Mega Riches welcome offer: Claim a £25 bonus and 50 free spins on your first £10 deposit
Mega Riches is a new, UKGC-licensed casino that is running a strong welcome offer for new UK players.
The offer is a combination of up to £25 in bonus cash plus 50 free spins, both of which can be unlocked with a first deposit, with the 50 spins for use on the popular Ancient Fortunes Poseidon Megaways—a jackpot slot where prizes can exceed £1,000,000.
And with this new UK casino only having launched last year, we've compiled a review of the Mega Riches welcome offer, including key promotional terms and how new customers can access the offer.
Mega Riches welcome offer
Mega Riches greets new players with a two-part welcome package that includes both a deposit match bonus and free spins—designed to appeal to those looking for big jackpot potential right from the get-go.
Part 1: Welcome Bonus
The first part of the offer is a 100 per cent deposit match up to £25, exclusively for use on jackpot games. The minimum deposit to qualify for the match is £10. To claim this bonus, players must activate it within 30 days of making their initial deposit.
Once activated, the bonus comes with a 35x wagering requirement that must be fulfilled within 60 days. A maximum stake of £2 per bet applies when playing qualifying jackpot games using bonus funds.
Part 2: Welcome Spins
The second part of the welcome offer is a bundle of 50 free spins on the popular slot Ancient Fortunes Poseidon Megaways. Each spin is valued at 10p and all winnings from the spins are paid out as cash, meaning these are no wagering free spins.
As is commonplace on casino sites, the free spins must be activated within seven days of qualifying and used within 24 hours of activation. Best of all, every spin carries a potential jackpot prize of £1m, making this a highly attractive offer for new players.
How to claim the casino offer
Step 1: Sign up via the links to Mega Riches on this page. There is no Mega Riches bonus code required.
Step 2: Deposit between £10 and £25 into your account.
Step 3: Activate your welcome bonus under My Profile > My Bonuses.
Step 4: Activate your Welcome Spins under My Profile > Welcome Bonuses.
Step 5: Start playing jackpot slots with your casino bonus.
Key terms to know
Below is a brief summary of the most important terms and conditions, though be sure to read the full T&Cs on the Mega Riches welcome bonus page before opting in:
Why play at Mega Riches?
As a new, UKCG-licensed casino, Mega Riches carries plenty of appeal beyond the value included in the welcome offer.
Of course, it is fully licensed and regulated in the UK, meaning that players and their data are kept safe and secure while playing.
In addition, the casino offers a wide selection of jackpot games and the best online slots, plus a transparent bonus structure with a straightforward claim process for the welcome bonus, the free spins and any winnings.
It is also a fast withdrawal casino which will appeal to those who like to collect their winnings pretty sharply.
Finally, from a user point of view, the site has a clean, mobile-friendly interface that makes play simple, enjoyable and accessible.
As a new slots site, Mega Riches has a lot going for it, but there are plenty of other options out there for casino players on the lookout for a new brand. Below, we've compared their sign up offer with other top new casinos.
Responsible gambling
When gambling, never bet more than you can afford to lose. Gambling is never a reliable way to make money, so please take steps to remain in control of your budget.
As with all regulated gambling sites, Mega Riches offer plenty of responsible gambling tools, such as deposit limits, loss limits, self-exclusion and time-outs.
The same tools will be available if you're using betting sites, poker sites or bingo sites too.
On the Mega Riches site, these tools can be accessed through the safer gambling hub, which offers advice on how to gamble responsibly online and what actions you should take if you have any concerns.
