurred upon our solar system by happenstance, but an intelligently controlled alien spacecraft?
Even the authors of the recent research paper posing the wild idea aren't completely sold on it, but – hey – extraterrestrial visitors are always fun to think about.
Black holes: Physicists detect largest-ever merger of 2 black holes equal in size to 240 suns
What is 3I/ATLAS?
A comet known as 3I/ATLAS made news earlier in July when it was confirmed to have originated outside of Earth's solar system, making it just one of three known interstellar objects ever discovered in our cosmic neighborhood.
What's more, the object, which scientists estimate to be more than 12 miles wide, is whizzing at 37 miles per second relative to the sun on a trajectory that on Oct. 30 will bring it within about 130 million miles of Earth, according to NASA.
A telescope in Chile – part of the NASA-funded Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) – was the first to spot what initially looked like an unknown asteroid on a path potentially coming close to Earth's orbit.
The observation was reported to the Minor Planet Center, the official authority for observing and reporting new asteroids, comets and other small bodies in the solar system. The object, eventually confirmed as a comet and named 3I/ATLAS, was later confirmed to have interstellar origins after follow-up observations.
Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb suggests 3I/ATLAS is alien tech
But is 3I/ATLAS definitely an icy comet?
A trio of researchers that most prominently includes Avi Loeb, an astrophysicist at Harvard University, recently published a paper speculating about whether the object could be "hostile" alien technology.
Loeb, who is renowned for encouraging astrophysicists to have an open mind about extraterrestrials, is the co-founder of the Galileo Project, a research program at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics dedicated to the scientific search for extraterrestrials.
The recent paper that Loeb co-authored, uploaded July 16 to the preprint server arXiv, is more a "pedagogical exercise" examining the unusual trajectory of 3I/ATLAS and how fast it is traveling through space than a study meant to offer definitive conclusions. The paper has also, it's important to say, not been peer-reviewed.
Loeb further explained the new paper in a blog post on Medium, writing that it was simply an "interesting exercise in its own right, and is fun to explore."
"This hypothesis proposes that our cosmic neighborhood is dangerous, filled with intelligent civilizations that are hostile and silent to avoid detection by potential predators," Loeb wrote.
However, experts who spoke to science news website LiveScience cast serious doubt on Loeb's sensational theory.
"Any suggestion that it's artificial is nonsense on stilts, and is an insult to the exciting work going on to understand this object," Chris Lintott, an astronomer at the University of Oxford who was part of the team that simulated 3I/ATLAS's galactic origins, told Live Science.
Even Loeb admits that 3I/ATLAS being alien technology is unlikely.
"By far, the most likely outcome will be that 3I/ATLAS is a completely natural interstellar object, probably a comet," he wrote in the blog post.
Loeb previously claimed metallic spheres were extraterrestrial
This is far from the first time that Loeb had theorized that an object in our solar system could be not only interstellar, but an extraterrestrial artifact.
Loeb made headlines in August 2023 when he claimed that remnants of a meteor he and a team recovered in the Pacific Ocean were interstellar in origin.
An unusual meteorite Loeb and his team named IM1 had crashed into Earth's atmosphere in 2014. The researchers then retrieved suspected remnants of the meteor in June 2023 off the coast of Papua New Guinea.
By August, Loeb announced that early analysis suggested the metallic spherules were composed of substance unmatched to any existing alloys in our solar system.
At the time, Loeb did not yet have an answer to the question of whether the metallic spheres were either artificial or natural in origin.
Loeb also theorized that comet Oumuamua was alien spaceship
In 2017, the comet Oumuamua, Hawaiian for 'scout' or 'messenger,' became the first interstellar object ever detected flying through the solar system, puzzling scientists with its strange shape and trajectory.
But Loeb posited that the comet − as long as a football field and thin like a cigar − was able to accelerate as it approached the sun by harnessing its solar power as a "light sail," not unlike the way a ship's sail catches the wind. Because no natural phenomenon would be capable of such space travel, Loeb was essentially suggesting Oumuamua could have been an alien spaceship.
A study in March explained the comet's odd orbit as a simple physical mechanism thought to be common among many icy comets: outgassing of hydrogen as the comet warmed in the sunlight.
The only other time an interstellar object has been spotted traveling through our solar system occurred in 2019 when comet Borisov passed by.
Contributing: Mary Walrath-Holdridge, USA TODAY
Eric Lagatta is the Space Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach him at elagatta@gannett.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SpaceX Crew-10 return delayed due to weather at splashdown site
SpaceX Crew-10 return delayed due to weather at splashdown site

