Australia widens teen social media ban to YouTube, scraps exemption
The decision came after the internet regulator urged the government last week to overturn the YouTube carve-out, citing a survey that found 37% of minors reported harmful content on the site.
"Social media have a social responsibility and there is no doubt that Australian kids are being negatively impacted by online platforms, so I'm calling time on it," Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said in a statement.
"I want Australian parents to know that we have their backs."
The decision broadens the ban set to take effect in December. YouTube says it is used by nearly three-quarters of Australians aged 13 to 15, and should not be classified as social media because its main activity is hosting videos.
"Our position remains clear: YouTube is a video sharing platform with a library of free, high-quality content, increasingly viewed on TV screens. It's not social media," a YouTube spokesperson said by email.
Since the government said last year it would exempt YouTube due to its popularity with teachers, platforms covered by the ban, such as Meta's (META.O), opens new tab Facebook and Instagram, Snapchat (SNAP.N), opens new tab and TikTok, have complained.
They say YouTube has key similarities to their products, including letting users interact and recommending content through an algorithm based on activity.
Artificial intelligence has supercharged the spread of misinformation on social media platforms such as YouTube, said Adam Marre, chief information security officer at cyber security firm Arctic Wolf.
"The Australian government's move to regulate YouTube is an important step in pushing back against the unchecked power of big tech and protecting kids," he added in an email.
The reversal sets up a fresh dispute with Alphabet, which threatened to withdraw some Google services from Australia in 2021 to avoid a law forcing it to pay news outlets for content appearing in searches.
Last week, YouTube told Reuters it had urged the government "to uphold the integrity of the legislative process". Australian media said YouTube threatened a court challenge, but YouTube did not confirm that.
The law passed in November only requires "reasonable steps" by social media platforms to keep out Australians younger than 16, or face a fine of up to A$49.5 million.
The government, which is due to receive a report this month on tests of age-checking products, has said those results will influence enforcement of the ban.
($1=1.5363 Australian dollars)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
25 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump says he thinks US will have a 'very fair deal' on trade with China
WASHINGTON, July 30 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that talks were moving along with China and he expected the two sides would reach a fair deal on trade. "We're moving along with China. We're doing fine with China," Trump told reporters at the White House. "I think it's going to work out very well. We're right in step. I think we're going to have a very fair deal with China." U.S. and Chinese officials met in Stockholm on Monday for more than five hours of talks aimed at resolving economic disputes with a goal of extending their truce on a trade war by three months. China is facing an August 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement with Trump's administration, after Beijing and Washington reached preliminary deals in May and June to end escalating tit-for-tat tariffs and a cut-off of rare earth minerals. Trump's administration has agreed trade deals with the European Union, Britain and Japan. It is negotiating with multiple other countries to achieve more.
Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
YouTube is no replacement for old media
Young people now choose to watch YouTube more than any traditional TV channel, according to Ofcom figures. Founded just 20 years ago, YouTube has around 2.7 billion users in more than 80 countries. It has effectively become the biggest TV channel in the world. With 720,000 hours of video uploaded every day, this explosion of content provides the viewer with virtually unlimited choice. It has democratised content creation and allowed an extraordinary diversity of voices to bypass almost all editorial oversight. There is much to celebrate in the media revolution. Artists, musicians, commentators and performers can now build and interact with their audiences directly, relying on their own creativity alone. Consumers have a range of content undreamt of just a few decades ago when the only question was which of the four terrestrial TV channels to watch. At the same time, however, the lack of any filter or editorial control provides real risks to democracies which rely on an informed public and high quality journalism. Without any kind of moderation, platforms like YouTube provide fertile ground for misinformation and disinformation, allowing conspiracy theorists and hostile states equal space with professional reporting and properly resourced high quality content. Unlike the public service broadcasters (PSBs) which are bound by strict editorial standards and regulatory oversight, YouTube, TikTok and other platforms rely on algorithms which prioritise engagement over accuracy. Sensationalist, misleading or outright false content often garners more views, likes and shares, amplifying its reach. This distorts the information and facts which voters need to have in order to make informed decisions at election time. Despite this huge increase in the number of competing providers of video content, the need for reliable and trusted public service broadcasting remains greater than ever. The range of entertainment across the TV channels and streaming services is vast, benefiting viewers and creators alike. However, consumers also need to have sources of trusted and factual information on which they can rely. Public service broadcasters are governed by the Broadcasting Code and are required to be impartial and not to give undue offence. The quality press like the Telegraph survive on a reputation for accuracy and properly researched investigative journalism. Yet both are threatened by the rapid growth of unregulated and often unreliable social media platforms. The steady decline in the reach of public service broadcasters that we have seen in the past 10 years is likely to accelerate as we approach the time when terrestrial transmission will cease and all TV viewing will be via the internet. Sales of physical newspapers will continue to fall, with some already shifting to digital-only distribution. As viewers and readers move to online platforms, advertisers inevitably follow. Last year, YouTube made more than $36 bn from advertising. With so much free content available, it is tougher to persuade consumers to pay subscriptions for news content or to pay a compulsory licence fee in order to watch live TV. The latest BBC annual report records that the number of licence-fee payers fell yet again, by another 300,000 last year. Governments of both colours have struggled to support professional media. The latest Media Act, which I took through parliament just 18 months ago, requires that the PSB channels are given prominence (appearing at the top of the programme guide) on connected TV platforms, set-top boxes and streaming sticks. This has already been overtaken as more and more consumers reject scheduled TV and turn straight to on-demand services. Ofcom warned this week that the future of public service media is at stake and called for YouTube in particular to do more to ensure that this content is prominent and easy to find. There are other steps that government and regulators can take. More needs to be done to improve media literacy and to encourage consumers not to accept every claim online and instead to rely upon trusted news providers. The Competition Authority will need to use its new powers to ensure that those who create news content are properly rewarded by the tech platforms that disseminate it. And, as AI offers greater competition by scraping news content and re-presenting it, robust copyright laws must ensure that those who created it are able to control its use and receive appropriate payment. The challenge for policy makers and news organisations remains how best to adapt to a rapidly changing media landscape while protecting the principles of accuracy and impartiality on which a functioning democracy depends.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Spain's Viscofan reports second-quarter profit increase
GDANSK, July 30 (Reuters) - Spanish meat-packaging maker Viscofan ( opens new tab reported on Wednesday a 3.1% increase in net profit to 38.4 million euros ($44.08 million) in the second quarter from the prior year, as higher sales volume and cost savings offset the impact of U.S. dollar depreciation. In the second quarter, the company's revenues increased 2.7% to 311.5 million euros, while its earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) grew by 9% to 76.34 million euros compared to a year earlier. The North American and South American regions saw the highest revenue growth, with increases of 5.5% and 6.5%, respectively. Viscofan's solid second-quarter performance underscored resilient demand for its sausage casings despite broader economic uncertainty. The results showed growth from both the same period of last year and the first quarter. The U.S., where the company has three production plants, is Viscofan's second-largest market after Europe, accounting for 31.5% of its revenue. Viscofan shares had fallen around 8% since end-April due to lower-than-expected EBITDA growth in the first quarter and a 7% decline in net profit to 31.4 million euros due to negative exchange rate differences. The company said its operating performance is in line with the full-year guidance announced in February. ($1 = 0.8712 euros)