Should you wish to seek help for gambling-related issues, there are several charities and healthcare providers who offer support and information:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
35 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The rich are fleeing Labour's Britain. We could all pay the price
For over a century, Britain has been a hub for wealthy expats escaping political tumult, oppression or simply seeking better opportunities. From the 'White Russians' fleeing the Bolshevik revolution to wealthy Chinese seeking a safe haven for their capital in the 2010s, the UK was a magnet for the rich. Now, though, the flows may be reversing. After Labour's move to scrap non-dom status and overhaul inheritance tax, there are growing signs that the 1pc may be fleeing. 'I'm still here, counting the days I'm allowed to stay, waiting for a miracle, which is not going to happen,' says 55-year-old Magda Wierzycka, who has lived in Britain for half a decade. Wierzycka fled Poland as a refugee under communism in the early 1980s before settling in South Africa, where she made millions. In 2019 she moved to the UK to start a venture capital business. 'We brought in about £500m and invested it in British innovation. Five years in, I effectively get told 'We don't need your money, and we don't want you in the country'.' Wierzycka, who was a non-dom until the status was abolished, can now only stay in Britain for 91 days a year before incurring tax on her global earnings and gains, with a lower limit on how many days she can work. As a result, she is reluctantly planning to return to South Africa. Reeves's decision to raise taxes on people like Wierzycka was a calculated gamble. The Chancellor hopes that most of the rich will choose to stay in Britain and pay higher taxes, boosting public coffers by £5bn a year. The money will help pay for free breakfast clubs for children and plug gaps in stretched public finances. Yet the list of wealthy emigres has been growing steadily since tax changes took effect April. It includes people like South African national Richard Gnodde, Goldman Sachs' best paid banker outside the US, Aston Villa co-owner Nassef Sawiris and steel magnate Lakshmi Mittal. Those are the names we know of. How many others are leaving? 'We really don't know anything at this stage,' says Arun Advani, an associate professor of economics at the University of Warwick. 'The only way to know about what non-doms are doing is to look at the tax data. The data for the last tax year that ended in April, people don't even file those taxes until January of next year. 'Late filing is particularly prevalent at the top of the income distribution, where the £100 late fee is not really that costly. We don't really get that information here until, in I guess, 18 months.' It will be a nervous wait for the Chancellor. If 25pc of non-doms quit the UK, the Treasury would make no extra money from scrapping the tax status. If a third left, the UK would lose £700m in the first year of the policy, according to the Centre for Economics and Business Research (CEBR). 'I love this country,' says entrepreneur Bassim Haidar, who was born in Nigeria but has Lebanese citizenship. 'We really integrated. We've made amazing friends.' He left before the changes took effect on April 6 and now splits his time between the United Arab Emirates, Greece and Italy. 'Just like we adapted here, we will adapt somewhere else.' Tipping point Predicting an exodus of the wealthy has often been a case of the boy who cried wolf. Yet several studies suggest something big may actually be under way this time. Even before Labour took power, Swiss bank UBS said the UK was on track to see the biggest departure of dollar-millionaires out of a group of 56 countries by 2028. Henley & Partners, which makes money from helping the world's wealthy move around, claimed Britain saw a record exodus of almost 11,000 millionaires last year. Some of its data was based on flimsy metrics like the locations people list on their LinkedIn profiles, however. The most robust analysis so far has come from Bloomberg, which found a surge in the number of directors moving abroad after analysing 5m company filings. Around 4,400 directors reported an overseas move in the last year, it said. The figure likely includes non-doms and British nationals moving in protest over recent tax changes. This includes stripping away inheritance tax business relief, a policy that could potentially force the sale of family businesses to pay tax bills. The changes also abolished the more than 200-year-old non-dom status in April, replacing it with a residence-based regime. This grants well-heeled newcomers four years of reprieve from being taxed on their foreign income and gains. However, in a major change, anything you own anywhere in the world – like a stake in your family business – becomes subject to UK inheritance tax after this period, and for up to 10 years after you leave. Non-doms have been a target for the taxman for a while. Jeremy Hunt, the former chancellor, cut back on the tax breaks in April last year before Reeves scrapped the relief altogether. Many non-doms say this was their tipping point. One describes it thus: 'It's like boiling a frog, except in this case the frog can jump out of the water.' 