logo
Iran nuclear programme set back years with strikes: CIA chief to lawmakers

Iran nuclear programme set back years with strikes: CIA chief to lawmakers

Ratcliffe also told lawmakers that the intelligence community assessed the vast majority of Iran's amassed enriched uranium likely remains buried under the rubble at Isfahan and Fordow
AP Washington
CIA Director John Ratcliffe told skeptical US lawmakers that American military strikes destroyed Iran's lone metal conversion facility and in the process delivered a monumental setback to Tehran's nuclear programme that would take years to overcome, a US official said on Sunday.
The official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive intelligence, said Ratcliffe laid out the importance of the strikes on the metal conversion facility during a classified hearing for US lawmakers last week.
Details about the private briefings surfaced as President Donald Trump and his administration keep pushing back on questions from Democratic lawmakers and others about how far Iran was set back by the strikes before last Tuesday's ceasefire with Israel took hold.
It was obliterating like nobody's ever seen before, Trump said in an interview on Fox News Channel's "Sunday Morning Futures".
"And that meant the end to their nuclear ambitions, at least for a period of time.
Ratcliffe also told lawmakers that the intelligence community assessed the vast majority of Iran's amassed enriched uranium likely remains buried under the rubble at Isfahan and Fordow, two of the three key nuclear facilities targeted by US strikes.
But even if the uranium remains intact, the loss of its metal conversion facility effectively has taken away Tehran's ability to build a bomb for years to come, the official said.
Rafael Grossi, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said Sunday on CBS' Face the Nation that the three Iranian sites with capabilities in terms of treatment, conversion and enrichment of uranium have been destroyed to an important degree".
But, he added, some is still standing and that because capabilities remain, if they so wish, they will be able to start doing this again".
He said assessing the full damage comes down to Iran allowing in inspectors.
"Frankly speaking, one cannot claim that everything has disappeared, and there is nothing there," Grossi said.
Trump has insisted from just hours after three key targets were struck by US bunker-buster bombs and Tomahawk missiles that Iran's nuclear program was obliterated.
His defence secretary, Pete Hegseth, has said they were destroyed".
A preliminary report issued by the US Defence Intelligence Agency, meanwhile, said the strikes did significant damage to the Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan sites, but did not totally destroy the facilities.
As a result of Israeli and US strikes, Grossi said that it is clear that there has been severe damage, but it's not total damage". Israel claims it has set back Iran's nuclear program by many years".
The metal conversion facility that Ratcliffe said was destroyed was located at the Isfahan nuclear facility. The process of transforming enriched uranium gas into dense metal, or metallisation, is a key step in building the explosive core of a bomb.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio in comments at the NATO summit last week also suggested that it was likely the US strikes had destroyed the metal conversion facility.
You can't do a nuclear weapon without a conversion facility," Rubio said.
"We can't even find where it is, where it used to be on the map. You can't even find where it used to be because the whole thing is just blackened out. It's gone. It's wiped out.
The CIA director also stressed to lawmakers during the congressional briefing that Iran's air defence was shattered during the 12-day assault.
As a result, any attempt by Iran to rebuild its nuclear programme could now easily be thwarted by Israeli strikes that Iran currently has little wherewithal to defend against, the official said.
Ratcliffe's briefing to lawmakers on the US findings appeared to mesh with some of Israeli officials' battle damage assessments.
Israeli officials have determined that Iran's ability to enrich uranium to a weapons-grade level was neutralised for a prolonged period, according to a senior Israeli military official who was not authorized to talk publicly about the matter.
Tehran's nuclear programme was also significantly damaged by the strikes killing key scientists, damage to Iran's missile production industry and the battering of Iran's aerial defence system, according to the Israeli's assessment.
Grossi, and some Democrats, note that Iran still has the know-how.
You cannot undo the knowledge that you have or the capacities that you have, Grossi said, emphasising the need to come to a diplomatic deal on the country's nuclear programme.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Khamenei holds the Iran key as Trump pushes for new nuclear deal
Khamenei holds the Iran key as Trump pushes for new nuclear deal

