Housing advocates, providers see impending federal funding cuts as 'catastrophic'
Nonprofit housing and community development organizations face potential catastrophic funding disruptions due to the Trump administration's efforts to reshape the federal government, a coalition of North Carolina nonprofit leaders and supporters said over two recent Zoom meetings.
The first weeks of Donald Trump's second presidency have been fraught with uncertainty for the nonprofits. A flurry of executive orders, mass firings and funding freezes could have a devastating impact on housing and community development in North Carolina, coalition leaders said during the meetings, which took place Friday and Monday.
Samuel Gunter, executive director of the North Carolina Housing Coalition, the affordable housing advocacy group that organized the meetings, said that until recently, he's never had to call an emergency meeting of his board of directors. He's worked at the organization for 10 years.
'In the last week I've had three [meetings with the board of directors], and most of the folks that I've been talking to over the last couple of weeks, that is the case as well' Gunter said.
Housing and community nonprofit leaders are struggling to figure out what they have in the bank, what's supposed to be there that isn't, what federal dollars they were relying on that may not exist a couple of weeks from now, and what it all means for staff and programs, Gunter said.
'I wish I had solid answers for you,' Gunter told the more than 100 people who attended Friday's virtual meeting. 'I do not right now, but I need us to know that we are all in the same boat. The more we can communicate with one another, the more that we're going to be able to chart a course through this.'
Gunter said nonprofits housing and community development organizations must stick together and direct their energy at 'the folks that are shrinking the pie,' rather than engaging in destructive competition over the depleted resources that remain. 'We are not each other's enemies fighting over fewer and fewer resources,' he said.
Friday's Zoom meeting was attended by 79 organizations from more than 50 the counties. The attendees reported serving more than 96,000 families and receiving more than $165 million in public funding. They also reported being owed $7 million in funding as of Friday.
On Monday, 207 organizations from more than 80 counties were represented on the call, the organizers said. The organizations reported serving more than 80,000 families, receiving $461 million in public funding and being owed $14 million by the federal government.
The Trump administration has announced plans to cut the U.S. Housing and Urban Development (HUD) by 50% as part of Trump's effort to shrink the size of the federal government. Gunter is especially concerned about a proposed 84% cut to HUD's Office of Community Planning and Development (CPD), which oversees disaster recovery, homelessness services and Community Development Block Grants and other programs.
'My guess is that the bulk of folks on this call, if you get resources that flow through HUD, they come through that CPD office,' Gunter said. '[An 84% cut to CPD would be a] catastrophic impact to the flow of resources.'
NC Newsline previously reported that housing advocates across the nation are concerned about HUD Secretary Scott Turner's leadership because he supports policies that advocates believe will increase housing instability. Those policies include, for example, increasing the role of private equity in the rental market and opposing HUD's efforts to advance racial equity.
Turner recently announced that he would revoke $4 million worth of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) contracts at HUD. The move is keeping with a Trump directive to stamp out such efforts in the federal government.
Trump's executive order to end DEI initiatives could prove particularly troublesome for housing and community development advocates, Gunter said.
The DEI backlash is responsible for recent cancellations of HUD contracts for nonprofit capacity building grants and technical assistance programs that support community groups across the nation (Section 4 Programs), he said.
'These contracts were not canceled because of performance issues. They were not canceled because of a shift in strategy,' Gunter said. 'They were canceled because it was determined that their websites and or LinkedIn Profiles contain something related to DEI.'
Housing advocates say the decision to end the contracts will increase costs for families, stymie the creation of affordable housing and cost local jobs.
'Taken together, Section 4 and technical assistance programs provide a vital lifeline to communities across the country,' Shaun Donovan, president and CEO of Enterprise Community Partners, said in a statement late last month.
Donovan's organization is one of the nonprofits that received notification that HUD planned to cancel its capacity building grants and funding for its technical assistance programs that support community groups and housing providers across the country.