'Desperate situation' There were 68,900 non-doms living in Britain in the 2022 tax year, the latest HMRC data shows. They are typically employed in lucrative professions and are highly mobile. You would expect a high share to leave in any given year, which can make it difficult to discern genuine trends without hard evidence. One place to look for clues is in London's most well-heeled neighbourhoods. At private members' club Walbrook, in the City of London, between 20 and 50 clients have cancelled their memberships as a result of the tax changes. 'The exodus actually began last year,' says managing director Philip Palumbo. 'The City seems to lack confidence, purpose. It feels over-taxed, over-regulated, and we are haemorrhaging good people to artificial places like Dubai, which is just so unacceptable.' Wealth advisers tell clients that memberships, including for gyms and private clubs, can be used by the taxman to prove residency. As a result, other clubs have resorted to offering shorter-term options of up to 90 days, news reports suggest. It is not just clubland that is suffering. 'Very definitely, there's a reduction of customers – certainly customers from the Arab countries who had residences in London. They come here [in] far fewer [numbers] now,' says Brian Lishak, the 86-year-old co-founder of Savile Row tailor, Richard Anderson. There has also been a drop in demand for butlers and nannies, according to Joshua James from Super Private Staff. His firm helps source household staff for the very rich. 'We have observed a notable decline in the high-end household recruitment market in London. It's clear that opportunities are shifting. Strong demand is emerging in regions like the Middle East, Monaco, and America.' A surprising side effect of Reeves's tax changes may well be an exodus of Britain's finest butlers and nannies. 'It is worth saying, the appeal of a butler or nanny with a British accent remains attractive internationally,' James adds. Buyers of London's poshest houses in areas like Mayfair, Knightsbridge and St John's Wood are seeing financial crisis-level discounts, according to Savills. Prime central London prices are a fifth lower than at their peak in June 2014. The estate agent blamed the non-dom tax changes and stamp duty hikes. Interior designer Phillippa Thorp has witnessed several non-dom customers leave. 'Businesses like ours have survived on rich bankers and rich people coming here from all over the world. They've had their families here for 20 years, they would never have left but for this mad own-goal,' she laments. Thorp fears the skilled tradespeople she relies on such as painters and bronze workers will struggle to get by as a result. 'We're losing them and we're losing their skills, and they will never come back. It's desperate, the situation. There are an awful lot of people who don't know what to do. Should we let some people go? Do we pray that the Government is going to do something right for once? It just seems like one disaster after another,' she says. 'I can safely say it just gets worse. If I was a young me, I would never, ever start a business here.' Thorp's case underscores the broader risks from the tax crackdown. Few of Labour's voters will shed a tear if the super-rich decamp to Monaco or Dubai. But the exodus has a broader economic impact. It is measured in fewer pounds spent in Michelin-starred restaurants, fewer donations to galleries to support blockbuster exhibitions or wings, and fewer people employed to help and serve the wealthy, among other things. 'I had 16 staff [in the UK] – drivers, property managers, and so on,' says Haidar, the Nigerian-born Lebanese businessman. 'I'm down to two now. These guys have lost their jobs.' London's loss, Dubai's gain Just how big the eventual economic impact is depends on how many of the wealthiest choose to leave. 'It would be safe to say that a large number have left, full stop,' says Simon Gibb, a partner in the London private wealth team of Trowers & Hamlins. 'That is largely to do with the removal of trust protections both for income and capital gains tax, but ultimately inheritance tax was very much a deal-breaker.' Non-doms have traditionally sheltered income earned from foreign businesses by placing it in a trust abroad. However, such trusts will now be subject to a British inheritance tax bill of 6pc every 10 years after they die as long as it exists. Those inheriting the business may have to sell chunks of it to pay the tax bill, Gibb says. Many are more concerned about the tax rates in death rather than in life. The UK's loss is other countries' gain. Britons were the second biggest foreign buyers of property in Dubai last year. Philippe Amarante, managing partner at Henley & Partners Middle East, says the United Arab Emirates is welcoming the wealthy with open arms. 