First Post

time27 minutes ago

  • First Post

Khamenei holds the Iran key as Trump pushes for new nuclear deal

Senior Iranian officials are prepared to enter talks with the Trump administration over a civilian nuclear deal, but the final decision rests with Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei read more Despite public denials, senior Iranian officials are quietly signaling their willingness to resume nuclear negotiations with the Trump administration. However, as with all critical decisions in the Islamic Republic, the ultimate authority rests with Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei . A source familiar with the matter told The Jerusalem Post that Iran's leadership has indicated a readiness to talk, but they are still awaiting a green light from Khamenei. It remains unclear whether Khamenei is deliberately holding back his approval or if communication difficulties are contributing to the delay. Some reports suggest that Khamenei has retreated to a secure underground location — an apparent wartime measure—that has hampered contact with top officials. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Khamenei previously blocked key talks Journalist Barak Ravid recently reported that Khamenei previously blocked attempts by Iran's foreign minister to engage with US special envoy Steve Witkoff and Vice President JD Vance. That obstruction, during the recent conflict, was a decisive factor in US President Donald Trump 's choice to strike Iran's nuclear facilities. A deal is still on the table Despite the tensions and military strikes between Iran, Israel, and the US, efforts to bring Tehran back to the negotiating table are ongoing. Trump administration officials have floated a range of proposals — some highly ambitious — including potentially allowing Iran to access up to $30 billion for a civilian nuclear energy program. The proposals are contingent on a firm, non-negotiable condition: zero uranium enrichment by Iran. The US insists that any civilian nuclear programme must be powered by imported, not domestically enriched, uranium. This idea mirrors the model followed by the United Arab Emirates. Secret White House meetings and regional involvement Much of the recent diplomacy has been conducted in secret. A critical meeting occurred last Friday between US envoy Steve Witkoff and officials from Gulf states at the White House, just one day before the US military launched strikes against Iran. During this meeting, terms for a revamped Iranian nuclear program were laid out, including a $20–30 billion investment, primarily expected to come from US-aligned Gulf partners, not American taxpayers. One floated idea involves Gulf states funding the replacement of Iran's Fordow nuclear facility — recently bombed by the US — with a new non-enrichment energy site. Whether Iran would have access to or control over the facility remains unclear. Sanctions relief and access to frozen funds Another incentive under discussion is the removal of select economic sanctions and the unlocking of $6 billion in Iranian assets currently frozen in foreign bank accounts. These financial carrots are part of a broader strategy to draw Iran back into a compliance framework without direct concessions from Washington DC. Still, reports quoting senior Trump administration officials said these proposals are preliminary and subject to change. The US is not offering unilateral benefits but is open to facilitating peace and long-term stability. Trump's public indifference belies behind-the-scenes diplomacy In public statements, President Trump has struck a dismissive tone, stating he doesn't care whether a new deal is signed or not. However, CNN cited sources to say that the administration sees real value in locking down a longer-term nuclear agreement to reinforce the recent ceasefire between Iran and Israel. Witkoff has echoed similar views in his interviews. He said the US is pursuing a 'comprehensive peace agreement' and sees signs that Iran is open to one. He said multiple intermediaries — especially Qatar — are actively facilitating discussions. Road to a new agreement remains uncertain While a sixth round of negotiations had been scheduled before Israel's strikes disrupted talks, no formal date has been set to resume them. President Trump claimed that US-Iran talks might take place next week, though Iranian officials have not confirmed this and sources say the logistics are still being finalised. Before the recent military escalation, five rounds of preliminary talks had already been held. A proposal from the US was on the table and Iran was expected to respond in Oman — plans which were derailed by the Israeli assault. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Potential turning point or point of no return? The Trump administration hopes that the recent show of military force will pressure Iran into abandoning its pursuit of nuclear capabilities. However, some experts warn the opposite outcome is just as plausible: that Iran may now double down on its nuclear ambitions out of self-preservation. In a troubling sign, the Iranian parliament has recently voted to end cooperation with the UN's nuclear watchdog agency — a move widely interpreted as a signal of Tehran's intent to further conceal its nuclear activities. Direct talks are still uncertain US Secretary of State Marco Rubio reinforced that any future agreement depends on Iran's willingness to engage in direct negotiations. Still, back-channel communication continues, with Qatar playing a central role in conveying messages and helping maintain the fragile ceasefire. The coming days may determine whether this fragile diplomatic moment yields a new nuclear agreement — or slides into deeper mistrust and confrontation.

