
‘This land is ours': How Israeli settlers see life in the West Bank
The leafy children's playground was idyllic, if you ignored the men with automatic weapons slung over their shoulders, as well as the barbed-wire fence that stretched the length of the Israeli kibbutz.
Migdal Oz, with a population of about 500, was built almost 50 years ago on a plateau in the West Bank, the Palestinian territory that has been occupied by Israel since 1967. Like all of the hundreds of Israeli settlements in the area, its very existence is considered illegal under international law, as well as by the International Court of Justice.
The reason for the heavy security at Migdal Oz, which translates from Hebrew as Tower of Strength, is its proximity to the Palestinian village of Beit Fajjar, says Rabbi Benjy Myers, the deputy head of its emergency response team. At its closest point, Beit Fajjar is just 500 metres away from the kibbutz's metal gates, across sun-parched land dotted with rocks.
'There are a lot of people there who don't like us and the threat is credible. The nightmare scenario is that a few hundred or a few thousand of the residents of Beit Fajjar decide to march on us. If that happens, we're in a lot of trouble,' Myers said.
His concerns are not groundless. When Hamas fighters burst out of the Gaza Strip in October 2023, killing 1,200 people and abducting more than 200 in southern Israel, Migdal Oz also briefly came under attack, Myers said — before the threat was eliminated by its security team. None of its residents were hurt.
The kibbutz has also had a number of other security scares in recent years, including a car bomb exploding nearby and the murder of a teenage boy outside its gates, in what Israel said was a Hamas killing. More recently, Iranian ballistic missiles hurtled over Migdal Oz on their way to Tel Aviv and other Israeli cities, sending its residents rushing to bomb shelters.
Yet Myers, a father of six from Bradford, Yorkshire, who has been living in the kibbutz with his wife since 2011, rejected suggestions that it would make sense to move his family to a safer region, rather than make them spend their playtimes under the watchful gaze of men with guns.
'On a personal and a practical level, maybe. But on a national level, I have a responsibility for the continuity of the Jewish people. We are here because we belong here. Why should the Jewish people leave Judea?' he said, using the Israeli term for the areas of the West Bank south of Jerusalem. He pointed out a rocky hill where Abraham is said by locals to have been ordered by God to sacrifice his only son, Isaac, as a test of his faith.
'Is God happy that I'm here? As far as I can understand, yes. We're very much in a place where we are in the footsteps of our forefathers. That makes me feel pride and responsibility,' he added.
'I believe ideologically that the Jewish people should stick to their land. I know I have a right to live on this land, and I know that this place is the best place for me as a Jewish person to live. And that it is the right thing to do,' he said.
Ministers vow to annex the Gaza Strip and West Bank
The religious and political convictions voiced by residents of Migdal Oz are at the heart of what is driving Israel's latest round of expansion across the West Bank, as well as a surge in deadly violence against Palestinians.
Israeli troops and extremist settlers have killed more than 950 Palestinians, among them 200 children, in the West Bank since October 2023, according to the United Nations. The killings go unpunished in the vast majority of cases. About 40 Israelis have been killed in the same period, government officials say.
Last July, Itamar Ben-Gvir, the national security minister, approved the distribution of 120,000 firearms to settlers. He also said that Palestinian prisoners 'should be shot in the head' rather than fed. Israel says its soldiers are stationed in the West Bank to keep the peace between Jewish and Palestinian residents, as well as to thwart terrorist attacks.
Israel has been building on Palestinian land for decades, yet its government has never been so open about the scope of its ambitions. On the eve of the war with Iran, government ministers including Bezalel Smotrich, the finance minister who also holds a senior post in the defence ministry, vowed at an ultra-nationalist conference to annex the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.
Like President Trump, Smotrich, who has said 'there is no such thing as the Palestinian people', has also called for the removal of Gazans from their territory, an idea likened by organisations such as Human Rights Watch to ethnic cleansing. So far, 56,000 people have been killed by Israeli forces since 2023 in the strip, according to the Hamas-run health ministry.
The conference earlier this month came as Israel approved the construction of more than 20 new settlements in the West Bank, the biggest increase for years.
Both Ben-Gvir and Smotrich, who are themselves settlers, were sanctioned this month by Britain for inciting 'extremist violence' against Palestinians. On Tuesday Ireland became the first European country to ban trade with Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, a move that it said was a response to Israel's 'genocidal activity' in Gaza.
'Netanyahu is just waiting for an excuse'
On the sun-scorched streets of Ramallah, the de facto capital of the Palestinian territories that are partially controlled by the Palestinian Authority, a sworn enemy of Hamas, people were wary of speaking to outsiders, especially in sight of Israeli surveillance cameras that are mounted on the walls and barbed-wire topped fences that separate the city from the nearby homes of settlers.