'It's pro-migration. It can take you five days or two days even to come to Dubai and set up the company. It will take you a few days, a few weeks, to set up local domestic bank accounts and get you going,' he says. Parents who in the past came to Britain to put their children through school are now going to Dubai, he says. 'The clients that we have are saying ' you don't have knife crime, right? You don't have fist fights in the school courtyards'. The UK – particularly with crime and other elements – maybe the overall proposition has somewhat decreased.' Andrew Griffith, the shadow business secretary, says: 'It is a crisis of the Government's making. If [Reeves] would reverse the provisions about bringing global assets within UK inheritance tax, this flight from the UK would end tomorrow.' The issue is rapidly rising up the political agenda. Richard Tice, a Reform MP and the party's deputy leader, warns that Britain is 'seeing the greatest brain drain and wealth drain in my adult lifetime'. 'Every day of the week, I hear people say 'my friends are leaving,'' he says. 'It's truly terrifying. All these ludicrous people from the Left thinking the solution to our problems is to have a wealth tax. There won't be any wealth left in the country. It's a mobile world. This is a battle royale of hearts and minds.' Reform, which is currently polling as Britain's most popular party, has pledged to reverse the non-dom changes and scrap inheritance tax completely. The promise would leave a shortfall just shy of £20bn in public finances by the end of the decade, which Tice says would be filled 'by scrapping stupid net zero' amongst other things. A big mistake? The Treasury always expected people to leave in response to the non-dom and inheritance tax changes. The problems arise if more people go than expected. When Reeves announced her changes in October's Budget, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) said the measures would raise £5.2bn a year by the end of the decade. This reflects only the direct tax take, not wider impacts on investment, staff and businesses relying on these very wealthy individuals. The fiscal watchdog assumed that 12pc of non-doms without trusts and 25pc with trusts would go. However, the OBR warned that predicting behavioural responses was difficult. Reeves has softened some measures slightly since October after a backlash from the wealthy, but the OBR said the tweaks did 'not materially affect' its forecasts. Britain relies more on high earners than many other countries, with the top 1pc paying 28pc of all income tax. If you broaden it to the top 10pc, the figure rises to 60pc of receipts. The Chancellor risks getting no revenues at all from the policy if more than 25pc of non-dom taxpayers leave, according to analysis by the Centre for Economics and Business Research. If as many as half relocate, Reeves could end up with a black hole of £12.2bn a year by the end of the decade in a worst-case scenario, the CEBR said. Chris Walker, a former Treasury economist, recently published a study suggesting 10pc of non-doms had already left by the end of last year, though it was based in part on the Henley & Partners analysis focused on LinkedIn. Regardless, Walker says: 'I think the OBR and the Government have underestimated the behavioural response. My gut instinct is that the Government probably won't lose money. But I would be surprised if it got even half of the £34bn it's projecting over five years. It's either going to be tax rises or spending cuts or a combination of the two to fill any gap that arises.' Advani, the economist, is less concerned about a wealth exodus. He believes there will be an initial spike and then the departures will tail off. Other people will also come in their place under the four-year regime, he expects. But he warns: 'It seems to me completely crazy that we've designed a regime that will continue to be a huge discouragement from people investing in the UK. That seems like a really big mistake.' 'Tax me more' Anyone betting on another Labour about-turn on the issue is likely to be disappointed. Those on the Left argue that the exodus of the wealthy is simply fabricated. 'All I can say is I don't see that,' says Stephen Kinsella, who describes himself as a 'patriotic millionaire'. 'I have lots of friends who have more money than I do. The people I talk to have got serious money. Most of them have their kids at school here, their family is here, and they just like the life and the culture and everything else this country offers you.' Kinsella is part of a lobbying group of wealthy individuals pushing for a 2pc wealth tax on anyone with more than £10m of assets to help repair Britain's crumbling state. People who claim there is a wealth exodus 'have such a vested interest', he argues. 