Why US's most Jewish city picked vocal Israel critic Zohran Mamdani for Mayor
Why US's most Jewish city picked vocal Israel critic Zohran Mamdani for Mayor

India Today

time27 minutes ago

  • India Today

Why US's most Jewish city picked vocal Israel critic Zohran Mamdani for Mayor

In choosing Zohran Mamdani as their candidate for mayor, Democrats in America's most Jewish city have nominated an outspoken critic of Israel, alarming some in New York's Jewish community and signalling a sea change in the priorities of one of the party's most loyal voting 33-year-old democratic socialist's surprisingly strong performance against former Gov. Andrew Cuomo makes clear that taking a stance against Israel is no longer disqualifying in a Democratic primary. The state Assembly member has declined to support the right of Israel to exist as a Jewish state, refused to denounce the term 'global intifada" and supports an organised effort to put economic pressure on Israel through boycotts and other he excelled in the city with the largest Jewish population outside of Israel, and with the support of many Jewish voters. Mamdani's success reflects the ideological realignment of many American Jews since the Oct. 7, 2023, attack by Hamas on Israel that led to Israel's invasion of Gaza. Many Democratic voters, including Jews, have grown dismayed by Israel's conduct in the war and are deeply critical of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. That is especially true among younger, more progressive voters, many of whom have rejected the once-broadly accepted notion that anti-Israel sentiment is inherently others, Mamdani's showing has spurred new fears about safety and the waning influence of Jewish voters in a city where anti-Jewish hate crime has surged. Last year, Jews were the target of more than half of the hate crimes in the people are concerned," said Rabbi Shimon Hecht, of Congregation B'nai Jacob in Brooklyn, who said he has heard from congregants in recent days who hope Mamdani will be beaten in the November general election, where he will face Mayor Eric Adams, who is running as an independent, Republican Curtis Sliwa, and possibly Cuomo, if he stays in the race.'I think like every upsetting election, it's a wake-up call for people,' Hecht said. 'I strongly believe that he will not be elected as our next mayor, but it's going to take a lot of uniting among the Jewish people and others who are concerned about these issues. We have to unify."Veteran New York Democratic political strategist Hank Sheinkopf put it more bluntly, predicting a hasty exodus of religious Jews from the city and a decline in long-standing Jewish influence that would be replicated elsewhere.'It's the end of Jewish New York as we know it,' he said, adding: 'New York is a petri dish for national Democratic politics. And what happened here is what will likely happen in cities across the country."ISRAEL WAS A KEY CAMPAIGN ISSUEMamdani's top Democratic rival, the former governor, had called antisemitism and support for Israel "the most important issue' of the backers repeatedly accused Cuomo of trying to weaponise the issue. Many drew parallels to the way Republican President Donald Trump has cast any criticism of Israel's actions as antisemitic, claiming Jews who vote for Democrats 'hate Israel" and their own some Mamdani supporters, the election results signalled a rejection by voters of one of Cuomo's arguments: that an upstart socialist with pro-Palestinian views posed a threat to New York's Jewish were focused on issues such as affordability in a notoriously expensive city, or flat-out opposed to Cuomo, who was forced to resign in disgrace amid sexual harassment Leong Knauer, a 35-year-old Brooklyn bartender who is Jewish and backed Mamdani, said the vote represented 'New Yorkers, many of them Jewish, saying we care more about having an affordable city than sowing division.''Many of us take really deep offence to our history being weaponised against us,' she said. 