'We have never before witnessed such extremists in the Israeli government,' said Mohammad Abualrob, the spokesman for Mohammad Mustafa, prime minister of the state of Palestine. He also said that Israeli settlers had recently hurled stones at his car while his children were inside. 'They hide close to the checkpoints or in the hills,' he said. 'Luckily, the glass didn't break and I was able to get away and save my children.'
The increase in settler violence has sparked concerns that Netanyahu's government could seek to exploit tensions to justify a military campaign in the West Bank. 'This is a scenario that we are taking into consideration,' said a senior Palestinian security official. 'At some point, the Palestinian people might react violently. This could be a spark. We think Netanyahu is just waiting for an excuse.'
His comments were echoed by Mustafa Barghouti, a prominent Palestinian politician and the head of the Palestinian Medical Relief Society charity. 'When a government makes its strategic plan the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, then what remains is how to find the opportunity and the way to do it,' he said.
Although Israel has operated checkpoints in the West Bank for decades, they reached an unprecedented level after the start of the war with Iran. About 900 iron gates now block the entrances of West Bank cities and villages, cutting off families from one another, in what Israel says is a necessary security measure. 'It has always felt like we are in prison, but now it feels like we are in a maximum-security prison,' said Ahmad, 29, who lives in Ramallah.
Israeli soldiers also stepped up raids into the West Bank after the start of the war with Iran, locals say, detaining dozens of people, frequently without charge. They have likewise increased their demolitions of Palestinian homes in the region, usually giving families just three days to pack up their lives before sending in bulldozers.
The clampdown has exacerbated a widespread sense of despair in the West Bank, where one in three people are unemployed, and hopes for an independent Palestinian state now seem like a distant memory. 'Tell the world we are dying here,' said a young man outside a café. He refused to give his name, for fear of arrest.
Back at Migdal Oz, Abigail, a former resident who now studies at its women's college, nodded when asked if she believed that Israeli Jews and Palestinians could ever live in peace with one another. 'If they know that we are strong and that we govern here, that this land is ours, then can there be peace,' she said. 'But only if the last word is ours.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BreakingNews.ie
35 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Iran raises death toll from war with Israel to more than 900
Iran has raised the official death toll for its war with Israel, with official media reporting 935 people have been killed in the country during the 12-day conflict. The state-run IRNA news agency did not give a breakdown between military and civilian casualties, but said on Monday of the 935 people, 38 were children and 132 were women. Advertisement Its previous report last week said 627 people had been killed. The US-based Human Rights Activists over the weekend said 1,190 people had been killed according to data collected by the agency's network of medical and local volunteers. Of those, it said 436 were civilians, 435 military and 319 have not yet been identified. The group has consistently reported higher casualties than the official reports from Iran. Advertisement Israel relentlessly attacked Iran beginning June 13, targeting its nuclear sites, defence systems, high-ranking military officials and atomic scientists. In retaliation, Iran fired more than 550 ballistic missiles at Israel, most of which were intercepted, but those that got through caused damage in many areas and killed 28 people.


Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Intelligence experts in chilling new warning after US and Israel strikes on Iran
The so-called '12 day war' could re-ingite at any time be more intense than before, warns top former FBI expert, as American officials desperately try to get Tehran to the negotiating table Post-conflict tension between the Israel-US axis and Iran has created a 'new normal' which could erupt into a fresh and more intense war, an intelligence assessment warns. The US-based Soufan Centre declared brutal missile exchanges could ignite once more and it is possible it could even spread into the wider region if an agreement is not reached. In the latest assessment by Ali Soufan, a former FBI Middle East expert warns US President Donald Trump 's threats of a return to attacks has created conditions for war to return easily. His latest global security assessment warns: 'By threatening further strikes, the U.S. and Israel are establishing a 'new normal' in the region, in which further conflict with Iran, as well as Iranian retaliation, could erupt at any time. 'On Friday, asked whether he would consider new strikes if the U.S. and Israel had not succeeded in ending Iran's uranium enrichment program, Trump said, 'Sure, without question, absolutely.' And the report added: 'Should war erupt again, there are numerous pathways for conflict to expand and intensify, as happened after the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel.' After the October 7 Hamas attack, which sparked war in Gaza, Israel's attacks triggered conflict with Hamas-supporting Lebanon's Hezbollah, Yemeni Houthis and Iraqi pro-Iranian groups. Tehran has provided all of these groups with training, weaponry and huge support as they have acted as proxies, extending Iran's military power across the region. Trump's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff is meeting with Iranian counterparts this week in a bid to resume negotiations to avoid a return to missile exchange warfare. But so