'Who's more credible – them or us? I'm someone who says 'tax me more'. It would make no sense for me to do that if I genuinely believe that a lot of wealthy people would leave and therefore the UK tax take would go down. 'The wealth management companies have an interest in talking this up and talking up interest in their services. I'm not saying that being cynical, but it's obvious this narrative suits them.' Alex Cobham, the chief executive of Tax Justice, claims the whole notion of a wealth exodus has simply been whipped up the media and others who benefit from it. 'Anyone who says that they can tell you anything definitive about that is either kidding themselves or they're not being straight with you,' he says. 'Where did the spin come from that took these really thin and questionable numbers and turned them into this kind of headline news of 30 stories every day throughout 2024?' Cobham claims there is 'solid evidence' that tax changes generally lead to only small waves of migration among millionaires. 'Everybody's starting point should be that there isn't a significant concern here,' Cobham says. Regardless, lobbying groups are still trying to convince the Government to backtrack on some of the changes. Leslie MacLeod-Miller, founder of Foreign Investors for Britain, says: 'It's not just tax revenues, even though the non-doms contribute approximately £9bn per year in tax. Some families were spending between £20m and £40m a year on their services. Those go to cleaners, shopping, restaurants or hairdressers. The golden geese are leaving. I want to try and keep them here.' Some non-doms are stubbornly holding out hope too, but optimism is fading. Wierzycka is still hoping 'that some reason prevails'. She is sad to leave. So are many others. 'I think the UK is one of the greatest countries on the face of the planet,' says one wealthy foreigner who is reluctantly headed to Dubai with his family. 'I have a huge affinity for this place, and I'm leaving because the financial impact on our family is so substantial.'
Telegraph
35 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trade union bosses' pay shows all that's wrong with Labour's Britain
Are the leaders of Britain's trade unions among our Prime Minister's beloved 'working people'? While most have impeccable workerist credentials, their salaries may exclude them from the class of people who, in Sir Keir Starmer's vision, deserve to be exempted from Labour's tax hikes. Only a tiny few hit the £201,000 necessary to join the 1pc club of top earners, but many are 45pc additional rate taxpayers, earning above the threshold of £125,140. They certainly take home multiples of last year's UK median household disposable income of £36,700, as recorded by the Office for National Statistics. Union general secretaries, as a rule, earn much more than the people they represent. Ironically, this is not true of the UK's highest paid union boss. Maheta Molango, the Swiss-born chief executive of the Professional Footballers' Association, was paid £649,234 last year, with additional pension contributions of £56,617, making for a total package of £794,198. The footballers' union – and there is no doubt that it counts as a union, as it is registered as such with the Certification Officer to whom they must all file annual returns, and is one of the 48 affiliates of the Trades Union Congress – has over 5,800 members in total. The bulk of its income comes from a more select group: premiership players. They pay over £25m in dues annually. Ultra-high-earning professional footballers are among the most heavily unionised trades in the UK. Let us turn to the more run-of-the-mill unions, such as the 11 that are affiliated to the Labour Party. These range in size from the once mighty National Union of Mineworkers (NUM), clinging on to its last 196 members (of whom only 103 pay contributions) as it holds out against the threat of extinction, to the behemoths of the public sector-focused Unison and the all-purpose Unite, with over one million members each. The pay packages for the general secretaries of these Labour-affiliated unions range around £150,000. Mick Whelan of the train drivers' Aslef – a man with an impeccable record for imposing misery on commuters – was paid £126,067, plus a £24,015 pension contribution in 2023, a package worth £150,082 in total. Community's Roy Rickhuss received £129,523, coming to nearly £166,000 with benefits. The GMB, with its over 575,000 members, rewards its general secretary with a package worth around £156,000, with the Unison chief on a similar deal. The Fire Brigades Union (FBU) is among the most militant and proudly workerist, even disaffiliating from Labour in 2004 in outrage over Tony Blair's reformism, and only rejoining in 2015 when Jeremy Corbyn became leader. Its chief is on an un-proletarian £97,857 plus benefits, a total