The former HUD secretary and director of the Office of Management and Budget added: 'Both [capacity building grants and technical assistance programs] provide support for building and preserving affordable homes, a particularly urgent need as we face an unprecedented housing crisis. These programs, though, aren't just about affordable homes. They allow urban, rural, and Tribal communities to assess their own needs and leverage private dollars to invest in senior housing, establish local health clinics, fund child care centers, and so much more. It's no surprise that both initiatives have long had deep, bipartisan support.'
Meanwhile, Gunter said that when nonprofits receive communication from their federal counterparts that does not feel right, it's easy to 'go inward and not talk about it' and keep one's head down.
'What has been clear thus far in this administration, that's not going to be a winning strategy,' Gunter said. 'There is no keeping our heads down hoping that we don't make waves and on the other end we're going to get the resources and continue to do the work.'
He warned that funding for affordable housing programs and initiatives could lose out to GOP-prized tax cuts. 'We are in an existential crisis in affordable housing and community development,' Gunter said.
Gunter urged housing advocates to call their U.S. Senators and House members to let them know about their concerns. It's important, he said, to explain that the proposed cuts will cost people their homes and that waste and fraud are not the problem when it comes to affordable housing; the problem is inadequate resources.
'We are in a moment where we got to work because we're looking at some scary numbers if the federal government pulls out more, or all of the affordable housing and community development investments that they make in North Carolina and across the country,' Gunter said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's D.C. Goon Squads Are Un-American
When President Donald Trump first declared a crime emergency in the nation's capital and sent hundreds of federal law enforcement agents to patrol its streets, this district resident had a hard time taking it too seriously. The initial images of bored Drug Enforcement Administration agents strolling past perplexed joggers on the National Mall were more clownish than carceral. Local street resistance to the occupation was limited to a drunk guy throwing a sandwich at a federal agent. But inevitably, as this operation has dragged on, things have taken a darker turn. The sandwich-thrower was overcharged and rearrested in a needless, publicized show of force. Masked federal agents have set up an unconstitutional checkpoint, violently arrested at least one delivery driver, and filmed themselves tearing down a banner protesting their presence in the city. Each day, more and more National Guard members pour into the capital. The conversation about Trump's declared crime emergency has understandably, albeit unhelpfully, provoked a lot of discourse about how safe D.C. is, whether a federalized local police department will make it safer, whether federal agents are being deployed in the right places and going after the right crimes, and on and on. This incessant crime conversation has distracted from just how un-American Trump's show of force in the nation's capital is. Uniformed troops and masked federal agents doing routine law enforcement at the command of the president is just not how we do things in the United States. The entire point of the U.S. Constitution is to prevent the federal government from becoming a despotism, and one of the primary ways it does this is by limiting how many men with guns it has at its disposal. This is why the Constitution places strict constraints on maintaining a standing army. It's why there are only three crimes mentioned in the Constitution, none of which would plausibly require federal agents to patrol U Street. It's why questions of what to criminalize and who to prosecute were largely left up to the states. The Third Amendment is mostly treated as an anachronistic joke today. In fact, it is a load-bearing part of the Constitution that makes clear that the military and the police are different things and that Americans should not have to tolerate the presence of armed agents of the states as a routine part of daily life. Obviously we've deviated considerably from this ideal since the founding generation. The federal criminal code is now extensive. The feds' wars on drugs, terror, and immigration have grown the number of militarized federal agents doing law enforcement activities. Federal money has subsidized a similar trend of militarization of state and local police forces. Reason has been decrying this trend for decades. In his book Rise of the Warrior Cop, Radley Balko writes about how the trend of increased police militarization has eroded the "Symbolic Third Amendment" and the free society it protects. It's darkly ironic then that, after decades of politicians of both parties in D.C. gifting the federal government vast powers to police the rest of the country, a militarized federal police force is now being deployed on the streets of America's capital against its residents. This