'Jewish people all over the world have well-founded fears for their safety, but Jews in New York are safe overall.'Others agreed with Mamdani's views on Miller, political director of Jewish Voice for Peace Action, an anti-Zionist, progressive group that worked on Mamdani's behalf, said Mamdani 'was actually pretty popular among a lot of Jewish voters."advertisement'That is not in spite of his support for Palestinian rights. That is because of his support for Palestinian rights,' she said. 'There has been a massive rupture within the Jewish community and more and more Jews of all generations, but especially younger generations,' she said, now refuse to be tied to what they see as a rogue government committing atrocities against show support for Israel has declined since the war began. Overall, a slight majority of Americans now express a 'somewhat' or 'very' unfavourable opinion of Israel, according to a March Pew Research Centre poll, compared with 42 per cent in 2022. Democrats' views are particularly negative, with nearly 70 per cent holding an unfavourable opinion versus less than 40% of THE MAYORAL RACEMamdani's wasn't the only race where Israel was on voters' Brooklyn, City Councilwoman Shahana Hanif, who represents Park Slope and surrounding areas, drew criticism for her Palestinian advocacy. Some said she had failed to respond forcefully to antisemitic incidents in the Hanif, the first Muslim woman elected to the City Council, easily beat her top challenger, Maya Kornberg, who is Jewish, despite an influx of money from wealthy, pro-Israel groups and outcome dismayed Ramon Maislen, a developer who launched Brooklyn BridgeBuilders to oppose Hanif's reelection and said antisemitism did not seem to resonate with voters.'We were very disappointed with our neighbours' response," he campaigning against Hanif, he said he was routinely screamed at by residents and accused of supporting genocide.'I think that those of us in the Jewish community that are attuned to that are cognisant that there's been some kind of cultural sea change that's occurring," he said. 'What we're seeing is a legitimatisation of hatred that isn't happening in any other liberal or progressive space."MAMDANI'S RECORD AND RHETORICMamdani has repeatedly pledged to fight antisemitism, including during an appearance on 'The Late Show With Stephen Colbert,' where he was grilled on his stance. He was joined on the show by city comptroller and fellow candidate Brad Lander, the city's highest-ranking Jewish official, who had cross-endorsed him. He has also said he would increase funding for anti-hate crime programming by 800 per many of his comments have angered Jewish groups and officials, most notably his refusal to disavow the phrase 'globalize the intifada," which has been used as a slogan in recent protests. Many Jews see it as a call to violence against Israeli civilians. In a podcast interview, Mamdani said the phrase captured a 'a desperate desire for equality and equal rights in standing up for Palestinian human rights."advertisementGiven another opportunity to condemn the phrase, Mamdani on Sunday told NBC's 'Meet the Press' that it was not his role to police speech and he pledged to be a mayor who 'protects Jewish New Yorkers and lives up to that commitment through the work that I do.'Mamdani also supports the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement, which aims to pressure governments, schools and other institutions to boycott Israeli products, divest from companies that support the country, and impose sanctions. The Anti-Defamation League calls it antisemitic and part of a broader campaign to "delegitimise and isolate the State of Israel.'Mamdani has also said that, as mayor, he would arrest Netanyahu if the Israeli leader tried to enter the ADL in a statement Thursday warned candidates and their supporters not to use "language playing into dangerous antisemitic canards that time and time again have been used to incite hatred and violence against Jews.'In his victory speech, Mamdani alluded to the criticism he'd received and said he would not abandon his beliefs. But he also said he would "reach further to understand the perspectives of those with whom I disagree and to wrestle deeply with those disagreements.'- EndsMust Watch