UPI

time6 minutes ago

  • UPI

SpaceX Crew-10 return delayed due to weather at splashdown site

Crew-10 astronauts are preparing to return to Earth on Friday after being onboard the international space station for over 140 days. NASA/UPI | License Photo Aug. 7 (UPI) -- SpaceX and NASA delayed the return of Crew-10 astronauts to Earth that was originally scheduled to begin on Thursday afternoon. The Crew-10's Dragon capsule, Endurance, will undock at 6:05 p.m. EDT on Friday for a 17.5-hour journey and is scheduled to splash down in the Pacific Ocean off the coast of California at 11:33 a.m. Saturday. The crew was initially set to begin its return from ISS on Thursday at 12:05 p.m. EDT but the departure was delayed due to weather in the splashdown area. "Due to high winds at the splashdown sites off the coast of California, Dragon is standing down from today's undocking from the Space Station," SpaceX said in a post on X. "The spacecraft and Crew-10 crew remain healthy, and teams will continue to monitor weather conditions for the next available undocking opportunity." SpaceX's recovery ship Shannon will be on site to retrieve the capsule and its crew. Afterwards, the crew will be flown to Houston. Crew-10, which has been on the ISS for 140 days, will also be the first NASA ISS crewed mission to splash down in the Pacific Ocean. Crew-10's Anne McClain, Nichole Ayer, Takuya Onishi and Kirill Peskov had initially launched on March 14 and docked the ISS two days later. "Crew-10 has had the absolute privilege of working here for the last four months, and we have so much gratitude for all of the ground teams that showed up every day to make this possible," McClain said during a farewell ceremony on Tuesday on the ISS. "We truly are very humbled to represent humanity, and we hope that we can be a reminder to others of the goodness of humanity and what we really can accomplish when we work together," she added. Alongside the Crew-10, Endurance will be carrying home science samples on the Polar portable cold storage facility. SpaceX's Crew-11 members Zena Cardman, Mike Fincke, Kimiya Yui and Oleg Platonov have docked the ISS on Aug 2.

Harvard scientists say research could be set back years after funding freeze
Harvard scientists say research could be set back years after funding freeze

Chicago Tribune

time7 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Harvard scientists say research could be set back years after funding freeze