far Iran has given 'no indication' it is ready to accede to Trump's demand that it must end its enrichment of uranium and destroy any remaining stocks, the document warns. Trump's so-named '12 day war' with between Iran and Israel- which the US joined with its bunker buster bombing of Iran's nuclear sites, caused serious damage in Israel. It is thought 974 were killed in Iran, including 268 military members, 387 civilians and 319 unidentified dead, whilst 3,458 people were injured. Israel lost the lives of 28 civilians and 3,200 were injured, whilst widespread damage was unleashed on buildings in cities such as Tel Aviv and Beersheba. But the US administration still hopes to restore peace in the Middle East, whilst Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu is pressing on with his war on Gaza's Hamas despite talking to Donald Trump about plans to end the war in the Palestinian enclave within two weeks. And Soufan warns that in Lebanon Hezbollah 'remains sufficiently well-armed and influential to block any move by Beirut to normalise relations with Israel.' Hezbollah, although it has suffered scores of deaths of senior commanders including its slain leader Hassan Nasrallah and hundreds of fighters, remains a threat. In the recent 12 day war Hezbollah is said to have refused to fire on Israel when asked to by Tehran, out of fear of a revenge onslaught from Netanyahu's military. It is believed in the opening salvos of the 12 day war that as many as 20 senior Iranian military commanders were killed along with more than a dozen nuclear scientists.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Despite the Bob Vylan furore, Glastonbury still belongs at the BBC
'When the country is divided, the BBC is on the rack.' So said a BBC executive at the time of the Suez Crisis in 1956, which led to the resignation of the then prime minister, Sir Anthony Eden. That crisis was over the Middle East. Today, the corporation is on the rack again over its coverage of that region. This time, there are calls not for the PM to go, but for the BBC's director general or one of his senior executives to, first, explain themselves to MPs, and then perhaps walk the plank. The reason this time isn't a war – it's the Glastonbury Festival. It follows criticism of the BBC broadcasting a performance on Saturday by punk duo Bob Vylan, whose lead performer led crowds in chants of 'Free, free Palestine' and 'Death, death to the IDF'. The set went out live, with an on-screen warning but without other editorial interventions – no edits, no bleeping-out – and remained available to watch on the iPlayer for five hours, until it was eventually expunged. Festival organisers were quick to apologise, saying they were 'appalled' by the band's conduct, and that the apparent call to incite violence went against its ethos of 'hope, unity, peace and love'. On Saturday night, Lisa Nandy, the culture secretary, telephoned Tim Davie, director-general of the corporation, to demand an explanation. The prime minister believes the punk duo's call-and-response chant to be "appalling hate speech". Police in Somerset are reviewing footage of the tirade. For its part, the BBC has – some might say belatedly – apologised for the episode, saying it regretted broadcasting the 'utterly unacceptable' words, and 'with hindsight, we should have pulled the stream during the performance'. Some have suggested that the public service broadcaster ought to stop covering Glastonbury. On the first day of Wimbledon – another jewel in the corporation's crown – I am attempted to go full John McInroe: You cannot be serious. I think the heat is getting to some people. The BBC certainly has questions to answer about this year's Glastonbury coverage. Broadcast regulator Ofcom has said that it "clearly has questions to answer". It beggars belief that Bob Vylan's set was ever allowed to go out live on the iPlayer, given the BBC was already alert to possible problems relating to Kneecap, the Belfast band, whose controversial set – which included pro-Palestine chants – was not aired live by the broadcaster. The corporation must take decisive action to discipline those responsible. But we are also in danger of straying into 'shoot the messenger' territory. When issues such as this arise, politicians are always among the first to aim at what they see as an open goal. But rather than call the director general personally, Nandy, quick off the mark, should have talked to the regulator and the BBC chairman, not its chief executive. What would she have said if Conservative ministers had talked directly to the DG on such controversial matters? The shadow home secretary has since called for the BBC to be prosecuted over the broadcast. Should that not be a decision left to the police and the Crown Prosecution Service? This particular controversy will blow over, though it remains just as difficult to report accurately what is happening in Gaza as the Israeli government will not let independent journalists have access. Glastonbury is a glorious event, bringing together different generations all of whom can find the music they love and be introduced to music they will never hear otherwise. That sounds like public service to me. It costs the BBC some £7 million, which – given the hundreds of hours of coverage it generates – is extremely good value. You could argue that the BBC should spend more since its iPlayer coverage needs an upgrade: the ability to search for an act by name, rather than have to fast-forward through hours of broadcast footage, would be an obvious improvement. However, as the licence fee has lost around 40 per cent of its value in real terms over the last decade or so, that is a big ask. One of the roles of the BBC is to bring the nation together, says its director-general. Glastonbury does. When it returns in 2027, after a fallow year, it will have been broadcast on the BBC for three decades. Don't stop covering it.