is why arguments about whether federal agents could be more effectively deployed in less visible, higher crime areas of the city are completely beside the point. The federal government acting as a beat cop is inimical to our constitutional design, regardless of how effective its efforts are. That D.C. is a federal district might seem to complicate this point. In fact, it reinforces it. Despite being a constitutionally peculiar special district, a lot of effort has been put into giving D.C. a local police force that does not practically function as an arm of the federal government. Even in the seat of federal power, it's understood that a force of federal agents policing everyday life is not something ordinary citizens should have to put up with. That Trump has the power to federalize the D.C. police or deploy the D.C. National Guard doesn't stop his actions from being authoritarian and offensive to the spirit of the Constitution, even if it doesn't violate the letter of it. It's also cold comfort that Trump's declared crime emergency is clearly mostly a performative act to rile up the libs and not a serious effort at combating crime. While the president is staging the performance, it's disconcerting that he's opted to cast himself as the villain in the play. Moreover, the longer federal agents are deployed on D.C. streets, the greater the odds that more serious abuses do happen. It's true that D.C. today is not as locked down as it has been in recent years. The police-enforced curfews during the George Floyd protests or the security cordons that sprang up after the January 6 riots were a lot more visible and heavy-handed. Excessive as those police actions were (particularly the latter), they were at least being done as an emergency response to widespread breakdowns in public order. Trump is rolling out the feds in D.C. to do routine law enforcement. That's un-American. The post Trump's D.C. Goon Squads Are Un-American appeared first on Solve the daily Crossword


The Hill
19 minutes ago
- The Hill
Democrats press DHS for ‘Alligator Alcatraz' information
Democratic lawmakers are pressing the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for more information about how the Trump administration teamed up with the state of Florida to create a controversial detention facility for migrants in the middle of the Everglades. 'Brushing aside concerns from human rights watchdogs, environmentalist groups, and Tribal nations, [DHS] has greenlit the construction of this expansive detention facility that may violate detained individuals' human rights, jeopardize public and environmental health and violate federal law,' House and Senate Democrats wrote in a letter to DHS Secretary Kristi Noem dated Wednesday. The detention facility, dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz,' opened in early July to house arrested migrants awaiting deportation. It was created through a state and federal partnership, with Florida officials leading oversight and construction, with DHS footing the bill. President Trump toured the facility when it opened, along with Noem. A federal judge last week temporarily halted expansion of the site after tribal and environmental groups filed a lawsuit over potential damage to wetlands. Located just south of Miami, Alligator Alcatraz quickly raised alarms about conditions for detainees in the hot, humid climate. Some whistleblowers have described worm-infested food, plumbing problems and other issues since its opening. 'The Everglades site was selected precisely because of its remote location and harsh surroundings, which Florida officials reportedly view as 'an ideal location to house and transport migrants,'' the Democrats wrote in their letter Wednesday. 'We ask that DHS promptly provide critical information for the American public to better understand this detention plan.' The letter was signed by more than five dozen members of Congress, led by Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) and Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.). It requested that DHS respond to several questions by September 3.


The Hill
19 minutes ago
- The Hill
‘South Park' mocks Trump's DC takeover in upcoming episode
An upcoming episode of 'South Park' is set to make fun of President Trump's efforts to crack down on crime in Washington, D.C. A teaser for the Wednesday evening episode, released on social media and YouTube, shows the iconic character 'Towlie' arriving in Washington, D.C. As 'Towlie' gets off a bus arriving in the district, a tank rolls by in front of the White House while the character says, 'This seems like the perfect place for a towel.' Trump has sparked widespread backlash with his takeover of the local police force and mobilization of National Guard troops to help fight crime in D.C. 'South Park' has used the first several episodes of its new season to mock Trump and his allies, poking fun at the administration's deportation efforts as well as controversy relating to the Jeffery Epstein files. The show has targeted media conglomerate Paramount, the parent company of Comedy Central which earlier this year awarded the show's creators a new lucrative contract for rights to broadcast the animated satire program.