CAMBRIDGE, Mass. — Harvard University professor Alberto Ascherio's research is literally frozen. Collected from millions of U.S. soldiers over two decades using millions of dollars from taxpayers, the epidemiology and nutrition scientist has blood samples stored in liquid nitrogen freezers within the university's T.H. Chan School of Public Health. The samples are key to his award-winning research, which seeks a cure to multiple sclerosis and other neurodegenerative diseases. But for months, Ascherio has been unable to work with the samples because he lost $7 million in federal research funding, a casualty of Harvard's fight with the Trump administration. 'It's like we have been creating a state-of-the-art telescope to explore the universe, and now we don't have money to launch it,' said Ascherio. 'We built everything and now we are ready to use it to make a new discovery that could impact millions of people in the world and then, 'Poof. You're being cut off.'' The loss of an estimated $2.6 billion in federal funding at Harvard has meant that some of the world's most prominent researchers are laying off young researchers. They are shelving years or even decades of research, into everything from opioid addiction to cancer. And despite Harvard's lawsuits against the administration, and settlement talks between the warring parties, researchers are confronting the fact that some of their work may never resume. The funding cuts are part of a monthslong battle that the Trump administration has waged against some the country's top universities including Columbia, Brown and Northwestern. The administration has taken a particularly aggressive stance against Harvard, freezing funding after the country's oldest university rejected a series of government demands issued by a federal antisemitism task force. The government had demanded sweeping changes at Harvard related to campus protests, academics and admissions — meant to address government accusations that the university had become a hotbed of liberalism and tolerated anti-Jewish harassment. Harvard responded by filing a federal lawsuit, accusing the Trump administration of waging a retaliation campaign against the university. In the lawsuit, it laid out reforms it had taken to address antisemitism but also vowed not to 'surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights.' 'Make no mistake: Harvard rejects antisemitism and discrimination in all of its forms and is actively making structural reforms to eradicate antisemitism on campus,' the university said in its legal complaint. 'But rather than engage with Harvard regarding those ongoing efforts, the Government announced a sweeping freeze of funding for medical, scientific, technological, and other research that has nothing at all to do with antisemitism.' The Trump administration denies the cuts were made in retaliation, saying the grants were under review even before the demands were sent in April. It argues the government has wide discretion to cancel federal contracts for policy reasons. The funding cuts have left Harvard's research community in a state of shock, feeling as if they are being unfairly targeted in a fight has nothing to do with them. Some have been forced to shutter labs or scramble to find nongovernment funding to replace lost money. In May, Harvard announced that it would put up at least $250 million of its own money to continue research efforts, but university President Alan Garber warned of 'difficult decisions and sacrifices' ahead. Ascherio said the university was able to pull together funding to pay his researchers' salaries until next June. But he's still been left without resources needed to fund critical research tasks, like lab work. Even a year's delay can put his research back five years, he said. 'It's really devastating,' agreed Rita Hamad, the director of the Social Policies for Health Equity Research Center at Harvard, who had three multiyear grants totaling $10 million canceled by the Trump administration. The grants funded research into the impact of school segregation on heart health, how pandemic-era policies in over 250 counties affected mental health, and the role of neighborhood factors in dementia. At the School of Public Health, where Hamad is based, 190 grants have been terminated, affecting roughly 130 scientists. 'Just thinking about all the knowledge that's not going to be gained or that is going to be actively lost,' Hamad said. She expects significant layoffs on her team if the funding freeze continues for a few more months. 'It's all just a mixture of frustration and anger and sadness all the time, every day.' John Quackenbush, a professor of computational biology and bioinformatics at the School of Public Health, has spent the past few months enduring cuts on multiple fronts. In April, a multimillion dollar grant was not renewed, jeopardizing a study into the role sex plays in disease. In May, he lost about $1.2 million in federal funding for in the coming year due to the Harvard freeze. Four departmental grants worth $24 million that funded training of doctoral students also were canceled as part of the fight with the Trump administration, Quackenbush said. 'I'm in a position where I have to really think about, 'Can I revive this research?'' he said. 'Can I restart these programs even if Harvard and the Trump administration reached some kind of settlement? If they do reach a settlement, how quickly can the funding be turned back on? Can it be turned back on?' The researchers all agreed that the funding cuts have little or nothing to do with the university's fight against antisemitism. Some, however, argue changes at Harvard were long overdue and pressure from the Trump administration was necessary. Bertha Madras, a Harvard psychobiologist who lost funding to create a free, parent-focused training to prevent teen opioid overdose and drug use, said she's happy to see the culling of what she called 'politically motivated social science studies.' Madras said pressure from the White House has catalyzed much-needed reform at the university, where several programs of study have 'really gone off the wall in terms of being shaped by orthodoxy that is not representative of the country as a whole.' But Madras, who served on the President's Commission on Opioids during Trump's first term, said holding scientists' research funding hostage as a bargaining chip doesn't make sense. 'I don't know if reform would have happened without the president of the United States pointing the bony finger at Harvard,' she said. 'But sacrificing science is problematic, and it's very worrisome because it is one of the major pillars of strength of the country.' Quackenbush and other Harvard researchers argue the cuts are part of a larger attack on science by the Trump administration that puts the country's reputation as the global research leader at risk. Support for students and post-doctoral fellows has been slashed, visas for foreign scholars threatened, and new guidelines and funding cuts at the NIH will make it much more difficult to get federal funding in the future, they said. It also will be difficult to replace federal funding with money from the private sector. 'We're all sort of moving toward this future in which this 80-year partnership between the government and the universities is going to be jeopardized,' Quackenbush said. 'We're going to face real challenges in continuing to lead the world in scientific excellence.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store