of £126,646. The NUM's general secretary, Chris Kitchen, has to be content with rather less. The 2023 return shows him receiving £43,136 in salary, £56,043 if pension contributions and employer's National Insurance are included. This still amounts to £540 for each of the NUM's dues-paying members. The National Education Union (NEU) is not affiliated to Labour, but is certainly very much of the Left. Its general secretary, Daniel Kebede, receives what has clearly become the going rate for the leader of a substantial union, a package coming in last year at£153,320. The NEU's staffing bill totals over £10.6m. Can pay packages that are so out of kilter with those of most ordinary union members be justified? The market for general secretaries is not like that for the vast majority of jobs. Unions do not have to pay top whack to compete for, and hold on to, the best talent out there. Until Matt Wrack's move from leading the FBU to being appointed head of the NAS/UWT teaching union this year, such transfers were unheard of. The qualification for being a general secretary is like that for being an MP, winning an election – and nothing else. The difference is that the turnout for union votes is vastly lower than even the woeful levels seen in the UK for council elections. The key skill potential general secretaries need to acquire is the ability to make backroom deals with other internal union factions to build a coalition that can get them over the line and into office. The unions have no need to reward their leaders so munificently. The same people would almost certainly run for these same posts if their rewards were more closely in line with the people they represented. Much of the far-Left have long argued that union leaders' pay is excessive and that it means they lose touch with the everyday struggles of their membership. There have been demands that these salaries should be pegged to what a member of that union typically earns. Perhaps unsurprisingly, when the far-Left wins high office, these noble sentiments are somehow set aside. Even proud Marxists don't find it easy to say no to boss-class pay. In the case of union remunerations, the egalitarian instinct is probably the correct one. It would lead to much lower salaries for most general secretaries, although the footballers' champion Molango would be in line for a substantial rise to the £3m average pay of a Premiership player.
BBC News
38 minutes ago
- BBC News
Buckinghamshire villagers battle 'nightmare' housing plans
A proposed housing development on the edge of a village has been described as a "nightmare" and "just too big" by residents. Plans for Court Gate - which would see up to 90 new homes built to the north of Marsh Gibbon, near Bicester - were submitted to Buckinghamshire Council in March. Residents said they had welcomed smaller development, Deanfield View, completed in 2022, which included a new village shop, but called the current plans "not logical". Land promoter Catesby Estates said the area needed affordable homes and was a "sustainable location" for development. Parish councillor Mark Benzing said he was not opposed to the village's expansion in principle, but that it was about "proportion". "It's about 'how many [people] can we take, how many houses should be built'," he said. Resident Patrina Needham said the development was unrealistic, and that the village's infrastructure would struggle to cope. She added: "It's practically impossible to build it. The sewage cannot cope with the capacity.. It's just not logical."We understand the pressure that councils are under... [but] loss of village identity, loss of community... are still very important in our countryside." Sam Wicker, who has lived in the village for five years, said Marsh Gibbon was "like a little family". "We like the community spirit, we like that everybody is close-knit... we've got that country feel," she said. She said a development in 2022 had been a positive addition to the village, but the Court Gate proposals were continued: "So much is going to change. The roads cannot deal with even more houses... It's a nightmare to the extent that we would consider moving." In a statement, Catesby Estates said: "The rate of new housing development has not met the growing demand. "Between 2019/20 and 2023/24, new homes constructed in Buckinghamshire decreased by 53%, leading to a widening gap between housing supply and population said the plans delivered affordable housing, and Marsh Gibbon's size, location, and transport links made it a "sustainable" location for new homes."At the end of July 2024, there were 6,857 live applications on the housing register, Bucks Home Choice, an increase of 530 compared to March of the same year," it planning application is currently awaiting a decision by Buckinghamshire Council. The authority has been approached for comment. You can follow BBC Beds, Herts & Bucks on Facebook, X (formerly Twitter) and Instagram.
