The metro areas with the most gyms
Why it matters: Gyms offer city dwellers a way to get and stay healthy, and can serve as excellent "third places" — a spot to hang out and connect outside home or work.
By the numbers: The Bridgeport metro's got 27.5 gyms for every 100,000 residents, Boston has 20.6 and San Diego has 20.4.
San Juan (4.3); Lakeland, Florida (6.2); and McAllen, Texas (6.6) have the fewest gyms for every 100,000 people.
How it works: These figures represent "fitness and recreational sports centers" in the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages data for Q3 2024.
Axios looked at metro areas with at least 500,000 residents, for which BLS had sufficient data.
What's next: The latest crop of high-end gyms are setting themselves up as both a place to pump iron and take work meetings — though hopefully not at the same time.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
2 days ago
- Axios
Key decisions that will shape rural health fund
States next year will begin tapping the $50 billion rural health fund in the GOP's tax and spending law, but questions have already arisen about how the funds will be allocated — and how much they will benefit rural providers. Why it matters: The fund aims at helping rural hospitals and providers adjust to sweeping changes in how Medicaid is financed, including limits on provider taxes and state-directed payments. But important details have to be fleshed out. What they're saying: Sen. Josh Hawley, who pushed for the fund, in part to get his vote for the megabill, said CMS will need to make sure the money "flows to hospitals that need it" and are not simply "going to states in general to do whatever they want with it." "So far, so good. I liked how it was written up," Hawley said. "But we'll want to monitor closely how the agency puts it into effect." Sen. Thom Tillis, who was one of the three GOP "no" votes on the reconciliation bill, told Axios that CMS needs to "make sure it's a fair formula for rural hospitals." "I think that that pot of money looks big, but it's not really when you consider some of the economic impacts, mainly from the state-directed payments," Tillis said. "We'll be interested to see how they interpret the law." How it works: The new law allocates $10 billion annually for the next five years, starting in 2026. The law says $25 billion is to be distributed equally among all states that submit a "detailed rural health transformation plan," which could include details on how they would use the funds. Between the lines: States can apply for the aid only once, by the end of this year. If they estimate wrong, or run into unforeseen problems, they don't get another shot at it. CMS Administrator Mehmet Oz must approve each state's application by Dec. 31. CMS has discretion to distribute the other $25 billion, based on factors such as how much of the state's population is rural and the number of rural health facilities. The CMS administrator can also consider other factors deemed appropriate. Friction point: Some of that flexibility raises questions about how CMS will proceed, said Zach Levinson, director of the KFF Project on Hospital Costs. "States will also have discretion on how they distribute funds among hospitals and other providers," Levinson said. "And they maybe will steer some dollars to non-rural areas, pending CMS approval." The concern is that some states could be favored over others, or that funding will not go to providers with the greatest needs. "There are risks of this becoming a slush fund if it's not carefully attended to and if it's not focused" on actual rural hospitals, said Jackson Hammond, a senior policy analyst at Paragon Health Institute. All the money has to be distributed by 2030 and spent by 2032. That also means much of the assistance will have already been spent before the provider tax and state-directed payment provisions take effect in 2028. The $50 billion sum also is about one-third of the $155 billion in estimated cuts to federal Medicaid spending in rural areas, per a KFF analysis.
Axios
2 days ago
- Axios
How immigrants contribute to Arkansas' health care workforce
Immigrants make up a lower share of Arkansas' health care workforce than in most states, but the nation's hospitals still rely heavily on an immigrant workforce, per census data analyzed by KFF. Why it matters: It's a pivotal moment for the nation's hospitals. The health care industry is facing a double challenge — a White House immigration crackdown that could translate to worker shortages and the "big, beautiful bill," which pulls back federal health care spending. Meanwhile, an aging population will require more care. Zoom in: About 5% of health care workers in Arkansas are immigrants, and Northwest Arkansas has a growing need for health care workers to meet growing demand as the nation sees a shortage. By the numbers: Nationwide, 16% of hospital workers are immigrants — roughly in the line with the share of the workforce that's foreign-born. More populous states have higher numbers — 32% in California, 29% in New York and New Jersey, and 27% in Florida. The intrigue: There are already shortages of doctors in certain areas and within certain specialities, as well as an overall workforce shortage. Reducing the number of immigrants in the U.S. could make that worse. And it's not just physicians. Immigrants account for a high share of the cleaning and maintenance staff in hospitals — close to 30%. "If there aren't enough workers, hospitals may need to limit services," says Scott Hulver, a policy analyst at KFF. State of play: Hospitals are one of the big losers from the new spending bill, taking a major hit from Medicaid cuts and changes to the Affordable Care Act, report Axios' Peter Sullivan and Victoria Knight. Millions are likely to lose their health insurance. The bottom line: Since the passage of the ACA in 2010, more people have had access to health care and the industry exploded, hiring surged, and more workers were in demand.
Axios
2 days ago
- Axios
Drowning deaths are rising in Virginia waters. Here's how to stay safe
Thirteen children under the age of five have died from drowning in Virginia so far this year, state health officials tell Axios. Why it matters: It's a heartbreaking number by any measure, and reason enough to dedicate some space to drowning prevention tips on this World Drowning Prevention Day, especially given the incoming high heat. Threat level: Of the 13 drowning deaths of children under the age of five this year, nine have happened in swimming pools and since Memorial Day, VDH tells Axios. That's the highest number of annual child drowning deaths in the state since at least 2021. Drowning is the leading cause of death for children ages 1-4, according to the CDC. But it's not just children. There have been 23 other drowning deaths in the state so far this year, per preliminary data from VDH. Stunning stat: Nearly 500 people died from accidental drowning in Virginia between 2020 and 2024, per VDH. What they're saying: "This increase that we've seen is tragic," Briana Bill, VDH's environmental health coordinator, tells Axios. "We're just trying to do whatever it is that we can to educate people and empower them to take care of each other and to watch out for each other." Zoom in: Here's what you need to know to keep yourself and family safe, according to Bill. 🪜Know what drowning looks like — a person's mouth is usually at water level, they are quiet and they look like they're climbing a ladder. 👀 Do not leave children unsupervised in any water at any time: "If your eyes aren't on them, get them out of the water," she says. 🚫 Restrict access to pools with gates and fences, including by removing the ladder from above-ground pools. 🛟 Teach your kids to swim, and if they don't know how, use Coast Guard-approved life jackets. Arm floaties, water wings and pool noodles are toys, not life-saving devices. 😮💨 Know CPR. "Bystander-initiated is the most effective way" to save someone who's drowning. 🌊 If you're on the James, be mindful of your surroundings. "Your spot may not move, but the river does," as do debris, downed trees and other hazards. The bottom line: If you're in the water or in charge of children in the water, be alert, keep an eye out for each other, and don't leave children unattended.
