
Bargain Hunt contestant 'lost for words' as they make BBC history for all the wrong reasons and auction goes 'badly, badly wrong'
The iconic BBC show sees two teams - the blues and the reds - compete to find three antique items, with expert advice, and flog them for the highest possible profit.
A resurfaced episode from 2022, hosted by Eric Knowles, sees experts Charles Hanson and Caroline Hawley head to the village of Eccleston, Lancashire.
The instalment stands out from all others in the show's 25-year history - for all the wrong reasons.
For the first time ever, the red team - made up of Geraldine and Washington - did not find a third item to go under the hammer, taking just two to auction.
From A-list scandals and red carpet mishaps to exclusive pictures and viral moments, subscribe to the DailyMail's new Showbiz newsletter to stay in the loop.
For the first time ever, the red team - made up of Geraldine and Washington (pictured) - did not find a third item to go under the hammer, taking just two to auction
The pair were themselves 'lost for words', explaining how they found themselves in that position, with a rare Doulton jug and two vintage tennis racquets
'Because there are so many things here - but it's just finding that item that meets the criteria', they said.
The voiceover further clarified that the team simply 'ran out of time' to select their third antique.
The criteria in question was that one of their items had to be worth at least £75.
The pair did not manage to achieve this, only securing a rare Doulton jug and two vintage tennis racquets - both worth under the threshold.
Host Eric told them: 'I've got to say, you have made Bargain Hunt history by virtue of you only managing to buy two items.'
The team's expert helper Charles Hanson was just as flabbergasted by the unusual turn of events.
Outside the antiques shop, he addressed the reds: 'I like to play to the wire but it went badly, badly wrong.
Outside the antiques shop, he addressed the reds: 'I like to play to the wire but it went badly, badly wrong'
'We failed on the challenge. We failed with our big spend. I'm sorry, team. It really happened.'
Sticking to the rules of the show, host Eric said: 'The ruling is that because you didn't do the £75 spend, you start with minus £75.'
But the reds were soon thrown a lifeline, offered the chance to make a bonus buy and purchase an art deco clock for £200 - a style 'always in demand', Eric assured them.
The team ended up selling the clock for a massive £380 at auction, leaving them with a profit of £130 - and leaving them not so impacted by their error after all.
Viewers at the time were scandalised by the outcome on X: 'They shouldn't have been allowed a bonus if they hadn't bought three items!'
Another said: 'Shouldn't have been allowed to compete with only a £75 forfeit.
'Others can just do that now, but like the red team, still win! Should have been disqualified in my opinion!'
But someone else took the misdemeanour less seriously: 'Brilliant! This has got be the best episode ever! What larks!'
The rules of Bargain Hunt were similarly put to the test on a celebrity episode featuring Bez and Rowetta Idah of Happy Mondays and Pulp's Jarvis Cocker and Candida Doyle.
The now iconic instalment from 2018 famously had to be reshot when a major rule infringement was discovered after filming had finished.
It transpired Bez's girlfriend bid on and won his team's auction items, securing an £8 profit for them - as well as the overall victory.
When the infraction came to light, Pulp's team - despite making a £95 loss - was awarded the win, with the end of the episode refilmed to reflect that.
The unusual moment saw the host of the episode read out the relevant Bargain Hunt rule, 'Tis completely forbidden for friends or family members to bid on a team's item', before exclaiming: 'I'm speechless!'
Bez, who gave the £8 back, said: 'It was a genuine error. My girlfriend thought she was helping out.'
Bargain Hunt's executive producer Paul Tucker said at the time: 'We have rules and regulations on Bargain Hunt and we have to make sure they abide by them.
'It was picked up by a runner and we verified there were clearly misdemeanours going on.
'It was a genuine rule that was broken and we had to reshoot the end.
'They are rock and rollers and they live on the edge as they did in the eighties.
'It's not a surprise but in the end, it was quite amusing.'
The resurfacing of these rule-breaking moments comes after Charles Hanson made an emotional return to the show after being cleared of abusing his wife.
The antiques expert, 46, came back to the long-running show last month, marking his first TV appearance since 2023.
Hanson, who has also starred in Antiques Roadshow, Flog It! and Antiques Road Trip, had been off air while facing serious allegations of assault and coercive control against his wife Rebecca. He had denied all the charges.
In February, a jury at Derby Crown Court found him not guilty on all counts.
It came after a three-week trial which laid bare the collapse of his marriage to the 42-year-old radiographer. The couple are now divorcing.
During the trial, Hanson was accused of a decade of abuse, including putting his pregnant wife in a headlock, pushing and scratching her, and controlling her behaviour.
He told jurors she was a 'fantasist' and claimed he had been a 'slave' to her demands.
After his acquittal, the TV star sobbed in the dock before punching the air in relief and embracing his parents, Phillip and Gillian, who sat in court throughout proceedings.
Speaking outside court in February, Hanson said: 'I'm delighted after a year and half that the truth has finally come out and can finally live my life and feel this burden has finally been lifted.
'It has been a tormentous time and all I want now is to readjust to what has been such an ordeal.
'These last 18 months have been extremely upsetting. I have missed my children and quite simply I can now get back to my life and I relish that. It has been very impactful.