As US trade deal nears, India reviews timing, scope of digital economy policy
As US trade deal nears, India reviews timing, scope of digital economy policy

Mint

time33 minutes ago

  • Mint

As US trade deal nears, India reviews timing, scope of digital economy policy

New Delhi: As India and the US move closer to finalising a bilateral trade pact ahead of the 9 July tariff deadline, New Delhi is reassessing the timing and contours of pending policy measures that are sensitive to the interests of American tech giants. These include the proposed Digital Competition Bill, a comprehensive e-commerce framework, and new income attribution rules for non-resident enterprises, according to three people familiar with the matter. The recalibrations are being weighed to ensure the policy measures align with the broader objectives of the India-US trade deal and reflect India's commitment to a trust-based regulatory framework and investment requirements, one of them said. 'Policy measures which are on the drawing board can also be a bargaining chip in bilateral treaty negotiations," said the second person quoted above. Both of them spoke on condition of anonymity. The ministry of finance, the departments for promotion of industry and internal trade and commerce, and the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) did not reply to queries emailed on Friday. India has offered several concessions to US exporters of goods and services in the previous two Union budgets, including customs duty reductions and scrapping of the equalisation levy on digital services rendered to Indian businesses by non-resident entities such as tech giants Google and Meta. New Delhi is looking to finalise a bilateral agreement with Washington before the US's 9 July reciprocal tariffs deadline. The US wants India to significantly reduce duties on American agricultural goods, dairy products, and shrimp, and remove non-tariff barriers restricting US dairy exports. Washington, too, is under pressure to ensure the India-US trade deal passes before the deadline. A 26% reciprocal tariff on Indian exports into the US, which includes the 10% universal baseline tariff that now applies to Indian exports, along with tariffs on imports from other countries, could push up retail price inflation in the US. Concerns over the impact of reciprocal tariffs on inflation are already top on the mind of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, who has refused to buckle under pressure from President Trump to cut the benchmark lending rate. President Trump is pitching for rate cuts which could help lower the government's interest payments and the budget deficit. India's cautious approach Among the measures being reviewed is India's proposed Digital Competition Bill which seeks to introduce an ex-ante or forward-looking approach to regulating the digital economy. This will mandate influential tech firms to follow a code of conduct. The draft Bill, as it is framed now, will affect digital economy firms' ability to show targeted advertisements and the way people use Google services like maps, Mint reported on 24 April and 7 June, respectively, last year. The government is also reviewing the proposed profit attribution rules to be rolled out by the Income Tax department. These are meant to levy tax on non-resident companies which have a 'significant economic presence' in India, defined on the basis of transaction value and user base. But India's double tax avoidance deal with the US makes it difficult to tax these entities, as only those defined as having a 'permanent establishment' here under the treaty can be taxed. India abolished other efforts to tax tech giants catering to Indian customers remotely by removing the equalisation levy (6% on digital advertisements and 2% on e-commerce) over the last few months to ease trade tensions with the US and to remain aligned with OECD's framework to check tax base erosion, said Amit Maheshwari, tax partner at AKM Global, a tax and consulting firm. 'However, it still has domestic rules like the Significant Economic Presence (SEP) concept and draft profit attribution rules under Section 9 of the Income Tax Act and Rule 10. For now, the profit attribution rules have not been made effective, and US-based companies can still claim tax treaty benefits in case of a SEP existing in India unless they have a permanent establishment here," said Maheshwari. On Saturday, Canada rescinded a 3% digital services tax on big tech companies that was to take effect on 30 June. This was in response to Trump's announcement on Friday that he was cutting off trade talks with Canada for going ahead with this tax. E-commerce and FDI India's proposed comprehensive e-commerce policy, which has drawn strong interest from global entities such as Amazon and Walmart, is another measure under review as the countries reassess priorities in the wake of an eventful regime change in the US. 'This may not be the right time to push ahead with the e-commerce policy discussion, given the shifting global geopolitical scenario," a senior government official said. India is also considering a tweak to its foreign direct investment (FDI) policy in retail to allow foreign investment in building inventory, which is currently permitted only for domestic players. The idea is to enable US-based retailers to invest in warehousing infrastructure. The Digital Personal Data Protection Act of 2023 took into account some of the concerns of digital economy firms. 'It is true that a lot of discussions have been happening on issues like the Digital Competition Bill and the e-commerce policy. Some of these developments may also come up during bilateral discussions with the relevant foreign governments," said Amol Kulkarni, director of research at CUTS International, a non-profit, non-governmental organization working on public interest issues. The timing and form of these policy developments can offer India leverage in these discussions, Kulkarni said. "It is for the government to strike a fine balance in these talks taking into consideration the need for policy certainty and predictability and the gains that could come to the overall economy from specific policies," said Kulkarni. 'For instance, the regulation of cross border data flow had been subject to intense negotiation and the final framing under the Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 was quite accommodating, however, the requirements under the Digital Personal Data Protection Rules 2025 introduce some ambiguities, which could have been avoided, in the interest of policy certainty and predictability," said Kulkarni. After signing a major tariff deal with China, President Trump has hinted at a 'big trade deal' with India too. Whether India's moves so far, including removal of the equalisation levy and pause on contentious digital rules, are enough to soften the US stance remains to be seen, said Maheshwari.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store