'I am very lucky my parents have stood by me from start to finish – without my family it would have been a very, very testing time.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
7 minutes ago
- The Sun
Love Island fans ‘work out' why Dejon turned on Meg as villa's strongest couple hit the rocks days before final
LOVE Island fans have 'worked out' why Dejon turned on Meg - with the couple hitting the rocks as the final looms. The pair have been coupled up on the ITV2 show throughout all of this year's series. 4 4 Cracks have now started to form in their dynamic - with the final just days away. Writing online, sleuthing viewers think they know why Dejon has changed his attitude towards Meg. They had an argument at the end of Thursday's episode following a revealing villa game. Fans recalled returnee Blu telling the other boys about what he'd learned while away from the villa. In particular, how Meg and Helena were perceived as "mean girls" by the show's audience. A viewer penned on X: "Dejon saying what he did comes back to blu's comment about Meg being seen as a mean girl. "And to him, while he is a nasty individual, he also thinks he's saving her from being seen as nasty, as the conversation is about the 1/2 of the girls that blu said was popular #loveisland." Another added: "After blu spilled meg is the mean girl, you can see Dejon aborting his winning strategy in real time #LoveIsland #loveislanduk." While a third penned: "Blu told dejon meg was one of the mean girls and now he's picking fights … #LoveIsland." Meg and Dejon's drama began as the couples played a game of Knowing Me, Knowing You. Shock moment Love Islander admits he doesn't know his girlfriend's middle name Each Islander had a board, with the goal being to match with their partner's answers on respective questions. However, Dejon and Meg gave differing answers on the first question - which left him unhappy. The boys were later asked which girl they'd couple up with - if their actual partner wasn't in the villa. Dejon surprised Meg by choosing Yasmin - despite the pair's ongoing friction with Yasmin, Toni and Shakira. As the couple sat by the firepit, they disagreed as to whether Dejon ever shared this information before. LOVE ISLAND 2025 - ALL the dumped stars so far LOVE Island 2025 is in its penultimate week. Here are all the dumped Islanders so far ... Sophie Lee Blu Chegini (has since returned) Malisha Jordan Will Means Shea Mannings Poppy Harrison Caprice Alexandra Megan Clarke (has since returned) Remell Mullins Ryan Bannister Alima Gagigo Martin Enitan Chris Middleton Yas Broom Rheo Parnel Giorgio Russo Emily Moran Andrada Pop Ben Holbrough Tommy Bradley Lucy Quinn Lauren Wood Harrison Solomon (quit) Emma Munro Boris Vidovic Billykiss Azeez While the villa boy insisted he had, Meg was less certain about hearing it previously. The pair continued to clash, as Dejon asked why she was "trying to make him look bad" Eventually, Meg had enough and walked off - leaving her partner sat alone. 4


Times
26 minutes ago
- Times
I played The Traitors (and was terrible at it)
N ormally, when you and nine work colleagues find yourselves blindfolded in a Soho basement, you know it's probably about time to knock the office Christmas party on the head, but we're just getting started. There's also a man in thick mascara skulking about behind our heads, saying ominous things about lying and killing. Some of us — an unknown number — are to be tapped on the shoulder and lured ever further into the realm of darkness. This is The Traitors Live Experience, based on the centuries-old parlour game that became a smash hit TV show all over the world and is now, almost, a parlour game again, albeit one with extremely high production values and excellent cocktails. It is not yet three years since The Traitors made its first appearance on UK TV, turning a Scottish Highlands castle hotel and Claudia Winkleman's collection of fingerless gloves into cultural artefacts of equal value. It was itself a remake of the Dutch original, De Verraders, which debuted in 2021.


Times
28 minutes ago
- Times
To bring or not to bring wine: that is the question
For most guests, it is polite and right to pick up a decent bottle on the way to dinner GETTY IMAGES In Abigail's Party, Mike Leigh's achingly class-conscious satire of suburban life, Sue arrives at dinner with a bottle of wine in hand. Coming from the old bourgeoisie, she expects supper and duly brings a suitable accompaniment. Unfortunately, the other guests in this leafy fictional corner of London have eaten their 'tea' before arriving and poor Sue is left to starve quietly throughout the rest of the evening. To bring or not to bring: that is the question. It has been a matter of some debate in recent days, as this newspaper's writers spar over the matter of taking a bottle of wine when invited to supper. For most guests, it is polite and right to pick up a decent bottle on the way to dinner, not only as a thank you but as a way of helping to ensure a suitably lubricated and lively evening. But for others, especially those of an aristocratic persuasion, it is unthinkable to go equipped. Bringing a bottle would reveal a fear that the host will not crack open their cellars and share their rare vintages with anyone but themselves. For the truly posh, arriving empty-handed is a vote of confidence in the hosts. It presumes they have paired their food with suitable wines and the delicate balance struck should not be interfered with. • Rosé has peaked, say French wine makers as focus shifts to white This summer's wine hit provides an easy solution to this social dilemma. Frequent visitors to their local supermarket's wine section will recognise the distinctive label of La Vieille Ferme, the affordable drop from the southern Rhône valley. Referred to by cost-conscious Gen Zers as 'chicken wine', thanks to the farmyard poule adorning its label, the brand has gone viral in recent weeks, its rosé regarded as the perfect summer quaff. Any host will appreciate a bottle or two of old cluck — not, of course, for dining but as a simple, unpretentious offering that can be stashed in the fridge for deployment on a lazy afternoon. Problem solved.